59 006
105 th Congress
Rept. 105 364
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
1st Session
Part 1
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE RESTRUCTURING AND REFORM ACT OF 1997
October 31, 1997.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on
the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Mr. Archer, from the Committee on Ways and Means, submitted the
following
R E P O R T
[To accompany H.R. 2676]
[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]
together with
ADDITIONAL AND DISSENTING VIEWS
The Committee on Ways and Means, to whom was referred the bill (H.R.
2676) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restructure and
reform the Internal Revenue Service, and for other purposes, having
considered the same, report favorably thereon with an amendment and
recommend that the bill as amended do pass.
CONTENTS
I. Summary and Background 30
A. Purpose and Summary
30
B. Background and Need for Legislation
32
C. Legislative History
32
II.
Explanation of the Bill
33
Title I. Executive Branch Government
33
A. Creation of IRS Oversight Board (sec. 101)
33
B. Appointment and Duties of IRS Commissioner (secs. 102 and 103)
38
C. Structure and Funding of the Employee Plans and Exempt
Organizations Division (sec. 102)
40
D. Taxpayer Advocate (sec. 102)
42
E. Prohibition on Executive Branch Influence Over Taxpayer Audits
(sec. 104)
44
F. IRS Personnel Flexibilities (sec. 111)
45
Title II. Electronic Filing
50
A. Electronic Filing of Tax and Information Returns (sec. 201)
50
B. Time for Filing Certain Information Returns With the IRS (sec. 202)
51
C. Paperless Electronic Filing (sec. 203)
52
D. Return-Free Tax System (sec. 204)
53
E. Access to Account Information (sec. 205)
54
Title III. Taxpayer Bill of Rights 3
54
A. Burden of Proof (sec. 301)
54
B. Proceedings by Taxpayers
57
1. Expansion of authority to award costs and certain fees (sec. 311)
57
2. Civil damages for negligence in collection actions (sec. 312)
59
3. Increase in size of cases permitted on small case calendar (sec. 313)
60
C. Relief for Innocent Spouses and Persons With Disabilities
60
1. Innocent spouse relief (sec. 321)
60
2. Suspension of statute of limitations on filing claims during
periods of disability (sec. 322)
62
D. Provisions Relating to Interest
63
1. Elimination of interest differential on overlapping periods of
interest on income tax overpayments and underpayments (sec. 331)
63
2. Increase in overpayment rate payable to taxpayers other than
corporations (sec. 332)
65
E. Protections for Taxpayers Subject to Audit or Collection
65
1. Privilege of confidentiality extended to taxpayer's dealings
with non-attorneys authorized to practice before the IRS (sec. 341)
65
2. Expansion of authority to issue taxpayer assistance orders (sec.
342)
67
3. Limitation on financial status audits (sec. 343)
67
4. Limitation on authority to require production of computer source
code (sec. 344)
68
5. Procedures relating to extensions of statute of limitations by
agreement (sec. 345)
69
6. Offers-in-compromise (sec. 346)
70
7. Notice of deficiency to specify deadlines for filing Tax Court
petition (sec. 347)
71
8. Refund or credit of overpayments before final determination
(sec. 348)
72
9. Threat of audit prohibited to coerce tip report alternative
committment agreements (sec. 349)
73
F. Disclosures to Taxpayers
73
1. Explanation of joint and several liability (sec. 351)
73
2. Explanation of taxpayers' rights in interviews with the IRS
(sec. 352)
74
3. Disclosure of criteria for examination selection (sec. 353)
74
4. Explanation of appeals and collection process (sec. 354)
75
G. Low-Income Taxpayer Clinics (sec. 361)
75
H. Other Taxpayer Rights Provisions
76
1. Actions for refund with respect to certain estates which have
elected the installment method of payment (sec. 371)
76
2. Cataloging complaints (sec. 372)
77
3. Archive of records of the IRS (sec. 373)
78
4. Payment of taxes (sec. 374)
80
5. Clarification of authority of Secretary relating to the making
of elections (sec. 375)
81
6. Limitation on penalty on individual's failure to pay for months
during period of installment agreement (sec. 376)
81
I. Studies
82
1. Study of penalty administration (sec. 381)
82
2. Study of confidentiality of tax return information (sec. 382)
82
Title IV. Congressional Accountability for the IRS
83
A. Review of Requests for GAO Investigations of the IRS (sec. 401)
83
B. Joint Congressional Hearings and Coordinated Oversight Reports
(secs. 401 and 402)
84
C. Budget Matters
85
1. Funding for century date change (sec. 411)
85
2. Financial management advisory group (sec. 412)
85
D. Tax Law Complexity Analysis (sec. 422)
86
Title V. Revenue Offset: Employer Deduction for Vacation Pay (sec. 501)
87
III.
Votes of the Committee
91
IV.
Budget Effects of the Bill
92
A. Committee Estimates of Budgetary Effects
92
B. Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures
96
C. Cost Estimate Prepared by the Congressional Budget Office
96
V.
Other Matters to Be Discussed Under the Rules of the House
102
A. Committee Oversight Findings and Recommendations
102
B. Summary of Findings and Recommendations of the Committee on
Government Reform and Oversight
102
C. Constitutional Authority Statement
103
D. Information Relating to Unfunded Mandates
103
E. Applicability of House Rule XXI5(c)
103
VI.
Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported
103
VII.
Correspondence From Other Committees
148
A. Correspondence from Committee on Government Reform and Oversight
148
B. Correspondence from Committee on Rules
149
VIII.
Additional Views
150
IX.
Dissenting Views
161
The amendment is as follows:
Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert in lieu thereof the
following:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; AMENDMENT OF 1986 CODE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Internal Revenue
Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1997''.
(b) Amendment of 1986 Code.--Except as otherwise expressly provided,
whenever in this Act an amendment or repeal is expressed in terms of an
amendment to, or repeal of, a section or other provision, the reference
shall be considered to be made to a section or other provision of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(c) Table of Contents.--
Sec. 1. Short title; amendment of 1986 Code; table of contents.
TITLE I--EXECUTIVE BRANCH GOVERNANCE AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT OF THE
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
SUBTITLE A--EXECUTIVE BRANCH GOVERNANCE AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
Sec. 101. Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board.
Sec. 102. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; other officials.
Sec. 103. Other personnel.
Sec. 104. Prohibition on executive branch influence over taxpayer
audits and other investigations.
SUBTITLE B--PERSONNEL FLEXIBILITIES
Sec. 111. Personnel flexibilities.
TITLE II--ELECTRONIC FILING
Sec. 201. Electronic filing of tax and information returns.
Sec. 202. Due date for certain information returns filed electronically.
Sec. 203. Paperless electronic filing.
Sec. 204. Return-free tax system.
Sec. 205. Access to account information.
TITLE III--TAXPAYER PROTECTION AND RIGHTS
Sec. 300. Short title.
SUBTITLE A--BURDEN OF PROOF
Sec. 301. Burden of proof.
SUBTITLE B--PROCEEDINGS BY TAXPAYERS
Sec. 311. Expansion of authority to award costs and certain fees.
Sec. 312. Civil damages for negligence in collection actions.
Sec. 313. Increase in size of cases permitted on small case calendar.
SUBTITLE C--RELIEF FOR INNOCENT SPOUSES AND FOR TAXPAYERS UNABLE TO
MANAGE THEIR FINANCIAL AFFAIRS DUE TO DISABILITIES
Sec. 321. Spouse relieved in whole or in part of liability in
certain cases.
Sec. 322. Suspension of statute of limitations on filing refund
claims during periods of disability.
SUBTITLE D--PROVISIONS RELATING TO INTEREST
Sec. 331. Elimination of interest rate differential on overlapping
periods of interest on income tax overpayments and underpayments.
Sec. 332. Increase in overpayment rate payable to taxpayers other
than corporations.
SUBTITLE E--PROTECTIONS FOR TAXPAYERS SUBJECT TO AUDIT OR COLLECTION
ACTIVITIES
Sec. 341. Privilege of confidentiality extended to taxpayer's
dealings with non-attorneys authorized to practice before Internal
Revenue Service.
Sec. 342. Expansion of authority to issue taxpayer assistance orders.
Sec. 343. Limitation on financial status audit techniques.
Sec. 344. Limitation on authority to require production of
computer source code.
Sec. 345. Procedures relating to extensions of statute of
limitations by agreement.
Sec. 346. Offers-in-compromise.
Sec. 347. Notice of deficiency to specify deadlines for filing Tax
Court petition.
Sec. 348. Refund or credit of overpayments before final determination.
Sec. 349. Threat of audit prohibited to coerce Tip Reporting
Alternative Commitment Agreements.
SUBTITLE F--DISCLOSURES TO TAXPAYERS
Sec. 351. Explanation of joint and several liability.
Sec. 352. Explanation of taxpayers' rights in interviews with the
Internal Revenue Service.
Sec. 353. Disclosure of criteria for examination selection.
Sec. 354. Explanations of appeals and collection process.
SUBTITLE G--LOW INCOME TAXPAYER CLINICS
Sec. 361. Low income taxpayer clinics.
SUBTITLE H--OTHER MATTERS
Sec. 371. Actions for refund with respect to certain estates which
have elected the installment method of payment.
Sec. 372. Cataloging complaints.
Sec. 373. Archive of records of Internal Revenue Service.
Sec. 374. Payment of taxes.
Sec. 375. Clarification of authority of Secretary relating to the
making of elections.
Sec. 376. Limitation on penalty on individual's failure to pay for
months during period of installment agreement.
SUBTITLE I--STUDIES
Sec. 381. Penalty administration.
Sec. 382. Confidentiality of tax return information.
TITLE IV--CONGRESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
SUBTITLE A--OVERSIGHT
Sec. 401. Expansion of duties of the Joint Committee on Taxation.
Sec. 402. Coordinated oversight reports.
SUBTITLE B--BUDGET
Sec. 411. Funding for century date change.
Sec. 412. Financial Management Advisory Group.
SUBTITLE C--TAX LAW COMPLEXITY
Sec. 421. Role of the Internal Revenue Service.
Sec. 422. Tax complexity analysis.
TITLE V--CLARIFICATION OF DEDUCTION FOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION
Sec. 501. Clarification of deduction for deferred compensation.
TITLE I--EXECUTIVE BRANCH GOVERNANCE AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT OF
THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Subtitle A--Executive Branch Governance and Senior Management
SEC. 101. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OVERSIGHT BOARD.
(a) In General.--Section 7802 (relating to the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue) is amended to read as follows:
``SEC. 7802. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OVERSIGHT BOARD.
``(a) Establishment.--There is established within the Department of
the Treasury the Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board (hereafter in
this subchapter referred to as the `Oversight Board').
``(b) Membership.--
``(1) Composition.--The Oversight Board shall be composed of 11
members, as follows:
``(A) 8 members shall be individuals who are not Federal officers or
employees and who are appointed by the President, by and with the advice
and consent of the Senate.
``(B) 1 member shall be the Secretary of the Treasury or, if the
Secretary so designates, the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury.
``(C) 1 member shall be the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
``(D) 1 member shall be an individual who is a representative of an
organization that represents a substantial number of Internal Revenue
Service employees and who is appointed by the President, by and with the
advice and consent of the Senate.
``(2) Qualifications and terms.--
``(A) Qualifications.--Members of the Oversight Board described in
paragraph (1) (A) shall be appointed solely on the basis of their
professional experience and expertise in 1 or more of the following
areas:
``(i) Management of large service organizations.
``(ii) Customer service.
``(iii) Federal tax laws, including tax administration and compliance.
``(iv) Information technology.
``(v) Organization development.
``(vi) The needs and concerns of taxpayers.
In the aggregate, the members of the Oversight Board described in
paragraph (1) (A) should collectively bring to bear expertise in all of
the areas described in the preceding sentence.
``(B) Terms.--Each member who is described in paragraph (1) (A) or
(D) shall be appointed for a term of 5 years, except that of the members
first appointed under paragraph (1) (A)--
``(i) 1 member shall be appointed for a term of 1 year,
``(ii) 1 member shall be appointed for a term of 2 years,
``(iii) 2 members shall be appointed for a term of 3 years, and
``(iv) 2 members shall be appointed for a term of 4 years.
Such terms shall begin on the date of appointment.
``(C) Reappointment.--An individual who is described in paragraph
(1) (A) may be appointed to no more than two 5-year terms on the
Oversight Board.
``(D) Vacancy.--Any vacancy on the Oversight Board shall be filled
in the same manner as the original appointment. Any member appointed to
fill a vacancy occurring before the expiration of the term for which the
member's predecessor was appointed shall be appointed for the remainder
of that term.
``(E) Special government employees.--During the entire period that
an individual appointed under paragraph (1) (A) is a member of the
Oversight Board, such individual shall be treated as--
``(i) serving as a special government employee (as defined in
section 202 of title 18, United States Code) and as described in section
207(c)(2) of such title 18, and
``(ii) serving as an officer or employee referred to in section
101(f) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 for purposes of title I
of such Act.
``(3) Quorum.--6 members of the Oversight Board shall constitute a
quorum. A majority of members present and voting shall be required for
the Oversight Board to take action.
``(4) Removal.--
``(A) In general.--Any member of the Oversight Board may be removed
at the will of the President.
``(B) Secretary and commissioner.--An individual described in
subparagraph (B) or (C) of paragraph (1) shall be removed upon
termination of employment.
``(C) Representative of internal revenue service employees.--The
member described in paragraph (1)(D) shall be removed upon termination
of employment, membership, or other affiliation with the organization
described in such paragraph.
``(5) Claims.--
``(A) In general.--Members of the Oversight Board who are described
in paragraph (1) (A) or (D) shall have no personal liability under
Federal law with respect to any claim arising out of or resulting from
an act or omission by such member within the scope of service as a
member. The preceding sentence shall not be construed to limit personal
liability for criminal acts or omissions, willful or malicious conduct,
acts or omissions for private gain, or any other act or omission outside
the scope of the service of such member on the Oversight Board.
``(B) Effect on other law.--This paragraph shall not be construed--
``(i) to affect any other immunities and protections that may be
available to such member under applicable law with respect to such
transactions,
``(ii) to affect any other right or remedy against the United States
under applicable law, or
``(iii) to limit or alter in any way the immunities that are
available under applicable law for Federal officers and employees.
``(c) General Responsibilities.--
``(1) In general.--The Oversight Board shall oversee the Internal
Revenue Service in its administration, management, conduct, direction,
and supervision of the execution and application of the internal revenue
laws or related statutes and tax conventions to which the United States
is a party.
``(2) Exceptions.--The Oversight Board shall have no
responsibilities or authority with respect to--
``(A) the development and formulation of Federal tax policy relating
to existing or proposed internal revenue laws, related statutes, and tax
conventions,
``(B) law enforcement activities of the Internal Revenue Service,
including compliance activities such as criminal investigations,
examinations, and collection activities, or
``(C) specific procurement activities of the Internal Revenue Service.
``(3) Restriction on disclosure of return information to oversight
board members.--No return, return information, or taxpayer return
information (as defined in section 6103(b)) may be disclosed to any
member of the Oversight Board described in subsection (b)(1) (A) or (D).
Any request for information not permitted to be disclosed under the
preceding sentence, and any contact relating to a specific taxpayer,
made by a member of the Oversight Board so described to an officer or
employee of the Internal Revenue Service shall be reported by such
officer or employee to the Secretary and the Joint Committee on
Taxation.
``(d) Specific Responsibilities.--The Oversight Board shall have the
following specific responsibilities:
``(1) Strategic plans.--To review and approve strategic plans of the
Internal Revenue Service, including the establishment of--
``(A) mission and objectives, and standards of performance relative
to either, and
``(B) annual and long-range strategic plans.
``(2) Operational plans.--To review the operational functions of the
Internal Revenue Service, including--
``(A) plans for modernization of the tax system,
``(B) plans for outsourcing or managed competition, and
``(C) plans for training and education.
``(3) Management.--To--
``(A) recommend to the President candidates for appointment as the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue and recommend to the President the
removal of the Commissioner,
``(B) review the Commissioner's selection, evaluation, and
compensation of senior managers, and
``(C) review and approve the Commissioner's plans for any major
reorganization of the Internal Revenue Service.
``(4) Budget.--To--
``(A) review and approve the budget request of the Internal Revenue
Service prepared by the Commissioner,
``(B) submit such budget request to the Secretary of the Treasury, and
``(C) ensure that the budget request supports the annual and
long-range strategic plans.
The Secretary shall submit the budget request referred to in paragraph
(4)(B) for any fiscal year to the President who shall submit such
request, without revision, to Congress together with the President's
annual budget request for the Internal Revenue Service for such fiscal
year.
``(e) Board Personnel Matters.--
``(1) Compensation of members.--
``(A) In general.--Each member of the Oversight Board who is
described in subsection (b)(1)(A) shall be compensated at a rate of
$30,000 per year. All other members of the Oversight Board shall serve
without compensation for such service.
``(B) Chairperson.--In lieu of the amount specified in subparagraph
(A), the Chairperson of the Oversight Board shall be compensated at a
rate of $50,000.
``(2) Travel expenses.--The members of the Oversight Board shall be
allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at
rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter
57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their homes or
regular places of business for purposes of attending meetings of the
Oversight Board.
``(3) Staff.--At the request of the Chairperson of the Oversight
Board, the Commissioner shall detail to the Oversight Board such
personnel as may be necessary to enable the Oversight Board to perform
its duties. Such detail shall be without interruption or loss of civil
service status or privilege.
``(4) Procurement of temporary and intermittent services.--The
Chairperson of the Oversight Board may procure temporary and
intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5, United States
Code.
``(f) Administrative Matters.--
``(1) Chair.--The members of the Oversight Board shall elect for a
2-year term a chairperson from among the members appointed under
subsection (b)(1)(A).
``(2) Committees.--The Oversight Board may establish such committees
as the Oversight Board determines appropriate.
``(3) Meetings.--The Oversight Board shall meet at least once each
month and at such other times as the Oversight Board determines
appropriate.
``(4) Reports.--The Oversight Board shall each year report to the
President and the Congress with respect to the conduct of its
responsibilities under this title.''.
(b) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) Section 4946(c) (relating to definitions and special rules for
chapter 42) is amended--
(A) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (5),
(B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (6) and inserting
``, or'', and
(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(7) a member of the Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board.''.
(2) The table of sections for subchapter A of chapter 80 is amended
by striking the item relating to section 7802 and inserting the
following new item:
``Sec. 7802. Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board.''
(c) Effective Date.--
(1) In general.--The amendments made by this section shall take
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) Nominations to internal revenue service oversight board.--The
President shall submit nominations under section 7802 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as added by this section, to the Senate not later
than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 102. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; OTHER OFFICIALS.
(a) In General.--Section 7803 (relating to other personnel) is
amended to read as follows:
``SEC. 7803. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; OTHER OFFICIALS.
``(a) Commissioner of Internal Revenue.--
``(1) Appointment.--
``(A) In general.--There shall be in the Department of the Treasury
a Commissioner of Internal Revenue who shall be appointed by the
President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to a 5-year
term. The appointment shall be made without regard to political
affiliation or activity.
``(B) Vacancy.--Any individual appointed to fill a vacancy in the
position of Commissioner occurring before the expiration of the term for
which such individual's predecessor was appointed shall be appointed
only for the remainder of that term.
``(C) Removal.--The Commissioner may be removed at the will of the
President.
``(2) Duties.--The Commissioner shall have such duties and powers as
the Secretary may prescribe, including the power to--
``(A) administer, manage, conduct, direct, and supervise the
execution and application of the internal revenue laws or related
statutes and tax conventions to which the United States is a party; and
``(B) recommend to the President a candidate for appointment as
Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service when a vacancy occurs,
and recommend to the President the removal of such Chief Counsel.
If the Secretary determines not to delegate a power specified in
subparagraph (A) or (B), such determination may not take effect until 30
days after the Secretary notifies the Committees on Ways and Means,
Government Reform and Oversight, and Appropriations of the House of
Representatives, the Committees on Finance, Government Operations, and
Appropriations of the Senate, and the Joint Committee on Taxation.
``(3) Consultation with board.--The Commissioner shall consult with
the Oversight Board on all matters set forth in paragraphs (2) and (3)
(other than paragraph (3)(A)) of section 7802(d).
``(b) Assistant Commissioner for Employee Plans and Exempt
Organizations.--There is established within the Internal Revenue Service
an office to be known as the `Office of Employee Plans and Exempt
Organizations' to be under the supervision and direction of an Assistant
Commissioner of Internal Revenue. As head of the Office, the Assistant
Commissioner shall be responsible for carrying out such functions as the
Secretary may prescribe with respect to organizations exempt from tax
under section 501(a) and with respect to plans to which part I of
subchapter D of chapter 1 applies (and with respect to organizations
designed to be exempt under such section and plans designed to be plans
to which such part applies) and other nonqualified deferred compensation
arrangements. The Assistant Commissioner shall report annually to the
Commissioner with respect to the Assistant Commissioner's
responsibilities under this section.
``(c) Office of Taxpayer Advocate.--
``(1) In general.--
``(A) Establishment.--There is established in the Internal Revenue
Service an office to be known as the `Office of the Taxpayer Advocate'.
Such office shall be under the supervision and direction of an official
to be known as the `Taxpayer Advocate' who shall be appointed with the
approval of the Oversight Board by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue
and shall report directly to the Commissioner. The Taxpayer Advocate
shall be entitled to compensation at the same rate as the highest level
official reporting directly to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
``(B) Restriction on subsequent employment.--An individual who is an
officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service may be appointed as
Taxpayer Advocate only if such individual agrees not to accept any
employment with the Internal Revenue Service for at least 5 years after
ceasing to be the Taxpayer Advocate.
``(2) Functions of office.--
``(A) In general.--It shall be the function of the Office of
Taxpayer Advocate to--
``(i) assist taxpayers in resolving problems with the Internal
Revenue Service,
``(ii) identify areas in which taxpayers have problems in dealings
with the Internal Revenue Service,
``(iii) to the extent possible, propose changes in the
administrative practices of the Internal Revenue Service to mitigate
problems identified under clause (ii), and
``(iv) identify potential legislative changes which may be
appropriate to mitigate such problems.
``(B) Annual reports.--
``(i) Objectives.--Not later than June 30 of each calendar year, the
Taxpayer Advocate shall report to the Committee on Ways and Means of the
House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate on
the objectives of the Taxpayer Advocate for the fiscal year beginning in
such calendar year. Any such report shall contain full and substantive
analysis, in addition to statistical information.
``(ii) Activities.--Not later than December 31 of each calendar
year, the Taxpayer Advocate shall report to the Committee on Ways and
Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of
the Senate on the activities of the Taxpayer Advocate during the fiscal
year ending during such calendar year. Any such report shall contain
full and substantive analysis, in addition to statistical information,
and shall--
``(I) identify the initiatives the Taxpayer Advocate has taken on
improving taxpayer services and Internal Revenue Service responsiveness,
``(II) contain recommendations received from individuals with the
authority to issue Taxpayer Assistance Orders under section 7811,
``(III) contain a summary of at least 20 of the most serious
problems encountered by taxpayers, including a description of the nature
of such problems,
``(IV) contain an inventory of the items described in subclauses
(I), (II), and (III) for which action has been taken and the result of
such action,
``(V) contain an inventory of the items described in subclauses
(I), (II), and (III) for which action remains to be completed and the
period during which each item has remained on such inventory,
``(VI) contain an inventory of the items described in subclauses
(I), (II), and (III) for which no action has been taken, the period
during which each item has remained on such inventory, the reasons for
the inaction, and identify any Internal Revenue Service official who is
responsible for such inaction,
``(VII) identify any Taxpayer Assistance Order which was not
honored by the Internal Revenue Service in a timely manner, as specified
under section 7811(b),
``(VIII) contain recommendations for such administrative and
legislative action as may be appropriate to resolve problems encountered
by taxpayers,
``(IX) identify areas of the tax law that impose significant
compliance burdens on taxpayers or the Internal Revenue Service,
including specific recommendations for remedying these problems,
``(X) in conjunction with the National Director of Appeals,
identify the 10 most litigated issues for each category of taxpayers,
including recommendations for mitigating such disputes, and
``(XI) include such other information as the Taxpayer Advocate may
deem advisable.
``(iii) Report to be submitted directly.--Each report required under
this subparagraph shall be provided directly to the committees described
in clauses (i) and (ii) without any prior review or comment from the
Oversight Board, the Secretary of the Treasury, any other officer or
employee of the Department of the Treasury, or the Office of Management
and Budget.
``(C) Other responsibilities.--The Taxpayer Advocate shall--
``(i) monitor the coverage and geographic allocation of problem
resolution officers, and
``(ii) develop guidance to be distributed to all Internal Revenue
Service officers and employees outlining the criteria for referral of
taxpayer inquiries to problem resolution officers.
``(3) Responsibilities of commissioner.--The Commissioner shall
establish procedures requiring a formal response to all recommendations
submitted to the Commissioner by the Taxpayer Advocate within 3 months
after submission to the Commissioner.''.
