|
Accuracy-Related
Penalties:
Up Introduction Accuracy Related Penalty Negligence of Rules Substantial Understatement Valuation Misstatement Fraud Penalty Reasonnable Cause Annoucement 2002-2 Policy Statements Audit Techniques
|
Audit Techniques Guide
Chapter 8: Announcement 2002-2
Introduction
On December 21, 2001, the Service announced a Disclosure
Initiative under which the IRS will waive accuracy-related penalties for
transactions that produce an underpayment of tax and that the taxpayer
discloses to the IRS during the period within which the initiative was
in effect. Announcement 2002-2, 2002-2 IRB.
For a limited period, Announcement 2002-2 provided an
administrative basis under which a taxpayer could avoid the
accuracy-related penalty for an underpayment of tax. The IRS will waive
the accuracy-related penalty if the taxpayer disclosed an item before
the earlier of April 23, 2002, or the date the item was an issue raised
during an examination.
“Issues Raised During An Examination”
For purposes of the announcement, an item was an issue raised
during an examination if the agent communicated to the taxpayer
knowledge about the specific item, or on or before December 21, 2001,
the agent had made a request to the taxpayer for information, and the
taxpayer could not make a complete response to the request without
giving the agent knowledge of the item.
Applicability of Announcement 2002-2
By its express terms, Announcement 2002-2 does not apply to an
item that was an issue raised during an examination whether or not the
taxpayer itself had disclosed the existence of the item before December
21, 2001. The announcement provides no special rule for taxpayers
that disclosed the existence of an item before December 21, 2001,
whether on its return, under Rev. Proc. 94-69, or in some other manner.
Consequently, if a taxpayer was not eligible under
Announcement 2002-2 but disclosed regardless, there is no formal or
informal administrative policy of waiving the accuracy-related penalty
in the case of a taxpayer solely because the taxpayer disclosed to the
examination team the existence of the item. Accordingly, if there
is an underpayment of tax attributable to a listed transaction and the
taxpayer did not (including because it was unable to) disclose the
transaction under Announcement 2002-2, and then the penalty issue should
be developed. The fact that the taxpayer did disclose may,
however, be a mitigating factor in some circumstances. This
position is consistent with the penalty consideration memorandum from
the Commissioner of LMSB dated December 20, 2001.
|