Common Issues

Home Services FAQ Site Map Contact Us

Articles by Alvin Brown
Tax Preparation
Offer In Compromise
State Offers in Compromise
Levy
IRS Tax Liens
IRS Tax Liens - continued
IRS Tax Liens - continued 2
Levy - continued
Audit Techniques Guide
Congressional Contacts
Criminal Investigation
D.O.J Criminal Tax Manual
Tax Litigation
Penalty
Installment Agreements
Statute of Limitations
Frivolous Tax Argument
Interest Abatement
IRS Misconduct
IRS Abuses
Tax Fraud
Fraud Statutes
Bankruptcy
Tax Reform Legislation
Tax Shelters
Tax Court
Trust Fund Penalty
Legislation
Innocent Spouse Relief
Important Links

Overview
Bankruptcy Terms
Bankruptcy Legislation
Bankruptcy Section 6658
Bankruptcy Fraud
Statute of Limitations
Golden Parachute
Definition of "pending"
Chapter 9 Cases
Collection
Delinquent Accounts
Common Issues
IRS Case Processing
Proof of Claim
Chapter 7 Cases
Payments
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Closing

 

Common Issues

Back Next

Part 25. Special Topics

Chapter 17. Bankruptcy

 

 

Section 4. Common Bankruptcy Issues


25.17.4  Common Bankruptcy Issues

25.17.4.1  (09-01-2004)
Property of the Estate

1.       The Bankruptcy Estate. The filing of the bankruptcy petition creates the bankruptcy estate. The estate consists of all of the debtor’s interests in any property at the time the case is filed. 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1). It also encompasses the interest of the debtor and the debtor's spouse (the non-debtor or non-petitioning spouse) in community property states. 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(2). See IRM 25.17.3.4.1.1, Community Property; IRM 25.17.13.7.1,Property of the Estate After Confirmation; IRM 25.17.7.13, Bankruptcy Estate Income Taxes – I.R.C. § 1398; and IRM 25.17 11.4, Internal Revenue Code § 1398 Issues.

2.       After-Acquired Property. In a Chapter 12 or 13 bankruptcy, after-acquired property, including wages and income, becomes property of the estate, as does after-acquired community property. 11 U.S.C. §§ 1207 and 1306. In general, some property, especially wages or other income used to fund the plan, may continue to be property of the estate after confirmation. IRM 25.17.13.7.1 gives additional information about the post-confirmation estate in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

3.       Counsel Guidance. Complex issues surround what constitutes the property of a bankruptcy estate. Counsel should be contacted for guidance when case-specific issues initially arise.

25.17.4.1.1  (09-01-2004)
Levies and Bankruptcy

1.       Introduction. A levy served prepetition on a taxpayer who subsequently files for bankruptcy protection may lead to a hearing in bankruptcy court. Indeed, an IRS levy may provoke a bankruptcy filing. Both Insolvency and Counsel expend time and resources resolving levy disputes, in and out of court. If not properly resolved, the Service may be liable for damages if a violation of the automatic stay has occurred.

2.       Levies and Insolvency. Pursuant to United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc., 462 U.S. 198 (1983), property, whether tangible or intangible, levied upon prepetition but not transferred to the IRS prepetition, is property of the bankruptcy estate subject to turnover.

A.      Levy Funds Not Received By Petition Date. Accordingly, if an IRS levy on accounts receivable, bank accounts, wages, insurance proceeds, or other intangibles has not resulted in the receipt of funds by the IRS at the time the bankruptcy is filed, they are property of the bankruptcy estate.

B.      Prepetition Seizure. Any tangible property seized prepetition, but not sold prepetition, is property of the bankruptcy estate subject to turnover. The IRS may have a right to adequate protection before turnover. See (3) below.

C.      Levy Funds Received Prepetition. When the IRS has received a levy payment prior to the bankruptcy filing (prepetition), ownership has transferred to the IRS , and the payment is not property of the estate.

Note:

However, such a payment may be subject to recovery by the estate as a preference. See IRM 25.17.4.5, Preferences.

