This
section
provides
Campus
Examination
employees
guidelines
for
selecting,
controlling,
investigating
and
closing
Frivolous
Return
Program
(FRP)
cases.
Servicewide
consolidation
of
the
receipt
and
processing
of
all
frivolous
documents
at
the
Ogden
Compliance
Services
Campus
was
completed
January
1,
2001.
The
IRS,
through
administration
of
Internal
Revenue
Code
Section
6702,
will
address
non-compliance
based
on
unfounded
legal
or
constitutional
arguments.
This
law
provides
for
a
$500
penalty
to
be
imposed
upon
any
taxpayer
who
files
a
purported
return
failing
to
contain
information
from
which
the
correctness
of
the
reported
tax
liability
can
be
determined
or
that
clearly
indicates
that
the
tax
liability
shown
must
be
substantially
incorrect.
The
penalty
is
intended
to
address
those
situations
where
a
taxpayer
is
furthering
a
frivolous
argument
or
demonstrates
a
prima
facie
intent
to
delay
or
impede
administration
of
the
tax
law.
The
FRP
identifies
those
individuals
and/or
promoters
filing
or
promoting
frivolous
returns,
claims,
and/or
documents
and
attempts
to
educate
them
on
their
obligations
to
file
and
pay
taxes.
This
program
targets
individual
behaviors
by
responding
to
specific
actions.
Examination
will
be
responsible
for
detecting,
controlling,
processing
and
examining
frivolous
filing
activities.
Examination
will
conduct
orientations
to
functions
involved
in
processing
and/or
examining
returns
or
correspondence
to
emphasize
recognition
of
frivolous
documents
and
provide
appropriate
referral
instructions.
The
FRP
will
take
a
proactive
approach
to
addressing
frivolous
non-compliance
by
providing
outreach
education
through
TEC
and
other
stakeholders
on
pertinent
program
data
such
as
geographic
trends
of
frivolous
filings
and
common
frivolous
arguments.
The
program
will
participate
in
coordinating
new
systemic
identification
of
frivolous
filings
wherever
possible
and
make
referrals
to
affected
stakeholders
such
as
the
Office
of
Professional
Responsibility,
Criminal
Investigation
Division,
Lead
Development
Center,
and
Communications
and
Government
Liaison.
4.10.12.1.1
(03-01-2006)
Frivolous
Arguments
Recognized
frivolous
arguments
include
but
are
not
limited
to:
Wages/Receipts
Not
Income
(NTR)
-
The
individual
argues
that
salaries
and
wages
are
not
"income"
within
the
meaning
of
the
Sixteenth
Amendment,
which
grants
Congress
the
power
to
"Lay
and
collect
taxes
on
income,
from
whatever
source
derived..:"
The
individual
could
also
argue
that
labor
worth
a
certain
amount
is
exchanged
for
money
worth
the
same
amount
and
therefore
there
is
no
income
to
be
taxed.
Eisner
v.
McComber-
The
individual
reports
wages
but
deducts
them
as
"non-taxable
compensation/remuneration"
referencing
Eisner
v.
McComber.
The
individual
may
alter
line
items
showing
non-taxable
compensation
or
non-taxable
receipts
to
back
out
some
or
all
of
their
income,
generally
resulting
in
a
zero
tax
liability.
Zero
Returns
(ZERO)
-
The
individual
submits
a
return
with
zero
money
amounts
on
all
or
most
of
the
line
items
on
the
form,
e.g.,
an
individual
may
enter
zeros
for
income
and
deductions
but
enter
an
amount
of
tax
withheld
and
request
a
refund
of
that
amount..
A
statement
may
be
attached
claiming
there
is
no
section
of
the
Internal
Revenue
Code
that
established
an
income
tax
liability.
The
statement
may
also
contain
arguments
regarding
the
definition
of
income.
There
are
several
variations
on
this
type
of
filing
such
as
those
bearing
the
words
"nunc
pro
tunc"
and
"not
liable."
See
also
item
42
in
this
list.
U.S.
v.
Long
(Z-LONG)
-
The
individual
submits
a
return
with
zero
money
amounts.
To
explain
the
zeros
inserted
on
the
form,
the
individual
references
to
"U.S.
v.
Long"
.
Not
a
Citizen/Free
Citizen/Not
a
Resident
of
Federal
Zone
-
The
individual
argues
they
are
not
a
citizen
of
the
United
States
and
receive
no
income
or
benefits
from
sources
within
the
United
States.
May
file
a
Form
1040NR
to
receive
a
refund
of
withheld
income
tax
or
claim
citizenship
of
a
"
State
Republic"
.
