Criminal Investigation at a Glance

Home Services FAQ Site Map Contact Us

Articles by Alvin Brown
Tax Preparation
Offer In Compromise
State Offers in Compromise
Levy
IRS Tax Liens
IRS Tax Liens - continued
IRS Tax Liens - continued 2
Levy - continued
Audit Techniques Guide
Congressional Contacts
Criminal Investigation
D.O.J Criminal Tax Manual
Tax Litigation
Penalty
Installment Agreements
Statute of Limitations
Frivolous Tax Argument
Interest Abatement
IRS Misconduct
IRS Abuses
Tax Fraud
Fraud Statutes
Bankruptcy
Tax Reform Legislation
Tax Shelters
Tax Court
Trust Fund Penalty
Legislation
Innocent Spouse Relief
Important Links

Tax Fraud | IRS Fraud | Fraud Audit
Grand Jury Investigations
Tax Crimes General
Refund Fraud
Money Laundering
Currency Crimes
Organized Crime & Task Force
Narcotic Investigations
Investigative Reports
Methods of Proof
Methods of Proof cont.
C.I. at a glance

 

Criminal Investigation at a Glance

Back

Mission :

Criminal Investigation (CI) serves the American public by investigating potential criminal violations of the Internal Revenue Code and related financial crimes in a manner that fosters confidence in the tax system and compliance with the law.

Headquarters:

1111 Constitution Ave NW
Room 2501
Washington , DC 20224

Nancy J. Jardini, Chief, Criminal Investigation
Richard Speier, Jr., Deputy Chief, Criminal Investigation

 

IRS Criminal Investigation (CI) is comprised of approximately 4,400 employees worldwide, approximately 2,800 of which are special agents whose investigative jurisdiction includes tax, money laundering and Bank Secrecy Act laws. While other federal agencies also have investigative jurisdiction for money laundering and some bank secrecy act violations, IRS is the only federal agency that can investigate potential criminal violations of the Internal Revenue Code.

Compliance with the tax laws in the United States relies heavily on self-assessments of what tax is owed. This is called voluntary compliance. When individuals and corporations make deliberate decisions to not comply with the law, they face the possibility of a civil audit or criminal investigation which could result in prosecution and possible jail time. Publicity of these convictions provides a deterrent effect that enhances voluntary compliance.

As financial investigators, CI special agents fill a unique niche in the federal law enforcement community. Today’s sophisticated schemes to defraud the government demand the analytical ability of financial investigators to wade through complex paper and computerized financial records. Due to the increased use of automation for financial records, CI special agents are trained to recover computer evidence. Along with their financial investigative skills, special agents use specialized forensic technology to recover financial data that may have been encrypted, password protected, or hidden by other electronic means.

Criminal Investigation’s conviction rate is one of the highest in federal law enforcement. Not only do the courts hand down substantial prison sentences, but those convicted must also pay fines, civil taxes and penalties.

 

The Criminal Investigation strategic plan is comprised of three interdependent programs: Legal Source Tax Crimes; Illegal Source Financial Crimes; and Narcotics Related Financial Crimes. These three programs are mutually supportive, and encourage utilization of all statutes within CI’s jurisdiction, the grand jury process, and enforcement techniques to combat tax, money laundering and currency crime violations. Criminal Investigation must investigate and assist in the prosecution of those significant financial investigations that will generate the maximum deterrent effect, enhance voluntary compliance, and promote public confidence in the tax system.

 

United States Code Statutes for which Criminal Investigation has Jurisdiction

 

Violations that are within the investigative jurisdiction of Criminal Investigation are cited and summarized below: 

Table of Contents

Title 18

Violations

Aiding, abetting, counseling, commanding, inducing, or procuring the commission of an offense relating to a violation

18 USC §2

Receiving, relieving, comforting, or assisting an offender to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial, or punishment relating to a violation

18 USC §3

Misprision of felony (failure to disclose and concealment of information about commission of a felony) relating to a violation

18 USC §4

Assaulting, resisting, or impeding federal officers or employees

18 USC §111

Influencing, impeding, or retaliating against a Federal official by threatening or injuring a family member

18 USC §115

Concealment of assets, false oaths and claims; and bribery

18 USC §152

Bankruptcy fraud

18 USC §157

Bribery of public officials and witnesses

18 USC §201

Taking from official files, papers relating to claims or using papers so taken

18 USC §285

Conspiring to defraud the United States with respect to claims

18 USC §286

False, fictitious, or fraudulent claims upon the United States

18 USC §287

Conspiracy to commit an offense against or to defraud the United States relating to a violation listed in this section

18 USC §371

Conspiracy to impede or injure an officer relating to a violation listed in this section

18 USC §372

Power of courts relating to a violation listed in this section

18 USC §401

Contempts constituting crimes relating to a violation listed in this section

18 USC §402

Counterfeiting, forgoing, or falsifying powers of attorney, orders, receipts, or other writings to obtain money from or to defraud the United States , etc.

18 USC §495

Fictitious obligations

18 USC §514

Impersonating an officer or employee of the United States ( IRS only)

18 USC §912

Impersonator making search or arrest

18 USC §913

Making false, fictitious, or fraudulent written or oral statements or representing a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States relating to a violation

18 USC §1001

Possessing false writings or documents to enable another to obtain money from the United States relating to a violation

18 USC §1002

Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents

18 USC §1028

Concealing person from arrest relating to a violation listed in this section

18 USC §1071

Flight to avoid prosecution or giving testimony

18 USC §1073

Protection of officers and employees of the United States

18 USC §1114

Obstructing or assaulting a duly authorized server of a writ or process of a US Court or a US Magistrate relating to a violation

18 USC §1501

Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally

18 USC §1503

Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

18 USC §1505

Obstruction of criminal investigations relating to a violation in this section

18 USC §1510

Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

18 USC §1512

Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

18 USC §1513

Perjury relating to a violation

18 USC §1621

Procuring another to commit perjury (subornation of perjury) relating to a violation listed in this section

18 USC §1622

False declaration before a grand jury or court relating to a violation

18 USC §1623

Interstate or foreign travel or transportation in aid of racketeering enterprises

18 USC §1952

Whoever, knowing that the property involved in a financial transaction represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, conducts or attempts to conduct such a financial transaction which in fact involves the proceeds of specified unlawful activity with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity

18 USC §1956A1AI

With the intent to engage in conduct constituting a violation of 18 USC §7201 or §7206

18 USC §1956A1AII

Knowing that the transaction is designed in whole or in part to conceal or disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, or the control, of proceeds of specified unlawful activity

18 USC §1956A1BI

To avoid a transaction reporting requirement under state or Federal law

18 USC §1956A1BII

Whoever transports, transmits, or transfers, or attempts to transport, transmit, or transfer a monetary instrument or funds from a place in the United States to or through a place outside the United States or to a place in the United States from or through a place outside the United States

18 USC §1956A2

With the intent to promote the carrying on of a specified unlawful activity

18 USC §1956A2A

Knowing that the monetary instrument or funds involved in the transportation represent the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity and knowing that such transportation is designed in whole or part to conceal or disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, or the control, of proceeds of a specified unlawful activity

18 USC §1956A2B

To conceal or disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, or the control, of proceeds of a specified unlawful activity

18 USC §1956A2BI

To avoid a transaction reporting requirement under state or Federal law

18 USC §1956A2BII

Whoever conducts or attempts to conduct a financial transaction involving property represented to be the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, or property used to conduct or facilitate a specified unlawful activity, with the intent

18 USC §1956A3

To promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity

18 USC §1956A3A

To conceal or disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, or the control, of proceeds of specified unlawful activity

18 USC §1956A3B

To avoid a transaction reporting requirement under state or Federal law

18 USC §1956A3C

Conspiracy to commit violations of 18 USC §1956 or §1957 (as of 10/1994 renumbered as 18 USC §1956H)

18 USC §1956G

Conspiracy to commit violations of 18 USC §1956 or §1957

18 USC §1956H

Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from a specified unlawful activity

18 USC §1957

Illegal money transmitting business

18 USC §1960

Prohibited activities of racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations

18 USC §1962

Concealing, removing, mutilating Government records and reports

18 USC §2071

Assaulting, resisting, or interfering with a person making an authorized search or seizure

18 USC §2231

Destroying or removing property to prevent its seizure

18 USC §2232

Destruction or removal of property to prevent seizure

18 USC §2233

Providing material support to terrorists

18 USC §2339A

Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organization

18 USC §2339B

Prohibitions against the financing of terrorism

18 USC §2339C

Jury trial of criminal contents

18 USC §3691

 

Title 26

Violations

Structuring transactions to evade reporting requirements for returns relating to cash received in trade or business

26 USC §6050I

Evasion of tax in any matter

26 USC §7201

Failure to collect or account for and pay over tax

26 USC §7202

Failure to file return, pay tax, keep records, or supply information

26 USC §7203

Fraudulent statement or failure to make statement to employees

26 USC §7204

Fraudulent withholding exemption certificate or failure to supply information

26 USC §7205

Making and subscribing a false return, statement, or other document under the penalties of perjury

26 USC §72061

Aiding or advising the preparation or presentation of a false return, affidavit, claim, or other document

26 USC §72062

Executing a false bond, permit or other document, or aiding or advising such an execution

26 USC §72063

Removing, depositing, or concealing property subject to tax or levy with intent to evade

26 USC §72064

Concealing property, withholding, mutilating or falsifying a record, or making a false statement in connection with a compromise or closing agreement

26 USC §72065

Fraudulent returns, statements, or other document

26 USC §7207

Counterfeiting, mutilating, and other offenses relating to tax stamps

26 USC §7208

Unauthorized use or sale of stamps

26 USC §7209

Failure to obey summons

26 USC §7210

False statement to a purchaser or lessee relating to amount of tax involved in purchase or lease

26 USC §7211

Forcible interference with administration of the Internal Revenue Laws

26 USC §7212A

Forcible rescue of seized property

26 USC §7212B

Offenses by officers and employees of the United States

26 USC §7214

Failure to comply with notice (under IRC §7512) to collect withheld income and social security taxes and collected excise taxes and to deposit such taxes in a special bank account

26 USC §7215

Failure to obtain license for collection of foreign items (dividends and interest)

26 USC §7231

Failure to register or give bond, or false statement by manufacturer or producer of gasoline or lubricating oil

26 USC §7232

Representation that the retailer’s excise tax is excluded from the price of an article

