In
order
to
have
an
agreed
IRC
section
482
issue,
all
related
parties
must
be
in
full
agreement
with
the
IRC
482
issue.
Obtain
a
signed
agreement
(Form
870)
or
payment
of
the
deficiency
for
the
primary
adjustment
taxpayer.
Make
the
correlative
adjustments
and
obtain
agreements
for
the
overassessment.
The
taxpayers
will
be
advised
that
their
cases
can
be
more
expeditiously
adjusted
and
closed
if
the
taxpayer
scheduled
to
receive
refunds
will
voluntarily
consent
in
writing
to
have
the
refunds
applied
against
the
proposed
deficiencies.
The
taxpayer's
written
statement
can
be
incorporated
in
Form
870.
The
examiner's
report
in
the
overassessment
cases
must
include
a
statement
of
whether
consents
as
provided
for
in
this
paragraph
have
been
furnished
and,
if
not,
the
reason.
The
suggested
format
for
the
written
statement
is
as
follows:
"The
undersigned
taxpayer
also
consents
and
agrees
to
the
application
of
so
much
of
the
overassessment
as
represents
an
overpayment,
together
with
allowable
interest
thereon,
as
a
credit
to
the
deficiency
in
tax
in
the
amount
of
($amount),
together
with
interest
thereon,
due
from
________________
for
the
year
________.
This
is
provided
that
the
amount
of
the
overpayment,
if
any,
together
with
allowable
interest,
which
is
in
excess
of
the
said
deficiency
and
interest,
is
otherwise
credited
or
refunded
in
accordance
with
section
6402
of
the
Internal
Revenue
Code
of
1986,
or
the
corresponding
provisions
of
prior
revenue
laws."
The
examiner
should
refer
to
Rev.
Proc.
65-17,
as
amended,
in
situations
where
the
taxpayer
requests
permission
to
receive
payment
from
the
correlative
taxpayer
to
the
extent
of
the
IRC
section
482
adjustment,
without
further
Federal
income
tax
consequences
on
that
payment.
In
unagreed
IRC
section
482
cases
where
the
correlative
adjustment
is
the
only
adjustment
on
the
related
entity,
do
not
write
a
complete
report
for
the
correlative
adjustment.
Submit
the
files
on
related
entities
with
tax
computation
sheets
in
each
case
file.
Prior
to
closing,
the
examiner
will
draft
a
letter
inviting
the
related
entities
to
file
a
claim.
In
unagreed
IRC
section
482
cases
when
there
are
other
adjustments
on
the
related
entities,
take
an
inconsistent
position.
Do
not
make
the
correlative
IRC
482
adjustments,
but
explain
fully
the
reason
for
not
making
the
correlative
adjustments.
This
explanation
should
be
made
in
the
taxpayer's
portion
of
the
Revenue
Agent's
Report
(RAR).
In
all
unagreed
IRC
section
482
issue
cases,
the
correlative
taxpayer
should
be
advised
of
the
period
of
limitations
under
IRC
section
6511
for
filing
a
claim.
If
the
period
for
filing
a
claim
for
refund
expires
in
less
than
180
days,
the
examiner
should
solicit
a
Form
843,
Claim
Refund
and
Request
for
Abatement,
from
the
taxpayer.
Such
claims
should
be
picked
up
and
submitted
with
the
case,
if
possible.
To
ensure
that
overpayments
resulting
from
the
correlative
adjustments
are
not
scheduled
and
refunded
to
the
taxpayer,
the
examiner
will
appropriately
note
Form
3198.
4.10.13.4.5.4
(03-30-2005)
Related
Cases
Not
Managed
In
the
Same
Compliance
Area
When
a
return
is
examined
in
one
office
and
an
issue
is
the
transfer
of
income
or
deduction
to
a
related
taxpayer
under
examination
in
another
area
office,
the
office
making
the
initial
examination
will
(except
in
cases
arising
out
of
partnership
and/or
fiduciary
return
or
S
corporations)
immediately,
upon
identification
of
a
potential
IRC
section
482
adjustment,
advise
the
examiner
of
the
issue(s)
and
amount
involved.
Immediately
upon
conclusion
of
the
examination,
a
notice
should
be
issued
to
the
outside
office
that
will
contain
sufficient
information
to
enable
the
receiving
office
to
make
the
correlative
adjustment(s)
to
the
related
return(s).