3.       Right to Adequate Protection. The courts generally recognize the Service's right to adequate protection when a levy is issued prepetition. The levy provides the IRS with an interest in the levied–upon property. In any case where the IRS is entitled to adequate protection, the IRS should immediately contact the debtor-in-possession or the trustee to reach an adequate protection agreement, notify the court, and request relief from the automatic stay. Although adequate protection can be requested in other chapters, it is requested most often in Chapter 11 bankruptcies. IRM 25.17.11.3, Initial Processing; IRM 25.17.11.3.2, Adequate Protection and Turnover; and IRM 25.17.11.3.3, Cash Collateral/Property Depreciation of the Estate provide additional information on adequate protection.

4.       Prepetition Levy/Postpetition Levy Payment. Payment(s) received after a bankruptcy has been filed (postpetition), based on a prepetition levy, should be returned, unless the IRS seeks prompt relief from the automatic stay.

5.       Timeframe for Corrective Actions. Corrective actions must be initiated within two workdays of the date the Service becomes aware of the payment. Return of the payment will be expedited per local guidelines, to either the trustee or the debtor, using Form 5792 (manual refund) procedures. See IRM 25.17.4.3.1, Manual Refunds – Form 5792.

6.       Third Party Contact — Levy Release. Whenever Insolvency handles a release of levy, Form 12175 must be completed. A release of a levy is considered to be a third party contact. Form 12175 is the source of the third party contact list provided to the taxpayer/debtor. IRM 5.1.17.5, Recording Third Party Contacts, states multiple contacts with the same third party on different dates require the completion of a separate Form 12171 for each contact. See IRM 25.17.3.10.1, Third Party Contacts.

7.       Form 12175 Completion. On the date Insolvency completes Form 12175 (instructions are on the reverse of form), the form should be sent to the Third Party Contact Coordinator. A copy of the form must be retained in Insolvency, and the case history must be properly documented to show action(s) taken.

8.       Chapter 13 – Postpetition Levy Action. In a Chapter 13 case, if the plan does not provide for a postpetition tax liability, generally the postpetition liabilities can be collected (including by use of levy action) from any asset not dedicated to the plan. In re Lambright, 125 B.R. 733 (Bk. Ct. N.D. Tex. 1991). However, Insolvency must follow local rules/agreements or standing orders impacting this position.

A.      Levy Language for Postpetition Tax Liabilities. If wages and future earnings of the debtor are designated to fund the plan, and the IRS serves a wage levy against the debtor for postpetition debts, the levy should state it reaches only those wages which exceed the payments to the trustee.

B.      Pre-Levy Notice. IRM 25.17.3.6, Collection Due Process (CDP) Cases, provides information on debtors' rights, including pre-levy notice when levy action is under consideration for postpetition tax debts.

Caution:

The automatic stay may prohibit collection of postpetition tax liabilities after confirmation of the Chapter 13 plan. Counsel should be consulted for legal advice because judicial districts differ as to which assets (if any) are protected property of the estate after confirmation. IRM 25.17.4.1; IRM 25.17.7.14; and IRM 25.17.13.7.1. give additional information on property of the estate.

9.       Documentation. All actions taken on a federal levy matter, while the debtor is under the protections afforded by the Bankruptcy Code, must be timely and accurately documented. Insolvency's documentation on a case may be used in bankruptcy court.

Note:

Although a new bankruptcy case filing may not be loaded on AIS at the time a levy issue is handled by Insolvency, all documentation on the matter should be transferred to the AIS history screen at the earliest possible date.

10.   Counsel Assistance. Insolvency should contact Counsel for assistance on problematic levy issues arising during the pendency of a bankruptcy. Levy concerns must be addressed under strict timeframes so the debtor's rights are protected. The Service may be held liable for damages if violations of the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C.) occur.

25.17.4.1.2  (09-01-2004)
Exempt and Abandoned Property

1.       Exempt Property. "Exempt property" is excluded by state or federal law from the estate and cannot be liquidated by the trustee. Exempt property is not liable for any debts of the debtor except alimony, security interests, non-dischargeable tax debts, and dischargeable taxes secured by a Notice of Federal Tax Lien.See 11 U.S.C. § 522.

2.       Individuals and Exempt Property. Only individuals may claim exempt property. Debtors must select either federal or state exemptions; selection from both is not permitted.

A.      Federal or State Exemptions. The election between federal and state exemptions is permitted unless the state in which the debtor lives, by law, specifically prohibits election. In those states, the debtor is allowed only those exemptions provided by state law.

