Articles by Alvin Brown Tax Preparation Offer In Compromise State Offers in Compromise Levy IRS Tax Liens IRS Tax Liens - continued IRS Tax Liens - continued 2 Levy - continued Audit Techniques Guide Congressional Contacts Criminal Investigation D.O.J Criminal Tax Manual Tax Litigation Penalty Installment Agreements Statute of Limitations Frivolous Tax Argument Interest Abatement IRS Misconduct IRS Abuses Tax Fraud Fraud Statutes Bankruptcy Tax Reform Legislation Tax Shelters Tax Court Trust Fund Penalty Legislation Innocent Spouse Relief Important Links
|
Installment
Agreements
-
5.14
Installment Agreements
5.14.1 Securing Installment Agreements
5.14.2 Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED),
and Installment Agreements on
Specific Accounts
5.14.3 Deadlines and Payments and Requests
for Installment Agreements Made to
Delay Collection
5.14.4 Financial Reviews, Below Deferral
Level Accounts, Innocent Spouse,
Withdrawals and Multiple Entities
5.14.5 Streamlined, Guaranteed and
In-Business Trust Fund Express
Installment Agreements and
Extensions of Time to Pay
5.14.6 Multi-functional Installment
Agreement Authority
5.14.7 BMF Installment Agreements
5.14.8 Monitoring of Installment Agreements
5.14.9 Approval, Independent
Review, Appeals, and Disposition of
Documents
5.14.10 Payroll Deduction
Agreements and Direct Debit
Installment Agreements
5.14.11 Defaulted Installment
Agreements, Terminated Agreements
and Appeals of: Proposed
Terminations (Defaults), and
Terminated Installment Agreements
5.14.12 Monitoring Levy Payments General
5.14.1.1
(09-30-2004)
Overview
-
Installment
Agreements are arrangements whereby the
Internal Revenue Service allows
taxpayers to pay liabilities over time.
The only agreements that may be granted
are those that provide for full payment
of the accounts that are part of
agreements. During the course of
agreements, penalty and interest
continue to accrue. No levies may be
served during installment agreements.
-
The terms
"delinquent taxes," "accrued taxes," and
"current taxes" are used in this manual.
They are defined as follows:
-
Delinquent
Taxes: balance due, ACS balance due
accounts and/or notice status
accounts;
-
Accrued
Taxes: unassessed amounts due on
returns or undeposited FTDs as of
the date of contact; and,
-
Current
Taxes: FTDs and amounts which become
due after the date of contact.
-
Taxpayers should
be encouraged to pay the liability in
full to avoid the costs of an
installment agreement which include a
user fee, accrual of penalties and
interest, and the possible filing of the
Notice of Federal Tax Lien.
-
In addition to
the policies and procedures provided in
sections 1 12 of this chapter, the
following IRM chapters, sections and
sub-sections provide procedures on
installment agreements for specific
functions within the Internal Revenue
Service:
-
IRM 4.20
(Examination);
-
IRM
5.19.1.5.4 (Campuses, ACS,
toll-free);
-
IRM 8.7.2
(Appeals); and,
-
IRM 13.1.7
(Advocate)
Section 6 of
this chapter titled Multi-functional
Installment Agreements also contains
guidance for other functions.
5.14.1.2
(09-30-2004)
Installment Agreements and Taxpayer
Rights
- Prior to
discussing taxpayers' ability to pay a
liability, ensure they have received
Publication 1: "Your Rights as a
Taxpayer," and Publication 594: "What
You Should Know About The IRS Collection
Process."
- Request
full payment of the tax liability.
Encourage the taxpayer to pay off the
tax liability as quickly as possible. If
the taxpayer cannot pay the liability in
full, encourage them to pay within 120
days (See IRM 5.14.5.5). If taxpayers
are unable to pay in full, conduct
interest-based interviews. (See IRM
5.14.1.5)
- Request
some payment from the taxpayer.