The
initiating
office
examiner's
case
files
will
contain
copies
of
the
notification.
Upon
receipt
of
notification,
the
receiving
office
will
take
prompt
action
to
make
adjustments
for
the
transfer
of
income
or
deduction
resulting
from
the
initial
examination.
In
the
event
the
return
has
been
examined
and
closed,
reopening
procedures
will
be
considered.
If
the
corresponding
return
is
not
under
examination,
the
examiner
should
secure
the
return
and
prepare
the
report.
4.10.13.5
(03-30-2005)
Adjustments
Between
Correlative
Taxpayers
(a/k/a
Whipsaw
Issues)
Transactions
that
effect
the
income,
deductions,
or
credits
of
two
or
more
taxpayer's
returns
should
be
treated
consistently
between
the
taxpayers.
If
the
examiner
determines
the
transaction
is
not
treated
consistently
on
the
returns
of
the
taxpayers
involved
in
the
transaction,
corresponding
adjustments
must
be
made
to
ensure
proper
treatment.
The
taxpayers
that
are
effected
by
this
transaction
are
considered
"correlative
taxpayers."
Also
see
IRM
4.10.7.4.9
on
Whipsaw
Issues.
Adjustments
made
between
correlative
taxpayers
will
usually
increase
the
tax
liability
of
one
taxpayer
and
reduce
the
tax
liability
of
the
other.
Service
policy
(Policy
Statement
P-4-34)
requires
that
the
case
of
the
taxpayer
whose
tax
liability
has
been
reduced
will
not
be
closed
until
the
taxpayer
whose
tax
liability
was
increased
agrees
to
the
corresponding
adjustment(s)
and
signs
a
consent
agreeing
to
the
increase
in
tax
or
a
court
establishes
the
correctness
of
the
adjustment(s).
Adjustments
of
this
type
occur
most
frequently
in
the
returns
of:
Taxpayers
in
which
the
Commissioner
has
invoked
the
provisions
of
IRC
section
482
as
described
above;
Parent
and
subsidiary
corporations;
and
Taxpayers
involved
in
whipsaw
issues.
If
at
all
possible,
correlative
taxpayer's
cases
should
be
associated
and
remain
together
until
the
taxpayer
whose
report
reflects
a
deficiency
has
been
assessed,
or
until
the
correlative
taxpayer's
case
is
placed
in
suspense.
If
this
is
not
possible,
the
procedures
in
the
subsection
Related
Taxpayers
Controlled
in
More
than
One
Area,
below,
will
be
followed.
Procedures
for
disposition
of
related
cases
for
flow-through
entities
will
be
closed
using
the
procedures
in
IRM
4.31,
Flow-Through
Entity
Handbook.
4.10.13.5.1
(03-30-2005)
Definition
of
Terms
Primary
Adjustment
-
The
adjustment,
which
generally
increases
the
tax
liability
of
the
initial
taxpayer,
and
generally
creates
a
corresponding
decrease
in
the
tax
liability
of
one
or
more
taxpayers
involved
in
the
transaction.
Primary
Taxpayer
-
The
taxpayer
whose
tax
liability
is
affected
by
the
primary
adjustment.
Correlative
Adjustment
-
The
adjustment
that
generally
creates
a
corresponding
decrease
in
the
tax
liability
of
the
taxpayer(s)
involved
in
the
transaction
with
the
primary
taxpayer.
Correlative
Taxpayer
-
The
taxpayer
who
is
involved
in
the
transaction
with
the
primary
taxpayer
whose
tax
liability
is
affected
by
a
correlative
adjustment.
4.10.13.5.2
(03-30-2005)
Correlative
Taxpayers
Controlled
in
One
Area
The
examiner
for
the
primary
taxpayer
will
request
the
return(s)
of
all
correlative
taxpayer(s)
in
the
Area
if
a
manageable
number
of
correlative
taxpayers
are
involved.
The
cases
will
remain
associated
until
the
primary
and
correlative
adjustments
have
been
proposed
and
assessments
have
been
made,
or
until
the
correlative
taxpayers'
cases
are
placed
in
suspense
pending
the
resolution
of
the
primary
taxpayer's
case.
If
a
large
number
of
correlative
returns
are
involved
or
if
the
correlative
taxpayers
reside
in
other
PODs
within
the
Area,
PSP's
assistance
will
be
requested
in
ordering
and
controlling
the
related
taxpayers.