(b) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) The table of sections for subchapter A of chapter 80 is amended
by striking the item relating to section 7803 and inserting the
following new item:
``Sec. 7803. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; other officials.''
(2) Subsection (b) of section 5109 of title 5, United States Code,
is amended by striking ``7802(b)'' and inserting ``7803(b)''.
(c) Effective Date.--
(1) In general.--The amendments made by this section shall take
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) Current officers.--
(A) In the case of an individual serving as Commissioner of Internal
Revenue on the date of the enactment of this Act who was appointed to
such position before such date, the 5-year term required by section
7803(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by this
section, shall begin as of the date of such appointment.
(B) Section 7803(c)(1)(B) of such Code, as added by this section,
shall not apply to the individual serving as Taxpayer Advocate on the
date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 103. OTHER PERSONNEL.
(a) In General.--Section 7804 (relating to the effect of
reorganization plans) is amended to read as follows:
``SEC. 7804. OTHER PERSONNEL.
``(a) Appointment and Supervision.--Unless otherwise prescribed by
the Secretary, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is authorized to
employ such number of persons as the Commissioner deems proper for the
administration and enforcement of the internal revenue laws, and the
Commissioner shall issue all necessary directions, instructions, orders,
and rules applicable to such persons.
``(b) Posts of Duty of Employees in Field Service or
Traveling.--Unless otherwise prescribed by the Secretary--
``(1) Designation of post of duty.--The Commissioner shall determine
and designate the posts of duty of all such persons engaged in field
work or traveling on official business outside of the District of
Columbia.
``(2) Detail of personnel from field service.--The Commissioner may
order any such person engaged in field work to duty in the District of
Columbia, for such periods as the Commissioner may prescribe, and to any
designated post of duty outside the District of Columbia upon the
completion of such duty.
``(c) Delinquent Internal Revenue Officers and Employees.--If any
officer or employee of the Treasury Department acting in connection with
the internal revenue laws fails to account for and pay over any amount
of money or property collected or received by him in connection with the
internal revenue laws, the Secretary shall issue notice and demand to
such officer or employee for payment of the amount which he failed to
account for and pay over, and, upon failure to pay the amount demanded
within the time specified in such notice, the amount so demanded shall
be deemed imposed upon such officer or employee and assessed upon the
date of such notice and demand, and the provisions of chapter 64 and all
other provisions of law relating to the collection of assessed taxes
shall be applicable in respect of such amount.''.
(b) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) Subsection (b) of section 6344 is amended by striking ``section
7803(d)'' and inserting ``section 7804(c)''.
(2) The table of sections for subchapter A of chapter 80 is amended
by striking the item relating to section 7804 and inserting the
following new item:
``Sec. 7804. Other personnel.''
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 104. PROHIBITION ON EXECUTIVE BRANCH INFLUENCE OVER
TAXPAYER AUDITS AND OTHER INVESTIGATIONS.
(a) In General.--Part I of subchapter A of chapter 75 (relating to
crimes, other offenses, and forfeitures) is amended by adding after
section 7216 the following new section:
``SEC. 7217. PROHIBITION ON EXECUTIVE BRANCH INFLUENCE OVER
TAXPAYER AUDITS AND OTHER INVESTIGATIONS.
``(a) Prohibition.--It shall be unlawful for any applicable person to
request any officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service to
conduct or terminate an audit or other investigation of any particular
taxpayer with respect to the tax liability of such taxpayer.
``(b) Reporting Requirement.--Any officer or employee of the Internal
Revenue Service receiving any request prohibited by subsection (a) shall
report the receipt of such request to the Chief Inspector of the
Internal Revenue Service.
``(c) Exceptions.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to--
``(1) any request made to an applicable person by the taxpayer or a
representative of the taxpayer and forwarded by such applicable person
to the Internal Revenue Service,
``(2) any request by an applicable person for disclosure of return
or return information under section 6103 if such request is made in
accordance with the requirements of such section, or
``(3) any request by the Secretary of the Treasury as a consequence
of the implementation of a change in tax policy.
``(d) Penalty.--Any person who willfully violates subsection (a) or
fails to report under subsection (b) shall be punished upon conviction
by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not
more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.
``(e) Applicable Person.--For purposes of this section, the term
`applicable person' means--
``(1) the President, the Vice President, any employee of the
executive office of the President, and any employee of the executive
office of the Vice President, and
``(2) any individual (other than the Attorney General of the United
States) serving in a position specified in section 5312 of title 5,
United States Code.''
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part I of
subchapter A of chapter 75 is amended by adding after the item relating
to section 7216 the following new item:
``Sec. 7217. Prohibition on executive branch influence over
taxpayer audits and other investigations.''
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply
to requests made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Subtitle B--Personnel Flexibilities
SEC. 111. PERSONNEL FLEXIBILITIES.
(a) In General.--Part III of title 5, United States Code, is amended
by adding at the end the following new subpart:
``Subpart I--Miscellaneous
``CHAPTER 93--PERSONNEL FLEXIBILITIES RELATING TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE
``Sec.
``9301. General requirements.
``9302. Flexibilities relating to performance management.
``9303. Staffing flexibilities.
``9304. Flexibilities relating to demonstration projects.
``9301. General requirements
``(a) Conformance With Merit System Principles, Etc.--Any
flexibilities under this chapter shall be exercised in a manner
consistent with--
``(1) chapter 23, relating to merit system principles and prohibited
personnel practices; and
``(2) provisions of this title (outside of this subpart) relating to
preference eligibles.
``(b) Requirement Relating to Units Represented by Labor
Organizations.--
``(1) Written agreement required.--Employees within a unit with
respect to which a labor organization is accorded exclusive recognition
under chapter 71 shall not be subject to the exercise of any flexibility
under section 9302, 9303, or 9304, unless there is a written agreement
between the Internal Revenue Service and the organization permitting
such exercise.
``(2) Definition of a written agreement.--In order to satisfy
paragraph (1), a written agreement--
``(A) need not be a collective bargaining agreement within the
meaning of section 7103(8); and
``(B) may not be an agreement imposed by the Federal Service
Impasses Panel under section 7119.
``9302. Flexibilities relating to performance management
``(a) In General.--The Commissioner of Internal Revenue shall, within
a year after the date of the enactment of this chapter, establish a
performance management system which--
``(1) subject to section 9301(b), shall cover all employees of the
Internal Revenue Service other than--
``(A) the members of the Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board;
``(B) the Commissioner of Internal Revenue; and
``(C) the Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service;
``(2) shall maintain individual accountability by--
``(A) establishing standards of performance which--
``(i) shall permit the accurate evaluation of each employee's
performance on the basis of the individual and organizational
performance requirements applicable with respect to the evaluation
period involved, taking into account individual contributions toward the
attainment of any goals or objectives under paragraph (3);
``(ii) shall be communicated to an employee before the start of any
period with respect to which the performance of such employee is to be
evaluated using such standards; and
``(iii) shall include at least 2 standards of performance, the
lowest of which shall denote the retention standard and shall be
equivalent to fully successful performance;
``(B) providing for periodic performance evaluations to determine
whether employees are meeting all applicable retention standards; and
``(C) using the results of such employee's performance evaluation as
a basis for adjustments in pay and other appropriate personnel actions;
and
``(3) shall provide for (A) establishing goals or objectives for
individual, group, or organizational performance (or any combination
thereof), consistent with Internal Revenue Service performance planning
procedures, including those established under the Government Performance
and Results Act of 1993, the Information Technology Management Reform
Act of 1996, Revenue Procedure 64 22 (as in effect on July 30, 1997),
and taxpayer service surveys, (B) communicating such goals or objectives
to employees, and (C) using such goals or objectives to make performance
distinctions among employees or groups of employees.
For purposes of this title, performance of an employee during any
period in which such employee is subject to standards of performance
under paragraph (2) shall be considered to be `unacceptable' if the
performance of such employee during such period fails to meet any
retention standard.
``(b) Awards.--
``(1) For superior accomplishments.--In the case of a proposed award
based on the efforts of an employee or former employee of the Internal
Revenue Service, any approval required under the provisions of section
4502(b) shall be considered to have been granted if the Office of
Personnel Management does not disapprove the proposed award within 60
days after receiving the appropriate certification described in such
provisions.
``(2) For employees who report directly to the commissioner.--
``(A) In general.--In the case of an employee of the Internal
Revenue Service who reports directly to the Commissioner of Internal
Revenue, a cash award in an amount up to 50 percent of such employee's
annual rate of basic pay may be made if the Commissioner finds such an
award to be warranted based on such employee's performance.
``(B) Nature of an award.--A cash award under this paragraph shall
not be considered to be part of basic pay.
``(C) Tax enforcement results.--A cash award under this paragraph
may not be based solely on tax enforcement results.
``(D) Eligible employees.--Whether or not an employee is an employee
who reports directly to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue shall, for
purposes of this paragraph, be determined under regulations which the
Commissioner shall prescribe, except that in no event shall more than 8
employees be eligible for a cash award under this paragraph in any
calendar year.
``(E) Limitation on compensation.--For purposes of applying section
5307 to an employee in connection with any calendar year to which an
award made under this paragraph to such employee is attributable,
subsection (a)(1) of such section shall be applied by substituting `to
equal or exceed the annual rate of compensation for the Vice President
for such calendar year' for `to exceed the annual rate of basic pay
payable for level I of the Executive Schedule, as of the end of such
calendar year'.
``(F) Approval required.--An award under this paragraph may not be
made unless--
``(i) the Commissioner of Internal Revenue certifies to the Office
of Personnel Management that such award is warranted; and
``(ii) the Office approves, or does not disapprove, the proposed
award within 60 days after the date on which it is so certified.
``(3) Based on savings.--
``(A) In general.--The Commissioner of Internal Revenue may
authorize the payment of cash awards to employees based on documented
financial savings achieved by a group or organization which such
employees comprise, if such payments are made pursuant to a plan which--
``(i) specifies minimum levels of service and quality to be
maintained while achieving such financial savings; and
``(ii) is in conformance with criteria prescribed by the Office of
Personnel Management.
``(B) Funding.--A cash award under this paragraph may be paid from
the fund or appropriation available to the activity primarily benefiting
or the various activities benefiting.
``(C) Tax enforcement results.--A cash award under this paragraph
may not be based solely on tax enforcement results.
``(c) Other Provisions.--
``(1) Notice provisions.--In applying sections 4303(b)(1)(A) and
7513(b)(1) to employees of the Internal Revenue Service, `15 days' shall
be substituted for `30 days'.
``(2) Appeals.--Notwithstanding the second sentence of section
5335(c), an employee of the Internal Revenue Service shall not have a
right to appeal the denial of a periodic step increase under section
5335 to the Merit Systems Protection Board.
``9303. Staffing flexibilities
``(a) Eligibility to Compete for A Permanent Appointment in the
Competitive Service.--
``(1) Eligibility of qualified veterans.--
``(A) In general.--No veteran described in subparagraph (B) shall be
denied the opportunity to compete for an announced vacant competitive
service position within the Internal Revenue Service by reason of--
``(i) not having acquired competitive status; or
``(ii) not being an employee of that agency.
``(B) Description.--An individual shall, for purposes of a position
for which such individual is applying, be considered a veteran described
in this subparagraph if such individual--
``(i) is either a preference eligible, or an individual (other than
a preference eligible) who has been separated from the armed forces
under honorable conditions after at least 3 years of active service; and
``(ii) meets the minimum qualification requirements for the position
sought.
``(2) Eligibility of certain temporary employees.--
``(A) In general.--No temporary employee described in subparagraph
(B) shall be denied the opportunity to compete for an announced vacant
competitive service position within the Internal Revenue Service by
reason of not having acquired competitive status.
``(B) Description.--An individual shall, for purposes of a position
for which such individual is applying, be considered a temporary
employee described in this subparagraph if--
``(i) such individual is then currently serving as a temporary
employee in the Internal Revenue Service;
``(ii) such individual has completed at least 2 years of current
continuous service in the competitive service under 1 or more term
appointments, each of which was made under competitive procedures
prescribed for permanent appointments;
``(iii) such individual's performance under each term appointment
referred to in clause (ii) met all applicable retention standards; and
``(iv) such individual meets the minimum qualification requirements
for the position sought.
``(b) Rating Systems.--
``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding subchapter I of chapter 33, the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue may establish category rating systems
for evaluating job applicants for positions in the competitive service,
under which qualified candidates are divided into 2 or more quality
categories on the basis of relative degrees of merit, rather than
assigned individual numerical ratings. Each applicant who meets the
minimum qualification requirements for the position to be filled shall
be assigned to an appropriate category based on an evaluation of the
applicant's knowledge, skills, and abilities relative to those needed
for successful performance in the job to be filled.
``(2) Treatment of preference eligibles.--Within each quality
category established under paragraph (1), preference eligibles shall be
listed ahead of individuals who are not preference eligibles. For other
than scientific and professional positions at or higher than GS 9 (or
equivalent), preference eligibles who have a compensable
service-connected disability of 10 percent or more, and who meet the
minimum qualification standards, shall be listed in the highest quality
category.
``(3) Selection process.--An appointing authority may select any
applicant from the highest quality category or, if fewer than 3
candidates have been assigned to the highest quality category, from a
merged category consisting of the highest and second highest quality
categories. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the appointing
authority may not pass over a preference eligible in the same or a
higher category from which selection is made, unless the requirements of
section 3317(b) or 3318(b), as applicable, are satisfied, except that in
no event may certification of a preference eligible under this
subsection be discontinued by the Internal Revenue Service under section
3317(b) before the end of the 6-month period beginning on the date of
such employee's first certification.
``(c) Involuntary Reassignments and Removals of Career Appointees in
the Senior Executive Service.--Neither section 3395(e)(1) nor section
3592(b)(1) shall apply with respect to the Internal Revenue Service.
``(d) Probationary Periods.--Notwithstanding any other provision of
law or regulation, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may establish a
period of probation under section 3321 of up to 3 years for any position
if, as determined by the Commissioner, a shorter period would be
insufficient for the incumbent to demonstrate complete proficiency in
such position.
``(e) Provisions That Remain Applicable.--No provision of this
section exempts the Internal Revenue Service from--
``(1) any employment priorities established under direction of the
President for the placement of surplus or displaced employees; or
``(2) its obligations under any court order or decree relating to
the employment practices of the Internal Revenue Service.
``9304. Flexibilities relating to demonstration projects
``(a) Authority To Conduct.--The Commissioner of Internal Revenue
may, in accordance with this section, conduct 1 or more demonstration
projects to improve personnel management; provide increased individual
accountability; eliminate obstacles to the removal of or imposing any
disciplinary action with respect to poor performers, subject to the
requirements of due process; expedite appeals from adverse actions or
performance-based actions; and promote pay based on performance.
``(b) General Requirements.--Except as provided in subsection (c),
each demonstration project under this section shall comply with the
provisions of section 4703.
``(c) Special Rules.--For purposes of any demonstration project under
this section--
``(1) Authority of commissioner.--The Commissioner of Internal
Revenue shall exercise the authority provided to the Office of Personnel
Management under section 4703.
``(2) Provisions not applicable.--The following provisions of
section 4703 shall not apply:
``(A) Paragraphs (3) through (6) of subsection (b).
``(B) Paragraphs (1), (2)(B)(ii), and (4) of subsection (c).
``(C) Subsections (d) through (g).
``(d) Notification Required To Be Given.--
``(1) To employees.--The Commissioner of Internal Revenue shall
notify employees likely to be affected by a project proposed under this
section at least 90 days in advance of the date such project is to take
effect.
``(2) To congress and opm.--The Commissioner of Internal Revenue
shall, with respect to each demonstration project under this section,
provide each House of Congress and the Office of Personnel Management
with a report, at least 30 days in advance of the date such project is
to take effect, setting forth the final version of the plan for such
project. Such report shall, with respect to the project to which it
relates, include the information specified in section 4703(b)(1).
``(e) Limitations.--No demonstration project under this section may--
``(1) provide for a waiver of any regulation prescribed under any
provision of law referred to in paragraph (2)(B)(i) or (3) of section
4703(c);
``(2) provide for a waiver of subchapter V of chapter 63 or subpart
G of part III (or any regulations prescribed under such subchapter or
subpart);
``(3) provide for a waiver of any law or regulation relating to
preference eligibles as defined in section 2108 or subchapter II or III
of chapter 73 (or any regulations prescribed thereunder);
``(4) permit collective bargaining over pay or benefits, or require
collective bargaining over any matter which would not be required under
section 7106; or
``(5) include a system for measuring performance that provides for
only 1 level of performance at or above the level of fully successful or
better.
``(f) Permissible Projects.--Notwithstanding any other provision of
law, a demonstration project under this section--
``(1) may establish alternative means of resolving any dispute
within the jurisdiction of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,
the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Federal Labor Relations
Authority, or the Federal Service Impasses Panel; and
``(2) may permit the Internal Revenue Service to adopt any
alternative dispute resolution procedure that a private entity may
lawfully adopt.
``(g) Consultation and Coordination.--The Commissioner of Internal
Revenue shall consult with the Director of the Office of Personnel
Management in the development and implementation of each demonstration
project under this section and shall submit such reports to the Director
as the Director may require. The Director or the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue may terminate a demonstration project under this
section if either of them determines that the project creates a
substantial hardship on, or is not in the best interests of, the public,
the Federal Government, employees, or qualified applicants for
employment with the Internal Revenue Service.
``(h) Termination.--Each demonstration project under this section
shall terminate before the end of the 5-year period beginning on the
date on which the project takes effect, except that any such project may
continue beyond the end of such period, for not to exceed 2 years, if
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, with the concurrence of the
Director, determines such extension is necessary to validate the results
of the project. Not later than 6 months before the end of the 5-year
period and any extension under the preceding sentence, the Commissioner
of Internal Revenue shall, with respect to the demonstration project
involved, submit a legislative proposal to the Congress if the
Commissioner determines that such project should be made permanent, in
whole or in part.''
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The analysis for part III of title 5, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``SUBPART I--MISCELLANEOUS
``93. Personnel Flexibilities Relating to the Internal Revenue Service 9301''.
(c) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on the date of
enactment of this Act.
TITLE II--ELECTRONIC FILING
SEC. 201. ELECTRONIC FILING OF TAX AND INFORMATION RETURNS.
(a) In General.--It is the policy of the Congress that paperless
filing should be the preferred and most convenient means of filing tax
and information returns, and that by the year 2007, no more than 20
percent of all such returns should be filed on paper.
(b) Strategic Plan.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's
delegate (hereafter in this section referred to as the ``Secretary'')
shall establish a plan to eliminate barriers, provide incentives, and
use competitive market forces to increase electronic filing gradually
over the next 10 years while maintaining processing times for paper
returns at 40 days. To the extent practicable, such plan shall provide
that all returns prepared electronically for taxable years beginning
after 2001 shall be filed electronically.
(2) Electronic commerce advisory group.--To ensure that the
Secretary receives input from the private sector in the development and
implementation of the plan required by paragraph (1), the Secretary
shall convene an electronic commerce advisory group to include
representatives from the small business community and from the tax
practitioner, preparer, and computerized tax processor communities and
other representatives from the electronic filing industry.
(c) Promotion of Electronic Filing and Incentives.--Section 6011 is
amended by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g) and by
inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection:
``(f) Promotion of Electronic Filing.--
``(1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to promote the
benefits of and encourage the use of electronic tax administration
programs, as they become available, through the use of mass
communications and other means.
``(2) Incentives.--The Secretary may implement procedures to provide
for the payment of appropriate incentives for electronically filed
returns.''
(d) Annual Reports.--Not later than June 30 of each calendar year
after 1997, the Chairperson of the Internal Revenue Service Oversight
Board, the Secretary, and the Chairperson of the electronic commerce
advisory group established under subsection (b)(2) shall report to the
Committees on Ways and Means, Appropriations, and Government Reform and
Oversight of the House of Representatives, the Committees on Finance,
Appropriations, and Government Affairs of the Senate, and the Joint
Committee on Taxation, on--
(1) the progress of the Internal Revenue Service in meeting the goal
of receiving electronically 80 percent of tax and information returns by
2007;
(2) the status of the plan required by subsection (b); and
(3) the legislative changes necessary to assist the Internal Revenue
Service in meeting such goal.
SEC. 202. DUE DATE FOR CERTAIN INFORMATION RETURNS FILED ELECTRONICALLY.
(a) In General.--Section 6071 (relating to time for filing returns
and other documents) is amended by redesignating subsection (b) as
subsection (c) and by inserting after subsection (a) the following new
subsection:
``(b) Electronically Filed Information Returns.--Returns made under
subparts B and C of part III of this subchapter which are filed
electronically shall be filed on or before March 31 of the year
following the calendar year to which such returns relate.''
(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply
to returns required to be filed after December 31, 1999.
SEC. 203. PAPERLESS ELECTRONIC FILING.
(a) In General.--Section 6061 (relating to signing of returns and
other documents) is amended--
(1) by striking ``Except as otherwise provided by'' and inserting
the following:
``(a) General Rule.--Except as otherwise provided by subsection (b)
and'', and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b) Electronic Signatures.--
``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall develop procedures for the
acceptance of signatures in digital or other electronic form. Until such
time as such procedures are in place, the Secretary may waive the
requirement of a signature for all returns or classes of returns, or may
provide for alternative methods of subscribing all returns,
declarations, statements, or other documents required or permitted to be
made or written under internal revenue laws and regulations.
``(2) Treatment of alternative methods.--Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, any return, declaration, statement or other document
filed without signature under the authority of this subsection or
verified, signed or subscribed under any method adopted under paragraph
(1) shall be treated for all purposes (both civil and criminal,
including penalties for perjury) in the same manner as though signed and
subscribed. Any such return, declaration, statement or other document
shall be presumed to have been actually submitted and subscribed by the
person on whose behalf it was submitted.
``(3) Published guidance.--The Secretary shall publish guidance as
appropriate to define and implement any waiver of the signature
requirements.''
(b) Acknowledgment of Electronic Filing.--Section 7502(c) is amended
to read as follows:
``(c) Registered and Certified Mailing; Electronic Filing.--
``(1) Registered mail.--For purposes of this section, if any return,
claim, statement, or other document, or payment, is sent by United
States registered mail--
``(A) such registration shall be prima facie evidence that the
return, claim, statement, or other document was delivered to the agency,
officer, or office to which addressed, and
``(B) the date of registration shall be deemed the postmark date.
``(2) Certified mail; electronic filing.--The Secretary is
authorized to provide by regulations the extent to which the provisions
of paragraph (1) with respect to prima facie evidence of delivery and
the postmark date shall apply to certified mail and electronic
filing.''.
(c) Establishment of Procedures for Other Information.--In the case
of taxable periods beginning after December 31, 1998, the Secretary of
the Treasury or the Secretary's delegate shall, to the extent
practicable, establish procedures to accept, in electronic form, any
other information, statements, elections, or schedules, from taxpayers
filing returns electronically, so that such taxpayers will not be
required to file any paper.
(d) Procedures for Communications Between IRS and Preparer of
Electronically-Filed Returns.--The Secretary shall establish procedures
for taxpayers to authorize, on electronically filed returns, the
preparer of such returns to communicate with the Internal Revenue
Service on matters included on such returns.
(e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 204. RETURN-FREE TAX SYSTEM.
(a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's
delegate shall develop procedures for the implementation of a
return-free tax system under which appropriate individuals would be
permitted to comply with the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 without
making the return required under section 6012 of such Code for taxable
years beginning after 2007.
(b) Report.--Not later than June 30 of each calendar year after 1999,
such Secretary shall report to the Committee on Ways and Means of the
House of Representatives, the Committee on Finance of the Senate, and
the Joint Committee on Taxation on--
(1) what additional resources the Internal Revenue Service would
need to implement such a system,
(2) the changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that could
enhance the use of such a system,
(3) the procedures developed pursuant to subsection (a), and
(4) the number and classes of taxpayers that would be permitted to
use the procedures developed pursuant to subsection (a).
SEC. 205. ACCESS TO ACCOUNT INFORMATION.
Not later than December 31, 2006, the Secretary of the Treasury or
the Secretary's delegate shall develop procedures under which a taxpayer
filing returns electronically would be able to review the taxpayer's
account electronically, but only if all necessary safeguards to ensure
the privacy of such account information are in place.
TITLE III--TAXPAYER PROTECTION AND RIGHTS
SEC. 300. SHORT TITLE.
This title may be cited as the ``Taxpayer Bill of Rights 3''.
Subtitle A--Burden of Proof
SEC. 301. BURDEN OF PROOF.
(a) In General.--Chapter 76 (relating to judicial proceedings) is
amended by adding at the end the following new subchapter:
``SUBCHAPTER E--BURDEN OF PROOF
``Sec. 7491. Burden of proof.
``SEC. 7491. BURDEN OF PROOF.
``(a) General Rule.--The Secretary shall have the burden of proof in
any court proceeding with respect to any factual issue relevant to
ascertaining the income tax liability of a taxpayer.