Alternatively,
the
individual
may
claim
that
he
or
she
does
not
live
in
a
federal
Area
Office
or
zone
(Area
Office
of
Columbia,
Guam,
Puerto
Rico,
the
Virgin
Islands,
the
Northern
Marianna
Islands,
and
certain
other
"possessions,
enclaves,
and
trust
territories
"
).
NOTE:
The
aforementioned
does
not
apply
to
a
foreign
person
who
has
paid
withholding
inadvertently
and
has
filed
a
claim
for
a
refund.
Reparation
Tax
(REPTX)
-
The
individual
submits
a
return,
an
amended
return,
or
correspondence
referring
to
a
reparation
settlement
based
on
the
impact
of
slavery,
or
may
refer
to
black
taxes,
reparations
for
African-Americans,
or
40
acres
and
a
mule.
It
may
also
include
a
Form
2439
with
fictitious
RIC
such
as
Investment
Taxes
or
Department
of
the
Treasury.
Form
2555
Deduction
(F2555)
-
The
individual
submits
a
return
showing
income
then
deducts
that
same
amount
(or
a
large
portion
of
that
amount)
by
adding
"Form
2555"
to
line
21.
Form
2555,
Foreign
Earned
Income,
is
usually
attached
showing
the
individual's
address
in
the
United
States
as
the
foreign
address.
The
individual
also
shows
his
income
on
Form
2555
as
"foreign
earned
income"
even
though
his
employer's
address
is
also
in
the
United
States.
Correspondence
may
be
attached
arguing
the
term
"income"
and
stating
that
each
of
the
several
states
are
foreign
countries.
NOTE:
Frivolous
Forms
2555
should
be
worked
in
the
FRP
area
at
the
receiving
Campus
rather
than
forwarded
to
PSC.
Not
a
"Person"
or
"Individual
(NTINDV)
"
-
The
individual
argues
he
or
she
is
not
a
"Person"
or
"Individual"
within
the
meaning
of
the
Internal
Revenue
Code
and
is
therefore
not
subject
to
income
taxes.
Sixteenth
Amendment
(16AMEND)
-
The
individual
argues
the
Sixteenth
Amendment
was
not
properly
ratified
and
therefore
the
federal
government
does
not
have
the
legal
authority
to
collect
an
income
tax
without
apportionment.
Generally
the
argument
focuses
on
matters
such
as
inconsistencies
in
versions
ratified
by
the
various
states.
Fifth
Amendment
(5AMEND)
-
The
individual
makes
an
improper
blanket
assertion
of
the
Fifth
Amendment
right
against
self-incrimination
as
a
basis
for
not
providing
any
financial
information.
Altered
Jurat/UCC
1–207
(JURAT)
-
The
individual
submits
a
return
that
contains
income
and
deductions
but
the
jurat
has
been
altered
or
stricken.
May
include
reference
to
UCC
1–207
or
a
statement
that
the
return
was
not
signed
under
penalties
of
perjury.
The
alteration
may
be
located
elsewhere
on
the
return
with
an
arrow
pointing
to
the
jurat.
There
may
be
an
explanation
on
the
return
or
attachments
reflecting
the
desire
to
negate
the
effect
of
the
jurat
by
showing
the
taxpayer
did
not
intend
to
file
a
return
in
good
faith.
Altered
Form
(ALTFORM)
-
The
individual
submits
a
return
altering
any
or
all
line
items
with
the
intent
of
facilitating
non-compliance
with
the
tax
laws.
Unsigned
Returns
(UNSIGN)
-
The
individual
completes
a
return
but
fails
to
sign.
A
statement
why
the
return
is
not
signed
may
be
attached
or
added
to
the
return
indicating,
among
other
arguments,
disagreement
with
the
tax
system.
Wages
Deducted
in
Cost
of
Goods
Sold
(F-SCHC)
-
The
individual
submits
a
return
with
a
Schedule
C
attached
claiming
a
deduction
which
is
equal,
or
nearly
equal,
to
the
amount
reported
as
wage
income.
The
deduction
is
usually
included
in
the
cost
of
goods
sold
but
could
appear
under
a
different
deduction
category.
Valuation
(FAIRMV)
-
The
individual
argues
that
income
is
not
taxable
because
of
the
declining
fair
market
value
of
the
dollar,
because
the
dollar
is
not
backed
by
gold/silver,
because
the
value
of
services
is
offset
by
the
value
of
the
labor
(barter
income),
etc.
In
Lieu
of
(ILO)
-
The
individual
submits
a
document
captioned,
Statement
in
lieu
of
U.S.
income
tax
Form
1040.
Various
other
arguments
may
be
used
in
the
document.
Disclaimer
(DISCL)
-
The
individual
submits
documentation
which
contains
a
disclaimer.
