Articles by Alvin Brown Tax Preparation Offer In Compromise State Offers in Compromise Levy IRS Tax Liens IRS Tax Liens - continued IRS Tax Liens - continued 2 Levy - continued Audit Techniques Guide Congressional Contacts Criminal Investigation D.O.J Criminal Tax Manual Tax Litigation Penalty Installment Agreements Statute of Limitations Frivolous Tax Argument Interest Abatement IRS Misconduct IRS Abuses Tax Fraud Fraud Statutes Bankruptcy Tax Reform Legislation Tax Shelters Tax Court Trust Fund Penalty Legislation Innocent Spouse Relief Important Links
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 p1 Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 p2 Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 p3 Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 p4 Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 p5 Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 p6 Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 p7 Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 p8 Revenue Reconciliation Act p1 Revenue Reconciliation Act p2 Revenue Reconciliation Act p3 Revenue Reconciliation Act p4 Revenue Reconciliation Act p5 Revenue Reconciliation Act p6 Revenue Reconciliation Act p7 Revenue Reconciliation Act p8 Revenue Reconciliation Act p9 Revenue Reconciliation Act p10 RRA 1998 Conference Report p1 RRA 1998 Conference Report p2 RRA 1998 Conference Report p3 RRA 1998 Conference Report p4 RRA 1998 Conference Report p5 RRA 1998 Conference Report p6 RRA 1998 Conference Report p7 Changes in Existing Law RRA 1998 Senate Report p1 RRA 1998 Senate Report p2 RRA 1998 Senate Report p3 RRA 1998 Senate Report p4 RRA 1998 Senate Report p5 RRA 1998 Senate Report p6 RRA 1998 Senate Report p7 RRA 1998 Senate Report p8 RRA 1998 House Ways Report p1 RRA 1998 House Ways Report p2 RRA 1998 House Ways Report p3 RRA 1998 House Ways Report p4 RRA 1998 House Ways Report p5 RRA 1998 House Ways Report p6 Report on HR 4297 Tax Reform Act of 2005 Tax Relief Act of 2005
|
IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of
1998
House
ways & Means Committee Report page3

Subtitle
B --Budget
SEC
. 411. FUNDING FOR CENTURY DATE CHANGE.
It is the sense of Congress that the Internal
Revenue Service efforts to resolve the century date
change computing problems should be funded fully to
provide for certain resolution of such problems.
SEC
. 412. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORY GROUP.
The Commissioner shall convene a financial
management advisory group consisting of individuals
with expertise in governmental accounting and
auditing from both the private sector and the
Government to advise the Commissioner on financial
management issues, including --
(1) the continued partnership between the Internal
Revenue Service and the General Accounting Office;
(2) the financial accounting aspects of the Internal
Revenue Service's system modernization;
(3) the necessity and utility of year-round
auditing; and
(4) the Commissioner's plans for improving its
financial management system.
Subtitle
C --Tax Law Complexity
SEC
. 421. ROLE OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE.
It is the sense of Congress that the Internal
Revenue Service should provide the Congress with an
independent view of tax administration, and that
during the legislative process, the tax writing
committees of the Congress should hear from
frontline technical experts at the Internal Revenue
Service with respect to the administrability of
pending amendments to the Internal Revenue Code of
1986.
SEC
. 422. TAX COMPLEXITY ANALYSIS.
(a) IN GENERAL. --Chapter 92 (relating to powers and
duties of the Joint Committee on Taxation) is
amended by adding at the end the following new
section:
"
SEC
. 8024. TAX COMPLEXITY ANALYSIS.
"(a) IN GENERAL. --If --
"(1) legislation is reported by the Committee
on Finance of the Senate, the Committee on Ways and
Means of the House of Representatives, or any
committee of conference, and
"(2) such legislation includes any provision
amending the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the
report or statement accompanying such legislation
shall contain a Tax Complexity Analysis prepared by
the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation.
"(b) CONTENT OF COMPLEXITY ANALYSIS. --Each Tax
Complexity Analysis shall identify the provisions,
if any, adding significant complexity or providing
significant simplification, as determined by the
staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, and shall
include the basis for such determination.
"(c) LEGISLATION SUBJECT TO POINT OF ORDER.