Taxpayers may be required to make a
payment (see IRM 5.14.1.5(6)) or
payments (see IRM 5.14.3.1) while
securing documentation to determine the
proper disposition of accounts.
- When
taxpayers are unable to pay a liability
in full, an installment agreement (IA)
must be considered.
-
Taxpayers with individual income tax
liabilities of $10,000 or less
(exclusive of penalties and interest)
may be guaranteed an IA. Taxpayers with
liabilities of $25,000 or less, may
qualify for Streamlined Agreements. (See
IRM 5.14.5.2 and IRM 5.14.5.3,
Guaranteed and Streamlined Installment
Agreements)
- There
are various methods for making monthly
installment agreement payments. The
taxpayer must be encouraged to use one
of the following electronic methods or
credit card payments before accepting
payment by check or money order:
-
Electronic Federal Tax Payment
System (EFTPS) Taxpayers will
select the "payment-due with IRS
notice" payment type for posting to
masterfile with a TC 670. EFTPS has
the ability to schedule payments up
to 12 months in advance for
individual taxpayers and up to 4
months in advance for business
taxpayers. The taxpayer must
initiate payments by sending
instructions to EFTPS. (See IRM
21.7.1.4.9 for complete
instructions).
-
Direct Debit installment agreements
(if taxpayer maintains a checking
account you must encourage them to
take advantage of the direct debit
installment agreement. (See IRM
5.14.10.4 for Direct Debit
procedures.)
-
Payroll deduction installment
agreements (If the taxpayer will not
agree to a direct debit installment
agreement, you must encourage them
to take advantage of the payroll
deduction agreement.) (See IRM
5.14.10.2 for Payroll Deduction
procedures.)
-
Credit Card installment agreement
payment. (See IRM 21.2.1.4.23.14.4
for procedures for paying by credit
card.)
-
Payment by check or money order. If
payments are made by check, they
should be written to: US Treasury.
However, checks made out to
"Internal Revenue Service" or "IRS"
will be processed.
-
Beginning January 1, 2000, certain
taxpayers who enter installment
agreements on timely filed returns will
have failure to pay penalty reduced from
a half to a quarter percent per month
for any month in which an installment
agreement is in effect. (IRM 5.14.1.3
describes necessary inputs for TC 971
action codes.) Input of TC 971 AC 063
reduces failure to pay penalty from one
half (0.5) to one quarter (0.25) percent
per month if all of the following
conditions are met.
- the
installment agreement was entered
into on or after January 1, 2000;
- the
balances are due from an individual
(whether IMF or BMF, due on income,
employment or excise tax returns);
- the
tax return(s) were timely filed,
including extensions; and,
- no
CP 504, LT 11, or Letter 1058 was
sent (indicated by a TC 971 AC 069),
increasing the failure to pay
penalty from one-half (0.5) to one
(1) percent.
Note:
If
agreements are terminated
penalties increase to one-half
(0.50) percent. Input of TC 971 AC
163 causes reversal of the
reduction. (See IRM 5.14.11
regarding defaults and
terminations.)
- See IRM
5.14.7.5(1)(a) (d) regarding
designation of payments during
installment agreements.
- In
discussing installment agreements,
inform taxpayers:
-
penalty and interest continue to
accrue on unpaid liabilities.
Provide taxpayers current percentage
amounts and interest rates. If
taxpayers request further
information regarding penalty and
interest the IRM 20.1, Chapter 2
provides rates for IRC 6651(a)(1)
"failure to file" and IRC 6651(a)(2)
"failure to pay" penalties in its
sections: 2.3.1(2) and 2.4.1(2),
respectively. IRM 20.2.15 provides
interest rates, tables and
computation information.