The
disclaimer
states
the
individual,
"disclaims
the
liability
for
the
tax
due"
,
making
the
liability
on
the
return
zero.
This
disclaimer
may
be
a
part
of
a
return,
on
a
return
attachment,
or
in
other
documents.
Protest
Against
Government
Action/Inaction
(WARTAX)
-
The
individual
argues
that
their
refusal
to
file
a
return
or
pay
tax
is
justified
because
they
disagree
with
government
policies
or
spending
plans.
The
individual
may
claim
deductions
or
credits
because
of
an
objection
to
having
his
or
her
taxes
used
to
support
various
government
activities.
Taxes
are
Voluntary/Law
Does
Not
Require
(VOLUN)
-
The
individual
submits
a
return,
amended
return,
or
correspondence
that
argues
income
taxes
are
voluntary.
Challenges
to
Authority/Title
26
or
"law"
in
Other
Documents
(CONST)
-
The
individual
may
argue
that
Title
26
of
the
United
States
Code
is
not
law
because
it
was
never
enacted
as
named.
As
a
separate
position,
the
individual
may
argue
that
other
laws
or
documents
prevent
the
IRS
from
assessing
and
collecting
tax.
This
argument
may
reference
the
Bible,
Bill
of
Rights,
Declaration
of
Independence,
Magna
Carta,
Northwest
Ordinance,
Declaration
of
Resolved,
Federalist
Papers,
Mayflower
Compact,
Articles
of
Confederation
of
1788,
Declaration
of
Rights
of
1765
and
1774,
and
others.
Challenges
to
Authority/Due
Process
(VOFPOV)
-
The
individual
questions
various
administrative
authorities
such
as
delegation
orders,
summons
authority,
privacy
act,
etc.
This
argument
may
be
based
on
contentions
that
Treasury
Department
Orders
(TDOs)
were
not
published
in
the
Federal
Register,
that
the
Commissioner
lacked
authority
to
propose
regulations,
that
TDOs,
Regulations,
Treasury
Decisions,
Forms,
and
other
actions
and
activities
do
not
comply
with
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act,
Privacy
Act,
Administrative
Procedures
Act,
and
Federal
Register
Act.
The
individual
may
argue
that
they
must
be
afforded
a
hearing
or
a
trial
before
taxes
can
be
assessed
or
before
property
can
be
seized.
Internal
Revenue
Service
is
a
Private
Organization/Collects
Tribute,
Not
Taxes
(TRIBU)
-
The
individual
argues
that
the
IRS
is
an
entity
named
the
Internal
Revenue
and
Tax
Service,
Inc.
which
was
incorporated
in
Delaware
in
1933.
The
individual
further
argues
that
since
the
IRS
deposits
its
revenues
in
the
Federal
Reserve
Bank,
it
is
a
collection
agency
for
the
bank,
which
is
in
the
business
of
making
loans
and
conducting
proprietary
business,
thereby
removing
the
cloak
of
governmental
immunity.
Additionally,
they
argue
the
Department
of
Treasury
is
part
of
the
United
Nations
and
is
clandestinely
leading
the
tax-paying
public
into
a
"new
world
order"
.
Alleged
Churches/First
Amendment
(ALDGCH)
-
The
individual
receives
income
from
non-religious
sources
and
may
claim
a
vow
of
poverty.
The
individual
submits
a
return
where
all,
or
substantially
all,
of
the
gross
income
is
claimed
as
a
deduction
on
Schedule
A
of
the
return.
Amended
Returns/Form
843
Claim
for
Refund
and
Request
for
Abatemet(AMEND)
-
The
individual
files
an
amended
return
or
a
Form
843
to
obtain
a
total
refund
of
all
taxes
paid
in
prior
years,
based
on
a
tax
avoidance
argument
not
supported
by
law.
Untaxed
(UNTAX)
-
The
individual
argues
that
he
or
she
should
be
"untaxed"
and
attempts
to
drop
out
of
the
Social
Security
system.
He
or
she
will
withdraw
or
rescind
his
or
her
SSN,
claiming
he
or
she
is
a
sovereign
citizen.
Federal
Reserve
Notes
Are
Not
Legal
Tender
(FEDRES)
-
The
individual
argues
that
their
wages
are
not
taxable
because
they
were
paid
in
federal
reserve
notes.
He
or
she
argues
that
notes
are
not
valid
currency
or
legal
tender
and,
thus,
those
who
possess
them
cannot
be
subject
to
a
tax
on
them.
Services
Not
Taxable/Thirteenth
Amendment/Form
of
Servitude
(13AMEND)
-
The
individual
argues
that
income
results
only
from
the
sale
of
goods,
and
therefore,
the
value
of
services
is
not
taxable.
This
includes
indentured
servitude
arguments
and
barter
offsets.