26 USC §7261

Violation of occupational tax laws relating to wagering, failure to pay Special Tax

26 USC §7262

Possession of taxable goods with intent to sell in fraud or avoid payment of taxes thereon

26 USC §7268

Failure to affix stamps on foreign insurance policy with intent to evade tax

26 USC §7270

Penalty for offenses relating to certain airline tickets and advertising

26 USC §7275

Unlawful to have or possess any property used in violating provisions of Internal Revenue Law

26 USC §7302

 

Title 31

Violations

Financial institution's requirement to file currency transaction report

31 USC §5313A

Record and reports on foreign financial agency accounts

31 USC §5314

Search and forfeiture of monetary instruments

31 USC §5317

Failure to file SAR's

31 USC §5318G

Failure to establish an anti-money laundering program

31 USC §5318H

Criminal violation of Title 31 reporting requirements

31 USC §5322A

Criminal violation of Title 31 reporting requirements involving other criminal activity

31 USC §5322B

Cause or attempt to cause a domestic financial institution to fail to file a required report

31 USC §5324A1

Cause or attempt to cause a domestic financial institution to file a required report that contains a material omission or misstatement of fact

31 USC §5324A2

Structure or assist in structuring, or attempt to structure or assist in structuring, any transaction with one or more domestic financial institutions

31 USC §5324A3

Cause or attempt to cause a nonfinancial trade or business to fail to file a required report

31 USC
§5324b1

Cause or attempt to cause a nonfinancial trade or businesses to file a required report that contains a material omission or misstatement of fact

31 USC
§5324b2

Structure or assist in structuring, or attempt to structure or assist in structuring, any transaction with one or more nonfinancial trades or businesses

31 USC
§5324b3

Criminal penalties for violating any part of the structuring statute

31 USC
§5324d

Identification requirement for purchasing certain monetary instruments

31 USC
§5325

Registration requirement for money transmitting businesses

31 USC
§5330

Nonfinancial trade or business requirement to file report for coin and currency receipt of more than $10,000

31 USC
§5331a

Bulk cash smuggling into or out of the United States

31 USC §5332

 

 

 

 

On July 1, 19 19, the IRS Commissioner created the Intelligence Unit to investigate widespread allegations of tax fraud. To establish the Intelligence Unit, six United States Post Office Inspectors were transferred to the Bureau of Internal Revenue to become the first special agents in charge of the organization that would one day become Criminal Investigation.  They formed the nucleus that built the Intelligence Unit into an elite group of highly trained, dedicated professionals, who are recognized as the finest financial investigators in the world.

The Intelligence Unit quickly became renowned for the financial investigative skill of its special agents.  It attained national prominence in the thirties for the conviction of public enemy number one, Al Capone, for income tax evasion, and its role in solving the Lindbergh kidnapping.  From these promising beginnings the Intelligence Unit expanded over the intervening decades, investigating tax evasion by ordinary citizens, prominent businesspersons, government officials, and notorious criminals.

In July 1978, the Intelligence Unit changed its name to Criminal Investigation (CI).  Over the years CI’s statutory jurisdiction expanded to include money laundering and currency violations in addition to its traditional role in investigating tax violations.  However, Criminal Investigation’s core mission remains unchanged.  It continues to fulfill the important role of helping to ensure the integrity and fairness of our nation’s tax system.

Since CI’s inception in 1919 to the present, the conviction rate for Federal tax prosecutions has never fallen below 90 percent.  This is a record of success that is unmatched in Federal law enforcement. 

 

(TO:  Nick - Add the following linkS to a CI publication)

  Publication 3859  http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/pub3859.pdf

Publication 3860 http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/pub3860.pdf

Publication 3861http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p3861.pdf

Publication 3862 http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/pub3862.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

If you suspect or know of an individual or company that is not complying with the tax laws, report this activity. Reports of suspected tax fraud can be made by phone, mail or your local IRS walk-in office.

By phone:  

You can contact the IRS toll free at 1-800-829-0433 .

International callers may call their US Embassy or call 215-516-2000 (this is not a toll-free number).

 

 

The IRS has security measures in place to verify the accuracy of tax returns and validity of social security numbers submitted. If however, you have knowledge of tax fraud being committed, you can make an anonymous report toll free to (800) 829-0433 . You can contact the Social Security Administration to verify if there is another taxpayer using your social security number. The telephone number for the Social Security Administration is (800) 772-1213 . For information on how to prevent identity theft contact the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Identity Theft Hot-line (877) 438-4338 .

 

 

The American system of taxation is based on the premise that all income is taxable (which includes illegally earned income). To prove fraud, money laundering or Bank Secrecy Act violations, IRS Criminal Investigation must prove that a taxpayer willfully attempted to hide income from the Federal Government. Their methods of proof and investigative activities lead IRS special agents into nearly every legal as well as illegal business in America .

 

 

 

 

 

The Annual Business Plan ( ABP ) sets forth priorities and guidance for Criminal Investigation (CI) business operations for FY 2004. This guidance is intended to assist the area and field offices’ efforts in developing local plans and strategies consistent with the Strategy and Program Plan.

The FY 2004 ABP is comprised of four major strategies encompassing both compliance and business improvement components. The overall CI Compliance Strategy sets forth general priorities to reinforce our core mission with emphasis on tax enforcement. Investigative priorities remain in the following order.

  • Legal Source Tax Crimes
  • Illegal Source Tax and Financial Crimes
  • Terrorist Financing Crimes
  • Narcotics Related Financial Crimes (consistent with the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) reimbursement)

 

Strategy:

Increase support of compliance efforts in Operating Divisions through increased application of resources in tax administration investigations.

Criminal Investigation will continue to focus its investigative resources on Legal Source tax investigations to increase compliance with tax laws. Criminal Investigation will work closely with the other operating divisions to investigate and prosecute significant violators.

The operational priorities for this strategy are:

Tax Compliance

Fraud Referral Program: Criminal Investigation will continue to promote fraud awareness and actively support efforts to enhance the fraud referral program. Field Offices will timely evaluate referrals and conduct quarterly four-way conferences and formulate work plans for joint investigations.

Refund Crimes: Criminal Investigation will continue to combat refund-related crimes through its Questionable Refund Program (QRP) and the Return Preparer Program ( RPP ). Criminal Investigation will focus efforts on the activities of unscrupulous preparers who promote abusive or fraudulent schemes.

Abusive Tax Schemes: Criminal Investigation will partner with Small Business/Self-Employed (SB/SE) and Large & Mid-Size Business (LMSB) to develop strategies to identify and combat promoters of abusive tax schemes.

Non-Filer: The investigation of egregious high-income, high impact non-filers remains a priority. Significant emphasis has been placed on investigations of non-filers who espouse frivolous arguments.

Employment Tax: Employment tax investigations will continue to be a high priority with special emphasis currently placed on employee leasing schemes. All field offices are also encouraged to focus on other high impact employment tax schemes such as, split payment and independent contractor schemes.

Corporate Fraud

Criminal Investigation will partner with LMSB in identifying and investigating alleged violations by corporate executives with focus on employment and income tax violations, pension fund fraud, bankruptcy fraud or off shore tax shelter activities engaged in by large corporations. Case development in this area should be actively pursued.

Electronic Crimes and Technology-Based Tax Crimes (Domestic and International)

Criminal Investigation will partner with other operating divisions in researching and identifying non-compliance in the e-commerce sector. Electronic Commerce businesses present a new challenge because web site registration procedures inhibit identifying individuals. Electronic Crimes (E-Crimes) are those in which computers are used to facilitate and commit sophisticated financial crimes including those committed via the Internet. Criminal Investigation will continue to emphasize investigations where advanced technology is an integral part of the crime.

Strategy:

Establish key stakeholder relationships to assist in identifying and investigating egregious financial crimes which adversely affect tax administration.

Criminal Investigation will continue to support investigations of financial crimes, including tax and money laundering that adversely affect tax administration. Financial crimes involving money and the concealment of money as a source of income results in tax evasion.

The operational priorities for this strategy are:

Corporate Fraud

Criminal Investigation will develop partnerships and coordinate with the U.S. Attorney Offices and other federal and state agencies to identify and investigate high impact corporate fraud. Criminal Investigation will prioritize investigations involving tax fraud, accounting and financial fraud and other corporate criminal activity in an effort to foster corporate responsibility and protect America 's shareholders, workers, and the U.S. economy.

Compliance and White Collar Crimes

Criminal Investigation will continue to focus appropriate resources to investigate white collar crimes including tax fraud, money laundering, public corruption, bankruptcy fraud, technology crimes, and international commerce. Criminal Investigation will continue to partner with U.S. Attorney Offices to investigate significant, high impact egregious financial investigations, and support the efforts of the Financial Investigative Task Forces and Suspicious Activity Report Review Teams.

International and Domestic Terrorism

Since September 11, 2001, CI has played a prominent role in the investigation of individuals and organizations affiliated with international and domestic terrorist activities. Criminal Investigation will continue to participate in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Joint Terrorism Task Forces and the United States Attorney's Anti-Terrorism Task Forces. Criminal Investigation will use its expertise to analyze complex financial information to assist in disrupting and dismantling terrorist financing. Criminal Investigation will also assist the Office of Foreign Asset Control in freezing accounts controlled by "charitable" organizations and hawalas suspected of raising or facilitating the movement of funds used to support terrorism.

Electronic Crimes and Technology-Based Tax Crimes (Domestic and International)

Criminal Investigation will coordinate efforts with the U.S. Attorney Offices and other federal and state law enforcement to combat criminal activity involving computer technology. Electronic Crimes are those in which computers are used to facilitate and commit sophisticated financial crimes including those committed via the Internet. Criminal Investigation will continue to emphasize in vestigations where advanced technology is an integral part of the crime.

Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) Narcotics

Criminal Investigation supports national law enforcement strategies and initiatives by investigating and recommending prosecution of domestic and international narcotics traffickers and related money-laundering organizations. Criminal Investigation will devote appropriate resources to high-level multi-agency narcotics investigations warranting OCDETF designation in accordance with OCDETF Program reimbursable funding.

Business Component Strategies and Operational Priorities

Strategy:

Increase efficiency of Criminal Investigation by improvements in business systems and training.

Criminal Investigation continues to develop and enhance established information system projects in order to increase our efficiency through improvements in business systems and training.