B.      Spouses. In the case of a husband and wife whose estates are jointly administered, the debtors are not permitted to elect different exemption options.

C.      Federal Exemptions . 11 U.S.C. § 522(d) lists the federal exemptions available to the debtor.

3.       Abandoned Property. "Abandonment" severs a bankruptcy estate's interest in property. Under the Bankruptcy Code, the bankruptcy court may permit the trustee to abandon any property of the estate that is burdensome or of inconsequential value to the estate.

A.      Affirmative Abandonment. The trustee may actively abandon property, or a party in interest may request abandonment. The trustee may abandon the property to the debtor or to a party with a possessory interest. Notice of hearing is required.

B.      Administrative Abandonment. If the property is listed in the schedule of assets, but is not administered by the trustee, then it is abandoned to the debtor upon closing of the estate.

4.       Lien Rights. Discharged taxes may be collectible from exempt or abandoned property if a prepetition NFTL has been properly filed and recorded. 11 U.S.C. § 522(c)(2)(B). Collection from such property will be made only after Insolvency has made a determination the property is available for collection and collection actions are appropriate. IRM 25.17.14.4 deals with " OIs" and Exempt or Abandoned Property.

Caution:

Collection from exempt property is prohibited as long as the automatic stay is in effect.

5.       Pension Plans. See IRM 25.17.2.9.1.1(3), Pension Plans; IRM 25.17.14.4., "OIs" and Exempt or Abandoned Property. and IRM 25.17.14.4.1, Collection from Exempt or Abandoned Property.

25.17.4.2  (09-01-2004)
ASED/CSED

1.       Automatic Statute Computations. Master File computes appropriate statute extensions for assessment and collection in most instances when the TC 521 posts (reversing the TC 520 bankruptcy freeze code).

Note:

The statutory period for assessment is not affected by bankruptcy for cases filed after October 22, 1994 , the effective date of the Bankruptcy Reform Act (BRA), unless the Tax Court petition period is suspended by the automatic stay. See IRM 25.17.4.2.1, BRA 94 and its Effect on Assessments.

2.       Suspension Timeframes.

A.      Assessment Statute Expiration Date (ASED). On bankruptcy cases with a petition date before the enactment of BRA 94, the running of the statutory period for assessment (ASED) is suspended during the period the assessment is prohibited (while the automatic stay is in effect) and for 60 days thereafter. I.R.C. § 6503.

B.      Computation of a New ASED. To compute a new ASED, 60 days are added to the unexpired time (number of days) remaining on the original statute as of the petition date. Then that amount of time is added to the date of discharge or dismissal (or the date the stay was lifted) to establish the new ASED. (For ASEDs on examination cases, Compliance examination should be consulted.)

C.      Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED). The running of the statutory period for collection (CSED) is suspended for the period collection is prohibited (while the automatic stay is in effect) plus six months. I.R.C. § 6503.

D.      Computation of a New CSED. Computation of a new CSED is similar to an ASED computation. Six months are added to the unexpired time (number of days) remaining on the original statute as of the petition date and that total is added to the discharge or dismissal date (or the date the stay was lifted) to establish the new CSED.

Note:

The IRS will never receive less than the original statute plus 60 days for an ASED extension, or the original statute plus 6 months for a CSED extension.

3.       CSED Recomputation – Manual Input of TC 550.

A.      For Non–Master File (NMF) accounts, a manual input of TC 550 is necessary.

B.      The input of a TC 550 must be timely input (for example, when the court grants a discharge or dismisses a case).

C.      The presence of a TC 520 in the module will not prevent TC 550 from posting.

D.      If a TC 550 is input to a module with an unreversed TC 520 with a bankruptcy closing code, automatic computation of the CSED when the TC 521 posts will not occur. Generally, no TC 550 is necessary to update the CSED on modules to which a TC 520 was input after July 1986 and a TC 521 was input after January 1987.

4.       CSED — Individual Master File (IMF) TIN Indicators.

A.      Posting of CSED. The CSED for a tax module is displayed on IDRS. This information is invaluable to Compliance employees in determining the time remaining on a collection statute (i.e., if collection actions may be taken on a delinquent account).

B.      CSED and Joint Assessments — Both Spouses in Bankruptcy. With the filing of a bankruptcy petition and the subsequent input of a TC 520, the CSED is extended. However, if the tax module is for an IMF joint assessment, the statute is extended against both the husband and the wife, only if both have filed bankruptcy.