The
individual
may
also
argue
that
the
Thirteenth
Amendment
outlawed
slavery.
He
or
she
may
claim
to
be
"natural
unfranchised
individuals
and
freemen"
who
are
residents
of
states,
and
therefore
nonresident
aliens
for
the
purpose
of
the
Internal
Revenue
Code.
Obscene,
Vulgar,
Harassing
(OBSC)
-
The
individual
submits
documents
or
other
materials
indicating
that
non-filing
is
due
to
dissatisfaction
with
tax
policies
or
taxation
in
general.
Often,
this
argument
is
expressed
with
obscene,
vulgar,
or
crude
language
and
characters
in
an
extremely
demeaning
manner.
Other
—
All
others
not
specifically
defined.
Non-negotiable
Chargeback
(NNCB)
-
The
individual
attempts
to
sell
his/her
birthright
back
to
the
government
for
a
large
dollar
amount
and
requests
that
a
"Treasury
Direct
Account"
be
set
up
to
hold
the
money.
IRC
861
for
Individual
Employees
(IMF861)
-
The
individual
files
a
return
or
claim
stating
that
wages
are
not
taxable
based
on
CFR
1.861
and
requesting
a
refund
of
all
federal
withholding.
IRC
3121
(FICA)
-
The
individual
contends
that
IRC
3121
exempts
the
Federal
Insurance
Contribution
Act
(FICA)
portion
of
earnings
from
the
definition
of
wages
and
therefore
from
gross
income
for
federal
tax
purposes.
The
individual
attempts
to
reduce
taxable
income
by
his/her
portion
of
withheld
social
security
tax.
1041
-
Lifetime
Social
Security
Claims
(LFTMEARN)
-
The
individual
claims
a
refund
for
all
social
security
paid
during
their
lifetime.
Taxpayer
requests
a
"lifetime
earnings
statement"
from
Social
Security
Administration
in
order
to
list
the
amount
of
withheld
social
security
taxes
as
federal
income
tax
or
other
payments.
1041
-
In
Lieu
of
1040
(1041ILO)
-
The
individual
deducts
personal
income
as
fiduciary
fees
or
other
deductions
on
Form
1041
resulting
in
a
zero
tax
liability.
IRC
1341
-
Claim
of
Right
(COR)
-
The
individual
claims
"
Compensation
for
personal
labor"
is
not
taxed
by
Title
26,
IRC
Section
1341,
and
takes
a
deduction
on
Schedule
A
or
removes
the
amount
from
gross
income.
Bosnian
Refugees
(BOSNREF)
-
The
individual
attempts
to
eliminate
tax
liability
by
filing
Form
1040X
removing
their
tax
on
line
10
(Total
Tax)
and
citing
under
Part
II
that
they
are
entitled
to
refunds
based
upon
their
status
as
Bosnian
refugees.
Not
Liable
(NTLIABL)
-
The
individual
submits
returns
or
claims
with
"Not
Liable"
printed
on
the
return.
The
returns
also
reflect
zero
money
amounts.
IRC
861
Business
-
Employment
Tax
(BMF861)
-
This
argument
targets
employers
and
advises
them
that
wages
are
exempt
from
withholding.
Based
on
CFR
1.861,
promoters
of
this
scheme
advise
employers
to
stop
withholding
and
paying
payroll
taxes
on
their
employee's
wages.
In
addition,
some
employers
file
amended
payroll
tax
returns
and
request
refunds
of
previously
paid
payroll
taxes.
EIC
with
Disability
Income
(FRIVEIC)
-
The
individual
reports
disability
income
as
the
sole
source
of
income
to
claim
earned
income
credit
but
does
not
attach
a
Form
W-2
or
Form
1099.
Exempt
Employees
of
World
Bank
Organization
(XMTEMP)
-
The
individual
files
a
return
with
a
statement
attached
which
asserts,
"World
Bank
Employee
-
Wages
not
Subject
to
Income
and/or
Non-Taxable
Income
-
World
Bank."
The
individual
lists
an
adjustment
equal
to
the
amount
of
the
wages
and
claims
adjusted
gross
income
is
zero.
May
also
cite
IRC
Section
893
which
provides
a
tax
exemption
to
some
employees
of
international
organizations.
Note:
The
World
Bank
qualifies
as
an
international
organization,
therefore,
if
the
individual
worked
for
the
World
Bank
as
a
citizen
of
another
country,
they
may
qualify
for
the
exemption.
American
Indian
Treaty
(AMERIND)
-
The
individual
attempts
to
eliminate
tax
liability
by
filing
forms
1040
removing
their
income
on
line
21
(Other
Income)
and
citing,
"less
Native
American
Indian
Treaty"
or
"Native
American
Indian
Treaty."