If
the
correlative
taxpayer
resides
in
another
Area,
both
cases
may
be
controlled
by
an
examiner
by
requesting
a
CC
ESTABD
to
obtain
the
return
not
on
AIMS
or
through
the
transfer
of
the
related
return(s)
if:
the
adjustment
is
of
major
importance,
it
is
for
convenience
of
the
government,
or
it
would
promote
the
effective
and
efficient
conduct
of
the
examination.
If
the
above
are
not
applicable,
the
procedures
outlined
in
the
subsection
Related
Taxpayers
Controlled
in
More
Than
One
Area
below
should
be
followed.
If
a
return
must
be
transferred
from
one
Area
to
another,
the
provisions
of
the
subsection
Transfers
of
Returns
Prior
to
the
Initial
Appointment
in
IRM
4.10.2
will
be
followed.
If
this
is
not
possible,
contact
the
Area
PSP
in
which
the
correlative
taxpayer
is
controlled.
The
correlative
taxpayer(s)
will
be
given
notice
of
the
examination
(using
the
procedures
outline
in
4.10.2,
Pre-Contact
Responsibilities)
as
soon
as
it
is
known
that
adjustments
proposed
for
the
primary
taxpayer
will
affect
the
tax
liability
of
the
correlative
taxpayer.
A
protective
claim,
Form
1040X
or
1120X,
will
be
solicited
from
taxpayers
with
correlative
adjustment(s)
that
reduce
the
tax
liability
and
the
period
for
filing
a
claim
for
refund
expires
in
less
than
180
days.
This
will
hold
the
taxpayer's
statute
open
to
receive
any
refund
or
credit
that
is
due
up
to
the
amount
of
the
claim.
Letter
897
will
be
sent
to
the
taxpayer
each
year
requiring
protection.
Once
a
protective
claim
is
received,
Form
895,
Notice
of
Statute
Expiration,
will
be
attached
and
the
statute
will
be
updated
according
to
IRM
25.6,
Statute
of
Limitations.
4.10.13.5.2.1
(03-30-2005)
Primary
and
Correlative
Taxpayer's
Reports
Prepare
the
correlative
taxpayer's
report
concurrently
with
the
primary
taxpayer's
report.
Solicit
the
agreement
from
the
primary
taxpayer,
whose
tax
liability
has
been
increased,
prior
to
the
agreement
for
the
correlative
taxpayer,
whose
tax
liability
has
been
reduced.
The
primary
taxpayer's
report
will
include
a
statement
that
"
a
separate
examination
report
reflects
correlative
adjustments
to
the
taxable
income
of
the
correlative
taxpayer(s)."
Caution:
Rules
regarding
the
disclosure
of
information
apply
to
correlative
adjustments,
despite
the
relationship
between
primary
and
correlative
taxpayers.
The
correlative
report
should
not
disclose
tax
return
information
of
the
primary
taxpayer
except
to
the
extent
explaining
the
correlative
adjustment
is
necessary.
If
agreements
are
secured
from
the
primary
and
correlative
taxpayers,
note
Form
3198
so
that
overassessments
resulting
from
the
correlative
adjustments
are
not
refunded
to
the
taxpayer
prematurely.
4.10.13.5.2.2
(03-30-2005)
Reports
Applying
Overassessments
Against
Deficiencies
The
correlative
taxpayer(s)
must
be
given
the
option
of
applying
any
overassessment
against
the
deficiencies
of
the
primary
taxpayer
as
follows:
If
the
correlative
taxpayers
are
agreeable
to
the
adjustments,
the
examiner
will
tell
the
primary
and
correlative
taxpayers
that
their
cases
may
be
closed
more
expeditiously
if
the
taxpayer's
report
reflecting
an
overassessment
would
agree
to
apply
the
overassessment
and
any
interest
to
the
deficiency
of
the
taxpayer(s)
reflecting
deficiencies.
The
agreement
form
of
the
taxpayer
having
the
overassessment
will
be
modified
to
add
a
consent
to
apply
the
overpayment
to
the
related
deficiency.