``(b) Limitations.--Subsection (a) shall only apply with respect to
an issue if--
``(1) the taxpayer asserts a reasonable dispute with respect to such
issue,
``(2) the taxpayer has fully cooperated with the Secretary with
respect to such issue, including providing, within a reasonable period
of time, access to and inspection of all witnesses, information, and
documents within the control of the taxpayer, as reasonably requested by
the Secretary, and
``(3) in the case of a partnership, corporation, or trust, the
taxpayer is described in section 7430(c)(4)(A)(ii).
``(c) Substantiation.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to
override any requirement of this title to substantiate any item.''
(b) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) Section 6201 is amended by striking subsection (d) and
redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).
(2) The table of subchapters for chapter 76 is amended by adding at
the end the following new item:
``Subchapter E. Burden of proof.''
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply
to court proceedings arising in connection with examinations commencing
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Subtitle B--Proceedings by Taxpayers
SEC. 311. EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY TO AWARD COSTS AND CERTAIN FEES.
(a) Award of Higher Attorney's Fees Based on Complexity of
Issues.--Clause (iii) of section 7430(c)(1)(B) (relating to the award of
costs and certain fees) is amended by inserting ``the difficulty of the
issues presented in the case, or the local availability of tax
expertise,'' before ``justifies a higher rate''.
(b) Award of Administrative Costs Incurred After 30 -Day
Letter.--Paragraph (2) of section 7430(c) is amended by striking the
last sentence and inserting the following:
``Such term shall only include costs incurred on or after whichever
of the following is the earliest: (i) the date of the receipt by the
taxpayer of the notice of the decision of the Internal Revenue Service
Office of Appeals, (ii) the date of the notice of deficiency, or (iii)
the date on which the 1st letter of proposed deficiency which allows the
taxpayer an opportunity for administrative review in the Internal
Revenue Service Office of Appeals is sent.''.
(c) Award of Fees for Certain Additional Services.--Paragraph (3) of
section 7430(c) is amended to read as follows:
``(3) Attorney's fees.--
``(A) In general.--For purposes of paragraphs (1) and (2), fees for
the services of an individual (whether or not an attorney) who is
authorized to practice before the Tax Court or before the Internal
Revenue Service shall be treated as fees for the services of an
attorney.
``(B) Pro bono services.--In any case in which the court could have
awarded attorney's fees under subsection (a) but for the fact that an
individual is representing the prevailing party for no fee or for a fee
which (taking into account all the facts and circumstances) is no more
than a nominal fee, the court may also award a judgment or settlement
for such amounts as the court determines to be appropriate (based on
hours worked and costs expended) for services of such individual but
only if such award is paid to such individual or such individual's
employer.''
(d) Determination of Whether Position of United States is
Substantially Justified.--Subparagraph (B) of section 7430(c)(4) is
amended by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv) and by inserting
after clause (ii) the following new clause:
``(iii) Effect of losing on substantially similar issues.--In
determining for purposes of clause (i) whether the position of the
United States was substantially justified, the court shall take into
account whether the United States has lost in courts of appeal for other
circuits on substantially similar issues.''
(e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply
to costs incurred (and, in the case of the amendment made by subsection
(c), services performed) more than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
SEC. 312. CIVIL DAMAGES FOR NEGLIGENCE IN COLLECTION ACTIONS.
(a) In General.--Section 7433 (relating to civil damages for certain
unauthorized collection actions) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``, or by reason of
negligence,'' after ``recklessly or intentionally'', and
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting ``($100,000,
in the case of negligence)'' after ``$1,000,000'', and
(B) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``or negligent'' after ``reckless
or intentional''.
(b) Requirement That Administrative Remedies Be Exhausted.--Paragraph
(1) of section 7433(d) is amended to read as follows:
``(1) Requirement that administrative remedies be exhausted.--A
judgment for damages shall not be awarded under subsection (b) unless
the court determines that the plaintiff has exhausted the administrative
remedies available to such plaintiff within the Internal Revenue
Service.''
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply
to actions of officers or employees of the Internal Revenue Service
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 313. INCREASE IN SIZE OF CASES PERMITTED ON SMALL CASE CALENDAR.
(a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 7463 (relating to disputes
involving $10,000 or less) is amended by striking ``$10,000'' each place
it appears and inserting ``$25,000''.
(b) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) The section heading for section 7463 is amended by striking ``
$10,000 '' and inserting `` $25,000''.
(2) The item relating to section 7463 in the table of sections for
part II of subchapter C of chapter 76 is amended by striking ``$10,000''
and inserting ``$25,000''.
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply
to proceedings commencing after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Subtitle C--Relief for Innocent Spouses and for Taxpayers
Unable To Manage Their Financial Affairs Due to Disabilities
SEC. 321. SPOUSE RELIEVED IN WHOLE OR IN PART OF LIABILITY IN
CERTAIN CASES.
(a) In General.--Subpart B of part II of subchapter A of chapter 61
is amended by inserting after section 6014 the following new section:
``SEC. 6015. INNOCENT SPOUSE RELIEF; PETITION TO TAX COURT.
``(a) Spouse Relieved of Liability in Certain Cases.--
``(1) In general.--Under procedures prescribed by the Secretary, if--
``(A) a joint return has been made under section 6013 for a taxable
year,
``(B) on such return there is an understatement of tax attributable
to erroneous items of 1 spouse,
``(C) the other spouse establishes that in signing the return he or
she did not know, and had no reason to know, that there was such
understatement,
``(D) taking into account all the facts and circumstances, it is
inequitable to hold the other spouse liable for the deficiency in tax
for such taxable year attributable to such understatement, and
``(E) the other spouse claims (in such form as the Secretary may
prescribe) the benefits of this subsection not later than the date which
is 2 years after the date of the assessment of such deficiency,
then the other spouse shall be relieved of liability for tax
(including interest, penalties, and other amounts) for such taxable year
to the extent such liability is attributable to such understatement.
``(2) Apportionment of relief.--If a spouse who, but for paragraph
(1)(C), would be relieved of liability under paragraph (1), establishes
that in signing the return such spouse did not know, and had no reason
to know, the extent of such understatement, then such spouse shall be
relieved of liability for tax (including interest, penalties, and other
amounts) for such taxable year to the extent that such liability is
attributable to the portion of such understatement of which such spouse
did not know and had no reason to know.
``(3) Understatement.--For purposes of this subsection, the term
`understatement' has the meaning given to such term by section
6662(d)(2)(A).
``(4) Special rule for community property income.--For purposes of
this subsection, the determination of the spouse to whom items of gross
income (other than gross income from property) are attributable shall be
made without regard to community property laws.
``(b) Petition for Review By Tax Court.--In the case of an individual
who has filed a claim under subsection (a) within the period specified
in subsection (a)(1)(E)--
``(1) In general.--Such individual may petition the Tax Court (and
the Tax Court shall have jurisdiction) to determine such claim if such
petition is filed during the 90-day period beginning on the earlier of--
``(A) the date which is 6 months after the date such claim is filed
with the Secretary, or
``(B) the date on which the Secretary mails by certified or
registered mail a notice to such individual denying such claim.
Such 90-day period shall be determined by not counting Saturday,
Sunday, or a legal holiday in the District of Columbia as the last day
of such period.
``(2) Restrictions applicable to collection of assessment.--
``(A) In general.--Except as otherwise provided in section 6851 or
6861, no levy or proceeding in court for collection of any assessment to
which such claim relates shall be made, begun, or prosecuted, until the
expiration of the 90-day period described in paragraph (1), nor, if a
petition has been filed with the Tax Court, until the decision of the
Tax Court has become final. Rules similar to the rules of section 7485
shall apply with respect to the collection of such assessment.
``(B) Authority to enjoin collection actions.--Notwithstanding the
provisions of section 7421(a), the beginning of such proceeding or levy
during the time the prohibition under subparagraph (A) is in force may
be enjoined by a proceeding in the proper court, including the Tax
Court. The Tax Court shall have no jurisdiction under this paragraph to
enjoin any action or proceeding unless a timely petition for a
determination of such claim has been filed and then only in respect of
the amount of the assessment to which such claim relates.
``(C) Jeopardy collection.--If the Secretary makes a finding that
the collection of the tax is in jeopardy, nothing in this subsection
shall prevent the immediate collection of such tax.
``(c) Suspension of Running of Period of Limitations.--The running of
the period of limitations in section 6502 on the collection of the
assessment to which the petition under subsection (b) relates shall be
suspended for the period during which the Secretary is prohibited by
subsection (b) from collecting by levy or a proceeding in court and for
60 days thereafter.
``(d) Applicable Rules.--
``(1) Allowance of application.--Except as provided in paragraph
(2), notwithstanding any other law or rule of law (other than section
6512(b), 7121, or 7122), credit or refund shall be allowed or made to
the extent attributable to the application of this section.
``(2) Res judicata.--In the case of any claim under subsection (a),
the determination of the Tax Court in any prior proceeding for the same
taxable periods in which the decision has become final, shall be
conclusive except with respect to the qualification of the spouse for
relief which was not an issue in such proceeding. The preceding sentence
shall not apply if the Tax Court determines that the spouse participated
meaningfully in such prior proceeding.
``(3) Limitation on tax court jurisdiction.--If a suit for refund is
begun by either spouse pursuant to section 6532, the Tax Court shall
lose jurisdiction of the spouse's action under this section to whatever
extent jurisdiction is acquired by the district court or the United
States Court of Federal Claims over the taxable years that are the
subject of the suit for refund.''
(b) Separate Form For Applying For Spousal Relief.--Not later than
180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
the Treasury shall develop a separate form with instructions for use by
taxpayers in applying for relief under section 6015(a) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as added by this section.
(c) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) Section 6013 is amended by striking subsection (e).
(2) Subparagraph (A) of section 6230(c)(5) is amended by striking
``section 6013(e)'' and inserting ``section 6015''.
(d) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for subpart B of part
II of subchapter A of chapter 61 is amended by inserting after the item
relating to section 6014 the following new item:
``Sec. 6015. Innocent spouse relief; petition to Tax Court.''
(e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply
to understatements for taxable years beginning after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
SEC. 322. SUSPENSION OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON FILING
REFUND CLAIMS DURING PERIODS OF DISABILITY.
(a) In General.--Section 6511 (relating to limitations on credit or
refund) is amended by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i) and
by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection:
``(h) Running of Periods of Limitation Suspended While Taxpayer Is
Unable To Manage Financial Affairs Due to Disability.--
``(1) In general.--In the case of an individual, the running of the
periods specified in subsections (a), (b), and (c) shall be suspended
during any period of such individual's life that such individual is
financially disabled.
``(2) Financially disabled.--
``(A) In general.--For purposes of paragraph (1), an individual is
financially disabled if such individual is unable to manage his
financial affairs by reason of his medically determinable physical or
mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has
lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less
than 12 months. An individual shall not be considered to have such an
impairment unless proof of the existence thereof is furnished in such
form and manner as the Secretary may require.
``(B) Exception where individual has guardian, etc.--An individual
shall not be treated as financially disabled during any period that such
individual's spouse or any other person is authorized to act on behalf
of such individual in financial matters.''
(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply
to periods of disability before, on, or after the date of the enactment
of this Act but shall not apply to any claim for credit or refund which
(without regard to such amendment) is barred by the operation of any law
or rule of law (including res judicata) as of January 1, 1998.
Subtitle D--Provisions Relating to Interest
SEC. 331. ELIMINATION OF INTEREST RATE DIFFERENTIAL ON
OVERLAPPING PERIODS OF INTEREST ON INCOME TAX OVERPAYMENTS AND
UNDERPAYMENTS.
(a) In General.--Section 6621 (relating to determination of rate of
interest) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(d) Elimination of Interest on Overlapping Periods of Income Tax
Overpayments and Underpayments.--To the extent that, for any period,
interest is payable under subchapter A and allowable under subchapter B
on equivalent underpayments and overpayments by the same taxpayer of tax
imposed by chapters 1 and 2, the net rate of interest under this section
on such amounts shall be zero for such period.''
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (f) of section 6601 (relating
to satisfaction by credits) is amended by adding at the end the
following new sentence: ``The preceding sentence shall not apply to the
extent that section 6621(d) applies.''
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply
to interest for calendar quarters beginning after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
SEC. 332. INCREASE IN OVERPAYMENT RATE PAYABLE TO TAXPAYERS
OTHER THAN CORPORATIONS.
(a) In General.--Subparagraph (B) of section 6621(a)(1) (defining
overpayment rate) is amended to read as follows:
``(B) 3 percentage points (2 percentage points in the case of a
corporation).''
(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply
to interest for calendar quarters beginning after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
Subtitle E--Protections for Taxpayers Subject to Audit or
Collection Activities
SEC. 341. PRIVILEGE OF CONFIDENTIALITY EXTENDED TO TAXPAYER'S
DEALINGS WITH NON-ATTORNEYS AUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE BEFORE INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE.
Section 7602 (relating to examination of books and witnesses) is
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(d) Privilege of Confidentiality Extended to Taxpayer's Dealings
with Non-Attorneys Authorized to Practice Before Internal Revenue
Service.--
``(1) In general.--In any noncriminal proceeding before the Internal
Revenue Service, the taxpayer shall be entitled to the same common law
protections of confidentiality with respect to tax advice furnished by
any qualified individual (in a manner consistent with State law for such
individual's profession) as the taxpayer would have if such individual
were an attorney.
``(2) Qualified individual.--For purposes of paragraph (1), the term
`qualified individual' means any individual (other than an attorney) who
is authorized to practice before the Internal Revenue Service.''
SEC. 342. EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY TO ISSUE TAXPAYER ASSISTANCE ORDERS.
Section 7811(a) (relating to taxpayer assistance orders) is amended--
(1) by striking ``Upon application'' and inserting the following:
``(1) In general.--Upon application'',
(2) by moving the text 2 ems to the right, and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
``(2) Issuance of taxpayer assistance orders.--For purposes of
determining whether to issue a taxpayer assistance order, the Taxpayer
Advocate shall consider the following factors, among others:
``(A) Whether there is an immediate threat of adverse action.
``(B) Whether there has been an unreasonable delay in resolving
taxpayer account problems.
``(C) Whether the taxpayer will have to pay significant costs
(including fees for professional representation) if relief is not
granted.
``(D) Whether the taxpayer will suffer irreparable injury, or a
long-term adverse impact, if relief is not granted.
``(3) Standard where administrative guidance not followed.--In cases
where any Internal Revenue Service employee is not following applicable
published administrative guidance (including the Internal Revenue
Manual), the Taxpayer Advocate shall construe the factors taken into
account in determining whether to issue a taxpayer assistance order in
the manner most favorable to the taxpayer.''
SEC. 343. LIMITATION ON FINANCIAL STATUS AUDIT TECHNIQUES.
Section 7602 is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(e) Limitation on Examination on Unreported Income.--The Secretary
shall not use financial status or economic reality examination
techniques to determine the existence of unreported income of any
taxpayer unless the Secretary has a reasonable indication that there is
a likelihood of such unreported income.''
SEC. 344. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE PRODUCTION OF
COMPUTER SOURCE CODE.
(a) In General.--Section 7602 is amended by adding at the end the
following new subsection:
``(f) Limitation on Authority To Require Production of Computer
Source Code.--
``(1) In general.--No summons may be issued under this title, and
the Secretary may not begin any action under section 7604 to enforce any
summons, to produce or examine any tax-related computer source code.
``(2) Exception where information not otherwise available to verify
correctness of item on return.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any
portion of a tax-related computer source code if--
``(A) the Secretary is unable to otherwise reasonably ascertain the
correctness of any item on a return from--
``(i) the taxpayer's books, papers, records, or other data, or
``(ii) the computer software program and the associated data which,
when executed, produces the output to prepare the return for the period
involved, and
``(B) the Secretary identifies with reasonable specificity such
portion as to be used to verify the correctness of such item.
The Secretary shall be treated as meeting the requirements of
subparagraphs (A) and (B) after the 90th day after the Secretary makes a
formal request to the taxpayer and the owner or developer of the
computer software program for the material described in subparagraph
(A)(ii) if such material is not provided before the close of such 90th
day.
``(3) Other exceptions.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--
``(A) any inquiry into any offense connected with the administration
or enforcement of the internal revenue laws, and
``(B) any tax-related computer source code developed by (or
primarily for the benefit of) the taxpayer or a related person (within
the meaning of section 267 or 707(b)) for internal use by the taxpayer
or such person and not for commercial distribution.
``(4) Tax-related computer source code.--For purposes of this
subsection, the term `tax-related computer source code' means--
``(A) the computer source code for any computer software program for
accounting, tax return preparation or compliance, or tax planning, or
``(B) design and development materials related to such a software
program (including program notes and memoranda).
``(5) Right to contest summons.--The determination of whether the
requirements of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (2) are met or
whether any exception under paragraph (3) applies may be contested in
any proceeding under section 7604.
``(6) Protection of trade secrets and other confidential
information.--In any court proceeding to enforce a summons for any
portion of a tax-related computer source code, the court may issue any
order necessary to prevent the disclosure of trade secrets or other
confidential information with respect to such source code, including
providing that any information be placed under seal to be opened only as
directed by the court.''
(b) Application of Special Procedures for Third-Party
Summonses.--Paragraph (3) of section 7609(a) (defining third-party
recordkeeper) is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph
(H), by striking a period at the end of subparagraph (I) and inserting
``, and'', and by adding at the end the following:
``(J) any owner or developer of a tax-related computer source code
(as defined in section 7602(f)(4)).
Subparagraph (J) shall apply only with respect to a summons requiring
the production of the source code referred to in subparagraph (J) or the
program and data described in section 7602(f)(2)(A)(ii) to which such
source code relates.''
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply
to summonses issued more than 90 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act.
SEC. 345. PROCEDURES RELATING TO EXTENSIONS OF STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS BY AGREEMENT.
(a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 6501(c) (relating to the
period for limitations on assessment and collection) is amended--
(1) by striking ``Where'' and inserting the following:
``(A) In general.--Where'',
(2) by moving the text 2 ems to the right, and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
``(B) Notice to taxpayer of right to refuse or limit extension.--The
Secretary shall notify the taxpayer of the taxpayer's right to refuse to
extend the period of limitations, or to limit such extension to
particular issues, on each occasion when the taxpayer is requested to
provide such consent.''
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply
to requests to extend the period of limitations made after the date of
the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 346. OFFERS-IN-COMPROMISE.
(a) Allowances For Basic Living Expenses.--Section 7122 (relating to
offers-in-compromise) is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(c) Allowances For Basic Living Expenses.--The Secretary shall
develop and publish schedules of national and local allowances designed
to provide that taxpayers entering into a compromise have an adequate
means to provide for basic living expenses.''
(b) Preparation of Statement Relating to Offers-in-Compromise.--The
Secretary of the Treasury shall prepare a statement which sets forth in
simple, nontechnical terms the rights of a taxpayer and the obligations
of the Internal Revenue Service relating to offers-in-compromise. Such
statement shall--
(1) advise taxpayers who have entered into a compromise agreement of
the advantages of promptly notifying the Internal Revenue Service of any
change of address or marital status, and
(2) provide notice to taxpayers that in the case of a compromise
agreement terminated due to the actions of 1 spouse or former spouse,
the Internal Revenue Service will, upon application, reinstate such
agreement with the spouse or former spouse who remains in compliance
with such agreement.
SEC. 347. NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY TO SPECIFY DEADLINES FOR FILING
TAX COURT PETITION.
(a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's
delegate shall include on each notice of deficiency under section 6212
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 the date determined by such
Secretary (or delegate) as the last day on which the taxpayer may file a
petition with the Tax Court.
(b) Later Filing Deadlines Specified on Notice of Deficiency To Be
Binding.--Subsection (a) of section 6213 (relating to restrictions
applicable to deficiencies; petition to Tax Court) is amended by adding
at the end the following new sentence: ``Any petition filed with the Tax
Court on or before the last date specified for filing such petition by
the Secretary in the notice of deficiency shall be treated as timely
filed.''
(c) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) and the amendment made by
subsection (b) shall apply to notices mailed after December 31, 1998.
SEC. 348. REFUND OR CREDIT OF OVERPAYMENTS BEFORE FINAL DETERMINATION.
(a) Tax Court Proceedings.--Subsection (a) of section 6213 is
amended--
(1) by striking ``, including the Tax Court.'' and inserting ``,
including the Tax Court, and a refund may be ordered by such court of
any amount collected within the period during which the Secretary is
prohibited from collecting by levy or through a proceeding in court
under the provisions of this subsection.'', and
(2) by striking ``to enjoin any action or proceeding'' and inserting
``to enjoin any action or proceeding or order any refund''.
(b) Other Proceedings.--Subsection (a) of section 6512 is amended by
striking the period at the end of paragraph (4) and inserting ``, and'',
and by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraphs:
``(5) As to any amount collected within the period during which the
Secretary is prohibited from making the assessment or from collecting by
levy or through a proceeding in court under the provisions of section
6213(a), and
``(6) As to overpayments the Secretary is authorized to refund or
credit pending appeal as provided in subsection (b).''
(c) Refund or Credit Pending Appeal.--Paragraph (1) of section
6512(b) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``If
a notice of appeal in respect of the decision of the Tax Court is filed
under section 7483, the Secretary is authorized to refund or credit the
overpayment determined by the Tax Court to the extent the overpayment is
not contested on appeal.''
(d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 349. THREAT OF AUDIT PROHIBITED TO COERCE TIP REPORTING
ALTERNATIVE COMMITMENT AGREEMENTS.
The Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's delegate shall
instruct employees of the Internal Revenue Service that they may not
threaten to audit any taxpayer in an attempt to coerce the taxpayer into
entering into a Tip Reporting Alternative Commitment Agreement.
Subtitle F--Disclosures to Taxpayers
SEC. 351. EXPLANATION OF JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY.
The Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's delegate shall, as
soon as practicable, but not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, establish procedures to clearly alert married
taxpayers of their joint and several liabilities on all appropriate
publications and instructions.
SEC. 352. EXPLANATION OF TAXPAYERS' RIGHTS IN INTERVIEWS WITH
THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE.
The Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's delegate shall, as
soon as practicable, but not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, revise the statement required by section 6227 of
the Omnibus Taxpayer Bill of Rights (Internal Revenue Service
Publication No. 1) to more clearly inform taxpayers of their rights--
(1) to be represented at interviews with the Internal Revenue
Service by any person authorized to practice before the Internal Revenue
Service, and
(2) to suspend an interview pursuant to section 7521(b)(2) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
SEC. 353. DISCLOSURE OF CRITERIA FOR EXAMINATION SELECTION.
(a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's
delegate shall, as soon as practicable, but not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, incorporate into the
statement required by section 6227 of the Omnibus Taxpayer Bill of
Rights (Internal Revenue Service Publication No. 1) a statement which
sets forth in simple and nontechnical terms the criteria and procedures
for selecting taxpayers for examination. Such statement shall not
include any information the disclosure of which would be detrimental to
law enforcement, but shall specify the general procedures used by the
Internal Revenue Service, including whether taxpayers are selected for
examination on the basis of information available in the media or on the
basis of information provided to the Internal Revenue Service by
informants.
(b) Transmission to Committees of Congress.--The Secretary shall
transmit drafts of the statement required under subsection (a) (or
proposed revisions to any such statement) to the Committee on Ways and
Means of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Finance of the
Senate, and the Joint Committee on Taxation on the same day.
SEC. 354. EXPLANATIONS OF APPEALS AND COLLECTION PROCESS.
The Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's delegate shall, as
soon as practicable but not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, include with any 1st letter of proposed
deficiency which allows the taxpayer an opportunity for administrative
review in the Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals an explanation
of the appeals process and the collection process with respect to such
proposed deficiency.
Subtitle G--Low Income Taxpayer Clinics
SEC. 361. LOW INCOME TAXPAYER CLINICS.
(a) In General.--Chapter 77 (relating to miscellaneous provisions) is
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``SEC. 7525. LOW INCOME TAXPAYER CLINICS.
``(a) In General.--The Secretary shall make grants to provide
matching funds for the development, expansion, or continuation of
qualified low income taxpayer clinics.
``(b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section--
``(1) Qualified low income taxpayer clinic.--
``(A) In general.--The term `qualified low income taxpayer clinic'
means a clinic that--
``(i) does not charge more than a nominal fee for its services
(except for reimbursement of actual costs incurred), and
``(ii)(I) represents low income taxpayers in controversies with the
Internal Revenue Service, or
``(II) operates programs to inform individuals for whom English is a
second language about their rights and responsibilities under this
title.
``(B) Representation of low income taxpayers.--A clinic meets the
requirements of subparagraph (A)(ii)(I) if--
``(i) at least 90 percent of the taxpayers represented by the clinic
have incomes which do not exceed 250 percent of the poverty level, as
determined in accordance with criteria established by the Director of
the Office of Management and Budget, and
``(ii) the amount in controversy for any taxable year generally does
not exceed the amount specified in section 7463.
``(2) Clinic.--The term `clinic' includes--
``(A) a clinical program at an accredited law school in which
students represent low income taxpayers in controversies arising under
this title, and
``(B) an organization described in section 501(c) and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) which satisfies the requirements of paragraph
(1) through representation of taxpayers or referral of taxpayers to
qualified representatives.