The operational priorities for this strategy are:

Improve efficiency and reduce elapsed time on criminal subject investigations

Criminal Investigation will identify and implement specific actions to reduce elapsed time by 7.5 percent during FY 2004.

Reduce administrative burden

Several timesaving processes were developed and will be implemented in FY 2004. A streamlined Special Agent Report (SAR) process will be implemented nationwide. Criminal Investigation Electronic Records Management Information System (CIERMS) is a record management system to house all CI workpapers and records and will facilitate efficient workflows. This system will be piloted in FY 2004.

Electronic Crimes

Electronic Crimes has established the Computer Crime Development Center (CCDC). The CCDC will provide centralized support to Computer Investigative Specialists with advanced training, evaluation of new products and techniques, processing advanced electronic evidence and will serve as a technical resource to the field.

Partner with Modernization and Information Technology Services (MITS)

Criminal Investigation will upgrade their computer operating systems to Microsoft Windows XP Professional and Microsoft Office XP Professional. This conversion will be implemented in FY 2004. The XP operating systems are the foundation for all information technology enhancements for CI.

Strategy:

Improve employee productivity through improvement in recruitment and retention.

Criminal Investigation's prior operational priority under this strategy focused on the special agent workforce. This was expanded to include all non-1811 investigative support staff, the development of CI leadership, and to improve employee satisfaction by the reduction of administrative burden.

The operational priorities for this strategy are:

Recruit the highest quality candidates for all vacancies

Open announcements for a national recruitment effort to reinforce special agent staffing. We will actively recruit quality candidates in preparation of significant hiring in FY 05.

Employee Satisfaction

Utilize the employee satisfaction survey results and employee suggestion programs to identify areas of improvement in effort to retain an experienced workforce.

Improve productivity by reduction of administrative burden

In response to previous Survey Feedback Action verbatim responses, "Project Process Improvement" was initiated to streamline policy and procedures to reduce paperwork and administrative burden. Several timesaving process improvements were developed and will be implemented in FY 2004. Criminal Investigation Electronic Records Management Information System will facilitate efficient workflows and reduction of administrative burden. This system will be piloted in FY 2004. Additionally, a streamlined SAR process has been tested and will be implemented in FY 2004.

Identify and develop CI leadership candidates

Provide development opportunities and progressively responsible assignments in support of the Leadership Candidate Identification and Leadership Development Programs.

 

 

 

 

Criminal Investigation: Electronic Crimes Program

As financial investigators, IRS -Criminal Investigation ( IRS -CI) fills a unique niche in the federal law enforcement community. Today’s sophisticated schemes to defraud the government and the American economy demand the analytical ability of financial investigators to wade through complex arrays of financial records.  Records of transactions are moving from paper ledgers to computers to off-site, online storage. As a result, IRS -CI is developing tools and techniques to follow and find those records, wherever they may be.

IRS -CI designed the Electronic Crimes Program (ECP) to organize our growing expertise in computer and network forensics. Computer Investigative Specialists (CIS) use specialized equipment and techniques to preserve digital evidence and to recover financial data, including data that may have been encrypted, password protected or hidden by other electronic means.    
 
Program Strategy Overview

The Electronic Crimes Program’s mission is to support IRS special agents in the collection and analysis of digital evidence.  As the incidence of computers found during enforcement actions has risen from 5% to 95%, the reliance on ECP personnel to secure and analyze digital data has grown as well.   In the past, agents might find a single personal computer; now they encounter multiple computers, often linked together in a network, each having the capacity to hold several truckloads of documents.

Computer Investigative Specialists participate in search warrants with investigating agents and are responsible for the seizure and processing of evidence contained in various types of digital media.  Their primary mission is to secure the data, reduce it by eliminating programs and other files of non-evidentiary value, and then return the critical information to the investigating agent.  The agent can then electronically review evidence, which is much faster than the old manual paper procedures used in the past.  This technique, together with the scanning of paper documents, puts the entire investigation in a digital format that allows the investigation team and prosecutors to locate items of interest, move files among themselves and digitally present evidence in today’s electronic courtrooms.

Data Input and Research Facilities

In the rapidly evolving world of electronic crimes, CI’s agents must be proficient with both new computers and software and dated technology that may still be used by those committing financial crimes.  The Electronic Crimes Program maintains two facilities to assist with this task.  The Data Input Center in Kentucky is a state-of-the-art scanning and transcription center capable of converting volumes of paper evidence into digital format.  A research and training facility was recently opened in Virginia to focus on developing and enhancing techniques for processing digital evidence, using new technology, warehousing existing technology, and providing training to CISs.  These facilities enable agents across the country and around the world to follow a target through the wire on the back of the box into cyberspace where the evidence of an electronic crime may be found.

ILOOK©

ILOOK© is a forensic software tool developed and owned by IRS -CI. This two-part product automates the hard drive analysis process and makes it possible for a CIS to timely review the multi-gigabyte drives found in today’s computers.  The ILOOK Imager is a Linux-based product that allows the Computer Investigative Specialist to image almost every PC-based machine encountered, including mass data storage systems and non-Microsoft operating systems. 

ILOOK Investigator, the analysis portion of the product, recovers all data (including deleted files) from the target drive image and assists the investigator search for specific details. It also allows the investigator to insert foreign language character sets to search for information.  ILOOK© is supported by the FBI and NASA and is distributed free to state and local law enforcement agencies.

 

 

 

 

IRS Criminal Investigation (CI) is comprised of approximately 2,800 Special Agents whose investigative jurisdiction includes tax, money laundering and Bank Secrecy Act laws. While other federal agencies also have investigative jurisdiction for money laundering and some bank secrecy act violations, IRS is the only federal agency that can investigate potential criminal violations of the Internal Revenue Code.

Compliance with the tax laws in the United States relies heavily on self-assessments of what tax is owed. This is called voluntary compliance. When individuals and corporations make deliberate decisions to not comply with the law, they face the possibility of a civil audit or criminal investigation which could result in prosecution and possible jail time.

 

Financial investigations are by their nature very document intensive. Specifically, they involve records, such as bank account information and real estate files, which point to the movement of money. Any record that pertains to, or shows the paper trail of events involving money is important. The major goal in a financial investigation is to identify and document the movement of money during the course of a crime. The link between where the money comes from, who gets it, when it is received and where it is stored or deposited, can provide proof of criminal activity.

Tax evasion, public corruption, health care fraud, and telemarketing fraud are just a few of the types of crimes that revolve around money. In these cases, a financial investigation often becomes the key to a conviction.  Traditional law enforcement relies on investigative tools such as crime scene analysis, physical evidence, fingerprint identification or eyewitness accounts. The limitations of these techniques become obvious to those who are trying to prove wrongdoing in a sophisticated financial crime. With no proof, there is no conviction.

What are the Major Areas of Financial Investigations?

For Criminal Investigation financial investigations fall into three interdependent categories:  Legal Source Tax Crimes, Illegal Source Financial Crimes, and Narcotics-Related Financial Crimes.  These three areas are mutually supportive and create a well-rounded law enforcement program which addresses the growing fraud in legal industries as well as penetrate the nucleus of money laundering operations and drug trafficking organizations.  The overall CI Business Plan sets forth general priorities to increase emphasis on legal source tax cases. 

Focusing on Legal Source Tax Crimes:

Criminal Investigation's primary resource commitment is to develop and investigate legal source tax crimes.  These investigations involved legal industries and occupations, and more specifically, legally earned income.  Fraud in legal industries has been termed "white collar" crime because it involves income tax violations by individuals who are not involved in other criminal activity.  Some of the tax violations include income tax evasion, failure to file, or filing a false tax return.  The crimes can include frivolous filers/nonfilers who challenge the constitutionality of the American tax system, employment tax cases, claims for fraudulent refunds, abusive trust schemes, and unscrupulous tax return preparers. 

Focusing on Illegal Source Financial Crimes:

Illegal source financial crimes involve money obtained through illegal sources such as health care fraud or telemarketing fraud.  This money is a part of the untaxed underground economy which threatens the strength of the American economy.  Failure to investigate these crimes erodes public confidence in the tax system.  This program encompasses all tax and tax-related violations, as well as money laundering and currency violations.  The crimes can include overbilling of Medicare, kickbacks to public officials, activities to obtain money through telemarketing scams, securities fraud, ponzi schemes, or even gaming (book-making) activities.

Focusing on Narcotics-Related Financial Crimes:

The primary objective of Criminal Investigation's involvement in narcotics related financial crimes is to reduce the profit and financial gains of the drug trafficking and money laundering organizations.  The money obtained through narcotics crimes is also a part of the untaxed underground economy which threatens the strength of the American economy.  To learn more about CI's participation in narcotics-related financial crimes, see our Narcotics webpage.  

U.S. Code Statutes For Which CI Has Jurisdiction

Criminal Investigation's top priority is the investigation of violations of the tax law which falls under Title 26 of the U.S. Code. However, CI special agents lend their financial investigative expertise to money laundering and narcotics investigations conducted in conjunction with other law enforcement agencies at the local, state and federal levels.

Violations that are within the investigative jurisdiction of Criminal Investigation are cited in the Internal Revenue Manual ( IRM ) Part IX.  Specifically, Criminal Investigation Management Information System (CIMIS), Chapter 8.

In Summary

As financial investigators, CI Special Agents fill a unique niche in the federal law enforcement community. Today's sophisticated schemes to defraud the government and the American economy demand the analytical ability of financial investigators to wade through complex paper and computerized financial records. Due to the increase in the automation of financial records, CI Special Agents are trained in recovering computer evidence. Along with their investigative skills, Special Agents use specialized equipment to recover financial data that may have been encrypted, password protected, or hidden by other electronic means.

Criminal Investigation's conviction rate is one of the highest in federal law enforcement. Not only do the courts hand down substantial prison sentences, but those convicted may also be ordered to pay fines, civil taxes and penalties.

 

 

 

Criminal Investigation's (CI) primary resource commitment is to develop and investigate Legal Source Tax Crimes. The prosecution of these cases is key to supporting the Service's overall compliance goals, enhancing voluntary compliance with the tax laws, and promoting fairness and equity in our tax system. Legal Source Tax investigations involve taxpayers in legal industries and legal occupations, who earned income legally, but choose to evade taxes by violation of tax laws.