This
will
be
accomplished
by
adding
a
paragraph,
as
follows,
to
the
agreement
form:
"The
undersigned
taxpayer
also
consents
and
agrees
to
the
application
of
the
part
of
the
overassessment
that
represents
an
overpayment,
and
interest
allowable
thereon,
as
a
credit
to
the
deficiency
in
tax,
in
the
amount
of
$_________,
and
interest
thereon,
due
from
(related
taxpayer)
for
the
Year(s)
___________;
provided
the
amount
of
any
overpayment
and
interest
allowable
thereon
that
is
in
excess
of
the
deficiency
and
interest,
is
otherwise
credited
or
refunded
in
accordance
with
section
6402
of
the
Internal
Revenue
Code,
or
corresponding
provisions
of
prior
laws."
If
the
taxpayer(s)
agree
to
apply
the
overassessment
to
the
deficiency,
annotate
Form
3198,
Special
Handling
Notice,
for
the
taxpayer(s)
with
the
overassessment:
"Apply
the
overassessment
and
any
interest
thereon
to
(name
of
taxpayer
with
deficiency,
the
taxpayer
identification
number
(TIN),
and
tax
period)."
An
appropriate
notation
will
also
be
made
in
the
workpapers.
If
the
primary
taxpayer
whose
report
reflects
a
deficiency
does
not
agree
to
the
primary
adjustment(s)
and
submits
a
protest
to
the
30-day
letter,
the
correlative
taxpayer(s)
whose
report(s)
reflect
an
overassessment
will
remain
associated.
Correlative
adjustment(s)
that
reduce
the
correlative
taxpayer's
tax
liability
will
be
advised
of
the
nature
of
the
adjustment(s),
the
reason
the
overpayment
cannot
be
refunded
at
this
time
and
the
possible
need
to
protect
the
statute
of
limitations
from
expiring.
Primary
and
correlative
taxpayers
will
be
forwarded
together
to
Appeals
for
consideration.
Prior
to
sending
the
protested
case
to
Appeals
the
following
action
must
be
taken:
If
adjustments
other
than
the
correlative
adjustment(s)
exist
that
result
in
a
deficiency
(instead
of
an
overassessment),
a
partial
agreement
will
be
solicited
for
all
non-correlative
adjustment.
A
partially
agreed
report
will
be
prepared
using
Form
870,
Waiver
of
Restrictions
on
Assessment
and
Collection
of
Deficiency
in
Tax
and
Acceptance
of
Overassessment.
It
must
specifically
state
that
the
correlative
adjustment
is
not
reflected
in
the
computation
of
the
deficiency
or
overassessment.
The
case
will
be
sent
to
Case
Processing
for
a
partial
assessment
if
the
deficiency
is
agreed.
Form
3198
will
be
noted
"Make
partial
assessment
and
return
to
(group)
to
be
associated
with
related
case(s)."
The
correlative
taxpayer(s)
will
be
invited
to
file
a
claim
for
refund
(protective
claim)
if
the
period
for
filing
a
claim
for
refund
expires
in
less
than
180
days.
Letter
897
(DO)
will
be
sent
to
solicit
a
claim
for
each
taxable
year
needing
protection.
Once
a
protective
claim
is
received,
Form
895,
Notice
of
Statute
Expiration,
will
be
attached
and
the
statute
will
be
updated
according
to
IRM
25.6,
Statute
of
Limitations.
Form
3198
will
be
noted
to
ensure
that
overpayments
resulting
from
the
correlative
adjustment(s)
are
not
refunded
to
the
taxpayer
prematurely.
The
statute
of
limitations
will
be
protected
by
the
office
having
custody
of
the
case
if
a
deficiency
may
result
from
a
determination
adverse
to
the
Government
in
the
related
case.
4.10.13.5.2.4
(03-30-2005)
Statutory
Notice
of
Deficiency
Issued
for
Correlative
Adjustments
If
a
statutory
notice
of
deficiency
is
issued
to
the
taxpayer
whose
tax
liability
is
increased,
due
to
the
primary
adjustments,
and
a
timely
petition
is
filed
with
the
Tax
Court,
the
Area
will
transfer
the
correlative
taxpayer(s)
cases
(whose
tax
liability
has
been
reduced)
to
Appeals
to
be
associated
with
the
case
in
which
the
petition
has
been
filed
with
the
Tax
Court,
if
the
procedures
in
item
(4)
of
subsection
IRM
4.10.13.4.2.3,
above,
have
been
followed.