``(3) Qualified representative.--The term `qualified representative'
means any individual (whether or not an attorney) who is authorized to
practice before the Internal Revenue Service or the applicable court.
``(c) Special Rules and Limitations.--
``(1) Aggregate limitation.--Unless otherwise provided by specific
appropriation, the Secretary shall not allocate more than $3,000,000 per
year (exclusive of costs of administering the program) to grants under
this section.
``(2) Limitation on annual grants to a clinic.--The aggregate amount
of grants which may be made under this section to a clinic for a year
shall not exceed $100,000.
``(3) Multi-year grants.--Upon application of a qualified low income
taxpayer clinic, the Secretary is authorized to award a multi-year grant
not to exceed 3 years.
``(4) Criteria for awards.--In determining whether to make a grant
under this section, the Secretary shall consider--
``(A) the numbers of taxpayers who will be served by the clinic,
including the number of taxpayers in the geographical area for whom
English is a second language,
``(B) the existence of other low income taxpayer clinics serving the
same population,
``(C) the quality of the program offered by the low income taxpayer
clinic, including the qualifications of its administrators and qualified
representatives, and its record, if any, in providing service to low
income taxpayers, and
``(D) alternative funding sources available to the clinic, including
amounts received from other grants and contributions, and the endowment
and resources of the institution sponsoring the clinic.
``(5) Requirement of matching funds.--A low income taxpayer clinic
must provide matching funds on a dollar for dollar basis for all grants
provided under this section. Matching funds may include--
``(A) the salary (including fringe benefits) of individuals
performing services for the clinic, and
``(B) the cost of equipment used in the clinic.
Indirect expenses, including general overhead of the institution
sponsoring the clinic, shall not be counted as matching funds.''
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 77 is
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 7525. Low income taxpayer clinics.''
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
Subtitle H--Other Matters
SEC. 371. ACTIONS FOR REFUND WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ESTATES
WHICH HAVE ELECTED THE INSTALLMENT METHOD OF PAYMENT.
(a) In General.--Section 7422 is amended by redesignating subsection
(j) as subsection (k) and by inserting after subsection (i) the
following new subsection:
``(j) Special Rule for Actions With Respect to Estates for Which An
Election Under Section 6166 Is Made.--
``(1) In general.--The district courts of the United States and the
United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction over any
action brought by the representative of an estate to which this
subsection applies to determine the correct amount of the estate tax
liability of such estate (or for any refund with respect thereto) even
if the full amount of such liability has not been paid.
``(2) Estates to which subsection applies.--This subsection shall
apply to any estate if, as of the date the action is filed--
``(A) an election under section 6166 is in effect with respect to
such estate,
``(B) no portion of the installments payable under such section have
been accelerated, and
``(C) all installments the due date for which is on or before the
date the action is filed have been paid.
``(3) Prohibition on collection of disallowed liability.--If the
court redetermines under paragraph (1) the estate tax liability of an
estate, no part of such liability which is disallowed by a decision of
such court which has become final may be collected by the Secretary, and
amounts paid in excess of the installments determined by the court as
currently due and payable shall be refunded.''
(b) Extension of Time To File Refund Suit.--Section 7479 (relating to
declaratory judgments relating to eligibility of estate with respect to
installment payments under section 6166) is amended by adding at the end
the following new subsection:
``(c) Extension of Time To File Refund Suit.--The 2-year period in
section 6532(a)(1) for filing suit for refund after disallowance of a
claim shall be suspended during the 90-day period after the mailing of
the notice referred to in subsection (b)(3) and, if a pleading has been
filed with the Tax Court under this section, until the decision of the
Tax Court has become final.''
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply
to any claim for refund filed after the date of the enactment of this
Act.
SEC. 372. CATALOGING COMPLAINTS.
In collecting data for the report required under section 1211 of
Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2 (Public Law 104 168), the Secretary of the
Treasury or the Secretary's delegate shall maintain records of taxpayer
complaints of misconduct by Internal Revenue Service employees on an
individual employee basis.
SEC. 373. ARCHIVE OF RECORDS OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE.
(a) In General.--Subsection (l) of section 6103 (relating to
confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information) is
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(17) Disclosure to national archives and records
administration.--The Secretary shall, upon written request from the
Archivist of the United States, disclose or authorize the disclosure of
returns and return information to officers and employees of the National
Archives and Records Administration for purposes of, and only to the
extent necessary in, the appraisal of records for destruction or
retention. No such officer or employee shall, except to the extent
authorized by subsections (f), (i)(7), or (p), disclose any return or
return information disclosed under the preceding sentence to any person
other than to the Secretary, or to another officer or employee of the
National Archives and Records Administration whose official duties
require such disclosure for purposes of such appraisal.''
(b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 6103(p) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ``or (16)'' and inserting
``(16), or (17)'',
(2) in paragraph (4), by striking ``or (14)'' and inserting ``,
(14), or (17)'' in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), and
(3) in paragraph (4)(F)(ii), by striking ``or (15)'' and inserting
``, (15), or (17)''.
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply
to requests made by the Archivist of the United States after the date of
the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 374. PAYMENT OF TAXES.
The Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's delegate shall
establish such rules, regulations, and procedures as are necessary to
allow payment of taxes by check or money order made payable to the
United States Treasury.
SEC. 375. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY RELATING TO
THE MAKING OF ELECTIONS.
Subsection (d) of section 7805 is amended by striking ``by
regulations or forms''.
SEC. 376. LIMITATION ON PENALTY ON INDIVIDUAL'S FAILURE TO PAY
FOR MONTHS DURING PERIOD OF INSTALLMENT AGREEMENT.
(a) In General.--Section 6651 (relating to failure to file tax return
or to pay tax) is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(h) Limitation on Penalty on Individual's Failure To Pay for Months
During Period of Installment Agreement.--No addition to the tax shall be
imposed under paragraph (2) or (3) of subsection (a) with respect to the
tax liability of an individual for any month during which an installment
agreement under section 6159 is in effect for the payment of such tax to
the extent that imposing an addition to the tax under such paragraph for
such month would result in the aggregate number of percentage points of
such addition to the tax exceeding 9.5.''
(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply
for purposes of determining additions to the tax for months beginning
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Subtitle I--Studies
SEC. 381. PENALTY ADMINISTRATION.
The Joint Committee on Taxation shall conduct a study--
(1) reviewing the administration and implementation by the Internal
Revenue Service of the penalty reform provisions of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1989, and
(2) making any legislative and administrative recommendations it
deems appropriate to simplify penalty administration and reduce taxpayer
burden.
Such study shall be submitted to the Committee on Ways and Means of
the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate
not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act.
SEC. 382. CONFIDENTIALITY OF TAX RETURN INFORMATION.
The Joint Committee on Taxation shall conduct a study of the scope
and use of provisions regarding taxpayer confidentiality, and shall
report the findings of such study, together with such recommendations as
it deems appropriate, to the Congress not later than one year after the
date of the enactment of this Act. Such study shall examine the present
protections for taxpayer privacy, the need for third parties to use tax
return information, and the ability to achieve greater levels of
voluntary compliance by allowing the public to know who is legally
required to file tax returns, but does not file tax returns.
TITLE IV--CONGRESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Subtitle A--Oversight
SEC. 401. EXPANSION OF DUTIES OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION.
(a) In General.--Section 8021 (relating to the powers of the Joint
Committee on Taxation) is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsections:
``(e) Investigations.--The Joint Committee shall review all requests
(other than requests by the chairman or ranking member of a Committee or
Subcommittee) for investigations of the Internal Revenue Service by the
General Accounting Office, and approve such requests when appropriate,
with a view towards eliminating overlapping investigations, ensuring
that the General Accounting Office has the capacity to handle the
investigation, and ensuring that investigations focus on areas of
primary importance to tax administration.
``(f) Relating to Joint Hearings.--
``(1) In general.--The Chief of Staff, and such other staff as are
appointed pursuant to section 8004, shall provide such assistance as is
required for joint hearings described in paragraph (2).
``(2) Joint hearings.--On or before April 1 of each calendar year
after 1997, there shall be a joint hearing of two members of the
majority and one member of the minority from each of the Committees on
Finance, Appropriations, and Government Affairs of the Senate, and the
Committees on Ways and Means, Appropriations, and Government Reform and
Oversight of the House of Representatives, to review the strategic plans
and budget for the Internal Revenue Service. After the conclusion of the
annual filing season, there shall be a second annual joint hearing to
review the other matters outlined in section 8022(3)(C).''
(b) Effective Dates.--
(1) Subsection (e) of section 8021 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as added by subsection (a) of this section, shall apply to
requests made after the date of enactment of this Act.
(2) Subsection (f) of section 8021 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as added by subsection (a) of this section, shall take effect on
the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 402. COORDINATED OVERSIGHT REPORTS.
(a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 8022 (relating to the
duties of the Joint Committee on Taxation) is amended to read as
follows:
``(3) Reports.--
``(A) To report, from time to time, to the Committee on Finance and
the Committee on Ways and Means, and, in its discretion, to the Senate
or House of Representatives, or both, the results of its investigations,
together with such recommendations as it may deem advisable.
``(B) To report, annually, to the Committee on Finance and the
Committee on Ways and Means on the overall state of the Federal tax
system, together with recommendations with respect to possible
simplification proposals and other matters relating to the
administration of the Federal tax system as it may deem advisable.
``(C) To report, annually, to the Committees on Finance,
Appropriations, and Government Affairs of the Senate, and to the
Committees on Ways and Means, Appropriations, and Government Reform and
Oversight of the House of Representatives, with respect to--
``(i) strategic and business plans for the Internal Revenue Service;
``(ii) progress of the Internal Revenue Service in meeting its
objectives;
``(iii) the budget for the Internal Revenue Service and whether it
supports its objectives;
``(iv) progress of the Internal Revenue Service in improving
taxpayer service and compliance;
``(v) progress of the Internal Revenue Service on technology
modernization; and
``(vi) the annual filing season.''
(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
Subtitle B--Budget
SEC. 411. FUNDING FOR CENTURY DATE CHANGE.
It is the sense of Congress that the Internal Revenue Service efforts
to resolve the century date change computing problems should be funded
fully to provide for certain resolution of such problems.
SEC. 412. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORY GROUP.
The Commissioner shall convene a financial management advisory group
consisting of individuals with expertise in governmental accounting and
auditing from both the private sector and the Government to advise the
Commissioner on financial management issues, including--
(1) the continued partnership between the Internal Revenue Service
and the General Accounting Office;
(2) the financial accounting aspects of the Internal Revenue
Service's system modernization;
(3) the necessity and utility of year-round auditing; and
(4) the Commissioner's plans for improving its financial management
system.
Subtitle C--Tax Law Complexity
SEC. 421. ROLE OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE.
It is the sense of Congress that the Internal Revenue Service should
provide the Congress with an independent view of tax administration, and
that during the legislative process, the tax writing committees of the
Congress should hear from front-line technical experts at the Internal
Revenue Service with respect to the administrability of pending
amendments to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
SEC. 422. TAX COMPLEXITY ANALYSIS.
(a) In General.--Chapter 92 (relating to powers and duties of the
Joint Committee on Taxation) is amended by adding at the end the
following new section:
``SEC. 8024. TAX COMPLEXITY ANALYSIS.
``(a) In General.--If--
``(1) legislation is reported by the Committee on Finance of the
Senate, the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives,
or any committee of conference, and
``(2) such legislation includes any provision amending the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986,
the report or statement accompanying such legislation shall contain a
Tax Complexity Analysis prepared by the staff of the Joint Committee on
Taxation.
``(b) Content of Complexity Analysis.--Each Tax Complexity Analysis
shall identify the provisions, if any, adding significant complexity or
providing significant simplification, as determined by the staff of the
Joint Committee on Taxation, and shall include the basis for such
determination.
``(c) Legislation Subject to Point of Order.--It shall not be in
order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any
legislation described in subsection (a) required to be accompanied by a
Tax Complexity Analysis that does not contain a Tax Complexity Analysis.
``(d) Responsibilities of the Commissioner.--The Commissioner shall
provide the Joint Committee on Taxation with such information as is
necessary to prepare Tax Complexity Analyses.''
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 92 is
amended by adding at the end the following new item:
``Sec. 8024. Tax complexity analysis.''
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply
to legislation considered on or after January 1, 1998.
TITLE V--CLARIFICATION OF DEDUCTION FOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION
SEC. 501. CLARIFICATION OF DEDUCTION FOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION.
(a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 404 is amended by adding
at the end the following new paragraph:
``(11) Determinations relating to deferred compensation.--
``(A) In general.--For purposes of determining under this section--
``(i) whether compensation of an employee is deferred compensation, and
``(ii) when deferred compensation is paid,
no amount shall be treated as received by the employee, or paid,
until it is actually received by the employee.
``(B) Exception.--Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to severance pay.''
(b) Sick Leave Pay Treated Like Vacation Pay.--Paragraph (5) of
section 404(a) is amended by inserting ``or sick leave pay'' after
``vacation pay''.
(c) Effective Date.--
(1) In general.--The amendments made by this section shall apply to
taxable years ending after October 8, 1997.
(2) Change in method of accounting.--In the case of any taxpayer
required by this section to change its method of accounting for its
first taxable year ending after October 8, 1997--
(A) such change shall be treated as initiated by the taxpayer,
(B) such change shall be treated as made with the consent of the
Secretary of the Treasury, and
(C) the net amount of the adjustments required to be taken into
account by the taxpayer under section 481 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986 shall be taken into account in such first taxable year.
I. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND
A. PURPOSE AND SUMMARY
H.R. 2676, as amended, modifies the structure and procedures of the
Internal Revenue Service (``IRS''), provides IRS personnel
flexibilities, encourages electronic filing, provides additional
taxpayer rights and protections, modifies Congressional oversight of the
IRS, and provides a revenue offset relating to the treatment of the
employer deduction for vacation pay.
Title I--Executive branch governance
The bill establishes within the Treasury Department the Internal
Revenue Service Oversight Board (the ``Board''). The general
responsibility of the Board is to oversee the IRS in the administration,
management, conduct, direction, and supervision of the execution and
application of the internal revenue laws. The Board is to have the
following specific responsibilities: to review and approve strategic
plans of the IRS; to review the operational functions of the IRS; to
provide for the review of the Commissioner's selection, evaluation and
compensation of senior managers; to review and approve plans for major
reorganizations; and to review and approve the budget of the IRS
prepared by the Commissioner. The Board is to be composed of 8
private-life members appointed by the President with the advice and
consent of the Senate, plus the Secretary of the Treasury (or the Deputy
Secretary), the IRS Commissioner, and a representative of a union
representing a significant number of IRS employees (who would be
appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate).
The bill provides that the IRS Commissioner is appointed as under
present law by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate.
However, the Board has the authority to recommend candidates for
Commissioner to the President, and to recommend removal of the
Commissioner. The Commissioner has such duties and powers as prescribed
by the Secretary. Unless otherwise prescribed by the Secretary, such
duties include certain statutorily enumerated duties. The Secretary must
notify the Congress of any changes in the duties delegated to the
Commissioner.
The bill deletes the present-law funding mechanism for the employee
plans and exempt organizations division of the IRS in Code section
7802(b)(2). Such funding mechanism has never been utilized under present
law.
The bill makes changes relating to the Taxpayer Advocate designed to
strengthen the office, and prohibits Executive Branch influence over
taxpayer audits and collection activity.
The bill also makes certain changes to facilitate IRS personnel
flexibilities.
Title II. Electronic filing
The bill provides rules designed to facilitate and encourage
electronic filing of tax returns, whenever feasible. Under the bill,
electronic filing is encouraged by the use of advertising, development
of incentives, and setting a goal of 80 percent of returns to be
electronically filed by the year 2007. With respect to information
returns, submitters are encouraged to use electronic filing by extending
the due date for filing from February 28 to March 31. The bill requires
development of procedures to facilitate electronic filing, including
those that would permit the Secretary to accept returns without a manual
signature. The bill also requires the IRS to study and develop
procedures to implement a return free system. The IRS also must develop
procedures that would permit, to the extent feasible, taxpayers who use
electronic filing to review their account information electronically.
Title III. Taxpayer bill of rights 3
The bill contains a number of provisions designed to strengthen the
rights of taxpayers in their dealings with the Internal Revenue Service.
Among the more significant of these provisions are modifying the burden
of proof, providing more generous innocent spouse relief, protecting the
confidentiality of tax advice, expanding the conditions under which
taxpayers can receive awards of attorney's fees in disputes with the
IRS, permitting taxpayers to receive civil damages for negligence by the
IRS in collection actions, and suspending the statute of limitations on
filing refund claims during periods of disability.
Title IV. Congressional accountability for the Internal Revenue Service
The bill provides that all requests for studies of the IRS by the
General Accounting Office (other than requests by the Chair or ranking
member of a committee or subcommittee) must be approved by the Joint
Committee on Taxation. The bill provides for two joint hearings a year
of the 6 Congressional Committees with oversight jurisdiction over the
IRS. The Joint Committee on Taxation is required to report annually to
the tax-writing committees on the state of the Federal tax system, and
at the joint hearings.
The bill provides that a committee report or conference report on tax
legislation is to include a Tax Complexity Analysis prepared by the
staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation.
Title V. Clarification of deduction for vacation pay
The bill overrules a Tax Court decision by providing that vacation
pay that is actually received by employees more than 2\1/2\ months after
the end of the year is not deductible until paid by the employer. Under
the bill, amounts are not considered received by employees or paid
unless they are actually received. Letters of credit, trusts, and
similar mechanisms will not constitute payment or receipt.
B. BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION
The National Commission on Restructuring the Internal Revenue Service
(the ``Commission'') was established to review the present practices of
the Internal Revenue Service (``IRS'') and to make recommendations for
modernizing and improving its efficiency and taxpayer services. The
Commission's report, issued June 25, 1997\1\
contains recommendations relating to executive branch governance and
management of the IRS, Congressional oversight of the IRS, personnel
flexibilities, customer service and compliance, technology
modernization, electronic filing, tax law simplification, taxpayer
rights, and financial accountability. H.R. 2292, introduced on July 30,
1997, by Mr. Portman and Mr. Cardin, generally mirrors the
recommendations of the Commission.
\1\Report of the National Commission on Restructuring the Internal
Revenue Service, ``A Vision For a New IRS,'' June 25, 1997.
H.R. 2676 builds on the Commission's report and recommendations and
the provisions of H.R. 2292 to provide for a more effective IRS in its
administration of the tax laws and in improving the IRS's service and
responsiveness to taxpayers.
C. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
Committee bill
H.R. 2676\2\
was introduced by Chairman Archer and Messrs. Portman and Cardin on
October 21, 1997, and was amended by the Committee in a markup on
October 22, 1997. An amendment in the nature of a substitute (offered by
Chairman Archer) was adopted by a voice vote, with a quorum present. The
bill, as amended, was ordered favorably reported by a roll call of 33
yeas and 4 nays on October 22, 1997, with a quorum present.
\2\An earlier, related proposal was introduced by Messrs. Portman and
Cardin on July 30, 1997, as H.R. 2292.
Committee hearings
Full Committee .--The Committee held public hearings on September 16
17, 1997, on the recommendations of the National Commission on
Restructuring the Internal Revenue Service.
Subcommittee on Oversight .--The Subcommittee on Oversight held
public hearings on IRS-related topics in 1997 as follows:
Annual Report of the Internal Revenue Service Taxpayer Advocate
(February 25, 1997).
``High-Risk'' Programs Within the Jurisdiction of the Committee on
Ways and Means (March 4, 1997).
IRS Budget for Fiscal Year 1998 and the 1997 Tax Return Filing
Season (March 18, 1997).
Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (April 16, 1997).
Report of the National Commission on Restructuring the Internal
Revenue Service (July 24, 1997).
Recommendations of the National Commission on Restructuring the
Internal Revenue Service to Expand Electronic Filing of Tax Returns
(September 9, 1997).
Recommendations of the National Commission on Restructuring the
Internal Revenue Service on Taxpayer Protections and Rights (September
26, 1997).
In addition, the Subcommittee on Oversight submitted recommendations
on October 20, 1997, to the Full Committee relating to (1) electronic
filing and (2) taxpayer rights and protections. These Subcommittee
recommendations are the basis for the provisions in Title II and Title
III, respectively, of the Committee bill. Chairman Archer had directed
the Subcommittee on Oversight to review these two areas of the
Commission's report and to make recommendations to the Full Committee.
II. EXPLANATION OF THE BILL
TITLE I. EXECUTIVE BRANCH GOVERNANCE
A. CREATION OF IRS OVERSIGHT BOARD
(SEC. 101 OF THE BILL AND SEC. 7802 OF THE CODE)
Present Law
Under present law, the administration and enforcement of the internal
revenue laws are performed by or under the supervision of the Secretary
of the Treasury.\3\
\3\Code sec. 780(a).
Present law imposes standards of ethical conduct on Federal employees
in order to avoid conflicts of interest. Criminal penalties are imposed
on violations of these standards. In some cases, less strict standards
apply to special government employees than to regular, full-time Federal
government employees. In general, a special government employee is an
individual who is expected to serve no more than 130 days during any
365-day period.
In general, the ethical conduct rules (1) prohibit a Federal employee
from accepting compensation for representing clients before the agency
in which the employee serves or against the United States;\4\
(2) prohibit a Federal employee from acting as agent or attorney for
anyone in a claim against the United States;\5\
(3) impose post-employment restrictions on senior employees in order to
prohibit the unfair use of prior Government employment;\6\
and (4) prohibit a Federal employee from participating personally and
substantially in matters that affect his or her own financial interest
or that of persons with certain relationships to the employee.\7\
\4\18 U.S.C. sec. 203.
\5\18 U.S.C. sec. 205.
\6\18 U.S.C. sec. 207.
\7\18 U.S.C. sec. 208.
In the case of a special government employee who serves less than 60
days in the preceding 365 days, the restrictions in (1) and (2) above
only apply with respect to matters in which the special government
employee personally and substantially participated in his or her
official capacity.
One of the post-employment restrictions prohibits senior government
employees from representing parties other than the United States before
their former department or agency for one year after employment. This
restriction does not apply to special government employees who serve
less than 60 days in the final 1-year period of service.
Federal government employees compensated at certain pay grades are
subject to public financial disclosure requirements. Special government
employees who serve less than 60 days in a year are not subject to the
public financial disclosure requirements, but are subject to
confidential financial disclosure requirements.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that a well-run IRS is critical to the
operation of our tax system. Public confidence in the IRS must be
restored so that our system of voluntary compliance will not be
compromised. The Committee believes that most Americans are willing to
pay their fair share of taxes, and that public faith in the IRS is key
to maintaining that willingness.
The National Commission on Restructuring the IRS (the ``Restructuring
Commission''), which conducted a year-long study of the IRS, found that
a number of factors contribute to current IRS management problems,
including the following. While the Treasury is responsible for IRS
oversight, it has generally provided little consistent strategic
oversight or guidance to the IRS. The Secretary and Deputy Secretary
have many other broad responsibilities, and generally leave the IRS
largely independent. The average tenure of an IRS Commissioner is under
3 years, as is the average tenure of senior Treasury officials
responsible for IRS oversight. Many of the issues that need to be
addressed by the IRS will require expertise in various areas,
particularly management and technology.
The Restructuring Commission concluded that ``problems throughout the
IRS cannot be solved without focus, consistency and direction from the
top. The current structure, which includes Congress, the President, the
Department of the Treasury, and the IRS itself, does not allow the IRS
to set and maintain consistent long-term strategy and priorities, nor to
develop and execute focused plans for improvement. Additionally, the
structure does not ensure that the IRS budget, staffing and technology
are targeted toward achieving organizational success.''
The Committee shares the concerns of the Commission, and agrees that
fundamental change in IRS management and oversight is essential. The
Committee believes that a new management structure that will bring
greater expertise in more areas, focus, and continuity will help the IRS
on the path toward becoming an efficient, responsive, and respected
agency that always acts appropriately in carrying out its functions.
The Committee believes that private sector input is a necessary part
of any new management structure. The Committee believes that the ethics
rules applicable to special government employees (without regard to
exceptions for length of service or pay grade) should be applied to the
private sector members of the new IRS management. These rules will
enhance the ability of such members to demonstrate impartiality in the
performance of their duties, while not unduly restricting the available
pool of potential candidates.
The Committee is aware that the taxpaying public may never relish
contacts with the agency responsible for collecting taxes. Nevertheless,
by establishing a new management
structure that will better enable the IRS to develop and
fulfill long-term goals, the Committee believes that the IRS will be
able to gain public support, and will make contacts with the IRS as
infrequent and as pleasant as possible. The Committee is also aware that
changes being made to IRS management structure are not the final step,
and that continued oversight of the IRS, by Congress as well as the
Administration, is necessary in order to ensure long-term progress.
