This
chapter
provides
an
overview
and
outlines
the
purpose
and
goals
of
the
Special
Enforcement
Program
(SEP).
SEP
is
a
specialized
compliance
program
within
the
Small
Business/Self-
Employed
Operating
Division
(SB/SE)
directed
toward
that
segment
of
the
population
which
derives
substantial
income
from
either
legal
or
illegal
activities
and
intentionally
understate
their
tax
liability.
SEP
evolved
from
a
Strike
Force
program
focused
on
organized
crime
and
illegal
activity
into
a
compliance
program
with
emphasis
on
identifying,
developing
and
investigating
fraudulent
income
and
expense
issues
of
both
legal
and
illegal
entities.
The
goal
of
SEP
is
to
enhance
voluntary
compliance
and
to
promote
public
confidence
in
the
tax
system.
This
maximum
deterrence
is
generated
by
examining
those
cases
which
significantly
impact
the
public
and
assisting
in
the
investigation
and
prosecution
of
prominent
or
notorious
individuals
who
attempt
to
evade
or
defeat
the
tax
system.
SEP
cases
normally
involve
in-depth
examinations.
Section
7602(e)
of
the
Internal
Revenue
Code
(IRC)
provides
that
the
Service
is
not
to
use
financial
status
or
economic
reality
examination
techniques,
such
as
indirect
methods,
to
determine
the
unreported
income
of
any
taxpayer
unless
thee
is
a
reasonable
indication
that
there
is
a
likelihood
of
such
unreported
income.
The
examination
of
income
is
a
mandatory
audit
issue.
The
depth
of
the
examination
of
income
and
the
techniques
used
are
dependent
on
the
facts
and
circumstances
of
the
case.
To
determine
whether
unreported
income
exists,
the
SEP
agent
should:
conduct
the
minimum
income
probes;
resolve
Large,
Unusual
and
Questionable
(LUQ)
income
items;
perform
a
financial
status
analysis;
and
evaluate
internal
controls
in
the
case
of
a
business
return.
If
the
likelihood
of
unreported
income
has
been
established,
the
use
of
Financial
Status
Audit
Techniques
(FSAT's)
would
be
appropriate
and
are
not
prohibited
by
IRC
section
7602(e).
If
the
SEP
agent
has
established
that
there
is
a
reasonable
likelihood
of
unreported
income,
a
more
in-depth
examination
of
income
is
warranted.
Any
technique
or
procedure
used
to
determine
the
amount
of
unreported
income
could
be
labeled
a
FSAT.
A
FSAT
is,
therefore,
defined
by
its
purpose
which
is
a
technique,
analysis
or
procedure
used
to
determine
the
specific
amount
of
unreported
income.
See
IRM
4.16.1.2.6.
In
some
instances
the
SEP
agent
may
have
reasonable
indications
that
the
likelihood
of
unreported
income
exists
prior
to
the
start
of
the
actual
examination.
Examples
of
such
instances
could
include:
informant
information;
CI
information;
information
from
other
federal,
state
or
local
law
enforcement;
or
IRP
income
information
on
non-filers.
The
SEP
agent
should
always
document
their
workpapers
on
why
they
reached
their
conclusion
along
with
the
date
that
the
conclusion
was
reached.
This
step
should
always
take
place
regardless
of
the
methods
used
or
the
information
made
available
to
reach
the
determination
that
the
likelihood
of
unreported
income
exists.
4.16.1.2
(01-01-2003)
Introduction
The
primary
purpose
of
SEP
is
to:
Identify
and
develop
those
issues
which
have
significant
fraud
potential;
Assist
in
financial
investigations
of
taxpayers
who
derive
legal
and
illegal
income,
but
choose
to
evade
their
tax
liability
through
one
or
more
violations
of
the
tax
law;
To
support
Criminal
Investigation
(CI);
and
Assist
Area
Counsel
in
trial
preparation.