If
a
statutory
notice
of
deficiency
is
to
be
issued
to
the
taxpayer(s)
with
correlative
adjustment(s)
that
reduce
the
tax
liability
for
other
adjustments,
do
not
include
the
correlative
adjustments
in
deficiency
computation.
The
statutory
notice
of
deficiency
must
contain
an
explanation
of
the
correlative
adjustments
so
the
taxpayer
clearly
understands
the
nature
of
the
correlative
adjustment(s).
If
the
correlative
adjustments
completely
offset
the
tax
liability,
you
cannot
issue
a
statutory
notice
because
you
have
no
deficiency.
4.10.13.5.3
(03-30-2005)
Correlative
Taxpayers
Controlled
in
More
than
One
Area
If
the
examiner
has
not
secured
the
correlative
return
in
another
Area
according
to
the
procedures
described
in
IRM
4.10.13.4.2
above
before
the
examination
of
the
primary
taxpayer
has
been
concluded
(agreed,
protest
received,
or
forwarded
for
statutory
notice
of
deficiency)
and
the
correlative
adjustment(s)
affect
the
tax
liability
of
a
taxpayer
in
another
Area
(except
cases
arising
from
flow-through
entity
returns),
the
correlative
taxpayer's
Area
must
be
notified
of
the
correlative
adjustment(s)
and
the
status
of
the
primary
taxpayer.
The
primary
Area
will
secure
the
name,
address,
and
TIN
of
the
correlative
taxpayer
and
notify
the
correlative
Area
by:
Completing
Form
5346,
Examination
Information
Report,
Attaching
an
INOLES
transcript
of
the
correlative
taxpayer
to
Form
5346,
and
Attaching
copies
of
the
primary
taxpayer's
workpapers
and
to
aid
the
correlative
Area
in
proposing
the
correlative
adjustments.
A
copy
of
Form
5346
will
remain
in
the
primary
taxpayer's
case
file.
The
original
Form
5346
and
attachments
will
be
mailed
to
the
correlative
taxpayer's
Area,
addressed
to
the
Area
Director,
Attention:
Chief,
PSP.
Upon
receipt
of
Form
5346
in
the
correlative
taxpayer's
Area,
PSP
will
determine
if
the
correlative
taxpayer
is
currently
under
examination.
If
the
correlative
is
not
under
examination,
the
return
will
be
ordered,
and
assigned
for
examination
of
the
correlative
adjustments.
If
the
return
is
under
examination,
Form
5346
will
be
routed
to
the
examiner
conducting
the
examination
for
consideration
and
include
of
the
correlative
adjustments
with
any
other
adjustments
in
the
examination
report.
If
the
return
has
been
examined
and
closed,
it
will
be
ordered
and
reopening
to
make
the
correlative
adjustment(s).
4.10.13.5.3.1
(03-30-2005)
Primary
Taxpayer
Must
Close
Before
the
Correlative
Taxpayer
The
correlative
adjustment(s)
that
reduce
the
correlative
taxpayer's
tax
liability
will
be
held
open
until
the
additional
tax
for
the
primary
taxpayer
has
been
agreed.
The
case(s)
of
the
correlative
taxpayer(s)
whose
adjustment(s)
reduce
tax
liability
will
be
held
and
placed
in
IRC
section
1254
suspense
until
the
examination
of
the
primary
taxpayer
whose
tax
liability
was
increased
has
been
conducted.
It
will
be
held
in
suspense
pending
notice
from
the
primary
taxpayer's
Area
that
the
primary
taxpayer's
examination,
whose
tax
liability
was
increased,
has
been
concluded.
4.10.13.5.3.2
(03-30-2005)
Suspense
of
the
Correlative
Taxpayer's
Returns
The
following
procedures
must
be
completed
before
the
correlative
taxpayer's
case
can
be
placed
in
suspense,
maintained
and
controlled
in
the
Area
Office:
The
correlative
taxpayer
will
be
invited
to
file
a
claim
for
refund
(protective
claim)
if
the
period
for
filing
a
claim
for
refund
expires
in
less
than
180
days.
Letter
897
(DO)
will
be
sent
to
solicit
a
claim
for
each
taxable
year
needing
protection.
Once
a
protective
claim
is
received,
Form
895,
Notice
of
Statute
Expiration,
will
be
attached
and
the
statute
will
be
updated
according
to
IRM
25.6,
Statute
of
Limitations.