-
there is an Installment Agreement
User Fee (provide amount.) (See IRM
5.14.9.5.1 and IRM 5.19.1.5.4.3.);
- a
lien may be filed (see IRM
5.14.1.5.2) and if a lien was
previously filed, it remains on
file;
-
there is the possibility of a levy
if the agreement is terminated;
-
current returns for taxes must be
filed and current deposits paid to
qualify for an agreement (If
applicable, remind the taxpayer of
the obligation to make estimated tax
payments in order to avoid accruing
new tax liabilities which would
default their agreement); and,
-
federal tax refunds will be offset.
(See IRM 5.14.1.5.1(19)(e))
- of
the right to appeal proposed
terminations of installment
agreements, terminations of
installment agreements and
rejections of requests for
installment agreements. (See IRM
5.14.9.4)
- In
accordance with law, each year the IRS
mails Computer Paragraph (CP) 89,
"Annual Installment Agreement Statement,
" to every installment agreement
taxpayer. The statement provides:
- the
dollar amount of beginning account
balance(s) due;
- an
itemized listing of payments;
- an
itemized listing of penalties,
interest and other charges; and,
- the
dollar amount of ending account
balance(s) due.
5.14.1.3
(09-30-2004)
Identifying Pending, Approved and
Rejected Installment Agreement
Proposals on IDRS
-
Proposals to enter into installment
agreements may result from letters,
phone contacts, voice-mail, e-mail, or
other communications between taxpayers
and Service personnel. If proposals to
enter into installment agreements are
received by e-mail, do not respond in
kind. E-mail responses are prohibited
since they violate the IRS Security
Policy. In addition, do not solicit
e-mails from taxpayers regarding
installment agreements, or other tax
collection or examination issues. All
taxpayers have the right to request
installment agreements. Requests for
installment agreements, including those
on unassessed modules, will be noted in
the case history, and must be identified
on IDRS within 24 hours.
- The
following transaction codes (TC) and
Action Codes (AC) will be used:
-
Pending Agreements: TC 971 AC 043
for requests not immediately
approved; and,
-
Approved Agreements: TC 971 AC 063
for immediately approved requests.
- As noted
above, these inputs must be made within
24 hours of the request for, and
identification of, installment
agreements or pending agreements. These
codes prevent levy issuance. (See IRM
5.14.1.6 Levy Restrictions During
Installment Agreements.) Area offices
will designate officials responsible for
inputs in Case Processing Support, or at
the group, team, or unit level. (See
Exhibit 5.14.11 Input of TC 971,
Action Codes 043 & 063) Responsible
functions must be available during core
business hours to receive telephonic
requests for input of TC 971, Action
Codes 043 and 063.
-
Taxpayers need to provide specific
information for installment agreement
requests to be processed. Also, if the
information in (a) through (d) below is
provided but it is determined the
agreement request was made to delay
collection action, accounts should
not
be identified as in pending installment
agreement status. (See IRM 5.14.3.2) To
identify accounts as "pending"
installment agreements taxpayers must:
-
Provide information sufficient to
identify the taxpayer: generally,
the taxpayers name and
identification number. If a taxpayer
furnishes her or his name, but no ID
number, and the taxpayers identity
can be determined, pending status
should be identified.
-
Identify the tax liability to be
covered by the agreement;
-
Propose a monthly or other periodic
payment of aspecific
amount.
- Be
in compliance with filing
requirements (see IRM 5.14.1.5.1).
- Requests
that meet the criteria in IRM
5.14.1.3(4)(a) through (d) above will be
identified as pending installment
agreements even if taxpayers are not in
compliance with:
-
estimated (ES) payment requirements;
or,
-
federal tax deposit (FTD)
requirements,
unless
the procedures in IRM 5.14.3.2 apply.
- If
taxpayers do not provide all the
information in IRM 5.14.1.3(4)(a)
through (d) above, ask them for the
missing information. For example, if no
payment amount is specified, ask how
much can be paid per month. A monthly
payment amount
must be specified for the account to be
marked "pending" .
-
Acceptance or rejection of proposed
agreements is based on analysis of
Collection Information Statements (see
IRM 5.14.1.5)
Exception:
(1) If
installment agreement requests are
made to delay collection action see
IRM 5.14.3.2.