The
objective
of
SEP
is
to:
To
perform
timely
and
effectively
planned
and
managed
examinations
of
returns
filed
notwithstanding
obstacles
created
by
complexity,
diversification,
scarcity
of
audit
records
and
evidence,
or
geographic
dispersion
of
operations.
To
accumulated
at
the
Headquarters'
level
and
disseminate
novel
examination
techniques,
issues
unique
to
legal
or
illegal
income
sources,
avoidance
and
evasion
schemes,
and
all
other
information
useful
in
planning
and
executing
examinations.
To
encourage
and
promote
communications
and
exchange
of
techniques
and
procedures
between
compliance
officers
as
an
aid
in
achieving
the
most
effective
examination.
4.16.1.3
(01-01-2003)
SEP
Agent
Duties
and
Responsibilities
Revenue
Agents
in
SEP
are
financial
investigative
specialists.
In
addition
to
general
tax
law
knowledge
and
auditing
skills,
SEP
agents
are
experts
in
the
identification
and
development
of
cases
with
fraud
potential.
4.16.1.3.1
(01-01-2003)
General
SEP
agents:
Identify
fraud
issues
and
recognize
indicators
of
fraudulent
activity.
Conduct
in-depth
examinations
of
cases
with
fraud
potential.
Conduct
detailed
interviews
of
taxpayers
and
third
party
witnesses.
Secure
evidence,
with
a
summons
if
necessary,
to
determine
taxable
income.
Submit
referrals
to
CI
on
cases
meeting
criminal
criteria.
Participate
as
a
tax
law
expert
in
joint
investigations
and
assist
in
computing
the
criminal
tax
liability.
Balance
civil
and
criminal
aspects
in
joint
investigation
cases,
including
the
protection
of
the
statute
of
limitations.
Act
as
technical
advisor
and
assist
the
U.
S.
Attorney's
office
with
grand
jury
investigations.
Assist
U.
S.
Attorney's
office
and
Area
Counsel
in
preparing
tax
computations
and
special
schedules
for
trial.
Testify
as
expert
or
summary
witnesses
in
criminal
and
civil
tax
cases.
Develop
leads
by
networking
with
local,
state
and
federal
agencies.
SEP
agents
also
serve
as
experts
and
resource
persons
for
other
Service
functions
in
the
following
areas:
Indirect
methods
of
reconstructing
income.
Preparation,
use
and
enforcement
of
summonses
(Form
2039).
Development
and
application
of
civil
fraud
penalty,
IRC
section
6663,
and
fraudulent
failure
to
file
penalty,
IRC
section
6651(f).
See
Fraud
chapter,
IRM
25.1.6
and
the
Penalty
chapter,
IRM
20.1.
Recommendation
of
jeopardy
and
termination
assessments.
See
Jeopardy/Termination
Assessments
chapter,
IRM
4.15.1.
Expert
witness
and
trial
preparation.
4.16.1.3.2
(01-01-2003)
Interviews
An
in-depth
interview
is
one
of
the
most
important
aspects
of
a
SEP
examination.
Interviews
are
used
to
obtain
leads,
develop
information
and
establish
evidence.
The
testimony
of
witnesses
and
the
admissions
of
alleged
violators
are
major
factors
in
resolving
tax
cases.
In
an
initial
interview,
the
SEP
agent
should
obtain
as
much
information
as
possible
to
evaluate
the
taxpayer's
complete
financial
situation,
since
this
may
be
the
only
contact
with
the
taxpayer.
SEP
agents
should
interview
the
taxpayer
and
every
pertinent
witness
connected
with
the
case.
See
IRM
4.10.3.2.1.
Interviewing
taxpayers
in
custody:
Before
interviewing
a
taxpayer
confined
in
prison
or
otherwise
detained
by
federal,
state
or
local
authorities,
the
SEP
agent
will
first
evaluate
the
case
for
fraud
potential.
If
the
case
has
no
fraud
potential,
the
SEP
agent
may
conduct
the
interview
without
the
assistance
of
a
Special
Agent
(SA).