--It shall not be in order in the Senate or the
House of Representatives to consider any legislation
described in subsection (a) required to be
accompanied by a Tax Complexity Analysis that does
not contain a Tax Complexity Analysis.
"(d) RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COMMISSIONER.
--The Commissioner shall provide the Joint Committee
on Taxation with such information as is necessary to
prepare Tax Complexity Analyses."
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT --The table of sections for
chapter 92 is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:
"Sec. 8024. Tax complexity analysis."
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE. --The amendments made by this
section shall apply to legislation considered on or
after
January 1, 1998
.
TITLE
V --CLARIFICATION OF DEDUCTION FOR DEFERRED
COMPENSATION
SEC
. 501. CLARIFICATION OF DEDUCTION FOR DEFERRED
COMPENSATION.
(a) IN GENERAL. --Subsection (a) of section 404 is
amended by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
"(11) DETERMINATIONS RELATING TO DEFERRED
COMPENSATION. --
"(A) IN GENERAL. --For purposes of determining
under this section --
"(i) whether compensation of an employee is
deferred compensation, and
"(ii) when deferred compensation is paid, no
amount shall be treated as received by the employee,
or paid, until it is actually received by the
employee.
"(B) EXCEPTION. --Subparagraph (A) shall not
apply to severance pay."
(b) SICK LEAVE PAY TREATED LIKE VACATION PAY.
--Paragraph (5) of section 404(a) is amended by
inserting "or sick leave pay" after
"vacation pay".
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE. --
(1) IN GENERAL. --The amendments made by this
section shall apply to taxable years ending after
October 8, 1997
.
(2) CHANGE IN METHOD OF ACCOUNTING. --In the case of
any taxpayer required by this section to change its
method of accounting for its first taxable year
ending after
October 8, 1997
--
(A) such change shall be treated as initiated by the
taxpayer,
(B) such change shall be treated as made with the
consent of the Secretary of the Treasury, and
(C) the net amount of the adjustments required to be
taken into account by the taxpayer under section 481
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be taken
into account in such first taxable year.
I.
SUMMARY
AND
BACKGROUND
A. PURPOSE
AND
SUMMARY
H.R. 2676, as amended, modifies the structure and
procedures of the Internal Revenue Service ("
IRS
"), provides
IRS
personnel flexibilities, encourages electronic
filing, provides additional taxpayer rights and
protections, modifies Congressional oversight of the
IRS
, and provides a revenue offset relating to the
treatment of the employer deduction for vacation
pay.
Title I --Executive branch governance.
The bill establishes within the Treasury Department
the Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board (the
"Board"). The general responsibility of
the Board is to oversee the
IRS
in the administration, management, conduct,
direction, and supervision of the execution and
application of the internal revenue laws. The Board
is to have the following specific responsibilities:
to review and approve strategic plans of the
IRS
; to review the operational functions of the
IRS
; to provide for the review of the Commissioner's
selection, evaluation and compensation of senior
managers; to review and approve plans for major
reorganizations; and to review and approve the
budget of the
IRS
prepared by the Commissioner. The Board is to be
composed of 8 private-life members appointed by the
President with the advice and consent of the Senate,
plus the Secretary of the Treasury (or the Deputy
Secretary), the
IRS
Commissioner, and a representative of a union
representing a significant number of
IRS
employees (who would be appointed by the President,
with the advice and consent of the Senate).
The bill provides that the
IRS
Commissioner is appointed as under present law by
the President, with the advice and consent of the
Senate. However, the Board has the authority to
recommend candidates for Commissioner to the
President, and to recommend removal of the
Commissioner. The Commissioner has such duties and
powers as prescribed by the Secretary. Unless
otherwise prescribed by the Secretary, such duties
include certain statutorily enumerated duties. The
Secretary must notify the Congress of any changes in
the duties delegated to the Commissioner.
The bill deletes the present-law funding mechanism
for the employee plans and exempt organizations
division of the
IRS
in Code section 7802(b)(2). Such funding mechanism
has never been utilized under present law.
The bill makes changes relating to the Taxpayer
Advocate designed to strengthen the office, and
prohibits Executive Branch influence over taxpayer
audits and collection activity.
The bill also makes certain changes to facilitate
IRS
personnel flexibilities.