The Legal Source Tax Crimes Program includes those cases that threaten the tax system, such as the Questionable Refund Program (QRP) cases, unscrupulous return preparers and frivolous filers/non-filers who challenge the legality of the filing requirement. Additional important elements of the program are excise tax and employment tax investigations. This Program emphasizes the importance of cooperation between Service compliance functions as well as with Chief Counsel's Office and Department of Justice Tax Division.

 

 

The Illegal Source Financial Crimes Program recognizes that money gained through illegal sources, such as dollars obtained through illegal gambling operations, is part of the untaxed underground economy. This untaxed underground economy is a threat to our voluntary tax compliance system and undermines the overall public confidence in our tax system. Afterall, the Internal Revenue Code states that all income is taxable, from whatever source derived.

When money is derived through illegal sources, the primary concern for the criminal is to legitimize the dollars. This process of "cleaning" the illegally obtained dollars is termed "money laundering." Money laundering activity is considered to be "tax evasion in progress."

Historically, money launderers used legitimate businesses to "launder" their illegal proceeds. Now money launderers use various schemes and types of transactions to conceal their income and/or assets. Some of these schemes include the manipulation of numerous currency reporting requirements and the layering of transactions. The schemes are frequently international in scope.

The Illegal Source Financial Crimes Program encompasses all tax and tax related violations, as well as money laundering and currency violations. In fact, money laundering and currency violations are often intertwined with tax violations. As part of the criminal charges against an individual, Criminal Investigation (CI) makes effective use of the forfeiture statutes. Forfeiture statutes deprive individuals and organizations of their illegally obtained cash and assets.

 

 

 

One look at the daily newspaper is proof enough that crimes dealing with or motivated by money make up the majority of current criminal activity in the nation. Tax evasion, public corruption, health care fraud, and even drug trafficking are all examples of the types of crimes that revolve around money. In these cases, a financial investigation often becomes the key to a conviction.

Traditional law enforcement relies on investigative tools such as crime scene analysis, physical evidence, fingerprint identification or eyewitness accounts. The limitations of these techniques become obvious to those who are trying to prove wrongdoing in a sophisticated financial crime. With no proof, there is no conviction.

When the Internal Revenue Service astounded Public Enemy Number 1, Alphonse Capone by obtaining a conviction for tax evasion and demanding millions of dollars in back taxes, Capone said, "They can't collect legal taxes from illegal money." But it's really pretty simple: No matter what the source of income -- all income is taxable.

And this creates a real problem for drug dealers. What are they going to do with their money -- so that IRS won't find it?

For the IRS , money laundering and narcotics investigations are the compliance effort to address criminal violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 and section 6050(I) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Why a Financial Investigation?

Financial investigations are by their nature very document intensive. Specifically, they involve records, like bank account information and real estate files, which point to the movement of money. Any record that pertains to, or shows the paper trail of events involving money is important. The major goal in a financial investigation is to identify and document the movement of money during the course of a crime. The link between where the money comes from, who gets it, when it is received and where it is stored or deposited, can provide proof of criminal activity.

Criminal Investigation's contribution to the war on narcotics is vital but sometimes difficult to recognize, because the work of IRS special agents usually doesn't make the headlines. The long hours of tracking down and documenting financial leads isn't glamorous, but it does allow an investigation to go right to the door of the leader of the narcotics organization. A complete financial analysis and reconstruction of a drug organization's financial activity as it relates to unreported income on tax returns and money laundering can often be critical to making the conviction.

History

Criminal Investigation (CI) was established in 1919 and commenced its first narcotics investigation of an opium trafficker in Hawaii in the early 1920's, obtaining tax evasion charges against the leader of that organization.

The CI Narcotics Program's goal is to utilize the financial investigative expertise of its special agents to disrupt and dismantle, through investigation, prosecution and asset forfeiture, the country's major drug and money laundering organizations.

Federal Statutes, Task Forces and Strategies Regarding IRS Narcotics Investigations

Definition of Terms

Currency Transaction Report ( CTR ) - Form 4789: Filed by financial institutions that engage in a currency transaction in excess of $10,000.

Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) - Form TD F 90-22.47: Filed by financial institutions on transactions or attempted transactions involving at least $5,000 that the financial institution knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect the money was derived from illegal activities.

Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) - Form TD F 90-22.1: Filed by individuals to report a financial interest in or signatory authority over one or more accounts in foreign countries, if the aggregate value of these accounts exceed $10,000 at any time during the calendar year.

Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000 Received in a Trade or Business -Form 8300: Filed by persons engaged in a trade or business who, in the course of that trade or business, receive more than $10,000 in cash in one transaction or two or more related transactions within a twelve month period.

Report of International Transportation of Currency or Monetary Instruments (CMIR) - Form 4790: filed by persons who physically transport, mail or ship currency or other monetary instruments in an aggregate amount exceeding $10,000 at any one time into or out of the United States.

Federal Statutes

Internal Revenue Code – CI has sole jurisdiction for criminal violations of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), Title 26 of the United States Code. The IRC, Section 61(a) defines gross income as ". . . all income from whatever source derived." This has been held by the courts to include income earned from illegal activities such as drug trafficking. The primary criminal statutes violated include evasion of income tax, false income tax returns, and failure to file tax returns, among others.

Additionally, IRC, Section 6050(i), requires anyone involved in a trade or business, except financial institutions, to report currency received for goods or services in excess of $10,000. This requirement has provided a significant impediment to the use of illicit profits by narcotics traffickers for the purchase of luxury items such as vehicles, jewelry and boats. Financial institutions report similar information on a Currency Transaction Report.

A new law, Title 31, Section 5331 of the United States Code, was passed in 2001 as a result of the USA Patriot Act and duplicates the reporting provisions of IRC, Section 6050(i). Dual reporting of this information will now be made to both the IRS and the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 – CI investigates and recommends criminal prosecution for violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956 and 1957. These statutes make illegal certain financial transactions constituting laundering, hiding, or use of proceeds generated through specified unlawful activities, such as narcotics trafficking and embezzlement, among others.

Bank Secrecy Act – The Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act, Public Law No. 91-508, Title II, along with financial institution record-keeping requirements, became known as the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). The BSA mandates the reporting of certain currency transactions conducted with a financial institution, (Form 4789), the disclosure of foreign bank accounts (TD F 90-22.1), and the reporting of the transportation of currency exceeding $10,000 across United States borders (Form 4790).

Asset Forfeiture – The asset forfeiture program is one of the federal government's most effective tools against drug trafficking, money laundering, and organized crime. In conjunction with other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies, CI uses asset forfeiture statutes to dismantle criminal enterprises by seizing and forfeiting their assets. Most of CI's seizures and forfeitures are the result of Title 18 and Title 31 money laundering and currency investigations.

Criminal Investigation (CI) Supports National Strategies and Initiatives:

Criminal Investigation supports national law enforcement strategies and initiatives by investigating and recommending prosecution of domestic and international narcotics traffickers and related money-laundering organizations. CI follows the money trail, tracing the profits from the illegal activity back to the criminal.

National Money Laundering Strategy

In October 2001, the U.S. Departments of Treasury and Justice released the Money Laundering Strategy for 2001  . This strategy reflects a national commitment to a coordinated, effective fight against money laundering and other financial crimes. Specifically, the primary goal of the strategy is:

To focus our resources against major money laundering organizations, this Strategy mandates that law enforcement (1) establish inter-agency task forces in High Risk Money Laundering and Related Financial Crimes Areas (HIFCAs), (2) intensify use of federal criminal and civil asset forfeiture laws, (3) enhance intra-agency, inter-agency, and international coordination of money laundering investigations, (4) expand efforts to dismantle the Black Market Peso Exchange (BMPE), and (5) recommend legislation necessary to correct deficiencies in current money laundering laws, thereby strengthening law enforcement's ability to fight money laundering organizations.

Criminal Investigation supports this strategy through the investigation and prosecution of domestic and international narcotics traffickers and related money laundering organizations.

High Intensity Money Laundering and Related Financial Crime Area (HIFCA) Task Forces

Mandated in the National Money Laundering Strategy, HIFCAs occupy the flagship role in the nation's efforts to disrupt and dismantle large-scale money laundering systems and organizations. The designation of a  HIFCA  is intended to concentrate law enforcement efforts at the federal, state, and local level on combating money laundering in high-intensity money laundering zones, whether based on drug trafficking or other crimes. The 2001 Money Laundering Strategy announced the designation of two new HIFCA locations: Northern District of Illinois (Chicago) and Northern District of California (San Francisco). The four HIFCAs named in the 2000 strategy were: New York/New Jersey; San Juan/Puerto Rico; Los Angeles; and a "systems HIFCA," designed to address cross-border currency smuggling in Texas/Arizona to and from Mexico. HIFCAs are composed of all relevant federal, state, and local enforcement authorities; prosecutors; and federal financial supervisory agencies as needed. They work closely with the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) and Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) and focus on collaborative investigative techniques.

Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP)

As part of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, the President established the  Office of National Drug Control Policy to oversee the nation's effort to combat illegal drugs. As part of that oversight authority, the Director of the ONDCP established a National Drug Control Strategy. This strategy directed agencies involved in counter-narcotics activities to focus their efforts on reducing the demand for drugs through treatment and prevention and by attacking and disrupting the drug supply through aggressive law enforcement and increased international cooperation.

Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF)

The Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) Program was created and is managed by the Department of Justice "to identify, investigate, and prosecute members of high-level drug trafficking enterprises, and to destroy the operations of those organizations." IRS CI is substantially reimbursed for the resources it commits to the war on narcotics trafficking and has been a participating member of OCDETF since its inception in 1982. During FY 2001, CI participated in 38% of the OCDETF investigations.

High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA)

The High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) Program was established by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, to provide assistance to federal, state and local law enforcement agencies operating in areas most adversely affected by drug trafficking. The Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) has oversight authority over the  HIDTA Program . There are 28 locations designated as HIDTA.   HIDTA initiatives focus on the investigation of money laundering violators and the identification and confiscation of the profits derived from the illegal sale of narcotics. Criminal Investigation supports HIDTA by dedicating special agents and other resources to the initiatives. CI provides the financial investigative perspective necessary to meet the goals of the National Drug Control Strategy.

 

 

 

 

The Annual Business Plan ( ABP ) sets forth priorities and guidance for Criminal Investigation (CI) business operations. This guidance is intended to assist the area and field offices’ efforts in developing local plans and strategies consistent with the Strategy and Program Plan.