If
the
case
has
firm
indications
of
criminal
fraud,
the
SEP
agent
will
refer
the
case
to
CI
without
interviewing
the
taxpayer
in
custody.
If
the
evaluation
of
fraud
potential
is
not
possible
without
interviewing
the
taxpayer
in
custody,
the
SEP
agent
will
prepare
a
memorandum
to
the
Special
Agent
in
Charge
(SSA),
CI.
This
memorandum
will
request
the
assignment
of
a
SA
to
assist
in
the
interview
and
to
inform
the
taxpayer
in
custody
of
their
constitutional
rights
in
accordance
with
the
decision
of
Miranda
v.
Arizona,
86
S.
Ct.
1602
(1966).
After
the
interview,
the
assigned
SA
may
assist
the
SEP
agent
in
evaluating
any
possible
fraud
implications.
If
firm
indications
of
criminal
fraud
are
not
present,
the
SEP
agent
will
continue
to
work
the
case.
It
is
not
necessary
for
a
SA
to
be
present
when
interviewing
a
third
party
witness
in
custody.
The
SEP
agent
must
prepare
a
permanent
record
of
every
interview
using
one
or
more
of
the
following:
Memorandum
of
interview;
Transcript
of
interview
or
Question
and
Answer
Statement;
Affidavit;
or
Audio
recording.
Interviews
of
members
of
a
federally
recognized
Indian
tribe
should
be
in
accordance
with
protocols
set
forth
by
relevant
Presidential
Executive
Orders.
See
IRM
5.1
Chapter
12.
4.16.1.3.2.1
(01-01-2003)
Securing
Affidavits
One
of
the
principal
responsibilities
of
a
SEP
agent
is
to
obtain
early
and
accurate
information.
SEP
agents
must
initiate
and
proceed
with
in-depth
examinations
on
the
assumption
that
cases
will
result
in
litigation.
It
is,
therefore,
incumbent
upon
the
SEP
agent
to
obtain
as
much
documentation
as
possible.
During
the
examination,
the
SEP
agent
may
obtain
oral
testimony
which
may
significantly
affect
the
outcome
of
the
case.
The
SEP
agent
should
have
the
individual
attest
to
the
accuracy
of
their
statements
by
preparing
and
signing
an
affidavit
or
statement.
The
average
individual
is
not
familiar
with
the
law,
therefore,
the
SEP
agent
should
advise
them
that
preparing
or
the
giving
of
a
false
statement
is
a
criminal
offense.
Therefore,
an
attested
statement
has
greater
validity
when
properly
prepared
and
voluntarily
given.
Affidavits
and
statements
are
used
to:
Record
the
testimony
of
a
witness;
Refresh
the
memory
of
a
witness;
Deter
a
witness
from
becoming
hostile
and
changing
their
testimony;
Impeach
a
hostile
witness;
Be
used
as
evidence;
and/or
Help
accumulate
complete
and
accurate
information.
Some
of
the
methods
to
record
statements
by
a
SEP
agent
are
as
follows:
Affidavit
(Form
2311);
Narrative
Affidavit
-
Primarily
is
used
by
SEP
agents.
Variations
are
accepted
as
long
as
the
basic
elements
remain
unchanged.
If
feasible,
the
subject
should
be
requested
to
examine
and
sign
the
document.
If
they
refuse
to
sign,
the
following
legend
should
be
inserted
at
the
end
of
the
statement:
"This
statement
was
read
by
[subject's
name]
on
[date],
who
stated
that
it
is
true
and
correct,
but
refused
to
sign
it"
.
Summarized
Narrative
-
A
summary
of
a
conversation
or
statement
made
by
a
taxpayer
or
witness
who
should
be
requested
to
sign
the
document.
The
SEP
agents
present
at
the
interview
should
always
sign
the
statement.
Question
and
Answer
-
The
witness
should
attest
to
its
accuracy.
Reports
of
Interview
-
A
summary
of
an
interview
that
is
not
signed
by
the
taxpayer
or
witness,
but
attested
to
by
the
SEP
agent.