Form
3198
will
be
noted
to
ensure
that
overpayments
resulting
from
the
correlative
adjustment(s)
are
not
refunded
to
the
taxpayer
prematurely.
All
issues
except
for
the
correlative
adjustments
will
be
completed
prior
to
forwarding
the
case
for
suspense.
If
possible,
partial
agreements
will
be
secured
for
all
non-suspense
issues
using
Form
870.
It
must
specifically
state
that
the
correlative
adjustment
is
not
reflected
in
the
computation
of
the
deficiency
or
overassessment.
If
a
partial
agreement
was
obtained,
a
partial
assessment
must
be
made
by
Case
Processing
prior
to
routing
the
case
for
suspense.
The
examiner
will
prepare
an
RAR
(Form
4549-A,
4605-A,
etc.)
as
far
as
the
corrected
taxable
income
line
for
any
unagreed
non-suspense
issue,
and
Form
886,
Explanation
of
Items,
on
all
cases
submitted
for
suspense.
Form
3198,
Special
Handling
Notice,
will
be
noted
"Partial
Assessment
-
After
partial
assessment
is
made,
forward
to
Technical
Services
for
suspense.
"
Inform
the
taxpayer
that
the
case
has
been
placed
into
a
suspense
status
by
sending
Letter
1014,
Letter
to
TP
Advising
Him
of
the
Reasons
for
Suspended
Action
on
his
Tax
Return
Examination.
4.10.13.5.3.3
(03-30-2005)
Area
Notification
of
Correlative
Adjustments
That
Affect
Income
Tax
Liability
After
the
correlative
taxpayer's
Area
has
received
notice
from
the
primary
Area
on
Form
5346
and
has
contacted
the
taxpayer
concerning
the
correlative
adjustments
which
result
in
a
deficiency
(instead
of
an
overassessment),
the
correlative
Area
will
notify
the
primary
Area
by
letter
of
the
correlative
taxpayer's:
agreement,
default
after
issuance
of
a
statutory
notice
of
deficiency,
or
filing
of
a
petition
with
the
Tax
Court.
If
the
correlative
Area
also
has
control
of
the
return
of
another
correlative
taxpayer
whose
correlative
adjustments
produce
an
overassessment,
the
case
will
be
associated
with
the
related
case
containing
a
deficiency
and
the
procedures
in
item
(4)
of
subsection
IRM
4.10.13.4.2.3
above
will
be
followed.
When
the
primary
Area
receives
notification
that
all
correlative
cases
are
agreed
or
have
defaulted
after
issuance
of
the
statutory
notice
of
deficiency,
then
they
will
advise
all
correlative
Areas
to
the
process
and
close
all
related
taxpayer
cases
consistent
with
the
information
that
was
previously
sent
to
them.
If
the
primary
Area
receives
notification
that
a
related
taxpayer
has
filed
a
petition
with
the
Tax
Court,
the
primary
Area
will
advise
all
related
Areas
and
will
themselves
suspense
all
correlative
cases
pending
the
final
outcome
of
the
taxpayer
that
filed
a
petition
with
the
Tax
Court.
The
instructions
in
subsection
IRM
4.10.13.4.3.2
above
will
be
followed
in
placing
the
case
into
suspense.
Once
the
case
of
the
taxpayer
that
filed
a
petition
with
the
Tax
Court
has
been
concluded,
the
Area
will
notify
the
primary
Area
of
the
resolution,
which
will
in
turn
notify
the
correlative
Areas.
If
the
deficiency
of
the
correlative
taxpayer
becomes
an
overassessment:
the
correlative
Area
will
notify
the
primary
Area
if
the
correlative
taxpayer
agrees
to
the
overassessment.
if
the
agreement
is
not
secured,
the
primary
Area
will
be
notified
of
the
forwarding
of
the
case
for
processing
the
overassessment
and
the
basis
for
closing
the
case.
When
the
primary
Area
receives
notice,
they
will
close
the
overassessment
case.
The
primary
Area
will
then
notify
all
correlative
Areas
and
similar
action
on
overassessment
cases
will
be
taken.
4.10.13.6
(03-30-2005)
Activities
Not
Engaged
in
For
Profit
-
Hobby
Loss
(IRC
Section
183)
IRC
section
183(a)
provides
that
no
deductions
shall
be
allowed
in
the
case
of
an
activity
not
engaged
in
for
profit,
other
than
those
otherwise
allowable
under
the
Code,
and
supplies
some
criteria
to
be
used
in
making
the
determination
as
to
the
profit
notice.