EXPLANATION OF PROVISION
Duties, responsibilities, and powers of the IRS Oversight Board
The bill provides for the establishment within the Treasury
Department of the Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board (referred to
as the ``Board''). The general responsibilities of the Board are to
oversee the Internal Revenue Service (the ``IRS'') in its
administration, management, conduct, direction, and supervision of the
execution and application of the internal revenue laws. The Board has no
responsibilities or authority with respect to (1) the development and
formulation of Federal tax policy relating to existing or proposed
internal revenue laws, (2) law enforcement activities of the IRS,
including compliance activities such as criminal investigations,
examinations, and collection activities,\8\
and (3) specific procurement activities of the IRS (e.g., selecting
vendors or awarding contracts). As discussed more fully in Part B.,
below, the Board also has the authority to recommend candidates for IRS
Commissioner to the President, and to recommend removal of the
Commissioner. The members of the Board do not have authority to receive
confidential taxpayer return information.\9\
\8\This provision is not intended to limit the Board's authority with
respect to the review and approval of strategic plans and the budget of
the Commissioner or to preclude the Board from review of IRS operations
generally.
\9\The bill does not affect the extent to which the Secretary of the
Treasury (or the Deputy Secretary) and the IRS Commissioner have
authority to receive confidential taxpayer return information under
present law by virtue of such positions. Any request for information
that cannot be disclosed to Board members and any contact relating to a
specific tax payer made by a private-life Board member or the union
representative to an employee of the IRS must be reported by such
employee to the Secretary and Joint Committee on Taxation.
The Board has the following specific responsibilities: (1) to review
and approve strategic plans of the IRS, including the establishment of
mission and objectives (and standards of performance) and annual and
long-range strategic plans; (2) to review the operational functions of
the IRS, including plans for modernization of the tax system, out
sourcing or managed competition, and training and education; (3) to
provide for the review of the Commissioner's selection, evaluation and
compensation of senior managers; and (4) to review and approve the
Commissioner's plans for major reorganization of the IRS. It is intended
that major reorganizations subject to the Board's review and approval
are limited to major changes in organizational structure, such as the
1995 IRS reorganization that combined 7 regions into 4 and 63 districts
into 33. In addition, the Board will review and approve the budget
request of the IRS prepared by the Commissioner, submit such budget
request to the Secretary, and ensure that the budget request supports
the annual and long-range strategic plans of the IRS. The Secretary is
required to submit the budget request approved by the Board to the
President, who is required to submit such request, without revision, to
the Congress together with the President's annual budget request for the
IRS. The bill does not affect the ability of the President to include,
in addition, his own budget request relating to the IRS.
It is intended that the Board will reach a formal decision on all
matters subject to its review. With respect to those matters over which
the Board has approval authority, the Board's decisions are
determinative. It is fully expected that, with respect to those matters
over which the Board has approval authority (other than as relates to
the development of the budget), the Secretary will exert his or her
oversight responsibility over the IRS by working through and with the
Board.\10\
\10\The budget is excepted from this expectation because the bill
provides a separate mechanism through which the Secretary may act. The
procedures relating to the Board permit the President to submit his own
budget in addition to that approved by the Board.
The Board is required to report each year to the President and the
Congress regarding the conduct of its responsibilities.
It is expected that the Treasury Department will no longer utilize
the IRS Management Board once the new Board created by the bill is in
place, as the functions of the IRS Management Board would be taken over
by the new Board.
Composition of the Board
The Board is composed of 11 members. Eight of the members are
so-called ``private-life'' members who are not Federal officers or
employees. These private-life members will be appointed by the
President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The remaining
members are (1) the Secretary of the Treasury (or, if the Secretary so
designates, the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury), (2) a representative
from a union representing a substantial number of IRS employees, who
will be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the
Senate, and\11\
(3) the Commissioner of the IRS.
\11\In appointing the union representative, the President is not
constrained to choose an individual recommended by a union covering IRS
employees, but may choose whoever the President determines to be an
appropriate representative of the union.
The private-life members of the Board are to be appointed based on
their expertise in the following areas: management of large service
organizations; customer service; the Federal tax laws, including
administration and compliance; information technology; organization
development; and the needs and concerns of taxpayers. In the
aggregate, the members of the Board should collectively bring to bear
expertise in all these enumerated areas.
The private-life members are considered special government employees
during the entire period of their appointment. That is, they will be
considered to be performing services as a special government employee on
each day during their appointment, not just on those days on which they
actually perform services. Thus, they will be subject to the ethical
conduct rules applicable to special government employees who serve more
than 60 days during any 365-day period. Thus, for example, private-life
Board members would not be able to represent clients before the IRS on
matters during their term as a Board member. Private-life Board members
would also be subject to the 1-year post-employment restriction
applicable to senior-level employees. Finally, private-life members
would be subject to the public financial disclosure rules generally
applicable to special government employees above certain pay grades.
Compensation of Board members
The private-life members of the Board will be compensated at a rate
of $30,000 per year, except that the Chair will be compensated at a rate
of $50,000 a year. Other members of the Board will receive no
compensation for their services as Board members. The members of the
Board will be entitled to travel expenses for purposes of attending
meetings of the Board.
Administrative matters
The 8 private-life Board members and the union representative
generally will be appointed for 5-year terms. The private-life members
may serve no more than two 5-year terms. Each 5-year term begins upon
appointment. Board member terms are staggered, as a result of a special
rule providing that some private-life members first appointed to the
Board will serve initial terms of less than 5 years. The members of the
Board are to elect a chairperson from among the private-life Board
members for a 2-year term. Any member of the Board can be removed at the
will of the President. In addition, the Secretary of the Treasury (or,
if so delegated, the Deputy Secretary) and the IRS Commissioner are
removed from the Board upon termination of employment in such positions
and the representative of IRS employees is removed from the Board upon
termination of their employment, membership, or other affiliation with
the organization representing IRS employees.
The Board is required to meet at least once a month, and can meet at
such other times as the Board determines appropriate.
A quorum of 6 members is required in order for the Board to conduct
business. Actions of the Board are taken by a majority vote of those
members present and voting.
The Board will not have its own permanent staff, but will have such
staff as detailed by the Commissioner at the request of the Chair of the
Board. The Chair can procure temporary and intermittent services under
section 3109(b) of title 5 of the U.S. Code.
Claims against Board members
The private-life members of the Board and the union representative
have no personal liability under Federal law with respect to any claim
arising out of or resulting from an act or omission by such Board member
within the scope of service as a Board member. The bill does not limit
personal liability for criminal acts or omissions, wilful or malicious
conduct, acts or omissions for private gain, or any other act or
omission outside the scope of service of the Board member.
The bill does not affect any other immunities and protections that
may be available under applicable law or any other right or remedy
against the United States under applicable law, or limit or alter the
immunities that are available under applicable law for Federal officers
and employees.
EFFECTIVE DATE
The provisions of the bill relating to the Board are effective on the
date of enactment. The President is directed to submit nominations for
Board members to the Senate within 6 months of the date of enactment.
B. APPOINTMENT AND DUTIES OF IRS COMMISSIONER
(SECS. 102 AND 103 OF THE BILL AND SECS. 7803 AND 7804 OF THE CODE)
PRESENT LAW
Within the Department of the Treasury is a Commissioner of Internal
Revenue, who is appointed by the President, with the advice and consent
of the Senate. The Commissioner has such duties and powers as may be
prescribed by the Secretary.\12\
The Secretary has delegated to the Commissioner the administration and
enforcement of the internal revenue laws.\13\
The Commissioner generally does not have authority with respect to
policy matters.\14\
\12\Code sec. 7802(a).
\13\Treasury Order 150 10 (April 22, 1982).
\14\See, e.g., Treasury Order 111 2 (March 16, 1981), which delegates to
the Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy) the exclusive authority to make the
final determination of the Treasury Department's position with respect
to issues of tax policy arising in connection with regulations,
published Revenue Rulings and Revenue Procedures, and tax return forms
and to determine the time, form and manner for the public communication
of such position.
The Secretary is authorized to employ such persons as the Secretary
deems appropriate for the administration and enforcement of the internal
revenue laws and to assign posts of duty.
REASONS FOR CHANGE
The Committee believes that the duties and responsibilities of the
Commissioner are of such significance that the Commissioner should
continue to be appointed by the President.\15\
However, the frequency with which the Commissioner changes--the average
tenure in office is under 3 years--is one of the factors contributing to
lack of IRS management continuity. The Committee believes (as did the
National Commission on Restructuring the IRS) that providing a statutory
term for the Commissioner to serve would help ensure greater continuity
of IRS management.
\15\Retaining present law also eliminates any constitutional issues that
may arise if the Commissioner is appointed by someone other than the
President, such as by the Board, as suggested by the National Commission
on Restructuring the IRS.
The Committee believes that it is appropriate to preserve the
present-law structure under which the duties of the Commissioner are
delegated by the Secretary of the Treasury. Modifying this structure may
unnecessarily interfere with the operations of the IRS and other
agencies withing the Treasury. In order to enable the Congress to
properly fulfill its oversight responsibilities with respect to the IRS,
the Committee believes that the Congress should be notified of changes
in the delegation of authority to the Commissioner.
EXPLANATION OF PROVISION
As under present law, the Commissioner will be appointed by the
President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, and can be removed
at will by the President. The Commissioner will be appointed to a 5-year
term, beginning with the date of appointment. The Board has the power to
recommend candidates to the President for Commissioner. The Board has
the authority to recommend the removal of the Commissioner. Although the
President is not required to nominate for Commissioner a candidate
recommended by the Board (or to remove a Commissioner when the Board so
recommends), it is expected that the President will generally give
deference to the Board's expertise and familiarity with the needs and
functions of the IRS and will act in accordance with the Board's
recommendations.
The Commissioner has such duties and powers as prescribed by the
Secretary. Unless otherwise specified by the Secretary, such duties and
powers include the power to administer, manage, conduct, direct, and
supervise the execution and application of the internal revenue laws or
related statutes and tax conventions to which the United States is a
party and to recommend to the President a candidate for Chief Counsel
(and recommend the removal of the Chief Counsel). It is intended that
the listed duties codify present delegations. However, if the Secretary
changes such orders, they may be subject to the notice requirement of
the bill, described below.
If the Secretary determines not to delegate the specified duties to
the Commissioner, such determination will not take effect until 30 days
after the Secretary notifies the House Committees on Ways and Means,
Government Reform and Oversight, and Appropriations, the Senate
Committees on Finance, Government Operations, and Appropriations, and
the Joint Committee on Taxation.
This provision is not intended to alter the Secretary's existing
authority to delegate to agencies other than the IRS the authority to
administer and enforce certain portions of the internal revenue laws.
For example, the Secretary currently has delegated to the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms the authority to administer and enforce
the taxes under section 4181 and chapters 51, 52, and 53 of the Internal
Revenue Code (regarding excise and other taxes on alcohol, tobacco,
firearms, and destructive devices).
The Commissioner is to consult with the Board on all matters within
the Board's authority (other than the recommendation of candidates for
Commissioner and the recommendation to remove the Commissioner). With
respect to those matters within the Board's approval authority (other
than with respect to the development of the budget), it is fully
expected that the Secretary will exert his or her oversight
responsibility over the IRS by working through and with the Board.\16\
\16\The budget is excepted from this expectation because the bill
provides a separate mechanism through which the Secretary may act.
Unless otherwise specified by the Secretary, the Commissioner is
authorized to employ such persons as the Commissioner deems proper for
the administration and enforcement of the internal revenue laws and
would be required to issue all necessary directions, instructions,
orders, and rules applicable to such persons. Unless otherwise provided
by the Secretary, the Commissioner will determine and designate the
posts of duty.
The Commissioner is compensated as under present law.
EFFECTIVE DATE
The provisions of the bill relating to the Commissioner generally are
effective on the date of enactment. The provision relating to the 5-year
term of office applies to the Commissioner in office on the date of
enactment. This 5-year term runs from the date of appointment.
C. STRUCTURE AND FUNDING OF THE EMPLOYEE PLANS AND EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS
(``EP/EO'') DIVISION
(SEC. 102 OF THE BILL AND SEC. 7802(B) OF THE CODE)
Present Law
Prior to 1974, no one specific office in the IRS had primary
responsibility for employee plans and tax-exempt organizations. As part
of the reforms contained in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (``ERISA''), Congress statutorily created the Office of Employee
Plans and Exempt Organizations (``EP/EO'') under the direction of an
Assistant Commissioner.\17\
EP/EO was created to oversee deferred compensation plans governed by
sections 401 414 of the Code and organizations exempt from tax under
Code section 501(a).
\17\Code section 7802(b).
In general, EP/EO was established in response to concern about the
level of IRS resources devoted to oversight of employee plans and exempt
organizations. The legislative history of Code section 7802(b) states
that, with respect to administration of laws relating to employee plans
and exempt organizations, ``the natural tendency is for the Service to
emphasize those areas that produce revenue rather than those areas
primarily concerned with maintaining the integrity and carrying out the
purposes of exemption provisions.''\18\
\18\S. Rept. 93 383, 108 (1973). See also H. Rept. 93 807, 104 (1974).
To provide funding for the new EP/EO office, ERISA authorized the
appropriation of an amount equal to the sum of the section 4940 excise
tax on investment income of private foundations (assuming a rate of 2
percent) as would have been collected during the second preceding year
plus the greater of the same amount or $30 million.\19\
However, amounts raised by the section 4940 excise tax have never been
dedicated to the administration of EP/EO, but are transferred instead to
general revenues. Thus, the level of EP/EO funding, like that of the
rest of the IRS, is dependent on annual Congressional appropriations to
the Treasury Department.
\19\Code section 7802(b)(2).
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that it is important to retain the Office of
Employee Plans and Exempt Organizations under the supervision and
direction of an Assistant Commissioner of the Internal Revenue. Because
of EP/EO's expertise in the area of retirement benefits, the Committee
believes that its responsibilities should be expanded to include
nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. In addition, the
inclusion of an annual reporting mechanism in the bill is designed to
ensure that the Commissioner is adequately informed regarding the
activities of EP/EO.
The funding formula for EP/EO set forth in section 7802(b)(2) would,
if utilized, result in an unstable level of funding that may bear little
or no relation to the amount of financial resources actually required by
the EP/EO division. In repealing the funding mechanism, however, the
Committee notes that, given the magnitude of the sectors EP/EO is
charged with regulating, as well as the unique nature of its mandate, an
adequately funded EP/EO is extremely important to the efficient and fair
administration of the Federal tax system. Accordingly, financial
resources for EP/EO should not be constrained on the basis that EP/EO is
a ``non-core'' IRS function; rather, EP/EO, like all functions of the
IRS, should be funded so as to promote the efficient and fair
administration of the Federal tax system.
Explanation of Provision
The bill retains the Office of Employee Plans and Exempt
Organizations under the supervision and direction of an Assistant
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue. As under present law, EP/EO is
responsible for carrying out functions and duties associated with
organizations designed to be exempt from tax under section 501(a) of the
Code and with respect to plans designed to be qualified under section
401(a). In addition, however, EP/EO's responsibilities are expanded to
include nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. The bill also
provides that the Assistant Commissioner shall report annually to the
Commissioner on EP/EO operations.
In addition, the bill repeals the funding mechanism for EP/EO set
forth in section 7802(b). Thus, the appropriate level of funding for
EP/EO is, consistent with current practice, subject to annual
Congressional appropriations, as are other functions within the IRS.
Effective Date
The provision is effective on the date of enactment.
D. TAXPAYER ADVOCATE
(SEC. 102 OF THE BILL AND SEC. 7803 OF THE CODE)
Present Law
In 1996, the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2 (``TBOR 2'')\20\
established the position of Taxpayer Advocate, which replaced the
position of Taxpayer Ombudsman, created in 1979 by the IRS. Before the
creation of the Taxpayer Advocate, the Taxpayer Ombudsman was a career
civil servant selected by and serving at the pleasure of the IRS
Commissioner. The Taxpayer Advocate is appointed by and reports directly
to the IRS Commissioner.
\20\Public Law 104 168 (July 30, 1996).
TBOR 2 also created the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. The
functions of the office are (1) to assist taxpayers in resolving
problems with the IRS, (2) to identify areas in which taxpayers have
problems in dealings with the IRS, (3) to propose changes (to the extent
possible) in the administrative practices of the IRS that will mitigate
those problems, and (4) to identify potential legislative changes that
may mitigate those problems.
The Taxpayer Advocate is required to submit two annual reports to the
tax-writing committees, one, due by June 30, that describes the
objectives of the Taxpayer Advocate for the next fiscal year and
another, due by December 31, that describes the activities of the
Taxpayer Advocate for the previous fiscal year. The December 31 report
must identify what the Taxpayer Advocate has done to improve taxpayer
services and IRS responsiveness, contain recommendations received from
individuals who have the authority to issue a Taxpayer Assistance Order,
describe in detail the progress made in implementing those
recommendations, contain a summary of at least 20 of the most serious
problems encountered by taxpayers in dealing with the IRS, include
recommendations for such administrative and legislative action as may be
appropriate to resolve such problems, describe the extent to which
regional problem resolution officers participate in the selection and
evaluation of local problem resolution officers, and include other such
information as the Taxpayer Advocate may deem advisable. The reports are
submitted without review by the Commissioner, the Secretary of the
Treasury, or any other officer or employee of the Department of Treasury
or the Office of Management and Budget.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that the Taxpayer Advocate serves an important
role within the IRS in terms of preserving taxpayer rights and solving
problems that taxpayers encounter in their dealings with the IRS. To
that end, it is appropriate that the IRS Oversight Board have input in
the selection of the Taxpayer Advocate. In addition, the Committee
believes that the Taxpayer Advocate should have experience appropriate
to the position and that the Taxpayer Advocate's objectivity would be
best preserved by limiting future employment with the IRS. The Committee
also believes that the reporting requirements of the Taxpayer Advocate
should be targeted not only towards solving problems with the IRS but
also towards preventing problems before they arise.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires the Commissioner to obtain the approval of the IRS
Oversight Board on the selection of the Taxpayer Advocate. A candidate
for the Taxpayer Advocate must have either substantial experience
representing taxpayers before the IRS or have substantial experience
within the IRS. If the prospective Taxpayer Advocate was an officer or
an employee of the IRS before being appointed as the Taxpayer Advocate,
the individual is required to agree not to accept any employment with
the IRS for at least 5 years after ceasing to be the Taxpayer Advocate.
The bill modifies the information to be included in the December 31
report to the tax-writing committees. The report no longer needs to
include information about the extent to which regional problem
resolution officers participate in the selection and evaluation of local
problem resolution officers. The report identifies areas of the tax law
that impose significant compliance burdens on taxpayers or the IRS,
including specific recommendations for solving these problems. The
Taxpayer Advocate also is required to work in conjunction with the
National Director of Appeals to identify the 10 most litigated issues
for each category of taxpayers, and include the list of issues and
recommendations for mitigating such disputes in the report. Categories
of taxpayers include, for example, individuals, self-employed
individuals, small businesses, etc.
As under present law, the reports are submitted directly to the
tax-writing committees, without review by the IRS Oversight Board, the
Secretary of the Treasury, or any other officer or employee of the
Department of the Treasury or the Office of Management and Budget.
In addition, the bill imposes new responsibilities on the Taxpayer
Advocate. The Taxpayer Advocate is requested to monitor the coverage and
geographical allocation of problem resolution officers and develop
guidance that outlines criteria to be used by IRS employees in referring
taxpayer inquiries to problem resolution officers. In connection with
these responsibilities, it is anticipated that the Taxpayer Advocate
will work with the IRS District Offices to ensure convenient taxpayer
access to the local problem resolution officer. For example, the local
telephone number for the problem resolution officer in each district
should be published and available to taxpayers.
It is intended that the Taxpayer Advocate will work with the
Commissioner in developing career paths for local problem resolution
officers, so that individuals can progress through the General Schedule
in the same manner as examination employees, without having to leave the
problem resolution system. In that regard, it is contemplated that the
compensation levels of local and regional problem resolution officers
should be the same as those of IRS personnel operating in other
functional units. Under the current system, local problem resolution
officers generally must return to an audit or collection function to
achieve promotion. This lack of a career path within the problem
resolution system reduces the independence of the system. It is
contemplated that, to the extent feasible, regional problem resolution
officers should be selected from the available pool of local problem
resolution officers.
Effective Date
This provision is effective on the date of enactment, except that the
post-employment restrictions on the Taxpayer Advocate do not apply to an
individual holding that position on the date of enactment.
E. PROHIBITION ON EXECUTIVE BRANCH INFLUENCE OVER TAXPAYER AUDITS
(SEC. 104 OF THE BILL AND NEW SEC. 7217 OF THE CODE)
Present Law
There is no explicit prohibition in the Code on high-level Executive
Branch influence over taxpayer audits and collection activity.
The Internal Revenue Code prohibits disclosure of tax returns and
return information, except to the extent specifically authorized by the
Internal Revenue Code (sec. 6103). Unauthorized disclosure is a felony
punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000 or imprisonment of not more
than five years, or both (sec. 7213). An action for civil damages also
may be brought for unauthorized disclosure (sec. 7431).
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that the perception that it is possible that
high-level Executive Branch influence over taxpayer audits and
collection activity could occur has a negative influence on taxpayers'
views of the tax system. Accordingly, the Committee believes that it is
appropriate to prohibit such influence.
Explanation of Provision
The bill makes it unlawful for a specified person to request that any
officer or employee of the IRS conduct or terminate an audit or
otherwise investigate or terminate the investigation of any particular
taxpayer with respect to the tax liability of that taxpayer. The
prohibition applies to the President, the Vice President, and employees
of the executive offices of either the President or Vice President, as
well as any individual (except the Attorney General) serving in a
position specified in section 5312 of Title 5 of the United States Code
(these are generally Cabinet-level positions). The prohibition applies
to both direct requests and requests made through an intermediary.
Any request made in violation of this rule must be reported by the
IRS employee to whom the request was made to the Chief Inspector of the
IRS. The Chief Inspector has the authority to investigate such
violations and to refer any violations to the Department of Justice for
possible prosecution, as appropriate. Anyone convicted of violating this
provision will be punished by imprisonment of not more than 5 years or a
fine not exceeding $5,000 (or both).
Three exceptions to the general prohibition apply. First, the
prohibition does not apply to a request made to a specified person by a
taxpayer or a taxpayer's representative that is forwarded by the
specified person to the IRS. This exception is intended to cover two
types of situations. The first situation is where a taxpayer (or a
taxpayer's representative) writes to a specified person seeking
assistance in resolving a difficulty with the IRS. This exception
permits the specified person who receives such a request to forward it
to the IRS for resolution without violating the general prohibition. The
second situation that this first exception is intended to cover is an
audit or investigation by the IRS of a Presidential nominee. Under
present law (sec. 6103(c)), nominees for Presidentially appointed
positions consent to disclosure of their tax returns and return
information so that background checks may be conducted. Sometimes an
audit or other investigation is initiated as part of that background
check. The Committee anticipates that any such audit or investigation
that is part of such a background check will be encompassed within this
first exception.
The second exception to the general prohibition applies to requests
for disclosure of returns or return information under section 6103 if
the request is made in accordance with the requirements of section 6103.
The third exception to the general prohibition applies to requests
made by the Secretary of the Treasury as a consequence of the
implementation of a change in tax policy.
Effective Date
The provision applies to violations occurring after the date of
enactment.
F. IRS PERSONNEL FLEXIBILITIES
(SEC. 111 OF THE BILL AND NEW SECS. 9301 9304 OF TITLE 5, U.S.C.)
Present Law
The Internal Revenue Service, like almost all other federal agencies,
is subject to the personnel rules and procedures set forth in title 5,
United States Code. As such, its employees generally are classified
under the General Schedule or the Senior Executive Service.
Reasons for Change
Under the existing personnel rules and procedures set forth in title
5, hiring, evaluating, promoting, and firing employees is subject to
extensive regulation. Given the role of the IRS in the federal
government, its unique needs in terms of skilled tax, technology, and
service personnel, and its present needs to motivate its managers and
employees to embrace continuous improvements and cost savings while
maintaining adequate levels of service for taxpayers, the Committee
finds that certain flexibilities are appropriate and will facilitate the
efforts of the IRS to better manage its workforce.
The Committee finds that the vast majority of IRS employees are
competent professionals who perform their jobs as well as can be
expected under existing organizational constraints. However, over the
past decade, the quality of IRS interaction with taxpayers and the
public has deteriorated, in part due to lower personnel qualifications,
pay levels, and training quality. In addition, the stovepipe nature of
IRS operations, in which functional units such as taxpayer services,
exam, collection, and appeals set and implement their own priorities and
objectives, which often are disconnected from the other functions and
the organization as a whole, adds to the problem of decreased taxpayer
service. Moreover, the risk averse nature of the IRS, which provides
minimal incentive for managers or front-line employees for achieving
mission, stifles creativity, innovation, and quick problem resolution.
Consistent with the rest of this bill, the Committee intends section
111 to lead to increased accountability on the part of IRS managers and
employees and increased focus on the IRS mission, goals, and objectives.