The
SEP
agent
may
decide
to
administer
an
oath
to
the
taxpayer
and/or
witness
at
the
start
of
the
interview.
The
authority
to
administer
oaths
and
affirmations,
whether
pursuant
to
the
issuance
of
a
summons
or
a
request
for
information,
is
in
IRC
sections
7602
and
7622.
While
CI
may
normally
administer
oaths
on
a
regular
basis,
it
is
recommended
that
SEP
agents
seek
Area
Counsel
guidance
prior
to
the
creation
of
an
oath
to
record
statements.
For
additional
information
on
oaths
and
the
waiver
of
constitutional
rights,
see
IRM
9.4.5.11.3.2.2
and
related
exhibits.
4.16.1.3.2.2
(01-26-2004)
Electronic
or
Verbatim
Recording
of
Interviews
Requests
to
make
audio
tape,
audio
disk,
stenographic
or
other
verbatim
recordings
of
interviews
will
ordinarily
be
allowed
except
where
the
taxpayer
or
representative's
behavior
is
disruptive.
Requests
to
make
video
recordings
will
not
be
permitted.
A
request
to
record
an
interview
requires:
Ten
(10)
calendar
day
advance
notice;
Group
manager
approval;
The
taxpayer
or
representative
to
furnish
their
own
equipment
and
allow
the
Service
to
produce
its
own
recording;
and
The
recording
takes
place
in
a
suitable
location,
ordinarily
in
an
IRS
office.
If
the
ten
(10)
calendar
day
advance
notice
is
not
given
and/or
Service
equipment
is
not
available,
a
new
appointment
will
be
scheduled.
When
the
SEP
agent
has
concerns
that
testimony
may
later
change,
the
Service
can
record
an
interview
of
a
taxpayer
or
witness.
In
instances
where
the
Service
initiates
the
recording,
the
provision
to
record
at
an
IRS
office
is
not
required.
The
Service
must
notify
the
individual
ten
(10)
calendar
days
in
advance
of
the
interview
using
Pattern
Letter
2156.
The
Territory
Manager
must
approve
all
Service
initiated
recordings.
See
Exhibit
4.10.3-1
for
a
copy
of
the
pattern
letter.
At
the
outset
of
the
recording
the
SEP
agent
must
identify
themselves,
provide
the
taxpayer's
name
and
SSN/EIN,
the
date,
time,
place
and
purpose
of
the
proceeding.
Each
participant
in
the
proceeding
also
must
identify
themselves,
their
role
in
the
proceeding,
and
their
acknowledgement
to
the
making
of
a
verbatim
recording.
The
arrival
or
departure
of
a
participant
must
be
noted
on
the
recording.
Written
records
presented
to
the
taxpayer
or
witness
must
be
clearly
identified
on
the
recording.
At
the
conclusion,
the
SEP
agent
should
state
the
interview
has
been
completed,
the
recording
has
ended
and
the
time.
Immediately
after
the
interview,
the
recording
should
be
labeled
with
the
date
and
a
brief
description
of
the
contents.
Upon
request,
the
Service
will
provide
the
taxpayer
with
a
transcript
or
copy
of
the
recording
if
the
taxpayer
provides
reimbursement
for
the
cost
of
the
transcription
or
reproduction.
IRC
section
7521(a)(2)
requires
that
the
Service
notify
the
taxpayers
of
its
intent
to
record
an
interview.
The
code
section
does
not
require
that
the
taxpayer
must
consent
to
the
audio
recording.
Cumulative
Bulletin
Notice
89-51
(1989-1
CB
691)
does
specify
that
the
taxpayer
must
be
given
prior
notice
of
the
intent
to
record
an
interview
and
provide
a
transcript
upon
request.
See
also
IRM
4.10.3.2.5
(Examination
of
Returns
chapter)
for
further
guidance
on
audio
recordings.
4.16.1.3.3
(01-01-2003)
Evidence
SEP
examinations
are
unique
because
of
the
significant
potential
for
fraud
and
litigation.