The ABP is comprised of four major strategies encompassing both compliance and business improvement components. The overall CI Compliance Strategy sets forth general priorities to reinforce our core mission with emphasis on tax enforcement. Investigative priorities remain in the following order.

  • Legal Source Tax Crimes
  • Illegal Source Tax and Financial Crimes
  • Terrorist Financing Crimes
  • Narcotics Related Financial Crimes (consistent with the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) reimbursement)

Compliance Component Strategies and Operational Priorities

Strategy:

Increase support of compliance efforts in Operating Divisions through increased application of resources in tax administration investigations.

Criminal Investigation will continue to focus its investigative resources on Legal Source tax investigations to increase compliance with tax laws. Criminal Investigation will work closely with the other operating divisions to investigate and prosecute significant violators.

The operational priorities for this strategy are:

Tax Compliance

Fraud Referral Program: Criminal Investigation will continue to promote fraud awareness and actively support efforts to enhance the fraud referral program. Field Offices will timely evaluate referrals and conduct quarterly four-way conferences and formulate work plans for joint investigations.

Refund Crimes: Criminal Investigation will continue to combat refund-related crimes through its Questionable Refund Program (QRP) and the Return Preparer Program ( RPP ). Criminal Investigation will focus efforts on the activities of unscrupulous preparers who promote abusive or fraudulent schemes.

Abusive Tax Schemes: Criminal Investigation will partner with Small Business/Self-Employed (SB/SE) and Large & Mid-Size Business (LMSB) to develop strategies to identify and combat promoters of abusive tax schemes.

Non-Filer: The investigation of egregious high-income, high impact non-filers remains a priority. Significant emphasis has been placed on investigations of non-filers who espouse frivolous arguments.

Employment Tax: Employment tax investigations will continue to be a high priority with special emphasis currently placed on employee leasing schemes. All field offices are also encouraged to focus on other high impact employment tax schemes such as, split payment and independent contractor schemes.

Corporate Fraud

Criminal Investigation will partner with LMSB in identifying and investigating alleged violations by corporate executives with focus on employment and income tax violations, pension fund fraud, bankruptcy fraud or off shore tax shelter activities engaged in by large corporations. Case development in this area should be actively pursued.

Electronic Crimes and Technology-Based Tax Crimes (Domestic and International)

Criminal Investigation will partner with other operating divisions in researching and identifying non-compliance in the e-commerce sector. Electronic Commerce businesses present a new challenge because web site registration procedures inhibit identifying individuals. Electronic Crimes (E-Crimes) are those in which computers are used to facilitate and commit sophisticated financial crimes including those committed via the Internet. Criminal Investigation will continue to emphasize investigations where advanced technology is an integral part of the crime.

Strategy:

Establish key stakeholder relationships to assist in identifying and investigating egregious financial crimes which adversely affect tax administration.

Criminal Investigation will continue to support investigations of financial crimes, including tax and money laundering that adversely affect tax administration. Financial crimes involving money and the concealment of money as a source of income results in tax evasion.

The operational priorities for this strategy are:

Corporate Fraud

Criminal Investigation will develop partnerships and coordinate with the U.S. Attorney Offices and other federal and state agencies to identify and investigate high impact corporate fraud. Criminal Investigation will prioritize investigations involving tax fraud, accounting and financial fraud and other corporate criminal activity in an effort to foster corporate responsibility and protect America's shareholders, workers, and the U.S. economy.

Compliance and White Collar Crimes

Criminal Investigation will continue to focus appropriate resources to investigate white collar crimes including tax fraud, money laundering, public corruption, bankruptcy fraud, technology crimes, and international commerce. Criminal Investigation will continue to partner with U.S. Attorney Offices to investigate significant, high impact egregious financial investigations, and support the efforts of the Financial Investigative Task Forces and Suspicious Activity Report Review Teams.

International and Domestic Terrorism

Since September 11, 2001, CI has played a prominent role in the investigation of individuals and organizations affiliated with international and domestic terrorist activities. Criminal Investigation will continue to participate in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Joint Terrorism Task Forces and the United States Attorney's Anti-Terrorism Task Forces. Criminal Investigation will use its expertise to analyze complex financial information to assist in disrupting and dismantling terrorist financing. Criminal Investigation will also assist the Office of Foreign Asset Control in freezing accounts controlled by "charitable" organizations and hawalas suspected of raising or facilitating the movement of funds used to support terrorism.

Electronic Crimes and Technology-Based Tax Crimes (Domestic and International)

Criminal Investigation will coordinate efforts with the U.S. Attorney Offices and other federal and state law enforcement to combat criminal activity involving computer technology. Electronic Crimes are those in which computers are used to facilitate and commit sophisticated financial crimes including those committed via the Internet. Criminal Investigation will continue to emphasize in vestigations where advanced technology is an integral part of the crime.

Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) Narcotics

Criminal Investigation supports national law enforcement strategies and initiatives by investigating and recommending prosecution of domestic and international narcotics traffickers and related money-laundering organizations. Criminal Investigation will devote appropriate resources to high-level multi-agency narcotics investigations warranting OCDETF designation in accordance with OCDETF Program reimbursable funding.

Business Component Strategies and Operational Priorities

Strategy:

Increase efficiency of Criminal Investigation by improvements in business systems and training.

Criminal Investigation continues to develop and enhance established information system projects in order to increase our efficiency through improvements in business systems and training.

The operational priorities for this strategy are:

Improve efficiency and reduce elapsed time on criminal subject investigations

Criminal Investigation will identify and implement specific actions to reduce elapsed time by 7.5 percent during FY 2004.

Reduce administrative burden

Several timesaving processes were developed and will be implemented in FY 2004. A streamlined Special Agent Report (SAR) process will be implemented nationwide. Criminal Investigation Electronic Records Management Information System (CIERMS) is a record management system to house all CI workpapers and records and will facilitate efficient workflows. This system will be piloted in FY 2004.

Electronic Crimes

Electronic Crimes has established the Computer Crime Development Center (CCDC). The CCDC will provide centralized support to Computer Investigative Specialists with advanced training, evaluation of new products and techniques, processing advanced electronic evidence and will serve as a technical resource to the field.

Partner with Modernization and Information Technology Services (MITS)

Criminal Investigation will upgrade their computer operating systems to Microsoft Windows XP Professional and Microsoft Office XP Professional. This conversion will be implemented in FY 2004. The XP operating systems are the foundation for all information technology enhancements for CI.

Strategy:

Improve employee productivity through improvement in recruitment and retention.

Criminal Investigation's prior operational priority under this strategy focused on the special agent workforce. This was expanded to include all non-1811 investigative support staff, the development of CI leadership, and to improve employee satisfaction by the reduction of administrative burden.

The operational priorities for this strategy are:

Recruit the highest quality candidates for all vacancies

Open announcements for a national recruitment effort to reinforce special agent staffing. We will actively recruit quality candidates in preparation of significant hiring in FY 05.

Employee Satisfaction

Utilize the employee satisfaction survey results and employee suggestion programs to identify areas of improvement in effort to retain an experienced workforce.

Improve productivity by reduction of administrative burden

In response to previous Survey Feedback Action verbatim responses, "Project Process Improvement" was initiated to streamline policy and procedures to reduce paperwork and administrative burden. Several timesaving process improvements were developed and will be implemented in FY 2004. Criminal Investigation Electronic Records Management Information System will facilitate efficient workflows and reduction of administrative burden. This system will be piloted in FY 2004. Additionally, a streamlined SAR process has been tested and will be implemented in FY 2004.

Identify and develop CI leadership candidates

Provide development opportunities and progressively responsible assignments in support of the Leadership Candidate Identification and Leadership Development Programs.


 

 

 

 

Criminal Investigation’s (CI) Financial Institution Fraud Program, addresses criminal violations involving fraud against banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, check cashers, and stockbrokers. Criminal Investigation is a major contributor in the effort to combat financial institution fraud, and the United States Attorneys’ recognize CI’s financial investigative expertise in this complex area.

The ability to bring income tax and money laundering charges augments prosecutor’s effectiveness in combating fraud committed against financial institutions, whether the violators work within or outside of the financial institution.

During FY2001 CI continued its involvement in bank fraud working groups and in financial institution task forces at the field level, and the Interagency Bank Fraud Working Group at the Headquarters level. This group is composed of regulatory and law enforcement agencies that either regulate financial institutions or investigate fraud committed against them. The group seeks to improve coordination between agencies and regulators in the investigation and prosecution of financial institution fraud.

Criminal Investigation recognizes the potential for individuals and organizations to use the Internet to facilitate income tax evasion and money laundering. Criminal Investigation has taken proactive steps to combat fraud involving the Internet and is an active participant in the Cyberbanking Working Group to study electronic money and devise safeguards to protect consumers. This group is comprised of representatives of regulatory and law enforcement agencies.

The use of Sight Drafts, also known as Bills of Exchange, to defraud financial institutions has proliferated with the upsurge in use by radical militia groups. These fictitious financial instruments resemble bank cashier’s checks and have been issued in amounts exceeding $10 billion. Criminal Investigation has taken an aggressive role in these investigations by using the charge of Title 18 USC Section 514 (Fictitious Obligations). This statute was enacted to prosecute individuals and groups who use sham instruments to defraud financial institutions as well as the IRS .

Currency Transaction Reports and Suspicious Activity Reports continue to be an effective source of information regarding financial institution fraud. Criminal Investigation follows up on Currency Transaction Reports and/or Suspicious Activity Reports with the reporting financial institution. Direct contact is made with the financial institution, enhancing the constructive and cooperative relationship CI has established with the banking industry.

 

 

 

 

Criminal Investigation's Role in Terrorist Financing Investigations

IRS Criminal Investigation special agents have a combined accounting and law enforcement background. These combined skills make IRS special agents unique Federal Agents.  They are experts at following financial transactions, analyzing key pieces of detailed financial information and putting together an otherwise confusing, jigzaw-type puzzle of financial transactions, that outline expenditures, life-style changes and acquisition of assets. Discovering where the money came from and where it went is what IRS special agents do best.

These unique skills enable them to analyze complex, often unusual, financial transactions, and are best utilized to combat terrorism involving:

  • The leadership and members of extremist groups who have committed tax, money laundering, or currency violations; 
  • Persons engaged in fundraising activities to support terrorism, especially if tax exempt organizations are being utilized; 
  • Terrorism investigations involving complex, extensive or convoluted financial transactions.