At the core of this accountability and focus lies increased attention on
providing adequate levels of service to taxpayers. The Committee
believes that taxpayers should deal only with IRS employees who are
trained adequately and possess the skills and tools necessary to do
their jobs well. To provide such service to taxpayers, the Committee
expects the IRS to use the flexibilities provided by this section to
hire and promote qualified professionals, to provide incentives for
employees to treat taxpayers with the service and respect that they
deserve, and to discipline employees who cannot or will not treat
taxpayers fairly. In short, the Committee expects the IRS to hold all
workers--from senior managers to front-line employees--accountable for
carrying out the IRS mission.
Explanation of Provision
In general
Section 111 of the bill would amend title 5, United States Code, by
inserting a new chapter 93 providing certain personnel flexibilities to
the IRS. By providing these flexibilities in this manner, the Committee
intends for the IRS to remain subject to all of the rules and procedures
of title 5, except to the extent that the exercise of flexibilities
provided under this new chapter 93 is inconsistent with prior law.
The bill clarifies that the personnel flexibilities for the IRS are
intended to be exercised consistently with existing rules relating to
merit system principles, prohibited personnel practices, and preference
eligibles. Moreover, the Committee believes that the employees of the
IRS should be involved in the reinvention of the bureaucracies in which
they work. Accordingly, the bill provides that the flexibilities
provided to the IRS must be negotiated between the IRS and the
employees' union. Such negotiations need not address all of the
flexibilities provided under this provision. The written agreement
should be a consensus document, but is not a contract that can be
appealed to the federal services impasse panel, or otherwise create
additional appeal rights. To the extent that the exercise of any
flexibility, such as that provided by new section 9303(c), would not
affect members of the employees' union, then no written agreement is
required.
Performance management
The bill would require the IRS to establish a new performance
management system within one year from the date of enactment. The
Committee expects that this system will refocus the IRS's personnel
system on the overall mission of the IRS and how each employee's
performance relates to that mission. The new performance standards are
premised on the notion of retention--performance at the retention
standard indicates that an employee has performed fully successfully, no
better or worse. Failure to meet this standard indicates that the
employee has not performed adequately, and managers should use the tools
available to encourage the employee to improve performance, or if such
efforts do not lead to improved performance, to remove the employee. The
performance standard above the retention standard is intended to
encourage employees to perform at a higher level, and to allow managers
to make performance distinctions among employees.
The Committee encourages the IRS to redesign its performance measures
to more appropriately align employee behavior with organizational goals.
One of the most significant efforts that the IRS must undertake in this
regard is to design internal measures that will encourage behavior which
makes it easier for taxpayers to interact with the IRS. While this will
involve significant effort, the Committee expects that these measures
will bring the organizational goals and objectives, including those
established under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 and
Revenue Procedure 64-22, down to the individual employee level. In
addition, the Committee expects the IRS to develop taxpayer service
surveys that will gauge the level of service that taxpayers actually
receive, for use in evaluating organizational and group performance. In
no case should measures be used which rank employees or groups of
employees based solely on enforcement results, establish dollar goals
for assessments or collections, or otherwise undermine fair treatment of
taxpayers. While any system of measures must reflect the efficiency and
productivity of employees, the Committee expects that the IRS will
establish a balanced system of measures that will ensure that taxpayer
satisfaction is paramount throughout all IRS functions.
Awards
There are three types of awards specifically referenced in the bill.
First, certain awards for superior accomplishments will continue to
require certification to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), but
absent objection from OPM within 60 days, the Commissioner's
recommendations for such awards will take effect. As with all awards,
these awards should be made based on performance under the new
performance management system, and in no case should awards be made (or
performance measured) based solely or principally on tax enforcement
results.
The second category of awards relates to the most senior managers in
the IRS. The Commissioner will have discretion, upon consultation with
the IRS Oversight Board established under section 101 of this bill, to
make awards of up to 50 percent of salary to such managers, so long as
the total compensation for an employee as a result of such an award does
not equal or exceed the annual rate of compensation for the Vice
President for such calendar year. As with awards for superior
accomplishments, OPM will have 60 days to object. The Commissioner will
be required to prescribe regulations defining how determinations will be
made as to whether an employee is eligible for such awards. In no case,
however, will more than 8 employees be eligible to receive such awards
in any calendar year. Moreover, it is not expected that all of the
eligible pool will receive such awards each year, or that the full 50
percent would be appropriate, except in cases of extraordinary
performance.
Finally, the third category of awards--based on savings--is intended
to encourage the practice of rewarding employees for developing more
efficient methods of administration. The Committee encourages the IRS to
establish programs that encourage employee input into reorganizing
business processes leading to efficiency gains, and sharing resultant
savings with employees. Provided that taxpayers receive adequate levels
of service, the Committee expects that such gainsharing awards will help
to improve the efficiency of the IRS.
Streamlined procedures
The bill provides two tools to streamline the process of taking
certain adverse actions for poor performance. First, the notice period
for taking adverse actions is reduced from 30 days to 15 days. At the
discretion of the IRS, and in accordance with regulations issued by OPM,
this period can be extended.
Second, the bill prohibits appeals of the denial of a step increase
to the Merit Systems Protections Board. Aggrieved employees nonetheless
can appeal such actions pursuant to internal agency procedures,
including any procedures agreed to pursuant to collective bargaining
agreements or pursuant to the written agreement under section 9301(b)
authorizing the use of this flexibility.
Staffing flexibilities
The bill provides the IRS with flexibility in filling certain
permanent appointments in the competitive service by authorizing the IRS
to fill such vacancies with either qualified veterans or qualified
temporary employees. For purposes of this provision, a qualified veteran
is an individual who is either a preference eligible or has been
separated from the armed forces under honorable conditions after at
least three years of active service, and who meets the minimum
qualifications for the vacant position. A qualified temporary employee
is defined under the bill as a temporary employee of the IRS with at
least two years of continuous service, who has met all applicable
retention standards and who meets the minimum qualifications for the
vacant position.
The bill also authorizes the IRS to establish category rating systems
for evaluating job applicants, under which qualified candidates are
divided into two or more quality categories on the basis of relative
degrees of merit, rather than assigned individual numerical ratings.
Managers would be authorized to select any candidate from the highest
quality category, and would not be limited to the three highest ranked
candidates, as is the case under existing law. In administering these
category rating systems, the IRS generally will be required to list
preference eligibles ahead of other individuals within each quality
category. Nonetheless, the appointing authority can select any candidate
from the highest quality category, as long as existing requirements
relating to passing over preference eligibles are satisfied.
The bill authorizes the Commissioner to reassign or remove career
appointees in the Senior Executive Service immediately upon taking
office. While the Committee does not intend for any Commissioner to make
wholesale management changes without thorough evaluations, the Committee
believes that if the Commissioner is to be held accountable, then the
Commissioner must have the flexibility to recruit his own management
team.
The bill authorizes the Commissioner to establish probation periods
for IRS employees of up to 3 years, when the Commissioner determines
that a shorter period is not sufficient for an employee to demonstrate
proficiency in a position.
Demonstration projects
The bill makes it easier for the IRS to establish demonstration
projects under title 5. The Committee expects that the IRS will use this
flexibility to establish demonstration projects to improve personnel
management, particularly to the extent that such projects lead to
increased individual accountability. For example, the IRS might use this
flexibility to establish demonstration projects involving broad-banded
pay systems or alternative classification systems, to provide for
variations in the existing rules regarding grade and pay retention, or
to provide for variations from existing provisions relating to payment
of recruitment, relocation, and retention bonuses. In addition, the
Committee expects that the IRS will use this flexibility to develop more
efficient means of handling employee appeals of personnel actions. No
flexibility can be exercised under this provision that does not preserve
due process for employees, however.
To allow the IRS the flexibility to establish these and other
demonstration projects, as appropriate, the bill authorizes any number
of projects, and exempts the IRS from many of the requirements
applicable to demonstration projects under section 4703 of title 5,
United States Code. Specifically, the bill eliminates the requirement
that the IRS submit plans to establish demonstration projects to a
public hearing, and streamlines the advance notice requirements of
section 4703. In addition, the bill allows the IRS to establish
demonstration projects for any number of its employees, and gives the
Commissioner greater latitude in working with OPM to develop and
implement demonstration projects. The bill maintains a number of the
existing prohibitions on demonstration projects, including the
prohibition on using demonstration projects to waive any requirement of
title 5 relating to family and medical leave. As with the other
personnel flexibilities provided under this section, the bill requires
the IRS to negotiate a written agreement with the employees' union to
the extent that the implementation of a demonstration project affects
such employees.
The bill establishes a general time limitation of 5 years on the
duration of any demonstration project established under this section.
However, if the Commissioner and the Director of OPM concur, a
demonstration project may be extended for an additional 2 years if
necessary to validate the results of the project. Not later than 6
months prior to the termination of a project, the bill requires the
Commissioner to submit a legislative proposal to the Congress if the
Commissioner determines that such project should be made permanent.
Effective Date
The provisions shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this
Act.
TITLE II. ELECTRONIC FILING
A. ELECTRONIC FILING OF TAX AND INFORMATION RETURNS
(SEC. 201 OF THE BILL AND SEC. 6011 OF THE CODE)
Present Law
Treas. Reg. section 1.6012 5 provides that the Commissioner may
authorize, at the option of a person required to make a return, the use
of a composite return in lieu of a paper return. An electronically filed
return is a composite return consisting of electronically transmitted
data and certain paper documents that cannot be electronically
transmitted. Form 8453 is a paper form that must be received by the IRS
before any electronically filed return is complete. Form 8453 provides
signature information to the IRS.
The IRS conducted the first test of electronic filing in 1986, for a
limited number of tax year 1985 returns.\21\
In 1990, the IRS permitted nationwide electronic filing of returns that
had refunds owing.\22\
In 1991, the IRS accepted electronically filed returns that had
balances due.\23\
In 1993, the IRS established an electronic filing goal of 80 million
tax returns by 2001. During the 1997 tax filing season, the IRS received
approximately 20 million individual tax returns electronically.
\21\Rev. Proc. 86 4, 1986 1 C.B. 423.
\22\Rev. Proc. 90 62, 1990 2 C.B. 659.
\23\Rev. Proc. 91 69, 1991 2 C.B. 893.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that the implementation of a comprehensive
strategy to encourage electronic filing of tax and information returns
holds significant potential to benefit taxpayers and make the IRS
returns processing function more efficient. For excample, the error rate
associated with processing paper tax returns is approximately 20
percent, half of which is attributable to the IRS and half to error in
taxpayer data. Because electronically-filed returns usually are prepared
using computer software programs with built-in accuracy checks, undergo
pre-screening by the IRS, and experience no key punch errors, electronic
returns have an error rate of less than one percent. Thus, the Committee
believes that an expansion of electronic filing will significantly
reduce errors (and the resulting notices that are triggered by such
errors). In addition, taxpayers who file their returns electronically
receive confirmation from the IRS that their return was received.
Explanation of Provision
The bill states that the policy of Congress is to promote paperless
filing, with a long-range goal of providing for the filing of at least
80 percent of all tax returns in electronic form by the year 2007. The
bill requires the Secretary of the Treasury to establish a strategic
plan to eliminate barriers, provide incentives, and use competitive
market forces to increase taxpayer use of electronic filing. The
strategic plan initially targets returns prepared in electronic form but
filed in paper form, such as a return prepared by the taxpayer using
return preparation software, which the taxpayer then printed and filed
in paper form. The bill requires all such returns to be filed
electronically, to the extent feasible, by the year 2002.
The bill requires the Secretary to create an electronic commerce
advisory group comprised of representatives from the small business, tax
practitioner, preparer, and computerized tax processor communities and
other representatives from the electronic filing industry. Under the
bill, the Chair of the IRS Oversight Board, together with the Secretary
and the Chair of the electronic commerce advisory group, are required to
report annually to the tax-writing committees on the IRS's progress in
implementing its plan to meet the goal of 80 percent electronic filing
by 2007.
To promote electronic filing, the bill authorizes the Secretary to
publicize the benefits of electronic filing by using mass communications
and other means. In addition, the bill authorizes the Secretary to
implement procedures for paying appropriate incentives for
electronically filed returns. This provision is not intended to override
section 1205 of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997,\24\
which prohibits the IRS from paying fees to credit card companies in
connection with receiving tax payments by credit card.
\24\Public Law 105 34 (August 5, 1997).
Effective Date
The provision is effective on the date of enactment.
B. TIME FOR FILING CERTAIN INFORMATION RETURNS WITH THE IRS
(SEC. 202 OF THE BILL AND SEC. 6071 OF THE CODE)
Present Law
Information such as the amount of dividends, partnership
distributions, and interest paid during the tax year must be supplied to
taxpayers by the payors by January 31 of the year following the calendar
year for which the return must be filed. The payors must file an
information return with the IRS with the information by February 28 of
the year following the calendar year for which the return must be filed.
Under present law, the due date for information returns is the same
whether such returns are filed on paper, on magnetic media, or
electronically. Most information returns are filed on magnetic media
(such as computer tapes) which must be physically shipped to the IRS.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that encouraging information return filers to
file electronically will substantially increase the efficiency of the
tax system by avoiding the need to convert the information from magnetic
media or paper to electronic form before return matching.
Explanation of Provision
The bill provides an incentive to filers of information returns to
use electronic filing by extending the due date for filing such returns
from February 28 (under present law) to March 31 of the year following
the calendar year to which the return relates. The bill does not change
the requirement that payors must supply taxpayers with the applicable
information by January 31. The Committee anticipates that the IRS will
cooperate with interested private sector filers of information returns
in facilitating to the maximum extent feasible the utilization of
electronic filing for such forms.
Effective Date
The provision applies to information returns required to be filed
after December 31, 1999.
C. PAPERLESS ELECTRONIC FILING
(SEC. 203 OF THE BILL AND SEC. 6061 OF THE CODE)
Present Law
Code section 6061 requires that tax forms be signed as required by
the Secretary. The IRS will not accept an electronically filed return
unless it has received a Form 8453 providing signature information on
the filer.
Generally, a return is considered timely filed when it is received by
the IRS on or before the due date of the return. If the requirements of
Code section 7502 are met, timely mailing is treated as timely filing.
If the return if mailed by registered mail, the dated registration
statement is prima facie evidence of delivery. As an electronically
filed return is not mailed, section 7502 does not apply.
The IRS periodically publishes a list of the forms and schedules that
may be electronically transmitted, as well as a list of forms,
schedules, and other information that cannot be electronically filed.
Reasons for Change
Electronically filed returns cannot provide the maximum efficiency
for taxpayers and the IRS under current rules that require signature
information to be filed on paper. Also, taxpayers need to know how the
IRS will determine the filing date of a return filed electronically. The
Committee believes that more types of returns could be filed
electronically if proper procedures were in place.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires the Secretary to develop procedures that would
eliminate the need to file a paper form relating to signature
information. The Secretary is required to develop procedures for the
acceptance of signatures in digital or other electronic form. Until the
procedures are in place, the bill authorizes the Secretary to waive the
requirement of a signature or to provide for alternative methods of
subscribing all returns, declarations, statements, or other documents.
The bill treats documents subscribed under such alternative methods as
signed for all purposes, both civil and criminal, and provides a
rebuttable presumption that any such return, declaration, statement or
other document was actually submitted and subscribed by the person on
whose behalf it was submitted. It is contemplated that the IRS will
establish procedures for rebuttal of the presumption.
The bill also provides rules for determining when electronic returns
are deemed filed, and for authorization for return preparers to
communicate with the IRS on matters included on electronically filed
returns.
The bill also requires that the Secretary establish procedures, to
the extent practicable, to receive all tax forms electronically by
December 31, 1998.
Effective Date
The provision is effective on the date of enactment.
D. RETURN-FREE TAX SYSTEM
(SEC. 204 OF THE BILL)
Present Law
Under present law, taxpayers are required to calculate their own tax
liabilities and submit returns showing their calculations.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that it would benefit taxpayers to be
relieved, to the extent feasible, from the burden of determining tax
liability and filing returns.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires the Secretary or his delegate to study the
feasibility of and develop procedures for the implementation of a
return-free tax system for taxable years beginning after 2007. The
Secretary is required annually to report to the tax-writing committees
on the progress of the development of such system, including what
additional resources the IRS would need to implement the system, the
changes to the Internal Revenue Code that would facilitate the system,
the procedures developed to date, and the number and classes of
taxpayers who would be permitted to use such a system. The Secretary is
required to make the first report on the development of the return-free
filing system to the tax-writing committees on June 30, 1999. It is
contemplated that the return-free filing system would initially be
targeted at taxpayers who had taxable income from wages, interest,
dividends, pensions, and unemployment compensation; did not itemize
deductions; and did not take any tax credits other than the earned
income tax credit.\25\
\25\See ``The President's Tax Proposals to Congress for Fairness,
Growth, and Simplicity,'' at 115 (May 1985) and The GAO Report on Tax
Administration Alternative Filing Systems (October 1996).
Effective Date
The provision is effective on the date of enactment.
E. ACCESS TO ACCOUNT INFORMATION
(SEC. 205 OF THE BILL)
Present Law
Taxpayers who file their returns electronically cannot review their
accounts electronically.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes, to the extent feasible, that taxpayers should
have access to their account information held by the IRS. If taxpayers
file electronically, they should be able to review the information
electronically, to the extent feasible.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires the Secretary to develop procedures under which a
taxpayer filing returns electronically could review the taxpayer's
account electronically not later than December 31, 2006, but only if all
necessary privacy safeguards are in place by that date.
Effective Date
The provision is effective on the date of enactment.
TITLE III. TAXPAYER BILL OF RIGHTS 3
A. BURDEN OF PROOF
(SEC. 301 OF THE BILL AND NEW SEC. 7491 OF THE CODE)
Present Law
Under present law, a rebuttable presumption exists that the
Commissioner's determination of tax liability is correct.\26\
``This presumption in favor of the Commissioner is a procedural device
that requires the plaintiff to go forward with prima facie evidence to
support a finding contrary to the Commissioner's determination. Once
this procedural burden is satisfied, the taxpayer must still carry the
ultimate burden of proof or persuasion on the merits. Thus, the
plaintiff not only has the burden of proof of establishing that the
Commissioner's determination was incorrect, but also of establishing the
merit of its claims by a preponderance of the evidence''.\27\
\26\ Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).
\27\ Danville Plywood Corp. v. U.S., U.S. Cl. Ct., 63 AFTR 2d 89 1036,
1043 (1989); citations omitted.
The general rebuttable presumption that the Commissioner's
determination of tax liability is correct is a fundamental element of
the structure of the Internal Revenue Code. Although this presumption is
judicially based, rather than legislatively based, there is considerable
evidence that the presumption has been repeatedly considered and
approved by the Congress. This is the case because the Internal Revenue
Code contains a number of civil provisions that explicitly place the
burden of proof on the Commissioner in specifically designated
circumstances. The Congress would have enacted these provisions only if
it recognized and approved of the general rule of presumptive
correctness of the Commissioner's determination. A list of these civil
provisions follows.
(1) Fraud. --Any proceeding involving the issue of whether the
taxpayer has been guilty of fraud with intent to evade tax (secs.
7454(a) and 7422(e)).
(2) Required reasonable verification of information returns. --In any
court proceeding, if a taxpayer asserts a reasonable dispute with
respect to any item of income reported on an information returned filed
with the Secretary by a third party and the taxpayer has fully
cooperated with the Secretary (including providing, within a reasonable
period of time, access to and inspection of all witnesses, information,
and documents within the control of the taxpayer as reasonably requested
by the Secretary), the Secretary has the burden of producing reasonable
and probative information concerning such deficiency in addition to such
information return (sec. 6201(d)).
(3) Foundation managers.-- Any proceeding involving the issue of
whether a foundation manager has knowingly participated in prohibited
transactions (sec. 7454(b)).
(4) Transferee liability.-- Any proceeding in the Tax Court to show
that a petitioner is liable as a transferee of property of a taxpayer
(sec. 6902(a)).
(5) Review of jeopardy levy or assessment procedures.-- Any
proceeding to review the reasonableness of a jeopardy levy or jeopardy
assessment (sec. 7429(g)(1)).
(6) Property transferred in connection with performance of
services.-- In the case of property subject to a restriction that by its
terms will never lapse and that allows the transferee to sell only at a
price determined under a formula, the price is deemed to be fair market
value unless established to the contrary by the Secretary (sec.
83(d)(1)).
(7) Illegal bribes, kickbacks, and other payments.-- As to whether a
payment constitutes an illegal bribe, illegal kickback, or other illegal
payment (sec. 162(c)(1) and (2)).
(8) Golden parachute payments.-- As to whether a payment is a
parachute payment on account of a violation of any generally enforced
securities laws or regulations (sec. 280G(b)(2)(B)).
(9) Unreasonable accumulation of earnings and profits.-- In any Tax
Court proceeding as to whether earnings and profits have been permitted
to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business, provided that
the Commissioner has not fulfilled specified procedural requirements
(sec. 534).
(10) Expatriation.-- As to whether it is reasonable to believe that
an individual's loss of citizenship would result in a substantial
reduction in the individual's income taxes or transfer taxes (secs.
877(e), 2107(e), 2501(a)(4)).
(11) Public inspection of written determinations.-- In any proceeding
seeking additional disclosure of information (sec. 6110(f)(4)(A)).
(12) Penalties for promoting abusive tax shelters, aiding and
abetting the understatement of tax liability, and filing a frivolous
income return.-- As to whether the person is liable for the penalty
(sec. 6703(a)).
(13) Income tax return preparers' penalty.-- As to whether a preparer
has willfully attempted to understate tax liability (sec. 7427).
(14) Status as employees.-- As to whether individuals are employees
for purposes of employment taxes (pursuant to the safe harbor provisions
of section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978).\28\
\28\Public Law 95 600 (November 6, 1978), as amended by section 1122 of
the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (Public Law 104 188;
August 20, 1996).
Reasons for Change
The Committee is concerned that individual and small business
taxpayers frequently are at a disadvantage when forced to litigate with
the Internal Revenue Service. The Committee believes that the present
burden of proof rules contribute to that disadvantage. The Committee
believes that, all other things being equal, facts asserted by
individual and small business taxpayers who fully cooperate with the IRS
and satisfy all relevant substantiation requirements should be accepted.
The Committee believes that shifting the burden of proof to the
Secretary in such circumstances will create a better balance between the
IRS and such taxpayers, without encouraging tax avoidance.
Explanation of Provision
The bill provides that the Secretary shall have the burden of proof
in any court proceeding with respect to a factual issue if the taxpayer
asserts a reasonable dispute with respect to any such issue relevant to
ascertaining the taxpayer's income tax liability. Two conditions apply.
First, the taxpayer must fully cooperate at all times with the Secretary
(including providing, within a reasonable period of time, access to and
inspection of all witnesses, information, and documents within the
control of the taxpayer, as reasonably requested by the Secretary).\29\
Full cooperation also includes providing reasonable assistance to the
Secretary in obtaining access to and inspection of witnesses,
information, or documents not within the control of the taxpayer
(including any witnesses, information, or documents located in foreign
countries\30\
). A necessary element of fully cooperating with the Secretary is that
the taxpayer must exhaust his or her administrative remedies (including
any appeal rights provided by the IRS). The taxpayer is not required to
agree to extend the statute of limitations to be considered to have
fully cooperated with the Secretary. Second, certain taxpayers must meet
the net worth limitations that apply for awarding attorney's fees. In
general, corporations, trusts, and partnerships whose net worth exceeds
$7 million are not eligible for the benefits of the provision. The
taxpayer has the burden of proving that it meets each of these
conditions, because they are necessary prerequisites to establishing
that the burden of proof is on the Secretary.
\29\This requirement parallels the present-law provision relating to
reasonable verification of information returns (sec. 6201(d)).
\30\Full cooperation also includes providing English translations, as
reasonably requested by the Secretary.
The provision explicitly states that nothing in the provision shall
be construed to override any requirement under the Code or regulations
to substantiate any item. Accordingly, taxpayers must meet all
applicable substantiation requirements, whether generally imposed\31\
or imposed with respect to specific items, such as charitable
contributions\32\
or meals, entertainment, travel, and certain other expenses.\33\
Substantiation requirements include any requirement of the Code or
regulations that the taxpayer establish an item to the satisfaction of
the Secretary.\34\
Taxpayers who fail to substantiate any item in accordance with the
legal requirement of substantiation will not have satisfied all of the
legal conditions that are prerequisite to claiming the item on the
taxpayer's tax return and will accordingly be unable to avail themselves
of this provision regarding the burden of proof. Thus, if a taxpayer
required to substantiate an item fails to do so in the manner required
(or destroys the substantiation), this burden of proof provision is
inapplicable.\35\
\31\See e.g., Sec. 6001 and Treas. Reg. sec. 1.6001 1 requiring every
person liable for any tax imposed by this Title to keep such records as
the Secretary may from time to time prescribe, and secs. 6038 and 6038A
requiring United States persons to furnish certain information the
Secretary may prescribe with respect to foreign businesses controlled by
the U.S. person.
\32\Sec. 170(a)(1) and (f)(8) and Treas. Reg. sec. 1.170A 13.
\33\Sec. 274(d) and Treas. Reg. sec. 1.274(d) 1, 1.274 5T, and 1.274 5A.