Many
SEP
cases
result
in
recommendations
for
criminal
prosecution
and
an
even
greater
number
involve
assertions
of
the
civil
fraud
penalty.
The
nature
of
SEP
cases
increases
the
likelihood
that
the
burden
of
proof
will
rest
with
the
government.
SEP
agents
must
gather
the
evidence
necessary
to
sufficiently
prove
the
facts
of
the
case.
SEP
agents
should
be
familiar
with
the
Federal
Rules
of
Evidence
(FRE)
particularly:
Best
evidence
rule
(FRE
1001
through
1006);
Hearsay
rule
and
exceptions
(FRE
801
through
806);
and
Attorney
client
and
accountant
client
privilege
rules
(FRE
501).
SEP
agents
should
also
be
familiar
with
case
law
interpretations
of
evidential
principles
and
the
law
of
privileges,
e.g.,
the
attorney-client
privilege
and
the
practitioner
privileges
of
IRC
section
7525.
When
securing
evidence,
SEP
agents
must
always
be
aware
of
the
secrecy
provisions
of
Rule
6
of
the
Rules
of
Federal
Criminal
Procedure.
SEP
agents
must
always
verify
that
the
information
received
was
not
grand
jury
information.
SEP
agents
can
utilize
evidence
secured
by
federal,
state
or
local
law
enforcement
agencies
in
securing
leads
and
developing
cases.
SEP
agents
should
obtain
a
copy
of
the
search
warrant
and/or
inventory
to
document
how
the
evidence
was
obtained.
Consult
Area
Counsel
if
there
is
a
motion
to
suppress
the
search
warrant
or
other
technical
problems
with
the
search
warrant
evidence.
In
U.S.
v.
Janis,
76-2
USTC
16,299,
428
U.S.
433,
96
S.
Ct.
3021,
the
Service
was
allowed
to
use
evidence
for
civil
purposes
that
was
suppressed
from
criminal
usage
by
the
local
authorities.
Evidence
developed
from
a
court
ordered
electronic
monitoring
can
be
an
important
source
of
information
in
SEP
cases.
The
evidence
may
support
a
computation
of
income
for
a
period
of
time
in
cases
such
as
wagering
or
narcotics
as
well
as
links
to
assets,
expenditures,
associates
of
a
taxpayer
or
other
leads.
Generally,
the
evidence
will
consist
of
tapes
of
actual
telephone
conversations,
listing
of
telephone
numbers
called
(Pen
Register)
and
places
from
which
calls
were
received
(Trap
and
Trace).
Title
18
USC
section
2517
sets
forth
a
statutory
theme
under
which
disclosure
and
use
of
intercepted
oral
and
wire
communications
are
permitted.
Section
2517(1)
permits
law
enforcement
officers
who
obtain
wiretap
evidence
to
turn
such
evidence
over
to
other
law
enforcement
officers
for
the
latter's
use.
Section
2517(2)
permits
the
receiving
law
enforcement
officer
to
use
wiretap
evidence
in
their
official
duties,
such
as
issuing
summonses;
obtaining
jeopardy
assessments;
investigating
tax
offenses
or
preparing
a
Special
Agent's
Report
(SAR).
Caution
-Title
18
USC
section
2515
prohibits
the
use
of
evidence
derived
from
intercepted
wire
communications,
if
that
information
is
in
violation
of
the
law.
Before
receiving
such
evidence,
SEP
agents
must
obtain
the
subsequent
court
order
releasing
the
evidence
to
the
IRS
for
use
in
an
income
tax
examination.
Follow
the
procedures
set
forth
below
to
preserve
the
IRS's
right
to
use
this
evidence.
The
SEP
agent
is
responsible
for
initiating
an
application
for
disclosure.
On
a
U.S.
District
Court
approved
case
the
application
should
be
made
through
Area
Counsel
to
the
U.S.
Attorney's
office.
On
a
state
court
approved
case,
the
application
will
be
made
through
Area
Counsel
to
either
the
District
Attorney's
office
or
the
U.S.
Attorney's
office.
