Audit Techniques Guide
Chapter 4: Substantial Understatement
In General
If the correct income tax liability for a taxable year exceeds
the amount reported by the taxpayer by the greater of 10 percent of the
correct tax or $5,000 ($10,000 in the case of a corporation other than
an S corporation or personal holding company), then a substantial
understatement exists and a penalty may be imposed equal to 20 percent
of the underpayment of tax attributable to the understatement.
Definition of Tax Shelter for
Purposes of IRC § 6662(d)
For transactions entered into on or after August 6, 1997, the
definition of tax shelter includes, among other things, any plan or
arrangement a significant purpose of which is the avoidance or evasion
of Federal income tax. IRC § 6662(d)(2)(C)(iii).
For transactions entered into before
August 6, 1997, the relevant standard is whether tax avoidance or
evasion was the principal purpose of the entity, plan, or arrangement.
Treas. Reg. § 1.6662-4(g)(2)(i). The former principal purpose
standard is more difficult for the government to meet than the current
significant purpose standard.
Typical of tax shelters are transactions
structured with little or no motive for the realization of economic
gain, and transactions that utilize mismatching of income and
deductions, overvalued assets or assets with values subject to
substantial uncertainty, certain nonrecourse financing, financial
techniques that do not conform to standard commercial business
practices, or the characterization of the substance of the transaction.
See generally Treas. Reg. § 1.6662-4(g)(2)(i)(c).
Substantial Authority Exception
There is an exception to the penalty attributable to a
substantial understatement when the substantial understatement relates
to a tax shelter item of a taxpayer other than a corporation.
Specifically, the examiner should not assert the penalty if there is
substantial authority for the tax treatment of an item or return
position and the taxpayer reasonably believed that the tax treatment was
more likely than not the proper tax treatment.
Substantial authority for the tax
treatment of an item will exist if there is substantial authority at the
time the return containing the item is filed or there was substantial
authority on the last day of the taxable year to which the return
relates. There is substantial authority if the weight of the
authorities supporting the treatment of the item is substantial in
relation to the weight of the authorities supporting the contrary
treatment. See Exhibit
6 for a list of those authorities.
A taxpayer is considered to reasonably
believe that the tax treatment of an item is more likely than not the
proper treatment if --
-
the taxpayer analyzes the pertinent
facts and authorities and, in reliance on that analysis,
reasonably concludes in good faith that there is a greater than 50
percent likelihood that the tax treatment of the item will be
upheld if challenged by the Service; or
-
the taxpayer reasonably relies
in good faith on the opinion of a professional tax advisor, if the
opinion is based on the tax advisor’s analysis of the pertinent
facts and authorities and unambiguously states that the tax
advisor concludes that there is a better than 50 percent
likelihood that the tax treatment of the item will be upheld if
challenged by the Service. (See discussion of IRC § 6664
below for additional information relating to what constitutes
reasonable reliance.)
In the case of tax shelter items
attributable to a pass-through entity, the actions taken by the entity
(e.g., the general partners of a partnership) to establish reasonable
belief are deemed taken by the taxpayer.
No exception under IRC § 6662 applies to
any item of a corporation which is attributable to a tax shelter.
Therefore, if a corporate taxpayer has a substantial understatement that
is attributable to a tax shelter item, the accuracy-related penalty
applies to the understatement unless the reasonable cause and good faith
exception under IRC § 6664 applies. (See Treas. Reg. §
1.6662-4(g)(1)(ii)(B) for special rules relating to transactions entered
into by a corporation prior to December 9, 1994.)
See IRM 20.1.5.8.4.1 (at page 18) for
additional information relating to the substantial authority exception
to the IRC § 6662(d) penalty.
|