Exception:
(2)
Grant Streamlined, Guaranteed and
In-Business Trust Fund
Express
installment agreements based on the
criteria in IRM 5.14.5.
- The
following transaction codes (TC) and
Action Codes (AC) will be input on ALL
taxpayer modules containing TC 971 AC
043 to indicate acceptance or rejection
of proposed agreements:
- For
Approved Agreements: request that TC
971 AC 063 be input to IDRS on ALL
taxpayer modules.
- For
Rejected Proposals: request reversal
of TC 971 AC 043 forty-five (45)
days after the rejection is
communicated to the taxpayers,
unless a timely appeal is received.
- For
Appeals: during appeals, TC 971 AC
043 remains on all modules. If
Appeals sustains rejections, input
TC 972 AC 043 (if 30 days have
passed) or 30 days after rejection
is communicated to taxpayers. If
Appeals grants installment
agreements, follow the procedures
above for approved agreements.
- To
identify trust fund recovery penalties
as pending or approved installment
agreements, the balance due account must
be:
-
assessed; or,
- Form
2751 must be executed by the
taxpayer; or,
- the
assessment must be recommended for
the potentially responsible officer
by approval of Form 4183 and
signatures on Letter 1153.
- Examples
of "Pending" and "No Pending
(agreement)" are in IRM 5.14.1.5 and the
two charts below.
5.14.1.4
(09-30-2004)
Cases Received From ACS or Campuses
- In
circumstances where cases are assigned
to the field from ACS or Campuses with
Transaction Code (TC) 971 Action Code
(AC) 043 present on one or more of the
tax modules, employees will:
-
Attempt to contact the taxpayer.
- If
contact is made, determine if the
taxpayer wants an installment
agreement.
- If
the taxpayer wants an installment
agreement, follow the procedures in
IRM 5.14.3.1, regarding requesting
payments. Include a definite request
for payment, if appropriate.
Consider the contact date to be the
new request date and begin case
action. If rejection is planned, an
independent review is required. If
the TC 971 AC 043 has not been input
on all Balance Due periods, request
input immediately.
- If
the taxpayer did not request an
installment agreement, request
reversal of the TC 971 AC 043 using
TC 972 AC 043 with the same date of
input.
- In some
situations the criteria regarding
installment agreements made to delay
collection action may apply. In these
cases, if the current date is within 30
days of the input date of the TC 971 AC
043, and it is clear one of the criteria
provided in IRM 5.14.3.2 is present:
-
Contact is necessary.
-
Follow the procedures provided in
IRM 5.14.3.1.
-
Independent review is not necessary.
-
Request input of TC 972 AC 043.
-
Ensure case histories are documented
with regard to the procedures
provided in IRM 5.14.3.2.
5.14.1.5
(09-30-2004)
Interest Based Interviews: Installment
Agreement Acceptance and Rejection
Determinations
- Conduct
an interest-based interview with balance
due taxpayers. Interest based
negotiation with taxpayers reduces the
risk of misunderstanding. The purpose of
the interview is to determine the best
manner of resolving the taxpayer's
balance due accounts and, if
appropriate, delinquent returns. At the
interview:
-
Provide the taxpayer with
Publications 1 and 594 (See IRM
5.14.1.2(1)) and request full
payment. If the taxpayer is unable
to fully pay the liability
immediately, ask the taxpayer how
much can be paid within 120 days,
and request that amount. (See the
procedures provided in IRM 5.14.5.5
regarding Extensions of Time to
Pay.) If the liability will be
fully
paid within 120 days secure the
following minimum information only
on the financial statement: name and
address of employer(s) (accounts
receivables if sole proprietor or
business); bank name and address,
bank account number; full property
address of all real property; and
year, make, model and tag number of
motor vehicles.
Note:
If
additional time is given to an ACS
taxpayer, inform the ACS call site
immediately.