When
the
order
is
obtained
through
the
District
Attorney's
office,
the
final
order
should
be
forwarded
to
Area
Counsel
after
receipt
for
its
approval
of
the
order.
Once
approval
of
the
court
and/or
Area
Counsel
is
secured,
the
SEP
agent
will
make
arrangements
for
a
SA
to
be
assigned
to
accompany
the
SEP
agent
to
secure
the
evidence.
The
SA
will
make
a
determination
about
the
criminal
aspects
of
the
evidence
received.
If
none
is
found
or
prosecution
is
declined
due
to
dual
prosecution
or
other
reasons,
the
SA
will
refer
the
evidence
to
the
SEP
agent
for
civil
purposes.
Disclosure
by
the
SEP
agent
should
be
limited
to
those
named
on
the
order.
Title
18
USC
section
2517(3)
allows
disclosure
of
such
evidence
while
giving
testimony
under
oath
in
any
proceeding
held
under
the
authority
of
the
United
States.
When
closing
an
unagreed
case,
the
electronic
communications
evidence
must
be
removed
from
the
case
file
and
stored
in
a
secured
access
storage
area
within
an
IRS
office
to
prevent
unauthorized
disclosure.
The
workpapers
should
indicate
that
additional
evidence
is
under
the
control
of
the
SEP
agent
and
would
be
available
for
litigation.
On
an
unagreed
case,
the
evidence
should
be
held
in
the
secured
area
until
the
statutes
for
any
claims
have
expired
at
which
time
the
evidence
should
be
destroyed.
See
IRM
31.7.5
(Electronic
Surveillance)
for
further
information
on
electronic
surveillance.
4.16.1.3.4
(01-01-2003)
Summons
The
summons
is
an
important
tool
for
obtaining
financial
data
to
complete
in-depth
examinations.
Frequently
SEP
cases
involve
uncooperative
taxpayers
who
do
not
have
records
or
will
not
make
records
available.
The
SEP
agent
may
find
it
necessary
to
summons
information
from
taxpayers
and/or
third
parties.
SEP
agents
should
be
familiar
be
familiar
with
provisions
of
the
law
relating
to
the
use
and
enforcement
of
a
summons.
SEP
agents
should
use
good
judgement
when
considering
the
issuance
of
a
summons,
including
the
potential
legal
problems
associated
with
summons
enforcement.
A
summons
should
be
prepared
and
issued
in
accordance
with
the
Summons
chapter
contained
in
IRM
25.5.
4.16.1.3.5
(01-01-2003)
Specific
Item
and
Indirect
Methods
SEP
cases
often
involve
taxpayers
who
do
not
maintain
adequate
books
and
records.
Therefore,
SEP
agents
must
be
well
versed
in
the
various
methods
of
reconstructing
income.
The
two
basic
approaches
in
determining
correct
taxable
income
are:
Specific
item
method;
and
Indirect
method.
The
specific
item
method
uses
specific
items
to
identify
unreported
income
from
both
legal
and
illegal
sources.
These
preferred
methods
limit
the
taxpayer's
ability
to
challenge
the
government's
determination
since
the
methods
are
based
on
information
personal
to
the
taxpayer.
When
specific
items
are
not
traceable,
it
may
be
necessary
to
use
indirect
methods
to
reconstruction
income
based
on
circumstantial
evidence.
The
use
of
indirect
methods
is
allowed
by
IRC
section
446
and
has
been
upheld
by
the
courts
in
civil
and
criminal
tax
cases.
The
court
tested
methods
of
reconstructing
income
include:
Bank
deposit;
Source
and
application
of
funds
Net
worth;
Percentage
of
mark-up;
and
Unit
Volume.
The
indirect
method
used
must
include
evidence
of
a
likely
source
of
taxable
income.
In
addition,
the
SEP
agent
must
be
able
to
refute
defenses
such
as
nontaxable
sources
of
income
and
cash
hoards.
IRM
4.10.4.6
provides
guidance
on
the
use
of
various
indirect
methods.