C.      CSED and Joint Assessment — Only One Spouse in Bankruptcy. If only one spouse files bankruptcy, and the joint (prepetition) tax return was filed under the non-petitioning spouse's Social Security Number ( SSN ), then Service personnel handling the account(s) must know to which individual's SSN the CSED extension and freeze code apply. CSED Indicator Codes make this identification possible. An Individual Master File (IMF) CSED taxpayer identification number ( TIN ) indicator is input as part of the transaction data of the TC 520.

D.      CSED Indicator Codes. The CSED TIN indicator is input by the Insolvency Interface Program (IIP) during initial processing. The indicator codes can also be input manually (i.e., as part of the manual TC 550 extensions in bankruptcy). The applicable IMF CSED TIN indicator codes are P — indicating the CSED applies to theprimary TIN ; S — indicating the CSED applies to the secondary TIN ; and B — recording the CSED applies to both TINs.

Note:

The TC 520, with the appropriate closing code and the CSED TIN indicator, can alert IDRS users which taxpayer spouse is in bankruptcy and to whom of the taxpayers the CSED extension applies. These indicators help the Service, during routine collection actions (e.g., a levy under consideration against a spouse's wages), to avoid a violation of the automatic stay. The indicators are particularly helpful to Service employees when community property issues arise.

5.       CSED Protection — OI For Non-Petitioning (Non-Debtor) Spouse. When considering collection from a non-petitioning spouse, an Other Investigation (OI) may be appropriate. However, as long as plan payments are sufficient to satisfy the claim, collection activity outside of bankruptcy and against the non-petitioner's spouse may not be warranted. To protect the collection statute, Insolvency must be aware of CSED problems that may develop on the non-debtor spouse. See IRM 25.17.3.4.1.1, Community Property, and IRM 25.17.14.6.1, Joint Account and Non-Debtor Spouse.

Caution:

In community property states, local Counsel advice should be sought before taking collection action against a non-debtor spouse.

6.       OI Potential. If, at the time a bankruptcy petition is filed, a case is assigned to an RO, an OI may be initiated to ensure continuity of case actions and to protect statute expirations.

A.      Chapter 11 — Individuals. As individual Chapter 11 cases typically involve large dollar accounts and are less likely to have a confirmed plan, an OI for collection against a non-petitioning spouse is generally appropriate.

B.      Chapter 7. OIs are particularly useful in Chapter 7 cases (for example, investigating exempt and abandoned property and lien equities).

C.      Queue CSED Expirations. Protection of the CSED on a non-petitioning spouse is unnecessary if the case will, absent the bankruptcy, expire in the queue (where IDRS accounts are maintained in a "Hold" file and assigned a lower priority status than current accounts). Likewise an account with an unreversed currently-not-collectable ( CNC ) closure based on financial data (TC 530 cc24 through 32) need not have the CSED for the non-petitioning spouse protected.

25.17.4.2.1  (09-01-2004)
BRA 94 and Its Effect on Assessments

1.       BRA 94. The Bankruptcy Reform Act (BRA 94) brought about significant changes affecting the IRS , including:

A.      Sovereign Immunity. BRA 94 waived the government's sovereign immunity against judgments in connection with enumerated provisions (preferences, violations of stay, etc.). However, sovereign immunity remains in effect on the awarding of punitive damages, and attorney fees are capped.

B.      Assessments Allowed. Before BRA 94, the Bankruptcy Code prohibited assessment of a tax liability unless the court granted relief from the automatic stay. After October 22, 1994 , in most cases, the automatic stay for assessment of any tax, including original tax returns, adjustments, Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP), and agreed audit deficiencies no longer applied.

Note:

Deficiencies in which the statutory period for petitioning the tax court has expired prior to the bankruptcy petition can also be assessed.

2.       Impact on ASEDs. BRA 94 has had an impact on ASED computations. In most cases, the stay of assessment and suspensions of the Assessment Statute Expiration Date no longer applies, beginning on or after the effective date of BRA 94. The Service must now take timely action to protect the ASED whenever this is applicable. See (b) below and also (3) and (4).