The
returns
usually
include
Form
1099
MISC
or
other
income
documents
that
include
withholding
which
can
result
in
a
refund
of
withholding
credit.
Note:
IRC
7873,
various
court
cases
and
revenue
rulings
allow
for
tax
free
income
earned
either
for
fishing
rights
on
treaty
land,
income
from
the
land
or
on
land
held
in
trust
for
certain
individual
Native
Americans.
For
more
information,
contact
an
IRS
Indian
Tribal
Government
Specialist.
Nunc
Pro
Tunc
(NUNC)
-The
individual
attempts
to
eliminate
tax
liability
by
filing
returns
citing
"Nunc
Pro
Tunc"
somewhere
on
the
return.
The
return
usually
consists
of
all
zeros
except
withholding
and
generally
a
refund
is
claimed.
No
further
justification
for
the
zero
return
is
given.
"Nunc
Pro
Tunc"
is
Latin
for
"Now
for
Then"
.
These
taxpayers
appear
to
want
the
IRS
to
accept
the
frivolous
return
they
have
filed
in
place
of
what
they
filed
previously.
IRC
1001
(1001)
-
The
individual
attempts
to
eliminate
tax
liability
by
filing
forms
104X
removing
all
or
part
of
income
as
an
itemized
deduction
on
Schedule
A,
"Other
Miscellaneous
Deductions"
and
citing,
"IRC
1001:
even
exchange
of
property-Labor(property)-Employer's(property).
NO
GAIN
REALIZED.
Butcher's
Union
Co.
v.
Crescent
City
Co.,
111
US
746
S.
CT.
Rptr..
pp.
660-661."
4.10.12.1.2
(03-01-2006)
Authority
and
Responses
to
Common
Frivolous
Arguments
The
judicial
system
and
the
Internal
Revenue
Code
provide
alternative
ways
to
test
the
income
tax
statutes
without
violating
the
law.
Taxpayers
may
contest
a
notice
of
deficiency
by
filing
a
petition
with
the
Tax
Court
without
paying
the
tax.
Taxpayers
may
also
file
a
refund
suit
in
the
United
States
District
Court
or
the
United
States
Court
of
Federal
Claims
after
paying
the
tax.
However,
if
the
IRS
Appeals
Office
provides
administrative
review
in
connection
with
such
litigation,
it
will
not
give
a
taxpayer
an
Appeals
hearing
on
cases
involving
solely
the
failure
or
refusal
to
comply
with
tax
law
because
of
moral,
religious,
political,
constitutional,
conscientious
or
similar
grounds.
See
IRM
8.1.1.2.3,
No
Appeals
Conference
or
Concession
on
Certain
Arguments,
and
20.1.6.1.3,
Appeal
Rights,
for
additional
information.
It
is
not
the
policy
of
the
IRS
to
respond
to
frivolous
arguments
on
a
point
by
point
basis.
These
arguments
almost
always
reflect
personal
opinions
and
frustrations
with
the
tax
system
that
the
IRS
is
unable
to
address.
The
responsibility
of
the
IRS
is
to
administer
the
federal
tax
law
as
enacted
by
Congress.
The
Service
responds
to
technical
questions
about
individual
accounts;
however,
it
has
no
administrative
authority
to
change
tax
laws.
The
Service's
responsibility
is
to
administer
the
tax
laws
as
they
exist
and
to
ensure
they
are
uniformly
applied.
The
Frivolous
Return
Program
provides
for
initial
responses
to
each
issue
or
argument
presented;
however,
it
provides
for
no
responses
to
repeated
inquiries
on
the
same
positions
that
have
no
basis
in
law.
The
program
encourages
individuals
to
seek
competent
tax
counsel
and
advises
of
the
potential
consequences
for
frivolous
arguments.
Title
26
of
the
United
States
Code,
reproduced
separately
as
the
Internal
Revenue
Code
(Code),
contains
most
of
the
Federal
tax
law.
Under
Title
26,
the
IRS
is
a
part
of
the
United
States
Department
of
the
Treasury.
Generally,
Section
7803
of
the
Code
provides
that
there
shall
be
in
the
Department
of
the
Treasury
a
commissioner
of
Internal
Revenue,
who
shall
be
appointed
by
the
President,
by
and
with
the
advice
and
consent
of
the
Senate.
Section
7803
of
the
Code
states
that
the
Commissioner
shall
have
such
duties
and
powers
as
may
be
prescribed
by
the
Secretary
of
the
Treasury.
Section
7804
of
the
Code
states
that
the
Secretary
is
authorized
to
employ
such
number
of
persons
as
the
Secretary
deems
proper
for
the
administration
and
enforcement
of
the
Internal
Revenue
Laws.