Since September 11, 2001 , IRS special agents have responded to all requests for assistance - in whatever capacity - as needed by the Government.  For example, IRS special agents conducted grid searches at the crash sites at the World Trade Center and in Pennsylvania, sifted through rubble searching for evidence at the New York landfill and provided extra security at several locations.

Some of IRS Criminal Investigation's more traditional investigative assignments in connection with the September 11th attack include:

Special Assignments in the Middle East.  Special Agents from IRS CI are currently assigned to use those skills as part of an interagency effort to trace and recover Iraqi assets, including both official assets of the former regime and illicit assets looted and held by or on behalf of Saddam Hussein, his associates, their families, front companies, etc. The financial investigative process for the assignment is very similar to the routine duties IRS CI special agents are trained to address including complex tax schemes and narcotics money laundering where nominees and layered transactions are conducted with artificial entities to hide and conceal money.

CI Computer Investigative Specialists (CIS) assistance to terrorist investigations.  Today most financial records are stored on computers.  CI’s Computer Investigative Specialists (CIS) are experts in extracting financial records stored in computer hard drives, computer networks, and even the Internet.  CISs take part in every IRS criminal and counterterrorism investigation that involves the acquisition of digital evidence.  CI owns the rights to the primary tool used in this work, the “ILook Investigator,” which is a suite of forensic tools that significantly shortens the time needed to analyze digital evidence seized from targets’ computers.  ILook is also widely used by law enforcement and other government agencies investigating terrorism and terrorist activities.

Strategic Information Operations Center (SIOC). Headquartered at the FBI in Washington, DC, this is the centralized location for all of the information obtained by the below-mentioned task forces as well as any other state, local or federal information relating to terrorist activity. Federal agents from numerous bureaus work together, bringing their own unique investigative skills, to review, analyze and further investigate the accumulated information. IRS Criminal Investigation managers and agents are reviewing the financial leads.

Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF). The Federal Bureau of Investigation's JTTFs were created to strengthen efforts to combat terrorism by enhancing cooperation between federal, state and local law enforcement agencies throughout the country. Thirty-four JTTFs have been established. Prior to September 11, 2001 , each federal agency had one member on the JTTF -- membership included all federal agencies who have GS-1811 agents and state and local police. Support by IRS Criminal Investigation has increased since the September 11, 2001 attack.

Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the Department of the Treasury and the Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice coordinate this activity. The President's Counter-terrorism initiative calls for the establishment of a Foreign Terrorism Asset Tracking (FTAT) Center in Washington, DC under the office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). This center employs the investigative skills and analytical capabilities of Treasury enforcement agencies to identify terrorist fundraising activities - then pursue these leads to determine if legal cause exists to civilly or criminally forfeit the assets.

Anti-Terrorism Task Forces. On September 17, 2001 , the Attorney General issued instructions to each United States Attorney to establish an Anti-Terrorism Task Force within each judicial district. The task forces will be part of a national network that will coordinate the dissemination of information and the development of investigative and prosecutive strategy through the country. The task forces will be a conduit of information about suspected terrorists between the federal and local agencies. Intelligence about terrorist networks obtained by federal agencies will be disseminated through these task forces to the local police officials who can help monitor those networks in their localities. The task forces will also serve as a coordinating body for implementing the operational plan for the prevention of terrorism. And, the task forces will serve as a standing organizational structure for a coordinated response to a terrorist incident in that district.

High Intensity Money Laundering and Related Financial Crime Area (HIFCA) Task Forces. (Mandated in the National Money Laundering Strategy) HIFCAs occupy the flagship role in the nation's efforts to disrupt and dismantle large-scale money laundering systems and organizations. The designation of a HIFCA is intended to concentrate law enforcement efforts at the federal, state, and local level on combating money laundering in high-intensity money laundering zones, whether based on drug trafficking or other crimes. The 2001 Money Laundering Strategy announced the designation of two new HIFCA locations: Northern District of Illinois (Chicago) and Northern District of California (San Francisco). The four HIFCAs named in the 2000 strategy were: New York/New Jersey; San Juan/Puerto Rico; Los Angeles; and a "Southwest Border systems HIFCA," designed to address cross-border currency smuggling in Texas/Arizona to and from Mexico. HIFCAs are composed of all relevant federal, state, and local enforcement authorities; prosecutors; and federal financial supervisory agencies as needed. They work closely with the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) and Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) and focus on collaborative investigative techniques. In 2003 The HIFCA Executive Board approved a South Florida HIFCA which is centralized in Miami.

 

 

 

What is Money Laundering?

The term “money laundering” refers to the activities and financial transactions that are undertaken specifically to hide the true source of the income. In most cases, the money involved is earned from an illegal enterprise and the goal is to give that money the appearance of coming from a legitimate source.

Why is IRS Involved in Money Laundering Investigations?

One look at the daily news is proof that the crimes dealing with or motivated by money make up the majority of criminal activity in the nation. Tax evasion, public corruption, health care fraud, money laundering and drug trafficking are all examples of the types of crimes that revolve around money. In these cases, a financial investigation often becomes the key to a conviction. For this reason, IRS is one of the key agencies involved in money laundering investigations.

Money laundering is a very complex crime involving intricate details, often involving numerous financial transactions and financial outlets throughout the world. Criminal Investigation has the financial investigators and expertise that is critical to “follow the money trail.”

Criminal Investigation focuses on money laundering where the underlying conduct is a violation of the income tax laws. According to the IRS , money laundering is the means by which criminals evade paying taxes on illegal income by concealing the source and the amount of profit. Money laundering is in effect tax evasion in progress.

When no other crimes could be pinned to Al Capone, the Internal Revenue Service obtained a conviction for tax evasion. As the astonished Capone left the courthouse he said, "This is preposterous. You can't tax illegal income!" But the fact is income from whatever source derived (legal or illegal) is taxable income. 

Had the money laundering statutes been on the books in the 1930's, Capone would also have been charged with money laundering. However, since October 1986, with the passage of the Money Laundering Control Act, organized crime members and many others have been charged and convicted of both tax evasion and money laundering.

When a criminal has a large amount of illegal income, they have to do something with it in order to hide it from the IRS . They attempt to launder it to make it appear as if it was from a legitimate source, allowing them to spend it or invest it in assets without having to worry about the IRS and tax consequences.

One of the ways to launder illegal proceeds is to move the money out of the United States and then bring it back in a clean form, often disguised as loan proceeds. Another method is to channel or co-mingle the money through various business activities to give the appearance that the money was derived from a legal source. 

Why a Financial Investigation?

Financial investigations are by their nature very document intensive. They involve records, such as bank account information or real estate files, which point to the movement of money. Any record that pertains to or shows the sequence of events involving money movement is important. The major goal in a financial investigation is to identify and document the movement of money during the course of a crime. The link between where the money comes from, who gets it, when it is received and where it is stored or deposited, can provide proof of criminal activity.

IRS investigations of illegal income cases involving money laundering are critical components of the nations National Money Laundering Strategy. The long hours of tracking and documenting financial leads allows an investigation to go right to the door of the money launderers and eventually to the leader of the illegal enterprise. A complete financial analysis and reconstruction of the illegal activity (i.e. a drug organization or an abusive trust scheme) will document the financial activities related to unreported income on tax returns and money laundering which is usually key to securing a conviction.

Money laundering creates an underground, untaxed economy that harms our country’s overall economic strength. It is a global threat that erodes our financial systems. 

 

Internal Revenue Code

IRS has sole investigative jurisdiction for criminal violations of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), Title 26 of the United States Code. The IRC, Section 61(a) defines gross income as ". . . all income from whatever source derived." This has been held by the courts to include income earned from illegal activities such as drug trafficking, embezzlement, extortion, healthcare fraud, bankruptcy fraud and numerous other crimes. The primary criminal statutes include evasion of income tax, false income tax returns, and failure to file tax returns, among others.

Additionally, IRC, Section 6050 I, requires anyone involved in a trade or business, except financial institutions, to report currency received for goods or services in excess of $10,000 on a Form 8300. This requirement has created a significant impediment to the use of illicit profits by narcotics traffickers and others engaged in illegal activity for the purchase of luxury items such as vehicles, jewelry and boats. Financial institutions report similar information on a Currency Transaction Report.

Federal Statutes and Acts Passed by Congress

Title 31, USC Section 5331 – was passed in 2001 as a result of the USA Patriot Act and duplicates the reporting provisions of IRC, Section 6050I (Form 8300). Dual reporting of this information will now be made to both the IRS and the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

Title 31 USC Section 5332 –Also as a result of the USA Patriot Act was the passage of Title 31 USC 5332, Bulk Cash Statute. Criminal Investigation has jurisdiction to investigate violations of this statute. This affects anyone who transports or attempts to transport currency or other monetary instruments of more than $10,000, from a place within the United States to a place outside of the United States, or from a place outside the United States to a place within the United States, and knowingly conceals it with the intent to evade the reporting requirements of 31 USC 5316. 

Title 18 USC Section 1960 IRS has the jurisdiction to investigate violations under Title 18 USC 1960 which requires Money Service Businesses to be registered with the Federal Government.

Bank Secrecy Act – The Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act, Public Law No. 91-508, Title II, along with financial institution record-keeping requirements, became known as the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). The BSA mandates the reporting of certain currency transactions conducted with a financial institution, (Form 4789), the disclosure of foreign bank accounts (TD F 90-22.1), and the reporting of the transportation of currency exceeding $10,000 across United States borders (Form 4790).

Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 – Criminal Investigation investigates and recommends criminal prosecution for violations of Title 18, USC , Sections 1956 and 1957. These statutes make it illegal to conduct certain financial transactions with proceeds generated through specified unlawful activities, such as narcotics trafficking, Medicare fraud and embezzlement, among others.

Asset Forfeiture – The asset forfeiture program is one of the federal government’s most effective tools against drug trafficking, money laundering, and organized crime. In conjunction with other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies, Criminal Investigation uses asset forfeiture statutes to dismantle criminal enterprises by seizing and forfeiting their assets. Most of Criminal Investigation's seizures and forfeitures are the result of Title 18 and Title 31 money laundering and currency investigations. 

 

 

Criminal Investigation was established in 1919 and commenced its first narcotics investigation of an opium trafficker in Hawaii in the early 1920's, bringing the only charge we could; tax evasion. At that time, millions of dollars were being laundered through financial institutions, going untaxed and being used to purchase assets. There was no paper trail at the financial institution other than bank account records, if the money was deposited. There was no requirement for banks to report the large amounts of currency transactions.