IRC
section
183(d)
gives
the
taxpayer
a
rebuttable
presumption
that
an
activity
is
a
business
and
not
a
hobby,
if
profit
results
from
the
activity
in
three
out
of
five
(two
out
of
seven
in
the
case
of
horse
racing,
breeding
or
showing)
consecutive
years.
Since
a
full
presumption
period
is
not
available
when
the
taxpayer
first
begins
the
activity,
IRC
section
183(d)
allows
him
to
make
an
election
which
will
defer
the
determination
until
he
has
had
the
opportunity
to
achieve
the
presumption
during
the
first
five
(or
seven)
years
of
the
activity.
Examiners
should
be
aware
that
failure
to
make
a
profit
does
not
in
and
of
itself
indicate
a
lack
of
a
profit
motive.
This
is
true
regardless
of
whether
the
taxpayer
has
made
an
election
under
IRC
section
183(e)
or
not.
The
question
of
profit
motive
is
a
factual
one,
and
all
facts
must
be
considered
in
making
any
determination.
4.10.13.6.1
(03-30-2005)
Development
of
IRC
183(a)
Issues
Normally,
business
expenses
must
meet
the
requirements
of
either
"carrying
on
a
trade
or
business"
(IRC
section
162)
or
"for
the
production
of
income"
(IRC
section
212).
If
it
fails
to
meet
either
of
these
sections,
the
activity
is
then
considered
under
IRC
section
183.
In
other
words,
first
determine
if
the
activity
has
a
profit
motive.
The
examination
should
not
begin
with
consideration
of
IRC
section
183.
4.10.13.6.1.1
(03-30-2005)
Factual
Development
Examiners
should
determine
whether
or
not
the
activity
is
engaged
in
for
profit
from
all
available
facts
and
circumstances
without
regard
to
the
presumption
under
IRC
section
183(d)
or
the
possible
election
under
IRC
183(e).
This
determination
should
take
into
consideration
the
"relevant
factors"
listed
in
Treas.
Reg.
1.183-2(b)
as
well
as
all
other
pertinent
facts.
See
Exhibit
4.10.13-5.
The
IRC
section
162
position
(i.e.,
substantiation,
personal
use,
etc.)
must
be
developed
before
the
case
can
be
forwarded
to
Appeals
or
placed
in
suspense.
Appeals
has
indicated
concern
about
cases
coming
in
with
inadequate
factual
development
of
the
issue.
Discussion
of
IRC
section
183(d)
and
(e)
with
the
taxpayer
should
be
postponed
until,
and
if,
the
activity
has
been
determined
to
be
an
activity
not
engaged
in
for
profit.
4.10.13.6.1.2
(03-30-2005)
Passive
Activity
Loss
Rules
Passive
active
loss
rules
of
IRC
section
469
should
be
also
be
considered.
Since
IRC
section
469
adjustments
are
timing
adjustment
while
IRC
183
adjustments
are
permanent
adjustments,
the
IRC
section
183
issue
should
generally
be
treated
as
the
primary
position
and
the
IRC
section
469
issue
should
be
treated
as
an
alternative
position
when
both
issues
are
present.
4.10.13.6.1.3
(03-30-2005)
Determine
If
Prior
Years
Are
Being
Held
In
Suspense
If
a
potential
IRC
183(a)
issue
exists,
check
with
the
Technical
Services
IRC
section
1254
suspense
coordinator.
If
the
earlier
years
are
not
in
suspense,
and
the
activity
is
determined
to
be
engaged
in
for
profit,
allow
the
deductions
to
the
extent
they
are
otherwise
allowable
by
the
Code
(i.e.,
IRC
section
162).
If
the
activity
is
not
engaged
in
for
profit
and
IRC
section
183(e)
is
elected,
the
case
must
be
placed
in
suspense.
4.10.13.6.1.4
(03-30-2005)
Deductions
Under
IRC
Section
183
Which
the
Taxpayer
May
Claim
IRC
section
183(b)
provides
for
two
types
of
deductions
allowed
with
regard
to
activities
not
engaged
in
for
profit.
They
are
the
IRC
section
183(b)(1)
and
section
183(b)(2)
deductions.