4.16.1.3.6
(01-01-2003)
Joint
Investigations
SEP
agents
devote
a
significant
amount
of
time
working
joint
investigations
with
CI.
Joint
investigations
are
also
known
as
administrative
tax
cases.
Joint
investigations
are
comprehensive
investigations
conducted
jointly
by
CI
and
Examination.
The
primary
purpose
of
a
joint
investigation
is
to
determine
if
criminal
tax
fraud
is
involved
and
whether
criminal
prosecution
should
be
recommended.
In
addition
to
assisting
with
the
criminal
tax
computation,
SEP
agents
are
responsible
for
the
civil
aspects
of
the
case
including:
Statute
protection
(see
Fraud
chapter,
IRM
25.1.4.3.5)
Consideration
of
subsequent
year
and
related
returns
Preparation
of
the
Revenue
Agent
workpapers
and
examination
report
of
adjustments
for
prosecution
and
non-prosecution
years
Civil
closing.
Joint
investigations
can
originate
from
the
following:
Referral
Report
of
Potential
Criminal
Fraud
Cases
(Form
2797)
or
Request
for
Cooperating
Examiner
(Form
6544).
Upon
assignment,
the
SEP
agent
should
verify
that
the
case
is
an
administrative
tax
case
rather
than
a
grand
jury
case.
Different
procedures
apply
for
grand
jury
cases
as
explained
in
the
following
section.
SEP
agents
and
SA's
have
separate,
clearly
defined
roles
in
joint
investigations.
SEP
agents
must
not
participate
in
law
enforcement
activities
nor
be
placed
in
situations
for
which
they
are
not
trained
and/or
which
may
put
them
or
others
at
risk.
SEP
agent
responsibilities
and
detailed
procedures
regarding
joint
investigations
can
be
found
in
the
Fraud
chapter,
IRM
25.1.4.
4.16.1.3.7
(01-01-2003)
Grand
Jury
Investigations
A
grand
jury
is
a
powerful
investigative
tool
for
the
government
used
to
investigate
allegations
criminal
wrongdoing.
SEP
agents
are
frequently
involved
with
grand
jury
investigations
and
grand
jury
material.
Proceedings
of
a
grand
jury
are
secret
and
are
governed
by
Rule
6(e)
of
the
Rules
of
Federal
Criminal
Procedure.
The
use
of
grand
jury
information
for
civil
purposes
is
further
restricted
by
the
decisions
in
United
States
v.
Baggot,
103
S.
Ct.
3164
(1983)
and
United
States
v.
Sells
Engineering
Co.,
Inc.,
103
S.
Ct.
3133
(1983).
The
SEP
agent
assigned
to
a
grand
jury
assists
the
U.S.
Attorney's
office,
which
controls
the
investigation.
The
SEP
agent
is
primarily
concerned
with
the
consideration,
resolution
and
review
of
issues
as
they
relate
to
the
criminal
charges
being
investigated.
Although
the
SEP
agent
involved
in
the
grand
jury
case
will
not
complete
the
final
civil
tax
liability,
they
must
be
aware
of
the
civil
ramifications
of
information
received
or
developed
during
the
grand
jury
investigation.
Only
information
made
a
matter
of
public
record
or
obtained
prior
to
or
independent
of
the
grand
jury
can
be
used
in
a
subsequent
civil
case.
SEP
agents
may
use
their
credentials
for
identification,
but
must
make
it
clear
that
they
are
assisting
in
a
grand
jury
investigation
as
a
grand
jury
agent.
IRS
summonses
are
not
used
in
a
grand
jury
investigation.
Documents
and
testimony
are
obtained
by
the
U.S.
Attorney's
office
through
the
use
of
grand
jury
subpoenas.
The
grand
jury
SEP
agent
is
considered
tainted
and
is
prohibited
from
participating
in
any
civil
aspects
of
the
case
resulting
from
the
grand
jury.
Guidance
for
grand
jury
investigations
can
be
found
in
IRM
25.1.4
of
the
Fraud
chapter.