\34\For example, sec. 905(b) of the Code provides that foreign tax
credits shall be allowed only if the taxpayer establishes to the
satisfaction of the Secretary all information necessary for the
verification and computation of the credit. Instructions for meeting
that requirement are set forth in Treas. Reg. sec. 1.905 2.
\35\If, however, the taxpayer can demonstrate that he had maintained the
required substantiation but that it was destroyed or lost through no
fault of the taxpayer, such as by fire or flood, existing tax rules
regarding reconstruction of those records would continue to apply.
Effective Date
The provision applies to court proceedings arising in connection with
examinations commencing after the date of enactment.
B. PROCEEDINGS BY TAXPAYERS
1. Expansion of Authority to Award Costs and Certain Fees
(sec. 311 of the bill and sec. 7430 of the Code)
Present Law
Any person who substantially prevails in any action by or against the
United States in connection with the determination, collection, or
refund of any tax, interest, or penalty may be awarded reasonable
administrative costs incurred before the IRS and reasonable litigation
costs incurred in connection with any court proceeding. In general, only
an individual whose net worth does not exceed $2 million is eligible for
an award, and only a corporation or partnership whose net worth does not
exceed $7 million is eligible for an award.
Reasonable litigation costs include reasonable fees paid or incurred
for the services of attorneys, except that the attorney's fees will not
be reimbursed at a rate in excess of $110 per hour (indexed for
inflation) unless the court determines that a special factor, such as
the limited availability of qualified attorneys for the proceeding,
justifies a higher rate. Awards of reasonable litigation costs and
reasonable administrative costs cannot exceed amounts paid or incurred.
Once a taxpayer has substantially prevailed over the IRS in a tax
dispute, the IRS has the burden of proof to establish that it was
substantially justified in maintaining its position against the
taxpayer. A rebuttable presumption exists that provides that the
position of the United States is not considered to be substantially
justified if the IRS did not follow in the administrative proceeding (1)
its published regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures,
information releases, notices, or announcements, or (2) a private letter
ruling, determination letter, or technical advice memorandum issued to
the taxpayer.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that taxpayers should be allowed to recover
the reasonable administrative costs they incur where the IRS takes a
position against the taxpayer that is not substantially justified,
beginning at the time that the IRS establishes its initial position by
issuing a letter of proposed deficiency which allows the taxpayer an
opportunity for administrative review in the IRS Office of Appeals. In
determining what constitutes reasonable costs, the Committee believes
that either the difficulty of issues or the limited local availability
of tax expertise may justify the payment of higher hourly rates.
The Committee believes that the pro bono publicum representation of
taxpayers should be encouraged and the value of the legal services
rendered in these situations should be recognized. Where the IRS takes
positions that are not substantially justified, it should not be
relieved of its obligation to bear reasonable administrative and
litigation costs because representation was provided the taxpayer on a
pro bono basis.
The Committee is concerned that the IRS may continue to litigate
issues that have previously been decided in favor of taxpayers in other
circuits. The Committee believes that this places an undue burden on
taxpayers that are required to litigate such issues. Accordingly, the
Committee believes it is important that the court take into account
whether the IRS has lost in the courts of appeals of other circuits on
similar issues in determining whether the IRS has taken a position that
is not substantially justified and thus liable for reasonable
administrative and litigation costs.
Explanation of Provision
The bill: (1) provides that the difficulty of the issues presented or
the unavailability of local tax expertise can be used to justify an
award of attorney's fees of more than the statutory limit of $110 per
hour; (2) moves the point in time after which reasonable administrative
costs can be awarded to the date on which the first letter of proposed
deficiency which allows the taxpayer an opportunity for administrative
review in the IRS Office of Appeals is sent; (3) permits the award of
attorney's fees (in amounts up to the statutory limit determined to be
appropriate) to specified persons who represent for no more than a
nominal fee a taxpayer who is a prevailing party; and (4) provides that
in determining whether the position of the United States was
substantially justified, the court shall take into account whether the
United States has lost in courts of appeal for other circuits on
substantially similar issues. The court may also take into account
whether the United States has won in courts of appeal for other circuits
on substantially similar issues.
Effective Date
The provision applies to costs incurred and services performed more
than 180 days after the date of enactment.
2. Civil Damages for Negligence in Collection Actions (sec.
312 of the bill and sec. 7433 of the Code)
Present Law
A taxpayer may sue the United States for up to $1 million of civil
damages caused by an officer or employee of the IRS who recklessly or
intentionally disregards provisions of the Internal Revenue Code or
Treasury regulations in connection with the collection of Federal tax
with respect to the taxpayer.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that taxpayers should also be able to recover
economic damages they incur as a result of the negligent disregard of
the Code or regulations by an officer or employee of the IRS in
connection with a collection matter.
Explanation of Provision
The bill provides for up to $100,000 in civil damages caused by an
officer or employee of the IRS who negligently disregards provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code or Treasury regulations in connection with the
collection of Federal tax with respect to the taxpayer. Inadvertent
errors in IRS functions, such as in computer programming, do not trigger
the application of this provision. No person is entitled to seek civil
damages for negligent, reckless, or intentional disregard of the Code or
regulations in a court of law unless he first exhausts his
administrative remedies.
Effective Date
The provision is effective with respect to actions of officers or
employees of the IRS occurring after the date of enactment.
3. Increase in Size of Cases Permitted on Small Case
Calendar (sec. 313 of the bill and sec. 7463 of the Code)
Present Law
Taxpayers may choose to contest many tax disputes in the Tax Court.
Special small case procedures apply to disputes involving $10,000 or
less, if the taxpayer chooses to utilize these procedures (and the Tax
Court concurs).
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that use of the small case procedures should
be expanded.
Explanation of Provision
The bill increases the cap for small case treatment from $10,000 to
$25,000.
Effective Date
The provision applies to proceedings commenced after the date of
enactment.
C. RELIEF FOR INNOCENT SPOUSES AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
1. Innocent Spouse Relief (sec. 321 of the bill and new sec.
6015 of the Code)
Present law
Spouses who file a joint tax return are each fully responsible for
the accuracy of the return and for the full tax liability. This is true
even though only one spouse may have earned the wages or income which is
shown on the return. This is ``joint and several'' liability. A spouse
who wishes to avoid joint liability may file as a ``married person
filing separately.''
Relief from liability for tax, interest and penalties is available
for ``innocent spouses'' in certain limited circumstances. To qualify
for such relief, the innocent spouse must establish: (1) that a joint
return was made; (2) that an understatement of tax, which exceeds the
greater of $500 or a specified percentage of the innocent spouse's
adjusted gross income for the preadjustment (most recent) year, is
attributable to a grossly erroneous item\36\
of the other spouse; (3) that in signing the return, the innocent
spouse did not know, and had no reason to know, that there was an
understatement of tax; and (4) that taking into account all the facts
and circumstances, it is inequitable to hold the innocent spouse liable
for the deficiency in tax. The specified percentage of adjusted gross
income is 10 percent if adjusted gross income is $20,000 or less.
Otherwise, the specified percentage is 25 percent.
\36\Grossly erroneous items include items of gross income that are
omitted from reported income and claims of deductions, credits, or basis
in an amount for which there is no basis in fact of law (code sec.
6013(e)(2)).
It is unclear under present law whether a court may grant partial
innocent spouse relief. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Wiksell v.
Commissioner \37\
has allowed partial innocent spouse relief where the spouse did not
know, and had no reason to know, the magnitude of the understatement of
tax, even though the spouse knew that the return may have included some
understatement.
\37\90 F.3d 1459 (9th Cir. 1997).
The proper forum for contesting a denial by the Secretary of innocent
spouse relief is determined by whether an underpayment is asserted or
the taxpayer is seeking a refund of overpaid taxes. Accordingly, the Tax
Court may not have jurisdiction to review all denials of innocent spouse
relief.
No form is currently provided to assist taxpayers in applying for
innocent spouse relief.
Reasons for Change
The Committee is concerned that the innocent spouse provisions of
present law are inadequate. The Committee believes it is inappropriate
to limit innocent spouse relief only to the most egregious cases where
the understatement is large and the tax position taken is grossly
erroneous. The Committee also believes that partial innocent spouse
relief should be considered in appropriate circumstances, and that all
taxpayers should have access to the Tax Court in resolving disputes
concerning their status as an innocent spouse. Finally, the Committee
believes that taxpayers need to be better informed of their right to
apply for innocent spouse relief in appropriate cases and that the IRS
is the best source of that information.
Explanation of Provision
The bill generally makes innocent spouse status easier to obtain. The
bill eliminates all of the understatement thresholds and requires only
that the understatement of tax be attributable to an erroneous (and not
just a grossly erroneous) item of the other spouse.
The bill provides that innocent spouse relief may be provided on an
apportioned basis. That is, the spouse may be relieved of liability as
an innocent spouse to the extent the liability is attributable to the
portion of an understatement of tax which such spouse did not know of
and had no reason to know of.
The bill specifically provides that the Tax Court has jurisdiction to
review any denial (or failure to rule) by the Secretary regarding an
application for innocent spouse relief. The Tax Court may order refunds
as appropriate where it determines the spouse qualifies for relief and
an overpayment exists as a result of the innocent spouse qualifying for
such relief. The taxpayer must file his or her petition for review with
the Tax Court during the 90-day period that begins on the earlier of (1)
6 months after the date the taxpayer filed his or her claim for innocent
spouse relief with the Secretary or (2) the date a notice denying
innocent spouse relief was mailed by the Secretary. Except for
termination and jeopardy assessments (secs. 6851, 6861), the Secretary
may not levy or proceed in court to collect any tax from a taxpayer
claiming innocent spouse status with regard to such tax until the
expiration of the 90-day period in which such taxpayer may petition the
Tax Court or, if the Tax Court considers such petition, before the
decision of the Tax Court has become final. The running of the statute
of limitations is suspended in such situations with respect to the
spouse claiming innocent spouse status.
The bill also requires the Secretary of the Treasury to develop a
separate form with instructions for taxpayers to use in applying for
innocent spouse relief within 180 days from the date of enactment. An
innocent spouse seeking relief under this provision must claim innocent
spouse status with regard to any assessment not later than two years
after the date of such assessment.
Effective Date
The provision is effective for understatements with respect to
taxable years beginning after the date of enactment.
2. Suspension of Statute of Limitations on Filing Refund
Claims During Periods of Disability (sec. 322 of the bill and sec. 6511
of the Code)
Present Law
In general, a taxpayer must file a refund claim within three years of
the filing of the return or within two years of the payment of the tax,
whichever period expires later (if no return is filed, the two-year
limit applies) (sec. 6511(a)). A refund claim that is not filed within
these time periods is rejected as untimely.
There is no explicit statutory rule providing for equitable tolling
of the statute of limitations. Several courts have considered whether
equitable tolling implicitly exists. The First, Third, Fourth, and
Eleventh Circuits have rejected equitable tolling with respect to tax
refund claims. The Ninth Circuit has permitted equitable tolling.
However, the U.S. Supreme Court has reversed the Ninth Circuit in U.S.
v. Brockamp, \38\
holding that Congress did not intend the equitable tolling doctrine to
apply to the statutory limitations of section 6511 on the filing of tax
refund claims.
REASONS FOR CHANGE
\38\117 S. Ct. 849 (1997), reversing 67 F. 3d 260 and 70 F. 3d 120.
The Committee believes that, in cases of severe disability, equitable
tolling should be considered in the application of the statutory
limitations on the filing of tax refund claims.
Explanation of Provision
The bill permits equitable tolling of the statute of limitations for
refund claims of an individual taxpayer during any period of the
individual's life in which he or she is unable to manage his or her
financial affairs by reason of a medically determinable physical or
mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or to last for
a continuous period of not less than 12 months. Proof of the existence
of the impairment must be furnished in the form and manner required by
the Secretary. It is anticipated that, in applying the medically
determinable test, the Secretary will evaluate whether a medical opinion
that a physical or mental impairment exists has been offered by a person
qualified to do so with respect to that particular type of impairment.
Tolling does not apply during periods in which the taxpayer's spouse or
another person is authorized to act on the taxpayer's behalf in
financial matters.
Effective Date
The provision applies to periods of disability before, on, or after
the date of enactment but would not apply to any claim for refund or
credit which (without regard to the provision) is barred by the statute
of limitations as of January 1, 1998.
D. PROVISIONS RELATING TO INTEREST
1. Elimination of Interest Differential on Overlapping
Periods of Interest on Income Tax Overpayments and Underpayments (sec.
331 of the bill and sec. 6621 of the Code)
Present Law
A taxpayer that underpays its taxes is required to pay interest on
the underpayment at a rate equal to the Federal short term interest rate
plus three percentage points. A special ``hot interest'' rate equal to
the Federal short term interest rate plus five percentage points applies
in the case of certain large corporate underpayments.
A taxpayer that overpays its taxes receives interest on the
overpayment at a rate equal to the Federal short term interest rate plus
two percentage points. In the case of corporate overpayments in excess
of $10,000, this is reduced to the Federal short term interest rate plus
one-half of a percentage point.
If a taxpayer has an underpayment of tax from one year and an
overpayment of tax from a different year that are outstanding at the
same time, the IRS will typically offset the overpayment against the
underpayment and apply the appropriate interest to the resulting net
underpayment or overpayment. However, if either the underpayment or
overpayment have been satisfied, the IRS will not typically offset the
two amounts, but rather will assess or credit interest on the full
underpayment or overpayment at the underpayment or overpayment rate.
This has the effect of assessing the underpayment at the higher
underpayment rate and crediting the overpayment at the lower overpayment
rate. This results in the taxpayer being assessed a net interest charge,
even if the amounts of the overpayment and underpayment are the same.
The Secretary has the authority to credit the amount of any
overpayment against any liability under the Code.\39\
Congress has previously directed the Internal Revenue Service to
consider procedures for ``netting'' overpayments and underpayments and,
to the extent a portion of tax due is satisfied by a credit of an
overpayment, not impose interest.\40\
\39\Code sec. 6402
\40\Pursuant to TBOR2 (1996), the Secretary conducted a study of the
manner in which the IRS has implemented the netting of interest on
overpayments and underpayments and the policy and administrative
implications of global netting. The legislative history to the General
Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) (1994) stated that the Secretary
should implement the most comprehensive crediting procedures that are
consistent with sound administrative practice, and should do so as
rapidly as is practicable. A similar statement was included in the
Conference Report to the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that taxpayers should be charged interest only
on the amount they actually owe, taking into account overpayments and
underpayments from all open years. The Committee does not believe that
the different interest rates provided for overpayments and underpayments
were ever intended to result in the charging of the differential on
periods of mutual indebtedness.
The Committee is also concerned that current practices provide an
incentive to taxpayers to delay the payment of underpayments they do not
contest, so that the underpayments will be available to offset any
overpayments that are later determined. The Committee believes that this
is contrary to sound tax administrative practice and that taxpayers
should not be disadvantaged solely because they promptly pay their tax
bills.
Explanation of Provision
The bill establishes a net interest rate of zero on equivalent
amounts of overpayment and underpayment that exist for any period. Each
overpayment and underpayment is to be considered only once in
determining whether equivalent amounts of overpayment and underpayment
exist. The special rules that increase the interest rate paid on large
corporate underpayments and decrease the interest rate received on
corporate underpayments in excess of $10,000 do not prevent the
application of the net zero rate. The bill applies to income taxes and
self-employment taxes.
For example, following an examination of his 1998 return, a corporate
taxpayer is determined to have overpaid its 1998 taxes by $5,000.
Previously, the taxpayer established by an amended return that it had
underpaid its 1999 taxes by $7,000. The taxpayer has paid the 1999
underpayment, plus interest determined at the underpayment rate. The
statute of limitations has not run with respect to either 1998 or 1999.
In determining the amount of the refund owed the taxpayer with regard to
the 1998 overpayment, the period for which the 1999 underpayment was
outstanding must be taken into account. For all periods in which the
underpayment and overpayment run concurrently (i.e., from the due date
of the 1999 return until the underpayment was paid), the interest rate
on the $5,000 overpayment and $5,000 of the underpayment must be the
same so that the net interest rate of zero applies.\41\
The interest rate on the remaining $2,000 of the underpayment that was
originally calculated at the short term Federal rate plus three percent
would not be affected.
\41\In this case, it is assumed that the interest rate on $5,000 of
overpayment will be set equal to the underpayment rate for the period
that both the underpayment and overpayment are outstanding in order to
achieve the required net interest rate of zero. However, the Secretary
may use other procedures or methodologies that he deems appropriate, so
long as a zero net interest rate is achieved.
Effective Date
The provision applies to interest for calendar quarters beginning
after the date of enactment. Until such time as procedures are
implemented that allow for the automatic application of this provision
by the IRS, the Committee expects that the Secretary will promptly and
carefully consider any taxpayer's request to have interest charges
recalculated in accordance with this provision. It is expected that the
Secretary will extend the statute of limitations where necessary to
allow for the consideration of such requests.
In light of past Congressional statements urging the Secretary to
eliminate interest rate differentials in these circumstances, and taking
into consideration Congress' belief that the Secretary may do so, the
Committee continues to expect that the Secretary will implement the most
comprehensive crediting procedures that are consistent with sound
administrative practice, and not only those affected by this provision.
2. Increase in Overpayment Rate Payable to Taxpayers Other
than Corporations (sec. 332 of the bill and sec. 6621 of the Code)
Present Law
A taxpayer that underpays its taxes is required to pay interest on
the underpayment at a rate equal to the Federal short-term interest rate
(AFR) plus three percentage points. A taxpayer that overpays its taxes
receives interest on the overpayment at a rate equal to the Federal
short-term interest rate (AFR) plus two percentage points.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that the interest differential for
noncorporate taxpayers should be eliminated.
Explanation of Provision
The bill provides that the overpayment interest rate will be AFR plus
three percentage points, except that for corporations, the rate will
remain at AFR plus two percentage points.
Effective Date
The provision applies to interest for calendar quarters beginning
after the date of enactment.
E. PROTECTIONS FOR TAXPAYERS SUBJECT TO AUDIT OR COLLECTION
1. Privilege of Confidentiality Extended to Taxpayer's
Dealings with Non-attorneys Authorized to Practice Before IRS (sec. 341
of the bill and sec. 7602 of the Code)
Present Law
A common law privilege of confidentiality exists for communications
between an attorney and client with respect to the legal advice the
attorney gives the client. Communications protected by the
attorney-client privilege must be based on facts of which the attorney
is informed by the taxpayer, without the presence of strangers, for the
purpose of securing the advice of the attorney. The privilege may not be
claimed where the purpose of the communication is the commission of a
crime or tort. The taxpayer must be, or be seeking to become, a client
of the attorney.
The privilege of confidentiality applies only where the attorney is
advising the client on legal matters. It does not apply in situations
where the attorney is acting in other capacities. Thus, a taxpayer may
not claim the benefits of the attorney-client privilege simply by hiring
an attorney to perform some other function. For example, if an attorney
is retained to prepare a tax return, the attorney-client privilege will
not automatically apply to communications and documents generated in the
course of preparing the return. The privilege of confidentiality also
does not apply where an attorney that is licensed to practice another
profession is performing such other profession. For example, if a
taxpayer retains an attorney who is also licensed as a certified public
accountant (CPA), the taxpayer may not assert the attorney-client
privilege with regard to communications made and documents prepared by
the attorney in his role as a CPA.
The attorney-client privilege is limited to communications between
taxpayers and attorneys. No equivalent privilege is provided for
communications between taxpayers and other professionals authorized to
practice before the Internal Revenue Service, such as accountants or
enrolled agents.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that a right to privileged communications
between a taxpayer and his or her advisor should be available in
noncriminal proceedings before the Internal Revenue Service, so long as
the advisor is authorized to practice before the Internal Revenue
Service. A right to privileged communications in such situations should
not depend upon whether the advisor is also licensed to practice law.
The Committee believes that it is appropriate to provide for this right
within the Committee's jurisdiction, by applying it to noncriminal
proceedings before the IRS.
Explanation of Provision
The bill extends the present law attorney-client privilege of
confidentiality to tax advice that is furnished by any individual who is
authorized to practice before the Internal Revenue Service, acting in a
manner consistent with State law for such individual's profession, to a
client-taxpayer (or potential client-taxpayer) in any noncriminal
proceeding before the Internal Revenue Service.
The provision will allow taxpayers to consult with other qualified
tax advisors in the same manner they currently may consult with tax
advisors that are licensed to practice law. The provision does not
modify the attorney-client privilege. Accordingly, except for criminal
proceedings, the privilege of confidentiality under this provision
applies in the same manner and with the same limitations as the
attorney-client privilege of present law. The provision does not extend
the privilege of confidentiality to communications that would not be
eligible for the privilege if prepared by an attorney.
The provision applies to individuals authorized to practice before
the Internal Revenue Service, regardless of the method pursuant to which
they are so authorized. Some, such as accountants, are authorized to
practice by fulfilling State licensing requirements. Others, such as
enrolled agents and enrolled actuaries, are authorized to practice by
passing a Treasury Department examination.
Effective Date
The provision is effective on the date of enactment.
2. Expansion of Authority to Issue Taxpayer Assistance
Orders (sec. 342 of the bill and sec. 7811 of the Code)
Present Law
Taxpayers can request that the Taxpayer Advocate in the Internal
Revenue Service (''IRS'') issue a taxpayer assistance order (``TAO'') if
they are suffering or about to suffer a significant hardship as a result
of the manner in which the internal revenue laws are being administered
(sec. 7811). A TAO may require the IRS to release property of the
taxpayer that has been levied upon, or to cease any action, take any
action as permitted by law, or refrain from taking any action with
respect to the taxpayer.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that certain factors should generally be
considered by the Taxpayer Advocate in determining whether a taxpayer
assistance order should be issued.
Explanation of Provision
The bill provides that in determining whether to issue a TAO, the
Taxpayer Advocate shall consider, among others, the following four
factors: (1) whether there is an immediate threat of adverse action; (2)
whether there has been an unreasonable delay in resolving the taxpayer's
account problems; (3) whether the taxpayer will have to pay significant
costs (including fees for professional representation) if relief is not
granted; and (4) whether the taxpayer will suffer irreparable injury, or
a long-term adverse impact, if relief is not granted. In addition, in
cases where an IRS employee to whom the order would be issued is not
following applicable published administrative guidance, including the
Internal Revenue Manual (``IRM''), the Taxpayer Advocate shall construe
the factors taken into account in determining whether to issue a TAO in
the manner most favorable to the taxpayer.
Effective Date
The provision is effective on the date of enactment.
3. Limitation on Financial Status Audit Techniques (sec. 343
of the bill and sec. 7602 of the Code)
Present Law
The IRS examines Federal tax returns to determine the correct
liability of taxpayers. The IRS selects returns to be audited in a
number of ways, such as through a computerized classification system
(the discriminant function (``DIF'') system).
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that financial status audit techniques are
intrusive, and that their use should be limited to situations where the
IRS already has indications of unreported income.
Explanation of Provision
The bill prohibits IRS from using financial status or economic
reality examination techniques to determine the existence of unreported
income of any taxpayer unless the IRS has a reasonable indication that
there is a likelihood of unreported income.
Effective Date
The provision is effective on the date of enactment.
4. Limitation on Authority to Require Production of Computer
Source Code (sec. 344 of the bill and sec. 7602 of the Code)
Present Law
The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to examine any books,
papers, records, or other data that may be relevant or material to an
inquiry into the correctness of any Federal tax return. The Secretary
may issue and serve summonses necessary to obtain such data, including
summonses on certain third-party record keepers. There are no specific
statutory restrictions on the ability of the Secretary to demand the
production of computer records, programs, code or similar materials.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that the intellectual property rights of the
developers and owners of computer programs should be respected and is
concerned that the examination of third-party tax-related computer
source code by the IRS could lead to the diminution of those rights
through the inadvertent disclosure of trade secrets. The Committee also
believes that the indiscriminate examination of computer source code by
the IRS to identify issues on a taxpayer's return would be
inappropriate. Accordingly, the Committee believes that a summons for
the production of third-party tax-related computer source code should
only be issued where the IRS has not otherwise been able to ascertain
through reasonable efforts the manner in which a taxpayer has arrived at
the entry on a return and has identified with specificity the portion of
the computer source code it seeks to examine.
Explanation of Provision
The Secretary is generally prohibited from issuing (or beginning an
action to enforce) a summons in a civil action for any portion of any
third-party tax-related computer source code unless (1) the Secretary is
unable to otherwise reasonably ascertain the correctness of an item on a
return from the taxpayer's other books, papers, records, other data, or
the computer software program and associated data itself and (2) the
Secretary first identifies with reasonable specificity the portion of
the computer source code to be used to verify the correctness of the
item.
The Secretary would be considered to have satisfied these
requirements with regard to the identified portion of the source code if
the Secretary makes a formal request for such materials to both the
taxpayer and the owner or developer of the software that is not
satisfied within 90 days. Such formal request must clearly state that
one of the consequences of failure to respond to the request will be the
waiver of any prohibition on the summons of tax-related computer source
code that might otherwise apply.