Deductions
under
IRC
section
183
are
allowable
only
on
Schedule
A
as
Itemized
Deductions.
Deductions
under
section
IRC
183(b)(1)
would
appear
in
the
proper
places
on
Schedule
A
(e.g.,
as
mortgage
interest
or
taxes)
and
any
deduction
under
IRC
section
183(b)(2)
would
be
a
miscellaneous
Itemized
Deduction
subject
to
the
2%
of
AGI.
The
hobby
income
limitation
is
applied
before
the
2%
rule.
4.10.13.6.2
(03-30-2005)
Placing
Cases
in
Suspense
Check
with
the
taxpayer
and/or
the
IRC
183
Suspense
Coordinator
in
Examination
Technical
Services
to
determine
if
there
is
a
prior
election
on
file.
See
IRM
4.8.2.10.5,
IRC
§
183(e)
Hobby
Loss
Suspense.
4.10.13.6.2.1
(03-30-2005)
Election
on
File
Requisition
the
returns
for
all
open
years
not
in
the
suspense
file.
Examine
each
of
the
years
that
have
significant
audit
potential.
If
the
returns
for
any
years
subsequent
to
the
year
of
the
initial
IRC
section
183(a)
election
do
not
show
significant
audit
potential,
they
may
be
forwarded,
unaudited,
to
suspend
along
with
the
year(s)
of
the
initial
IRC
section
183(a)
election.
Secure
AMDISA,
IMFOLT/R
on
all
open
years.
Prepare
a
report
showing
the
audit
results
including
the
IRC
183(a)
issue.
The
cases
examined
must
be
completely
worked
prior
to
going
into
suspense.
Form
3198
should
indicate
that
the
case
is
an
IRC
section
183(a)
case
and
is
related
to
a
previously
suspended
case
and
should
be
routed
directly
to
suspense.
Process
the
case
in
the
normal
manner.
If
needed,
secure
a
statute
extension
for
any
non-hobby
loss
issue(s)
or
statutory
adjustment(s)
from
the
hobby
loss
issue(s)
not
resolved
prior
to
suspense.
4.10.13.6.2.2
(03-30-2005)
Election
Not
on
File
Determine
if
the
taxpayer
wants,
and
is
eligible,
to
elect
IRC
section
183(e).
The
election
must
be
made
before
the
statute
of
limitations
of
the
return
reporting
the
first
year
of
the
activity
expires.
If
an
election
has
not
been
made
prior
to
the
expiration
of
the
statute
on
the
initial
year,
an
election
cannot
be
accepted.
Inform
the
taxpayer
of
all
the
legal
and
procedural
implications
of
the
IRC
section
183(e)
election.
If
the
taxpayer
does
not
wish
to
make
the
election,
the
case
and
the
issue
should
be
processed
based
on
the
merits
that
have
already
been
determined.
When
possible,
a
written
statement
should
be
obtained
from
the
taxpayer
or
his
representative
stating
that
he
does
not
elect
the
provisions
of
IRC
section
183(e)
with
respect
to
the
tax
year(s)
containing
the
IRC
section
183(a)
issue.
(If
the
taxpayer
declines
to
provide
such
a
statement,
the
examiner
should
make
appropriate
comments
in
the
workpapers.)
Attach
the
statement
to
the
return(s).
If
the
taxpayer
wishes
to
made
an
IRC
section
183(a)
election:
Secure
fully
completed
and
properly
signed
Form
5213.
See
the
back
of
each
form
for
specific
instructions.
Requisition
all
returns
beginning
with
the
initial
year.
Obtain
AMDISA,
IMFOLT/R
for
all
tax
returns.
Perform
audit
functions
as
warranted,
paying
particular
attention
to
the
full
development
of
the
IRC
section
183(e)
issue.
The
open
years
that
are
examined
must
be
completed
prior
to
going
into
suspense.
Prepare
a
report
on
each
of
the
open
years
disallowing
the
IRC
section
183(e)
loss
to
the
extent
required
by
Treas.
Reg.
1.183-1(b).
Attach
Form
3198,
Special
Handling
Notice,
to
the
outside
of
the
case
file
and
indicate
"Suspense
Case
IRC
183(e)
-
Forward
to
Technical
Services"
.
The
group
should
forward
the
case
direct
to
Technical
Services
with
Form
3210.