In 1970, Congress passed the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). With the enactment of the BSA came the introduction of the Currency Transaction Report ( CTR , Form 4789), Report of International Transportation of Currency or Monetary Instruments (CMIR, Form 4790) and Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR, Form TD F 90-22.1).

The BSA created the paper trail needed by law enforcement to track untaxed dollars and the millions of dollars being laundered through U.S. banks. IRS has been able to follow this paper trail to disrupt and dismantle, through investigation, prosecution and forfeiture of assets, the country's major drug and money laundering organizations.

 

urrency Reporting - Money Laundering

 

The Currency Transaction Report ( CTR ) came into existence with the passage of the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act, better known as the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), in 1970. By 1975 only 3,418 CTRs had been filed in the United States.

When the first version of the CTR was introduced the only way a suspicious transaction of less than $10,000 was reported to the government was if a bank teller called an agent and provided the information. This was due, primarily, to the concern by financial institutions about the Right to Financial Privacy. On October 26, 1986, with the passage of the Money Laundering Control Act, the Right to Financial Privacy was no longer an issue. As part of the Act, Congress had stated that a financial institution could not be held liable for releasing suspicious transaction information to law enforcement. As a result, the next version of the CTR had a suspicious transaction check box at the top. This was in effect until April 1996 when the Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) was introduced.

Currency reporting has changed since its introduction in 1970. There are now several different requirements for several different types of financial institutions as well as non-financial institutions.
The various currency forms, their reporting requirements, and the number filed in calendar year 2003 are shown in this chart:

 

According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, national healthcare expenditures topped $1.3 trillion in 2000. Although the exact amount of healthcare fraud is difficult to determine, estimates range from three to ten percent, thus translating into staggering amounts of money lost to fraud.

The Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General reported in testimony to Congress that $13.5 billion of Medicare fee-for-service claim payments, which are only a portion of Medicare payments, may have been a result of inadvertent error or outright fraud in fiscal year 1999. This figure does not consider the amount of fraud perpetrated against private insurance companies.

Criminal Investigation investigates healthcare fraud perpetrated against the federal and state governments, as well as private insurance companies. In these investigations, CI follows the money trail and considers both tax and money laundering perspectives. Criminal tax investigations are initiated when income generated from healthcare fraud is not correctly reported on tax returns, or when there is an overstatement of expenses on tax returns. Criminal Investigation investigates money laundering when either illegally obtained funds from healthcare fraud are used to purchase assets or when the perpetrators of the schemes devise elaborate methods to conceal their fraudulent proceeds. Money laundering occurs in a wide range of fraudulent healthcare schemes such as false claims, kickbacks, or staged accidents.

Typical healthcare fraud investigations are lengthy, labor intensive, and involve complex issues. To assist in combating healthcare fraud, CI participates in DOJ-sponsored, multi-agency task forces and works closely with several state agencies. These task forces capitalize on the strength and expertise of the participating agencies and have proven effective in dealing with healthcare fraud.

Criminal Investigation’s participation enhances multi-agency healthcare fraud investigations by documenting that the perpetrators of these schemes financially benefited from their fraudulent activities. Currently, CI is involved in the following areas of healthcare fraud: false billings, mental health, nursing home fraud, chiropractic fraud, durable medical equipment fraud, staged accidents, pharmaceutical diversion, and patient referral (kickbacks) schemes.

Criminal Investigation keeps apprised of healthcare industry and fraud issues through its participation in the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association. Criminal Investigation has noticed a trend of specialized criminal organizations, such as Russian organized crime syndicates, being involved in healthcare fraud schemes that are defrauding millions of dollars from the government and private insurance carriers.

The Questionable Refund Program (QRP) is a nationwide multifunctional program established in January 1977. The QRP was designed to identify fraudulent returns, to stop the payment of fraudulent refunds and to refer identified fraudulent refund schemes to Criminal Investigation (CI) field offices. While the primary focus is on individual tax returns, business tax returns are also reviewed under the QRP. The increasing number of fraudulent business tax returns detected since 1999 resulted in the implementation of a pilot business return QRP in FY 2001 at several Fraud Detection Centers (FDCs).

Since its inception, the QRP has detected over $2.7 billion in fraudulent refunds and has stopped payment on 90 percent of these refunds. In addition, QRP has been responsible for the identification of substantial abuse in other programs which has resulted in the savings of hundreds of millions of dollars from fraudulent schemes in abusive tax shelters and fraudulent claims for the Earned Income Tax Credit.

Questionable Refund Detection Teams (QRDT) are located in the CI FDCs located on each of the ten IRS campuses, where individual tax returns are filed and processed. However, the QRP business return detection efforts take place at the Cincinnati and Ogden FDCs only. The QRDT reviews questionable tax returns that have been identified by manual or computerized screening techniques. Schemes with criminal potential are referred to CI field offices for investigation. In addition, many returns are referred to other IRS Operating Divisions as well as to the adjustments section for appropriate civil action.

QRP schemes are also detected through communications from electronic return originators, financial institutions, return preparers, and concerned citizens.

The Electronic Fraud Detection System is a Criminal Investigation (CI) computer system that automates the computer identification output for potentially fraudulent electronic filed tax returns, increases data available for analysis, and assists in the development of information relating to paper and ELF schemes detected by the QRDTs.

The filing of questionable claims for refund is also associated with the crime of identity theft. On October 30, 1998, The Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998, hereinafter referred to as the Act, went into effect. Section 3 of the Act amends Title 18 U.S.C. § 1028 by, among other things, adding new Subsection (a)(7). This subsection establishes an offense by anyone who:

Knowingly transfers or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person with the intent to commit, or to aid and abet, any unlawful activity that constitutes a violation of federal law, or that constitutes a felony under any applicable state or local law.

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1028(d)(3) defines "means of identification"
as any name or number that may be used, alone or in conjunction
with any other information, to identify a specific individual.
It covers several examples, such as name, social security number,
and government-issued driver’s licenses.

Criminal Investigation can investigate and recommend prosecution under this statute in tandem with the investigation of substantive tax and money laundering violations emanating from refund fraud and money laundering schemes.

In the context of tax crimes, Title 18 U.S.C. § 1028 could be applicable where a defendant steals another person’s identity for the purpose of falsely representing their identity to the Internal Revenue Service. The issue is most likely to occur in the QRP area where individual identities are stolen with the intent to file false tax returns claiming tax refunds.

he typical illegal telemarketer operates by exploiting the trust of consumers to whom they present an opportunity "too good to be true." These opportunities include cash, vehicles, vacations, jewelry, investments, donations to charity, participation in lotteries, or the opportunity to recoup losses from prior schemes. These "opportunities" are, in fact, too good to be true. Many times the merchandise or prizes are never delivered, or if delivered, are of minimal value and do not comport with claims made by the promoters.

In many instances senior citizens are the targets of telemarketers and in some situations their names are sold to other telemarketers to re-contact the victims to try and obtain more money with new false promises and pitches, a procedure the telemarketers call "reloading."

Advanced telecommunications, along with electronic banking, has led to unprecedented growth in the telemarketing industry. The Internet is also a productive tool for telemarketers. It allows them to reach a wide audience to market fraudulent credit repair schemes, business opportunities, pyramid investments and sweepstakes promotions in all 50 states quickly and at a much-reduced cost.

Criminal Investigation is combating telemarketing fraud by conducting investigations of fraudulent schemes in conjunction with multi-agency task forces. Criminal Investigation continues to employ innovative investigative techniques in pursuit of fraudulent telemarketers. Criminal Investigation pursues illegal telemarketers by recommending prosecution for violations of Title 18, Sections 371, 1956 and 1957, conspiracy and money laundering. When possible and appropriate, CI also recommends prosecution on more traditional Title 26 violations, including income tax evasion, filing a false return, failure to file a return, aiding and abetting in the preparation of false return.

The Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) Consumer Sentinel database is an online database that contains over 300,000 consumer complaints about fraud and deceptions from the FTC, law enforcement and consumer protection agencies. The database is used to analyze reports on a quarterly basis to target repeat offenders and refer information to investigative and regulatory agencies. The database allows law enforcement and regulatory agencies to focus resources on the smaller percentage of companies involved in fraudulent activity.

The National Fraud Information Center (NFIC), established in 1992 by the National Consumers League, receives complaints from and provides assistance to consumers. NFIC advises consumers about telephone solicitations and alleged telemarketing fraud to law enforcement agencies. According to the NFIC, the 2001 top five telemarketing fraud schemes reported include Work-At-Home, Prizes/Sweepstakes, Credit Card Issuing, Advance Fee Loans and Magazine Sales. The initial contact for these types of schemes reported to the NFIC involved the phone (44%), mail (37%) and other medium (19%). The top five United States telemarketing company locations are Florida (12%), California (12%), New York (10%), Texas (6%) and Illinois (4%).

Criminal Investigation (CI) continues to participate in numerous investigations involving individuals who violate the public trust. The subjects of these investigations include both elected and appointed officials from all levels of government including, local, county, state, federal, and foreign officials.

Public corruption investigations encompass a wide variety of criminal offenses including bribery, extortion, embezzlement, illegal kickbacks, entitlement and subsidy fraud, bank fraud, tax fraud, and money laundering. Criminal Investigation concentrates its resources on the tax and money laundering aspects of these investigations in cooperation with other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. Criminal Investigations’ expertise in conducting financial investigations has established our reputation as one of the leaders in the fight against corrupt public officials.

Criminal Investigation’s (CI) Insurance Fraud Program addresses criminal tax and money laundering violations relative to insurance claims and fraud perpetrated against insurance companies. Insurance fraud is either internal or external in nature and covers a wide variety of schemes. Agent/Broker premium diversion, re-insurance fraud and rented asset schemes are just a few internal fraud schemes. Phony insurance companies, offshore/unlicensed Internet companies, staged auto accidents, viatical and senior settlement fraud are external fraud schemes.

Rented assets schemes involve companies that pay an up-front fee to borrow assets and then, sometimes without the knowledge of the real owners, list them on their balance sheet. Re-insurance is the process in which insurance companies offset all or a part of their risk through other insurance companies. Fraud in this area involves non-existent reinsurance companies or moving illegally obtained insurance premiums offshore through transactions disguised as payments to a reinsurance company. Automobile fraud rings, assisted by corrupt doctors and attorneys continue to be a major source of false insurance claims.