A.      Most Taxes Can Now Be Assessed. For debtors who filed bankruptcy on or after October 22, 1994 , the automatic stay does not prohibit the IRS from assessing any tax where the Service would not be required to issue the taxpayer a statutory notice of deficiency. These include 1) the taxpayer's self-assessments arising from filed returns; 2) agreed audit deficiencies; 3) Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP) assessments; and 4) audit deficiencies where the statutory period for petitioning the Tax Court has expired prior to the filing of bankruptcy.

B.      Unagreed Audit Deficiencies. On unagreed audit deficiencies, the ASED is computed from the date of issuance of a statutory notice until the date a TC 521 is input at the close of the bankruptcy. Examination is responsible for the input of the transaction code to suspend the ASED.

Note:

Computation of the ASED for audit cases is made by the examination function.

3.       Tax Court and ASEDs. For taxpayers who filed bankruptcy on or after October 22, 1994 , I.R.C. § 362(a)(8) stays the taxpayer from filing a Tax Court petition, and I.R.C. § 6213(f)(1) suspends the taxpayer's time for filing a Tax Court petition for the period of the automatic stay plus 60 days thereafter. Accordingly, for taxpayers with an outstanding notice of deficiency, the ASED is suspended as a result of the bankruptcy petition.

4.       Consent to Extend ASED. Under BRA 94, the Service may obtain a valid consent to extend the statute of limitations on assessment from entities in bankruptcy. A TC 560, input by examination, indicates an extension of the ASED.

25.17.4.2.2  (09-01-2004)
Examination and Insolvency

1.       Insolvency Notification System. Using the Insolvency Notification System ( INS ), the examination function will make a timely determination if any returns of the taxpayer are under examination, and, if not, whether an examination will be made because of this notification.

2.       EXAM ( INS /AIMS) and INSOLVENCY (AIS). Since INS is an interface between the Automated Insolvency System (AIS) and Exam's Audit Information Management System (AIMS), its effectiveness depends upon both systems having current information. For INS to function as designed, Insolvency must enter date information timely on AIS, such as petition, bar, conversion, dismissal, and discharge dates. All actions taken on the case should be input on the system as the events occur, including all case closing actions.

3.       Examination Contacts to Insolvency. If an examination is open, a Compliance examination employee will:

A.      contact the responsible Insolvency employee; but

B.      continue with established examination bankruptcy procedures; and

C.      advise Insolvency of any proposed exam-initiated deficiencies or adjustments that might result in a refund or a credit to the taxpayer. This should be done at the earliest possible time before the bar dateby sending Insolvency a memorandum, or a locally developed form (along with a copy of the transmittal letter to the examination report), or a copy of the Revenue Agent Report (RAR).

Note:

Insolvency will not perform a periodic follow-up with the examination function. Responsibility to notify Insolvency rests entirely with the examination function.

4.       Exam's " HOLD" File. The examination function establishes a "HOLD" file of cases for which a statutory notice has been issued, and assessment is stayed because a Tax Court petition cannot be filed under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(8). Periodically, Examination transmits a list of these cases to Insolvency.

A.      Timeframe for Insolvency to Contact Exam. Within five workdays of receipt of the exam list, Insolvency will advise the examination function which assessments (if any) can be made. Insolvency's response will show the date the stay was lifted, if applicable.

B.      Determining the —L Freeze. INS does not pick up bankruptcies filed in geographical areas outside of where the primary examination case is assigned. As a safeguard, Insolvency must run IIP Process D to detect the —L freeze, which indicates accounts selected for an audit and which may require interoffice coordination.

C.      Alternatively, or, in addition, access to the Automated Insolvency System (AIS) (read only capabilities) can be granted to the examination function. IRM 25.17.5.5, Insolvency Interface Program (IIP), and IRM 25.17.5.5.1(1)(c) address timeframes.

5.       Insolvency Follow–Up/Monitoring. Because confirmations take place quickly in some bankruptcies (especially in Chapter 13), monitoring methods must be established by Insolvency for cases involving examination issues. If research indicates one or more tax periods are being examined, and the assigned exam function has not contacted the Insolvency group, Insolvency should contact the exam unit to gather current information on the status of the audit.

6.       Reminders — Changes Due to BRA 94 — Assessment of Taxes.

·         the Service is free to make most assessments, notwithstanding the automatic stay

·         the Service may assess an agreed tax deficiency — see 26 U.S.C. § 6213(d)