The
IRS
performs
administrative
and
enforcement
duties
pursuant
to
the
authorization
of
IRC
Sections
7803
and
7804
and
other
portions
of
the
Code.
Sections
6001
and
6011
of
the
Code
provide,
in
pertinent
part,
that
every
person
liable
for
any
tax
imposed
by
the
Code
shall
make
a
return.
In
addition,
Section
6012
of
the
Code
provides
that
every
individual
whose
gross
income
equals
or
exceeds
certain
amounts
shall
make
a
federal
income
tax
return.
Shall
as
used
in
Sections
6001,
6011,
and
6012,
means
"must"
;
"must"
means
"to
be
required
to."
The
persons
required
by
the
Code
to
file
an
income
tax
return
is
explained
in
the
instructions
for
Form
1040
under
the
heading
"Filing
Requirements."
The
Sixteenth
Amendment,
making
the
income
tax
constitutional,
was
ratified
in
1913.
The
Constitution,
Article
1,
Sections
7
through
9,
and
the
Sixteenth
Amendment
give
the
Federal
Government
the
right
to
levy
and
collect
taxes.
The
Sixteenth
Amendment
authorized
a
tax
on
income,
regardless
of
source,
without
apportionment.
The
courts
have
rejected
claims
that
the
Sixteenth
Amendment
was
not
properly
ratified.
The
Amendment
was
ratified
by
38
states
altogether,
and
ratification
was
necessary
by
only
36.
The
U.S.
Supreme
Court
has
recognized
the
validity
of
the
Sixteenth
Amendment.
Brushaber
v.
Union
Pacific
Railroad
Co.,
2408
U.S.
1,
18-20
(1916);
Bob
Jones
University
v.
United
States,
461
U.S.
574,
615
(1983.).
Official
notice
of
the
resolution
of
ratification
by
the
states
to
the
Secretary
and
his
subsequent
certification
by
proclamation
is
conclusive
upon
the
courts.
The
U.S.
Supreme
Court
has
held
that
the
requirement
that
individuals
file
a
federal
income
tax
return
does
not
violate
the
self-incrimination
clause
of
the
Fifth
Amendment.
United
States
v.
Sullivan,
274
U.S.
259
(1927).
Judicial
precedents
clearly
establish
that
failure
to
comply
with
the
filing
and
reporting
requirements
of
the
federal
income
tax
laws
will
not
be
excused
based
upon
blanket
assertions
of
constitutional
privilege
against
self-incrimination
under
the
Fifth
Amendment.
United
States
v.
Irwin,
561
F.2d
198
(10th
Cir.
1977),
cert.
denied,
434
U.S.
1012
(1978);
United
States
v.
Neff,
615
F.2d
1235
(9th
Cir.
1980)
cert.
denied,
447
U.S.
925
(1980).
The
statutory
provisions
of
the
Code
that
require
the
filing
of
income
tax
returns
do
not
violate
the
Fourth
Amendment
prohibition
against
unreasonable
searches
and
seizures
by
the
Federal
Government.
In
Flint
v.
Stone
Tracey
Co.,
220
U.S.
107
(1911),
the
Supreme
Court
said:
"Certainly
the
Amendment
was
not
intended
to
prevent
the
ordinary
procedure
of
requiring
tax
returns
to
be
made,
often
under
oath.
"
See
also
Boozer
v.
Commissioner,
99-2
U.S.T.C.
paragraph
50,836
(5th
Cir.
1999.)
Gross
income,
not
"income"
,
is
the
starting
point
for
determining
an
individual's
federal
income
tax
liability.
The
term
"gross
income"
is
defined
in
section
61
of
the
Code.
The
Code
in
Subtitle
A,
Chapter
1,
Subchapter
A
—
Determination
of
Tax
Liability,
provides
whether
an
individual
is
liable
for
income
tax.
Section
1
imposes
a
tax
on
the
taxable
income
of
every
individual.
Chapter
1,
Subchapter
B
—
Computation
of
Taxable
Income,
provides
whether
an
individual
has
taxable
income.
Section
63
defines
taxable
income,
generally,
as
gross
income
minus
the
deductions
allowed
by
Chapter
1.
The
argument
that
wages
are
not
income
has
been
rejected
so
frequently
that
the
very
raising
of
it
justifies
the
imposition
of
sanctions.
Connor
v.
Commissioner
,
770
F.2d
17,
20
(2d
Cir.
1985);
Crain
v.
Commissioner
,
737
F.2d
1417,
1417
(5th
Cir.
1984)
"We
perceive
no
need
to
refute
these
arguments
with
somber
reasoning
and
copious
citation
of
precedent;
to
do
so
might
suggest
that
these
arguments
have
some
colorable
merit."