- If
the taxpayer states that balance due
accounts cannot be fully paid within
120 days, a full Collection
Information Statement (CIS) must be
completed to determine the
taxpayer's ability to pay. (Refer to
IRM 5.15.1.3.1, to determine
allowable expenses.)
Exception:
If
taxpayers are eligible for
streamlined, guaranteed or in
business
Express agreements,
financial statements are not
required. (See IRM 5.14.5.2, IRM
5.14.5.3, or IRM 5.14.5.4)
-
While completing financial
statements, ensure taxpayers
interests are considered. Allow
taxpayers to explain reasons for
expenses and other circumstances
they believe impact their ability to
pay. (See IRM 5.15.1.3)
- Based on
the results of the interest based
interview, determine a plan for
resolving the balance due accounts. The
plan should be based upon:
-
results of financial statement
analysis; and,
-
other information and documentation
provided by taxpayers.
- There
are no minimum nor maximum dollar limits
for the amount of a liability that may
be included in an installment agreement.
(However, see IRM 5.14.4.2(4) regarding
$25 per month (or less) agreements.
Unless such agreements are "guaranteed"
(per IRM 5.14.5.3) payments will be used
for current withholding.)
- If
taxpayers are
unable to fully
or partially
satisfy bal due accounts, and an
installment agreement will fully satisfy
the bal due accounts (or accounts
included in agreements provided by IRM
5.14.2.2) then installment agreements
should be considered.
-
Installment agreements must reflect
taxpayers' ability to pay on a monthly
basis throughout the duration of
agreements.
- If
taxpayers do not agree to payment
amounts, or to increases, inform
them that these, and other issues
(see IRM 5.14.1.5(6) through (9)
below) may be discussed with the
next level of management.
-
Employees may choose to bring
managers into discussions to assist
in reaching agreements.
- If
agreements cannot be recommended for
approval, inform taxpayers their
requests are pending, and
rejection of
the request will be recommended,
and refer the case for independent
administrative review.
- If
taxpayers have the ability to fully
or partiallysatisfy
bal due accounts by:
-
using cash;
-
withdrawing cash from bank or other
accounts;
-
borrowing on equity in real or
personal property; or,
-
selling real or personal property,
then:
-
request full or
partial payment
(specify amount) be made on the bal
due accounts.
-
inform the taxpayer that the
specific amount of payment requested
is, based on conversion of assets
(through borrowing or selling); or
cash or other liquid assets (such as
securities or money market
accounts); or other analysis of the
taxpayer's financial statement.
-
inform taxpayers installment
agreements
will be recommended for rejection
if there is sufficient equity or
cash available to
fully pay
the taxes, and full payment is not
received by a set date, or
partially
pay the taxes, and the
partial payment requested is not
received by a set date.
Note:
See
IRM 5.14.3.1 about providing
deadlines.
-
Provide a specific deadline for
payment. In addition, notify
taxpayers of the consequences of
missing the deadline. (See IRM
5.14.3.1 for additional
information.)
Example:
If a
taxpayer has the ability to pay $3,000
per month on a $200,000 liability, has
a home valued at $400,000 with equity
of $200,000, require that he attempt
to borrow on the available equity in
the home prior to granting an
installment agreement. If the taxpayer
does not attempt to borrow on the home
he must be notified that, though the
installment agreement request is
pending, it will be recommended for
rejection. If the taxpayer is able to
get a home equity loan and the monies
are used to pay taxes, the amount of
the payment on the loan will be
considered an allowable expense.
Caution:
Do not
warn taxpayers of enforcement action
if installment agreements are pending
or in effect. See IRM 5.14.3.1 for
additional information.
-
Taxpayers do not qualify for installment
agreements if bal due accounts can be
fully or
partially satisfied by
liquidating assets, unless:
-
factors such as advanced age,
ill-health, or other special
circumstances, are determined to
prevent the liquidation of the
assets; and/or,
- they
qualify for guaranteed or
streamlined or
Express agreements.