The Secretary's determination that the identified portion of the
third-party tax-related computer source code may be summoned may be
contested in any proceeding to enforce the summons, by any person to
whom the summons is addressed. For this purpose, the special procedures
for third-party summonses\42\
will apply. In any such proceeding, the court may issue any order that
is necessary to prevent the disclosure of trade secrets or other
confidential information.
\42\Sec. 7609
For these purposes, tax-related computer source code includes the
human readable instructions for any computer software program that is
used for accounting, tax return preparation, tax compliance or tax
planning, along with the design and development materials related to
such software program, including any relevant program notes and
memoranda.
The prohibition on issuing summons for tax-related computer source
code does not apply in connection with any inquiry into any offense
connected with the administration or enforcement of the internal revenue
laws. A computer software program will not be treated as tax advice for
the purpose of the professional-client privilege contained in section
341 of this bill.
The prohibition applies only in the case of tax-related computer
software that is intended for commercial distribution. Source code
related to computer software that was developed by, or primarily for the
benefit of, the taxpayer or a related person (within the meaning of
section 267 or 707(b)) for the internal use of the taxpayer or such
related person may continue to be summonsed by the Secretary to the
extent allowed under present law.
Effective Date
The provision is effective for summonses issued more than 90 days
after the date of enactment. It is expected that the Secretary will not
use the 90 day period between the date of enactment and the effective
date in a manner that would circumvent the intent of the provision.
5. Procedures Relating to Extensions of Statute of
Limitations by Agreement (sec. 345 of the bill and sec. 6501 of the
Code)
Present Law
The statute of limitations within which the IRS may assess additional
taxes is generally three years from the date a return is filed (sec.
6501).\43\
Prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations, both the
taxpayer and the IRS may agree in writing to extend the statute, using
Form 872 or 872-A. An extension may be for either a specified period or
an indefinite period. The statute of limitations within which a tax may
be collected after assessment is 10 years after assessment (sec. 6502).
Prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations, both the taxpayer
and the IRS may agree in writing to extend the statute, using Form 900.
\43\For this purpose, a return filed before the due date is considered
to be filed on the due date.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that taxpayers should be fully informed of
their rights with respect to the statute of limitations.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires that, on each occasion on which the taxpayer is
requested by the IRS to extend the statute of limitations, the IRS must
notify the taxpayer of the taxpayer's right to refuse to extend the
statute of limitations or to limit the extension to particular issues.
Effective Date
The provision applies to requests to extend the statute of
limitations made after the date of enactment.
6. Offers-in-Compromise (sec. 346 of the bill and sec. 7122
of the Code)
Present Law
Section 7122 of the Code permits the IRS to compromise a taxpayer's
tax liability. In general, this occurs when a taxpayer submits an
offer-in-compromise to the IRS. An offer-in-compromise is a proposal to
settle unpaid tax accounts for less than the full amount of the assessed
balance due. An offer-in-compromise may be submitted for all types of
taxes, as well as interest and penalties, arising under the Internal
Revenue Code.
Taxpayers submit an offer-in-compromise on Form 656. There are two
bases on which an offer can be made. The first is doubt as to the
liability for the amount owed. The second is doubt as to the taxpayer's
ability fully to pay the amount owed. An application can be made on
either or both of these grounds. Taxpayers are required to submit
background information to the IRS substantiating their application. If
they are applying on the basis of doubt as to the taxpayer's ability
fully to pay the amount owed, the taxpayer must complete a financial
disclosure form enumerating assets and liabilities.
As part of an offer-in-compromise made on the basis of doubt as to
ability fully to pay, taxpayers must agree to comply with all provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code relating to filing returns and paying taxes
for five years from the date the IRS accepts the offer. Failure to
observe this requirement permits the IRS to begin immediate collection
actions for the original amount of the liability.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that taxpayers should be fully informed of the
offer-in-compromise procedures, including the responsibilities created
by those procedures. In determining whether there is doubt as to the
taxpayer's ability fully to pay the amount owed, the Committee believes
that the Secretary should take into consideration a taxpayer's need to
provide for the basic living expenses of his or her family, based on the
cost of living in the taxpayer's locality.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires the IRS to develop and publish schedules of
national and local allowances designed to provide taxpayers entering
into an offer-in-compromise with adequate means to provide for basic
living expenses. The bill also provides that, in the case of a
compromise agreement that is terminated due to the actions of one spouse
or former spouse, the spouse or former spouse remaining in compliance
with the agreement may obtain reinstatement of such agreement on
application. All payments required under the offer-in-compromise must be
current for either spouse or former spouse to be in compliance with the
agreement. Finally, the bill requires the IRS to prepare a publication
or statement providing guidance to taxpayers on the rights and
obligations of taxpayers and the IRS relating to offers in compromise.
This statement will include materials explaining to married taxpayers
their responsibilities should their marital status change and
instructions for applying to have an offer-in-compromise reinstated
under the circumstances discussed above. It is expected that this
publication or statement will be provided to taxpayers considering an
offer in compromise at appropriate times.
Effective Date
The provision is effective on the date of enactment. It is expected
that the materials required by this provision will be published as soon
as practicable, but no later than 180 days after the date of enactment.
It is expected that offers-in-compromise based on this provision will be
available as of the date of enactment.
7. Notice of Deficiency to Specify Deadlines for Filing Tax
Court Petition (sec. 347 of the bill and sec. 6213 of the Code)
Present Law
Taxpayers must file a petition with the Tax Court within 90 days
after the deficiency notice is mailed (150 days if the person is outside
the United States) (sec. 6213). If the petition is not filed within that
time period, the Tax Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the
petition.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that taxpayers should receive assistance in
determining the time period within which they must file a petition in
the Tax Court and that taxpayers should be able to rely on the
computation of that period by the IRS.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires that the IRS include on each deficiency notice the
date determined by the IRS as the last day on which the taxpayer may
file a petition with the Tax Court. It is expected that the last day on
which a taxpayer who is outside the United States may file a petition
with the Tax Court will be shown as an alternative. The bill provides
that a petition filed with the Tax Court by this date shall be treated
as timely filed.
Effective Date
The provision would apply to notices mailed after December 31, 1998.
8. Refund or Credit of Overpayments Before Final
Determination (sec. 348 of the bill and sec. 6213 of the Code)
Present Law
A taxpayer may petition the Tax Court for a redetermination of a
deficiency within 90 days (150 days if the notice is addressed to a
person outside the United States) from the date the notice of deficiency
is mailed by the IRS. Generally, the Secretary may not make any
assessment or commence any levy or other proceeding to collect the
deficiency during such period or, if the taxpayer petitions the Tax
Court, until the decision of the Tax Court has become final. The making
of any such assessment, or the commencing of any proceeding or levy,
during the prohibited period may be enjoined by a proceeding in the
proper court (including the Tax Court). However, no authority is
provided for ordering the refund of any amount collected within the
prohibited period.
If a taxpayer contests a deficiency in the Tax Court, no credit or
refund of income tax for the contested taxable year generally may be
made, except in accordance with a decision of the Tax Court that has
become final. Where the Tax Court determines that an overpayment has
been made and a refund is due the taxpayer, and a party appeals a
portion of the decision of the Tax Court, no provision exists for the
refund of any portion of any overpayment that is not contested in the
appeal.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that the Secretary should be allowed to refund
the uncontested portion of an overpayment of taxes, without regard to
whether other portions of the overpayment are contested.
Explanation of Provision
The bill provides that where a timely petition in respect of a
deficiency is filed in the Tax Court, the proper court (including the
Tax Court) may order a refund of any amount that was collected within
the period during which the Secretary is prohibited from collecting the
deficiency by levy or other proceeding.
The bill also allows the refund of that portion of any overpayment
determined by the Tax Court to the extent the overpayment is not
contested on appeal.
Effective Date
The provision applies on the date of enactment.
9. Threat of Audit Prohibited to Coerce Tip Reporting
Alternative Commitment Agreements (sec. 349 of the bill)
Present Law
Restaurants may enter into Tip Reporting Alternative Commitment
(TRAC) agreements. A restaurant entering into a TRAC agreement is
obligated to educate its employees on their tip reporting obligations,
to institute formal tip reporting procedures, to fulfill all filing and
record keeping requirements, and to pay and deposit taxes. In return,
the IRS agrees to base the restaurant's liability for employment taxes
solely on reported tips and any unreported tips discovered during an IRS
audit of an employee.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that it is inappropriate for the Secretary to
use the threat of an Internal Revenue Service audit to induce
participation in voluntary programs.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires the IRS to instruct its employees that they may not
threaten to audit any taxpayer in an attempt to coerce the taxpayer to
enter into a TRAC agreement.
Effective Date
The provision is effective on the date of enactment.
F. DISCLOSURES TO TAXPAYERS
1. Explanation of Joint and Several Liability (sec. 351 of the bill)
Present Law
In general, spouses who file a joint tax return are each fully
responsible for the accuracy of the tax return and for the full
liability. This is true even though only one spouse may have earned the
wages or income which is shown on the return. This is ``joint and
several'' liability. Spouses who wish to avoid joint and several
liability may file as a married person filing separately. Special rules
apply in the case of innocent spouses pursuant to section 6013(e).
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that married taxpayers need to clearly
understand the legal implications of signing a joint return and that it
is appropriate for the IRS to provide the information necessary for that
understanding.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires that, no later than 180 days after the date of
enactment, the IRS must establish procedures clearly to alert married
taxpayers of their joint and several liability on all appropriate tax
publications and instructions. It is anticipated that the IRS will make
an appropriate cross-reference to these statements near the signature
line on appropriate tax forms.
Effective Date
The bill requires that the procedures be established as soon as
practicable, but no later than 180 days after the date of enactment.
2. Explanation of Taxpayers' Rights in Interviews With the
IRS (sec. 352 of the bill)
Present Law
Prior to or at initial in-person audit interviews, the IRS must
explain to taxpayers the audit process and taxpayers' rights under that
process (sec. 7521). In addition, prior to or at initial in-person
collection interviews, the IRS must explain the collection process and
taxpayers' rights under that process. If a taxpayer clearly states
during an interview with the IRS that the taxpayer wishes to consult
with the taxpayers' representative, the interview must be suspended to
afford the taxpayer a reasonable opportunity to consult with the
representative.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that taxpayers should be more fully informed
of their rights to representation in dealings with the IRS and that
those rights should be respected.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires that the IRS rewrite Publication 1 (``Your Rights
as a Taxpayer'') to more clearly inform taxpayers of their rights (1) to
be represented by a representative and (2) if the taxpayer is so
represented, that the interview may not proceed without the presence of
the representative unless the taxpayer consents.
Effective Date
The addition to Publication 1 must be made not later than 180 days
after the date of enactment.
3. Disclosure of Criteria for Examination Selection (sec.
353 of the bill)
Present Law
The IRS examines Federal tax returns to determine the correct
liability of taxpayers. The IRS selects returns to be audited in a
number of ways, such as through a computerized classification system
(the discriminant function (``DIF'') system).
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes it is important that taxpayers understand the
reasons they may be selected for examination.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires that IRS add to Publication 1 (``Your Rights as a
Taxpayer'') a statement which sets forth in simple and nontechnical
terms the criteria and procedures for selecting taxpayers for
examination. The statement must not include any information the
disclosure of which would be detrimental to law enforcement. The
statement must specify the general procedures used by the IRS, including
whether taxpayers are selected for examination on the basis of
information in the media or from informants. Drafts of the statement or
proposed revisions to the statement are required to be submitted to the
House Committee on Ways and Means, the Senate Committee on Finance, and
the Joint Committee on Taxation.
Effective Date
The addition to Publication 1 must be made not later than 180 days
after the date of enactment.
4. Explanations of Appeals and Collection Process (sec. 354
of the bill)
Present Law
There is no statutory requirement that specific notices be given to
taxpayers along with the first letter of proposed deficiency that allows
the taxpayer an opportunity for administrative review in the IRS Office
of Appeals.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes it is important that taxpayers understand they
have a right to have any assessment reviewed by the IRS Office of
Appeals, as well as be informed of the steps they must take to obtain
that review.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires that, no later than 180 days after the date of
enactment, an explanation of the appeals process and the collection
process be provided with the first letter of proposed deficiency that
allows the taxpayer an opportunity for administrative review in the IRS
Office of Appeals.
Effective Date
The bill requires that the explanation be included as soon as
practicable, but no later than 180 days after the date of enactment.
G. LOW-INCOME TAXPAYER CLINICS
(SEC. 361 OF THE BILL AND NEW SEC. 7525 OF THE CODE)
Present Law
There are no provisions in present law providing for assistance to
clinics that assist low-income taxpayers.
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that the provision of tax services by
accredited nominal fee clinics to low-income individuals and those for
whom English is a second language will improve compliance with the
Federal tax laws and should be encouraged.
Explanation of Provision
The Secretary shall make matching grants for the development,
expansion, or continuation of certain low-income taxpayer clinics.
Eligible clinics are those that charge no more than a nominal fee to
either represent low-income taxpayers in controversies with the IRS or
provide tax information to individuals for whom English is a second
language. The term ``clinic'' includes (1) a clinical program at an
accredited law school in which students represent low-income taxpayers,
and (2) an organization exempt from tax under Code section 501(c) which
either represents low-income taxpayers or provides referral to qualified
representatives.
A clinic is treated as representing low-income taxpayers if at least
90 percent of the taxpayers represented by the clinic have incomes which
do not exceed 250 percent of the poverty level and amounts in
controversy of $25,000 or less.
The aggregate amount of grants to be awarded each year is limited to
$3,000,000. No taxpayer clinic could receive more than $100,000 per
year. The clinic must provide matching funds on a dollar-for-dollar
basis. Matching funds may include the allocable portion of both the
salary (including fringe benefits) of individuals performing services
for the clinic and clinic equipment costs, but not general institutional
overhead.
The following criteria are to be considered in making awards: (1)
number of taxpayers served by the clinic, including the number of
taxpayers in the geographical area for whom English is a second
language; (2) the existence of other taxpayer clinics serving the same
population; (3) the quality of the program; and (4) alternative funding
sources available to the clinic.
Effective Date
The provision is effective on the date of enactment.
H. OTHER TAXPAYER RIGHTS PROVISIONS
1. Actions for Refund with respect to Certain Estates which
have Elected the Installment Method of Payment (sec. 371 of the bill and
sec. 7422 of the Code)
Present Law
In general, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the U.S. district
courts have jurisdiction over suits for the refund of taxes, as long as
full payment of the assessed tax liability has been made. Flora v.
United States, 357 U.S. 63 (1958), aff'd on reh'g, 362 U.S. 145 (1960).
Under Code section 6166, if certain conditions are met, the executor of
a decedent's estate may elect to pay the estate tax attributable to
certain closely-held businesses over a 14-year period. Courts have held
that U.S. district courts and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims do not
have jurisdiction over claims for refunds by taxpayers deferring estate
tax payments pursuant to section 6166 unless the entire estate tax
liability has been paid (i.e., timely payment of the installments due
prior to the bringing of an action is not sufficient to invoke
jurisdiction). See, e.g., Rocovich v. United States, 933 F.2d 991 (Fed.
Cir. 1991), Abruzzo v. United States, 24 Ct. Cl. 668 (1991).
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that the refund jurisdiction of the U.S. Court
of Federal Claims and the U.S. district courts should apply without
regard to whether the taxpayer has elected, and the Secretary accepted,
the payment of that tax in installments.
Explanation of Provision
The bill grants the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the U.S.
district courts jurisdiction to determine the correct amount of estate
tax liability (or for any refund) in actions brought by taxpayers
deferring estate tax payments under section 6166, as long as certain
conditions are met. In order to qualify for the provision, the estate
must have made an election pursuant to section 6166, fully paid each
installment of principal and/or interest due before the date the suit is
filed (as long as one or more installments are not yet due), and no
portion of the payments due may have been accelerated. The bill further
provides that once a final judgment has been entered by a district court
or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the IRS would not be permitted to
collect any amount disallowed by the court, and any amounts paid by the
taxpayer in excess of the amount the court finds to be currently due and
payable would be refunded to the taxpayer. Lastly, the bill provides
that the 2-year statute of limitations for filing a refund action would
be suspended during the pendency of any action brought by a taxpayer
pursuant to section 7479 for a declaratory judgment as to an estate's
eligibility for section 6166.
Effective Date
The provision is effective for claims for refunds filed after the
date of enactment.
2. Cataloging Complaints (sec. 372 of the bill)
Present Law
The IRS is required to make an annual report to the Congress,
beginning in 1997, on all categories of instances involving allegations
of misconduct by IRS employees, arising either from internally
identified cases or from taxpayer or third-party initiated
complaints.\44\
The report must identify the nature of the misconduct or complaint, the
number of instances received by category, and the disposition of the
complaints.
\44\Section 1211 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2 (Public Law 104 168;
July 30, 1996).
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that all allegations of misconduct by IRS
employees must be carefully investigated. The Committee also believes
that the annual report to Congress will help develop a public perception
that the IRS takes such allegations of misconduct seriously. The
Committee is concerned that, in the absence of records detailing
taxpayer complaints of misconduct on an individual employee basis, the
IRS will not be able to adequately investigate such allegations or
properly prepare the required report.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires that, in collecting data for this report, records
of taxpayer complaints of misconduct by IRS employees shall be
maintained on an individual employee basis. These individual records are
not to be listed in the report, but they will be useful in preparing the
report. The Committee intends that these records be used in evaluating
individual employees.
Effective Date
The requirement is effective on the date of enactment.
3. Archive of Records of the IRS (sec. 373 of the bill and
sec. 6103 of the Code)
Present Law
The IRS is obligated to transfer agency records to the National
Archives and Records Administration (``NARA'') for retention or
disposal. The IRS is also obligated to protect confidential taxpayer
records from disclosure. These two obligations have created conflict
between NARA and the IRS. Under present law, the IRS determines whether
records contain taxpayer information. Once the IRS has made that
determination, NARA is not permitted to examine those records. NARA has
expressed concern that the IRS may be using the disclosure prohibition
to improperly conceal agency records with historical significance.
IRS obligation to archive records
The IRS, like all other Federal agencies, must create, maintain, and
preserve agency records in accordance with section 3101 of title 44 of
the United States Code. NARA is the Government agency responsible for
overseeing the management of the records of the Federal government.\45\
Federal agencies are required to deposit significant and historical
records with NARA.\46\
The head of each Federal agency must also establish safeguards against
the removal or loss of records.\47\
\45\44 U.S.C. sec. 2904.
\46\5 U.S.C. sec. 552a(b)(6).
\47\44 U.S.C. sec. 3105.
Authority of NARA
NARA is authorized, under the Federal Records Act, to establish
standards for the selective retention of records of continuing
value.\48\
NARA has the statutory authority to inspect records management
practices of Federal agencies and to make recommendations for
improvement.\49\
The head of each Federal agency must submit to NARA a list of records
to be destroyed and a schedule for such destruction.\50\
NARA examines the list to determine if any of the records on the list
have sufficient administrative, legal research, or other value to
warrant their continued preservation. In many cases, the description of
the record on the list is sufficient for NARA to make the determination.
For example, NARA does not need to inspect Presidential tax returns to
determine that they have historical value and should be retained. In
some cases, NARA may find it helpful to examine a particular record.
NARA has general authority to inspect records solely for the purpose of
making recommendations for the improvement of records management
practices.\51\
However, tax returns and return information can only be disclosed under
the authority provided in section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code.
There is no exception to the disclosure prohibition for records
management inspection by NARA.\52\
\48\44 U.S.C. sec. 2905.
\49\44 U.S.C. sec. 2904(c)(7).
\50\44 U.S.C. sec. 3303.
\51\44 U.S.C. sec. 2906.
\52\ American Friends Service Committee v. Webster, 720 F.2d 29 (D.C.
Cir. 1983).
In connection with its evaluation of the records management system of
the IRS, NARA noted several instances where the disclosure prohibitions
of Code section 6103 complicated their review of many IRS records.
NARA is also responsible for the custody, use and withdrawal of
records transferred to it.\53\
Statutory provisions that restrict public access to the records in the
hands of the agency from which the records were transferred also apply
to NARA. Thus, if a confidential record, such as a Presidential tax
return, is transferred to NARA for archival storage, NARA is not
permitted to disclose it. In general, the application of such
restrictions to records in the hands of NARA expire after the records
have been in existence for 30 years.\54\
The issue of whether the specific disclosure prohibition of section
6103 takes precedence over the general 30-year expiration of
restrictions generally applicable to records in the hands of NARA has
not been addressed by a court, but an informal advisory opinion from the
Office of Legal Counsel of the Attorney General concluded that the
30-year expiration provision would not reach records subject to section
6103.\55\
\53\44 U.S.C. sec. 2108.
\54\44 U.S.C. sec. 2108.
\55\Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, Memorandum to
Richard K. Willard, Assistant Attorney General (Civil Division)
(February 27, 1986).
Confidentiality requirements
The IRS must preserve the confidentiality of taxpayer information
contained in Federal income tax returns. Such information may not be
disclosed except as authorized under Code section 6103. Section 6103 was
substantially revised in 1976 to address Congress' concern that tax
information was being used by Federal agencies in pursuit of objectives
unrelated to administration and enforcement of the tax laws. Congress
believed that the wide-spread use of tax information by agencies other
than the IRS could adversely affect the willingness of taxpayers to
comply voluntarily with the tax laws and could undermine the country's
self-assessment tax system.\56\
Section 6103 does not authorize the disclosure of confidential return
information to NARA.
\56\S. Rept. 94 938, p. 317 (1976).
Section 6103 restricts the disclosure of returns and return
information only. Return means any tax or information return,
declaration of estimated tax, or claim for refund, including schedules
and attachments thereto, filed with the IRS. Return information includes
the taxpayer's name; nature and source or amount of income; and whether
the taxpayer's return is under investigation. Section 6103(b)(2)
provides that ``nothing in any other provision of law shall be construed
to require the disclosure of standards used or to be used for the
selection of returns for examination, or data used or to be used for
determining such standards, if the Secretary determines that such
disclosure will seriously impair assessment, collection, or enforcement
under the internal revenue laws.'' Section 6103 does not restrict the
disclosure of other records required to be maintained by the IRS, such
as records documenting agency policy, programs and activities, and
agency histories. Such records are required to be made available to the
public under the Freedom of Information Act (``FOIA'').\57\
\57\FOIA does not require disclosure of records or information that
would frustrate law enforcement efforts. 5 U.S.C. sec. 552(b)(7).
The Internal Revenue Code prohibits disclosure of tax returns and
return information, except to the extent specifically authorized by the
Internal Revenue Code (sec. 6103). Unauthorized disclosure is a felony
punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000 or imprisonment of not more
than five years, or both (sec. 7213). An action for civil damages also
may be brought for unauthorized disclosure (sec. 7431).
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that it is appropriate to permit disclosure to
NARA for purposes of scheduling records for destruction or retention,
while at the same time preserving the confidentiality of taxpayer
information in those documents.
Explanation of Provision
The bill provides an exception to the disclosure rules to require IRS
to disclose IRS records to officers or employees of NARA, upon written
request from the Archivist, for purposes of the appraisal of such
records for destruction or retention in the National Archives. The
present-law prohibitions on and penalties for disclosure of tax
information will generally apply to NARA.
Effective Date
The provision is effective for requests made by the Archivist after
the date of enactment.
4. Payment of Taxes (sec. 374 of the bill)
Present Law
The Code provides that it is lawful for the Secretary to accept
checks or money orders as payment for taxes, to the extent and under the
conditions provided in regulations prescribed by the Secretary (sec.
6311). Those regulations\58\
state that checks or money orders should be made payable to the
Internal Revenue Service.
\58\Treas. Reg. Sec. 301.6311 1(a)(1).
Reasons for Change
The Committee believes that it more appropriate that checks be made
payable to the United States Treasury.
Explanation of Provision
The bill requires the Secretary or his delegate to establish such
rules, regulations, and procedures as are necessary to allow payment of
taxes by check or money order to be made payable to the United States
Treasury.
Effective Date
The provision is effective on the date of enactment.
5. Clarification of Authority of Secretary Relating to the
Making of Elections (sec. 375 of the bill and sec. 7805 of the Code)
Present Law
Except as otherwise provided, elections provided by the Code are to
be made in such manner as the Secretary shall by regulations or forms
prescribe.
Reasons for Change
The Committee wishes to eliminate any confusion over the type of
guidance in which the Secretary may prescribe the manner of making any
election.
Explanation of Provision
The provision clarifies that, except as otherwise provided, the
Secretary may prescribe the manner of making of any election by any
reasonable means.
Effective Date
The provision is effective as of the date of enactment.
6. Limitation on Penalty on Individual's Failure to Pay for
Months During Period of Installment Agreement (sec. 376 of the bill and
sec. 6651 of the Code)
Present Law
Taxpayers who fail to pay their taxes are subject to a penalty of
one-half percent per month on the unpaid amount, up to a maximum of 25
percent (sec. 6651(a)). Taxpayers who make installment payments pursuant