This
frivolous
argument
has
been
the
subject
of
numerous
court
decisions,
which
held
the
position
to
be
contrary
to
existing
law.
IRC
Section
6065
states,
"Except
as
otherwise
provided
by
the
Secretary,
any
return,
declaration,
statement
or
other
document
required
to
be
made
under
any
provision
of
the
internal
revenue
laws
or
regulations
shall
contain
or
be
verified
by
a
written
declaration
that
it
is
made
under
the
penalties
of
perjury."
Cohen
v.
United
States,
201
F.2d
386
(9th
Cir.),
cert.
denied,
345
U.S.
951
(1953);
Sen.
Rep.
No.
685,
81st
Cong.,
1st
Sess.,
Part
II
4
(1949)
("the
purpose
of
the
statute
is
to
relieve
the
taxpayers
of
the
burden
of
notarizing
their
returns"
.)
The
courts
have
often
imposed
sanctions
on
taxpayers
who
raise
these
types
of
arguments
in
litigation.
In
Coleman
v.
Commissioner,
791
F.2d
68,
69
(7th
Cir.
1986)
the
court
stated,
"Some
people
believe
with
great
fervor
preposterous
things
that
just
happen
to
coincide
with
their
self-interest.
[Certain
individuals]
have
convinced
themselves
that
wages
are
not
income,
that
only
gold
is
money,
that
the
Sixteenth
Amendment
is
unconstitutional,
and
so
on.
These
beliefs
all
lead
to
the
elimination
of
their
obligation
to
pay
taxes.
The
government
may
not
prohibit
the
holding
of
these
beliefs,
but
it
may
penalize
people
who
act
on
them."
The
Government
expects
voluntary
compliance
with
the
federal
tax
law.
This
means
that
we
expect
taxpayers
to
comply
with
the
law
without
being
compelled
to
do
so
by
action
of
a
Government
agent;
it
does
not
mean
the
taxpayer
is
free
to
disregard
the
law.
If
an
individual
is
required
by
law
to
file
a
return
or
pay
tax,
it
is
mandatory
that
he
or
she
do
so.
Failure
to
do
so
could
cause
the
individual
to
be
subject
to
civil
and
criminal
penalties;
including
fines,
and
imprisonment.
See,
for
example,
Schiff
v.
Commissioner,
T.C.Memo
1984–223,
aff'd,
751
F.2d
116
(2nd
Cir.
1984).
4.10.12.1.3
(03-01-2006)
Identification
of
Frivolous
Documents
Frivolous
documents
often:
contain
arguments
about
the
obligation
to
file
or
pay
tax
on
the
face
of
the
tax
return
or
on
attachments
to
the
tax
return
include
altered
forms
or
jurats
containing
frivolous
arguments
are
attempts
to
impede
or
circumvent
the
administrative
processing
of
the
tax
return.
The
criteria
for
considering
a
tax
return
frivolous
is
found
in
IRC
Section
6702.
It
states,
"If"
any
individual
files
what
purports
to
be
a
return
of
the
tax
imposed
by
subtitle
A
but
which
--(A)
does
not
contain
information
on
which
the
substantial
correctness
of
the
self-assessment
may
be
judged,
or
(B)
contains
information
that
on
its
face
indicates
that
the
self-assessment
is
substantially
incorrect;
and
the
conduct
referred
to
in
paragraph
(1)
is
due
to
--(A)
a
position
which
is
frivolous,
or
(B)
a
desire
(which
appears
on
the
purported
return)
to
delay
or
impede
the
administration
of
Federal
income
tax
laws,
then
such
individual
shall
pay
a
penalty
of
$500.
Frivolous
returns
may
be
valid
or
invalid.
A
valid
return
is
one
that
meets
the
requirements
to
start
the
statute
of
limitations
under
IRC
Section
6501.
Such
returns
are
normally
considered
"processable"
(although
there
are
some
exceptions)
and
must
meet
the
following
four-point
criteria
under
IRC
Section
6611(g).
The
return
must
contain
sufficient
data
to
calculate
a
tax
liability,
and
must
purport
to
be
a
return,
and
must
include
an
honest
and
reasonable
attempt
to
satisfy
the
requirements
of
the
tax
law,
and
must
be
signed
under
penalties
of
perjury.
(Generally
the
jurat
must
be
unaltered.)
A
frivolous
return
that
does
not
meet
the
four-point
criteria
listed
above
is
considered
invalid.
Invalid,
frivolous
returns
should
not
be
processed.
Frivolous
documents
take
many
forms.
Frivolous
arguments
may
be
asserted
on
original
returns,
amended
returns,
claims,
or
documents
purporting
to
be
returns.
Returns
may
claim
frivolous
deductions,
credits
or
exclusions
or
may
omit
items
of
income.