(See IRM 5.14.5)
-
Installment agreements may be granted if
taxpayers make payments on bal due
accounts that reduce the unpaid
balance(s) of assessments (UBAs) to
amounts that fit streamlined, guaranteed
or in business
Express criteria.
Example:
If a
taxpayer has equity in assets and cash
that total $100,000 and owes $40,000
(UBA) in taxes, request full payment
of the bal due accounts. If the
taxpayer makes payments that reduce
the UBA to $25,000 and requests a
streamlined installment agreement, the
agreement will be granted.
- If an
analysis of the taxpayer's financial
condition shows taxpayers cannot pay:
- but
they insist on installment
agreements;
-
amounts proposed will fully pay the
bal due account(s) within the
collection statute (and waiver
period if appropriate);
- but
the possibility remains that
payments cannot be made;
then
prepare a backup Form 53 along with the
installment agreement in case of
eventual default and termination. (See
Exhibit 5.14.12 and IRM 5.14.4.2.)
- If
analysis of the taxpayer's financial
condition shows a liability cannot be
collected in full through an installment
agreement, discuss the possibility of an
offer in compromise with the taxpayer
(See IRM 5.8.1 and IRM 5.14.2.2
regarding installment agreements on
specific balance due accounts.)
- See IRM
5.14.9.3 regarding Independent
Administrative Review if installment
agreement requests are recommended for
rejection.
- See IRM
5.11.1.2.2 and IRM 5.10.1.4(2) if
taxpayers qualify for installment
agreements or offers in compromise but:
- do
not submit or request one; or;
- do
not agree to an acceptable payment
amount.
Note:
Also see IRM 5.14.2.1(21) and IRM
5.14.3.1.
Reminder:
Although the
plan to reject may and
should be relayed, actual rejection of
proposed agreements must not be
conveyed to taxpayers prior to
independent administrative review, and
enforcement action may not be taken
while installment agreements are
pending.
- For
agreements that require no managerial
approval see IRM 5.14.5.2, 5.14.5.3, and
IRM 5.14.5.4 below. For agreements that
require management approval see IRM
5.14.9.2.
5.14.1.5.1 (09-30-2004)
Compliance and Installment
Agreements
- Filing
and paying compliance must be
considered prior to determining that
the best manner of paying delinquent
taxes is through an installment
agreement.
- Ensure
all balance
due modules, including
cross-referenced taxpayer
identification numbers
displayed on IDRS and Masterfile (use
CFOL commands) are included in
agreements. (See IRM 5.14.1.5.1(16)
for necessary information and IRM
5.14.2.2 for exceptions.)
-
Individuals that are in business
as sole proprietors must be in
compliance with both individual
and business filing requirements
to qualify for installment
agreements.
- If
sole proprietors have delinquent
accounts on two or more taxpayer
identification numbers (SSN and
EIN) all bal due accounts must be
included in one agreement. (See
IRM 5.14.2.2 for exceptions and
IRM 5.14.8.2 and IRM 5.14.8.3 for
monitoring.)
-
Liabilities for returns that were
filed, but are not assessed, may be
included in installment agreements.
Use Installment Agreement Locator
Number XX32 (See Exhibit 5.14.12)
Ensure all account balances included
in agreements will be fully paid prior
to CSEDs plus allowable extensions.
(See IRM 5.14.2.1(3)).
-
Taxpayers must be in compliance with
all filing requirements prior to
approval of installment agreements.
- Do not
grant installment agreements if
taxpayers have not filed required
returns. Do not identify requests for
agreements as "pending" agreements if
taxpayers have not filed required
returns. (See IRM 5.14.1.3(4)(d).)
- A Del
Ret is present when a delinquency
investigation is established by input
of Transaction Code (TC) 140. In some
publications and procedures the term
"Taxpayer Delinquency Investigation "
(TDI) is used to describe Del Rets.
