|
Accuracy-Related
Penalties:
Up Introduction Accuracy Related Penalty Negligence of Rules Substantial Understatement Valuation Misstatement Fraud Penalty Reasonnable Cause Annoucement 2002-2 Policy Statements Audit Techniques
|
Audit Techniques Guide
Chapter 3: Negligence or Disregard of
Rules or Regulations
Negligence
Negligence includes any failure to make a reasonable attempt to
comply with the provisions of the tax law, exercise ordinary and
reasonable care in tax return preparation, or keep adequate books and
records. Negligence is strongly suggested if a taxpayer fails to
make a reasonable attempt to ascertain the correctness of a reported
item "which would seem to a reasonable and prudent person to be
'too good to be true' under the circumstances." Treas. Reg.
§ 1.6662–3(b)(1)(ii).
For example, the facts may establish that
a taxpayer reported losses from a transaction that lacked economic
substance or reported losses or deductions from assets with bases
traceable to lease stripping transactions that would have seemed, to a
reasonable and prudent person, to be "too good to be true.”
The accuracy-related penalty attributable to negligence may be
applicable if the taxpayer failed to make a reasonable attempt to
ascertain the correctness of the claimed losses or deductions by
thoroughly investigating the bona fide economic or other relevant actual
aspects of the transaction. Consultation with a tax advisor,
regardless of the advisor’s independence, is not, standing alone,
conclusive evidence of a thorough investigation by the taxpayer.
All relevant facts, including the nature of the tax investment, the
independence of the tax advisor, the competence of the tax advisor, the
quality of the opinion, and the sophistication of the taxpayer must be
considered.
The penalty for negligence does not apply
if the taxpayer’s position has a reasonable basis. If a return
position is reasonably based on one or more of the authorities in Treas.
Reg. § 1.6662-4(d)(3)(iii), the position will generally satisfy the
reasonable basis standard even though it does not rise to the level of
substantial authority. The penalty for negligence may, however,
apply if the taxpayer fails to keep adequate books and records to
substantiate the items properly.
Disregard of Rules or Regulations
Disregard of rules or regulations relates to the taxpayer’s
failure to follow the appropriate law in completing the return, and
reflects a disregard of the Code, temporary or final regulations,
revenue rulings or notices (other than notices of proposed rule making).
The term “disregard” includes careless, reckless, or intentional
disregard. Treas. Reg. § 1.6662–3(b)(2).
Except for a reportable transaction, as
defined in the regulations under IRC § 6011, entered into on or after
January 1, 2003, and reported on a return filed after December 31, 2003,
there is no penalty for a position contrary to a revenue ruling or
notice published in the IRB if the position has a realistic possibility
of being sustained on its merits. Otherwise, a taxpayer may not
avoid a penalty for disregard of a rule or regulation on the basis that
the position had a realistic possibility of being sustained on its
merits.
Adequate Disclosure
The penalty for negligence or disregard of rules or regulations
does not apply if the taxpayer adequately discloses the position on Form
8275 or 8275-R (as appropriate). In the case of a transaction
entered into on or after January 1, 2003, and reported on a return filed
after December 31, 2003, taxpayers also must disclose reportable
transactions on Form 8886, as required under the IRC § 6011
regulations.
The penalty does not apply to a position
that is contrary to a regulation if the taxpayer discloses the position
and the position represents a good faith challenge to the regulation.
A good faith challenge to the validity of a regulation generally
requires a showing that the taxpayer conducted a careful analysis of
reasonably available authorities relating to the issue, including
statutory language, legislative history, the underlying Treasury
decision, relevant case law (including case law pertaining to the
presumption of validity to which regulations are entitled), and the
persuasiveness of the rationale supporting the contrary position.
The adequate disclosure exception does
not apply if the position with respect to a rule or regulation does not
have a reasonable basis or if the taxpayer fails to keep adequate books
and records or fails to substantiate records properly.
|