Individuals
might
refuse
to
pay
or
file
based
on
a
variety
of
frivolous
or
discredited
legal
or
constitutional
theories.
Unusual
attachments
to
the
return
also
serve
as
indicators
that
the
return
is
frivolous.
When
identifying
frivolous
documents,
consider
key
indicators
such
as:
Altered
jurats,
rewording
or
crossing
off
parts
of
the
jurat,
statements
such
as
"signed
under
duress,"
and
"all
rights
reserved"
Irregular
entities
such
as:
name
of
taxpayer
in
all
lower
case
letters,
addresses
such
as
"Territory
of
(state)"
or
address
in
all
lower
or
upper
case
letters
Reducing
or
eliminating
tax
liability
without
valid
justification
Identification
of
frivolous
filings
can
be
made
in
any
Service
office
by
any
employee.
They
may
be
identified
during
original
return
processing,
amended
return
or
claim
processing,
during
the
course
of
a
routine
audit,
or
upon
any
contact
with
a
taxpayer
or
their
representative.
Frivolous
filings
not
related
to
an
open
case
should
be
routed
to
the
Ogden
Compliance
Campus
Examination
Frivolous
Return
Program
(see
Transshipping
Frivolous
Filings
to
FRP
below.)
These
filings
include
returns
and
amended
returns
or
claims
identified
in
CAS
and
Compliance
in
the
campuses,
field
offices,
and
other
Service
offices.
Detection
of
frivolous
filings
should
be
associated
with
an
open
case
if
one
exists.
The
employee
assigned
the
open
case
is
responsible
for
replying
to
the
document
using
Correspondex
Letter
3175(C)/3176(C).
Any
reply
associated
with
an
open
case
should
be
documented
in
the
case
file
and
on
IDRS
via
command
code
ACTON.
If
the
document
contains
valid
inquiries
such
as
FOIA
requests,
transcripts
requests,
or
taxpayer
advocate
issues,
the
inquiry
should
be
forwarded
to
the
appropriate
function.
Coordination
on
responses
to
any
frivolous
filings
by
the
field
should
be
made
with
FRP
to
insure
documentation
is
made
on
the
FRP
Master
database.
Contact
the
FRP
Liaison
in
Ogden
via:
http://sbse.web.irs.gov/cs/Programs/FRP/FRP.htm
.
4.10.12.1.3.2
(03-01-2006)
Submission
Processing
Identification
and
Processing
of
Frivolous
Filings
Frivolous
returns
or
documents
purporting
to
be
returns
identified
by
Submission
Processing
operations
in
the
campuses
will
be
forwarded
to
a
central
location
for
screening.
See
IRM
3.11,
Campus
Returns
and
Document
Analysis,
and
3.12,
Campus
Error
Resolution,
for
guidance
on
identifying
and
forwarding.
Note:
Examination
will
coordinate
annual
training
with
Submission
Processing
on
identifying
new
arguments
and/or
refresher
for
this
program.
When
potential
frivolous
documents
are
identified
in
Submission
Processing,
screening
will
be
conducted
by
designated
Examination
employees.
Effective
January,
2003,
valid,
frivolous
returns
requiring
processing
will
be
worked
under
a
memorandum
of
understanding
between
W&I
and
SB/SE.
The
MOU
provides
for
expedite
handling
of
frivolous
IMF
returns
referred
by
Ogden
Compliance
Services
to
Fresno
Submission
Processing.
Frivolous
Return
Program
will
perform
all
Code
and
Edit
activities
prior
to
shipment
to
Fresno
and
insure
returns
are
statute
cleared.
Frivolous
Return
Program
will
transship
returns
to
Fresno
approximately
once
a
week
via
Form
3210.
When
processing
is
complete,
Fresno
will
transship
the
returns
back
to
Ogden
on
a
weekly
basis
via
Form
3210.
Fresno
will
batch
the
returns
separately
from
regular
Form
1040's;
however,
no
unique
program
code
or
5th
digit
is
necessary.
The
returns
will
be
expedited
through
cycle
and
processed
through
the
Integrated
Submission/Remittance
Processing
System
(ISRP).
The
returns
are
all
edited
with
Action
Code
440
which
will
place
them
in
Rejects
Suspense
inventory
after
going
through
ISRP.
Fresno
Rejects
personnel
will
then
return
them
to
Ogden
FRP.
Both
Ogden
and
Fresno
campuses
will
follow
IRM
3.10.72
and
any
local
procedures
for
using
designated
Private
Delivery
Service
to
transship.
The
sending
site
should
write
"FRP"
in
large
letters
on
each
package
to
make
clear
to
the
receiving
site
the
contents
of
the
package.
Mail
package