- If Del
Ret status is not indicated for a tax
period then, for the purpose of
granting an installment agreement, no
additional compliance check is
required (except on tax returns due
within the past sixteen months see
IRM 5.14.1.5.1(8) below).
- Prior
to granting IAs, ensure that tax
returns due within the past sixteen
months were filed. If not filed,
address compliance even if a Del Ret
is not indicated using the procedures
provided in IRM 5.14.1.5.1(11) below.
This ensures compliance is addressed
when Del Ret case creation has not yet
occurred. Del Rets are created within
sixteen months of due dates of
returns.
- If Del
Rets were resolved by one of the
following methods, the closure is not
considered evidence of compliance for
the purposes of entering into an
installment agreement:
-
surveyed;
-
shelved;
-
unable to locate;
-
referred to Exam or SFR (unless
the assessment is pending or the
case is assigned);
- If Del
Rets were resolved by a closure listed
in IRM 5.14.1.5.1(9)a d above, but
it is determined that they could have
been closed as provided in IRM
5.14.1.5.1(12) below, then input (or
request input of) appropriate
transaction and closing codes. In
these situations installment
agreements may be granted when closing
Del Rets.
- If an
installment agreement is the
appropriate case resolution, and there
is an open Del Ret on another tax
module(s); then the installment
agreement may be granted when:
-
Tax return(s) indicated as due are
filed.
-
Del Rets are resolved using the
dispositions listed in IRM
5.14.1.5.1(12).
-
Del Rets are resolved using the
dispositions listed in IRM
5.14.1.5.1(13).
-
Installment agreements may also be
granted when the following closures
are present:
- No
return secured little or no tax
due (Policy Statement P-5-133);
- No
return secured taxpayer due
refund.
- If
taxpayers are not required to file
returns, such modules should be closed
using appropriate transaction and
closing codes. The return closing
codes that indicate filing compliance,
or that filing is not required are
contained in LEM 5.3. Also see
Document 6209 Chapter 11 for
definitions.
- If
taxpayers are required to file returns
and these returns are not filed,
installment agreements cannot be
granted or approved. For a list of
closing codes for returns that are not
indicators of filing compliance see
LEM 5.3. Also see Document 6209
Chapter 11 for definitions.
- If
delinquency investigations (del rets)
were closed with a transaction code
that does not indicate filing
compliance, request that returns be
filed within a reasonable timeframe.
- See
IRM 5.1.11.4 for exceptions and
guidance regarding the filing of
returns.
-
Compliance checks based on case
information:
-
Except in those situations
described in IRM 5.14.1.5.1(7) and
IRM 5.14.1.5.1(8) above, further
compliance investigation is
neither required nor prohibited,
if Del Ret status is not indicated
on IDRS. In addition, unless there
is a Del Ret, no CFOL review (and
no IRPTR review) is required.
- If
further research is conducted, and
there is an indication a return is
due, then address filing
compliance prior to granting
installment agreements.
Installment agreements may not be
granted if it is determined
taxpayers are liable for unfilled
Bal Due returns. (P-5-133, refund
return determinations and the
dispositions provided in IRM
5.14.1.5.1(12) are permitted in
these situations, if determined
appropriate after further
investigation.
- The
compliance checks described in this
section are conducted to determine
eligibility for installment agreements
after they are requested by taxpayers.
If taxpayers do not file requested
returns within provided timeframes
(and the circumstances described in
IRM 5.1.11.4 do not apply) requests
for agreements will not be identified
as pending (rejection and independent
review are inapplicable) and
agreements will not be granted.
-
Analyze the current years anticipated
tax liability. If it appears a
taxpayer will have a balance due at
the end of the current year, the
accrued liability may be included in
an agreement. Compliance with filing,
paying estimated taxes, and federal
tax deposits must be current from the
date the installment agreement begins.
Use Agreement Locator Number (ALN)
XX32. (See Exhibit 5.14.12)
| |