Viatical settlements involve the purchase of life insurance policies, or their benefits, at a discounted rate from a terminally ill person. The beneficial interests in the insurance policies purchased are sold or assigned to an investor. A viatical investor receives the full benefits when the ill person dies. Viatical fraud is a major form of insurance fraud. Investors are promised guarantees that have no basis and in some instances have no underlying insurance policy securing their investment. Fraud involving senior settlements is also becoming more prevalent. Senior settlements follow the basic premise of viatical settlements but involve senior citizen insurance policies.

Criminal Investigation is an active participant in the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) which is comprised of state insurance commissioners and regulators, fraud bureaus, and industry specialists. The goal of this cooperative effort is to bar unscrupulous brokers and adjusters from the insurance industry. One of NAIC's benefits to law enforcement is its database of fraudulent activity within the industry. The NAIC has established a website that allows each state to post emerging schemes and significant investigations.

To effectively address international issues within the insurance industry, CI has maintained its affiliation with the International Association of Insurance Fraud Agencies. This association brings together insurance companies throughout the world. Their focus is to identify and combat fraud in the insurance industry through international cooperation.

Organized criminal groups continue to devise schemes to evade federal and state motor fuel excise tax, revenue that is needed to maintain and improve our national transportation systems. The impact of these schemes goes far beyond the revenue loss. They have an adverse effect on the motor fuel industry by eroding the market share of legitimate dealers and even forcing some dealers out of business. Through the Excise Tax Program, CI has made a concerted effort to disrupt or dismantle the criminal organizations responsible for motor fuel tax evasion schemes.

Convictions obtained in motor fuel excise tax investigations have suppressed evasion in many parts of the country, thereby enhancing voluntary compliance. They also provided an impetus for enactment of legislation, which further reduced evasion and contributed to increases in both federal and state revenue.

The removal of organized criminal groups from the marketplace, combined with regulatory reform, as well as enhanced federal, state and industry cooperation, has increased motor fuel tax compliance.

In 1993, legislation moved the point of taxation on diesel fuel to the fuel-dispensing terminal and mandated that diesel fuel used for non-taxable purposes be dyed. Since the implementation of this legislation, evasion has declined and billions in additional revenue have been collected. These reforms were the result by a concerted effort of government and industry.

In FY1998, the Joint Federal/State Motor Fuel Compliance Project was renewed for another six years. This project has been the catalyst for many past successes and is one of the most successful programs of its kind. The project’s continuation maintains the cooperative relationships essential for continued success and mandates the design and construction of improved fuel tracking systems to curtail motor tax fuel evasion.

Since opportunities still exist for blending and interstate evasion schemes, continued vigilance is required. Further, the program continues to demonstrate that schemes designed to evade excise tax on tires, freon, and other ozone-depleting chemicals as well as truck chassis have become targets of opportunity for organized criminal groups.

ccording to the United States Bankruptcy Court, bankruptcies are steadily increasing and reached 1.7 million in fiscal year 2003. The increasing number of bankruptcy petitions filed has been accompanied by a correlative increase in bankruptcy fraud.  In fact, the Department of Justice estimates that 10 percent of all bankruptcy petitions contain some elements of fraud.  This results in serious consequences which undermine public confidence in the system, taint the reputation of honest citizens seeking protection under the bankruptcy statutes, and have a negative impact on voluntary compliance in our income tax system. With so much at stake, the detection and prosecution of bankruptcy fraud continues to be an area of focus for the IRS , as well as the Department of Justice.

Over the past five years, bankruptcy filings have averaged 1.4 million annually, with the IRS a party to approximately 40 percent of these filings. Since the IRS is often a major creditor in many bankruptcy proceedings, it is important that we protect the interests of the IRS . The IRS files over 150,000 proofs of claim per year to protect billions in taxes annually.

The goals of IRS Criminal Investigation’s Bankruptcy Fraud Program are to:

  • Increase voluntary compliance with federal tax laws through the prosecution of those committing significant crimes in the bankruptcy arena
  • Enhance IRS presence among bankruptcy professionals and practitioners for the dual purpose of increasing compliance and providing contact points to report allegations of fraud
  • Foster enhanced cooperation between the IRS Operating Divisions and Criminal Investigation in attaining mutual compliance goals

Tax fraud investigations are the main component of the IRS ' efforts to foster voluntary compliance with the tax laws. Fortunately, the vast majority of Americans voluntarily comply with their tax-filing obligations. However those who do not comply pose a  serious threat to tax administration and the American economy.

In the restaurant industry, the types of criminal tax violations most frequently committed include:

·         Deliberately underreporting or omitting income

·         Overstating the amount of deductions

·         Keeping two sets of books

·         Making false entries in books and records

·         Claiming personal expenses as business expenses

·         Claiming false deductions

·         Failing to pay over to the IRS employment taxes

·         Hiding or transferring assets or income

Restaurant Industry Statistical Information

IRS special agents have investigated and recommended to the Department of Justice for prosecution numerous individuals involved in the restaurant industry. These investigations vary from tax evasion to employment tax fraud to money laundering conspiracies. The significant jump in investigations initiated by the IRS regarding individuals (mostly owners) involved in the restaurant industry is an indication that the IRS is concerned about tax fraud in this area.

The IRS has been involved in organized crime investigations since 1919 when the division was formed. Criminal Investigation (CI) has been a contributor in most major Organized Crime investigations. When no other agency could bring charges against the notorious mobster Alphonse Capone, the IRS charged him with income tax evasion.

Organized crime refers to a self-perpetuating, structured and disciplined association of individuals who combine for the purpose of obtaining monetary gains or profits, either wholly or in part, through illegal means. These groups generally engage in such illegal enterprises as drug trafficking, gambling, loan sharking, extortion, theft, arson, weapons trafficking, labor racketeering, pornography, prostitution, and money laundering. They often use extortion, graft, corruption, violence or threat of violence to achieve their objectives.

Criminal Investigation’s expertise in conducting financial investigations coupled with jurisdiction over criminal tax offenses and related Title 18 and Title 31 statutes places CI in an ideal position to help combat organized criminal enterprises when more traditional law enforcement approaches fail. Criminal Investigation’s investigations are undertaken in the spirit of cooperation and coordination with the United States Attorney's office and other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies.

Federal law enforcement agencies continue to aggressively investigate the traditional organized crime groups such as the La Cosa Nostra (LCN) or "mafia." Criminal Investigation, working in concert with other law enforcement agencies, has devoted resources to emerging organized crime groups as well. These include such groups as Russian, Nigerian, Asian, Jamaican Posses and street gangs.

Russian organized crime groups have been linked to the LCN and the Colombian cartels in cases involving stock manipulation and narcotics. They have obtained interests in offshore banks to facilitate their money laundering activities. Nigerian groups have been involved in identity theft, insurance fraud, advanced fee frauds, and questionable refund schemes.

Criminal Investigation is involved in the Interagency Nigerian Organized Crime Task Forces in New York, Newark, Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas and Houston. Nigerian criminal activity has escalated globally over the past decade. Nigerian criminal enterprises are known to engage in a myriad of criminal activities that collectively pose a substantial threat to the United States. These criminal activities include narcotics trafficking, financial crimes, money laundering, document fraud, counterfeiting, and corruption. To better address this threat, members of the federal law enforcement community recognized that a more unified approach was necessary, and developed a coordinated and comprehensive plan of action to combat Nigerian criminal organizations.

International organized crime has recently begun to take on national importance and now constitutes a significant worldwide problem, one that requires a joint effort among all law enforcement agencies worldwide. Use of the Internet, international banking, e-commerce and wireless communications has facilitated the transfer of information among organized crime groups around the world. In 1995, the President of the United States issued a directive that called upon all federal law enforcement agencies to review and assess the threat of international organized crime groups and make a concerted effort to combat transnational crime. In response to the President's directive, multi-agency task forces have been established throughout the United States as well as internationally to target organized crime.

mployers are required by law to withhold employment taxes from their employees. Employment taxes include federal income tax withholding, social security taxes, and federal unemployment taxes.

The federal income tax is a "pay as you go tax." You must pay the tax as you earn or receive income during the year. For most employees this takes the form of income taxes withheld from their pay. Self-employed persons are also required to make estimated tax payments during the year. The pay as you go system was designed to ensure that taxpayers meet their obligations in a timely manner.

Criminal Investigation (CI) investigates those taxpayers that have a pattern of noncompliance in reporting and paying employment taxes. Social Security and Medicare taxes pay for benefits workers and their families receive under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). Social Security taxes pay for benefits under the old age, survivors, and disability insurance part of FICA. Medicare taxes pay for hospital benefits. Each employee contributes part of these taxes and the employer contributes a matching amount. Self-employed taxpayers must also pay Social Security and Medicare taxes in the form of self-employment taxes. The Federal Unemployment Tax is another tax that pays unemployment compensation to workers who lose their jobs. These programs, funded by employment taxes, provide essential benefits to many citizens.

Evading employment taxes can have serious consequences for both employers and employees. Employers may be subject to criminal and civil sanctions for willfully failing to pay employment taxes. Employees suffer because they may not qualify for Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment benefits.

Criminal Investigation investigates employment tax evasion schemes that take a variety of forms. Pyramiding of payroll taxes is the fraudulent practice by which companies withhold payroll taxes from employees but fail to remit payments to the IRS . Businesses involved in pyramiding frequently file for bankruptcy to avoid payment of these liabilities, then start a new business under a different name and continue the pyramiding under this new company. Employee leasing is the practice of contracting with outside businesses to handle administrative, personnel, and payroll concerns. Sometimes these companies fail to pay over the collected taxes to the IRS , and dissolve and/or file for bankruptcy protection. Criminal Investigation also investigates the filing of false payroll tax returns or failing to file payroll tax returns. In FY2001, unscrupulous individuals and promoters have been employing a variety of false and misleading arguments in an attempt to convince employers that they are not required to withhold income and employment taxes. The courts have repeatedly rejected these frivolous arguments.
 

Home ] Services ] FAQ ] Site Map ] Contact Us ]

Presented by Alvin Brown and Associates, tax attorney, formerly with the Office of the Chief Counsel of the IRS. 
Call us for all IRS tax issues, problems and emergencies
Protect yourself from IRS intimidation, errors, and penalties.
www.irstaxattorney.com - ab@irstaxattorney.com - (888) 712-7690 - (703) 425-1400