Title II. Electronic filing
The bill provides rules designed to facilitate and
encourage electronic filing of tax returns, whenever
feasible. Under the bill, electronic filing is
encouraged by the use of advertising, development of
incentives, and setting a goal of 80 percent of
returns to be electronically filed by the year 2007.
With respect to information returns, submitters are
encouraged to use electronic filing by extending the
due date for filing from February 28 to March 31.
The bill requires development of procedures to
facilitate electronic filing, including those that
would permit the Secretary to accept returns without
a manual signature. The bill also requires the
IRS
to study and develop procedures to implement a
return free system. The
IRS
also must develop procedures that would permit, to
the extent feasible, taxpayers who use electronic
filing to review their account information
electronically.
Title
III
. Taxpayer bill of rights 3
The bill contains a number of provisions designed to
strengthen the rights of taxpayers in their dealings
with the Internal Revenue Service. Among the more
significant of these provisions are modifying the
burden of proof, providing more generous innocent
spouse relief, protecting the confidentiality of tax
advice, expanding the conditions under which
taxpayers can receive awards of attorney's fees in
disputes with the
IRS
, permitting taxpayers to receive civil damages for
negligence by the
IRS
in collection actions, and suspending the statute of
limitations on filing refund claims during periods
of disability.
Title IV. Congressional accountability for the
Internal Revenue Service
The bill provides that all requests for studies of
the
IRS
by the General Accounting Office (other than
requests by the Chair or ranking member of a
committee or subcommittee) must be approved by the
Joint Committee on Taxation. The bill provides for
two joint hearings a year of the 6 Congressional
Committees with oversight jurisdiction over the
IRS
. The Joint Committee on Taxation is required to
report annually to the tax-writing committees on the
state of the Federal tax system, and at the joint
hearings.
The bill provides that a committee report or
conference report on tax legislation is to include a
Tax Complexity Analysis prepared by the staff of the
Joint Committee on Taxation.
Title V. Clarification of deduction for vacation
pay
The bill overrules a Tax Court decision by providing
that vacation pay that is actually received by
employees more than 2 1/2 months after the end of
the year is not deductible until paid by the
employer. Under the bill, amounts are not considered
received by employees or paid unless they are
actually received. Letters of credit, trusts, and
similar mechanisms will not constitute payment or
receipt. B. BACKGROUND
AND
NEED FOR LEGISLATION
The National Commission on Restructuring the
Internal Revenue Service (the
"Commission") was established to review
the present practices of the Internal Revenue
Service ("
IRS
") and to make recommendations for modernizing
and improving its efficiency and taxpayer services.
The Commission's report, issued June 25, 19971
contains recommendations relating to executive
branch governance and management of the
IRS
, Congressional oversight of the
IRS
, personnel flexibilities, customer service and
compliance, technology modernization, electronic
filing, tax law simplification, taxpayer rights, and
financial accountability. H.R. 2292, introduced on
July 30, 1997, by Mr. Portman and Mr. Cardin,
generally mirrors the recommendations of the
Commission.
H.R. 2676 builds on the Commission's report and
recommendations and the provisions of H.R. 2292 to
provide for a more effective
IRS
in its administration of the tax laws and in
improving the
IRS
's service and responsiveness to taxpayers.
C. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
Committee bill
H.R. 26762
was introduced by Chairman Archer and Messrs.
Portman and Cardin on October 21, 1997, and was
amended by the Committee in a markup on October 22,
1997. An amendment in the nature of a substitute
(offered by Chairman Archer) was adopted by a voice
vote, with a quorum present. The bill, as amended,
was ordered favorably reported by a roll call of 33
yeas and 4 nays on October 22, 1997, with a quorum
present.
Committee hearings
Full Committee. --The Committee held public bearings
on September 16-17, 1997, on the recommendations of
the National Commission on Restructuring the
Internal Revenue Service.
Subcommittee on Oversight. --The Subcommittee
on Oversight held public hearings on
IRS
-related topics in 1997 as follows:
Annual Report of the Internal Revenue Service
Taxpayer Advocate (February 25, 1997).
"High-Risk" Programs Within the
Jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means
(March 4, 1997).
IRS
Budget for Fiscal Year 1998 and the 1997 Tax Return
Filing Season (March 18, 1997).
Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (April 16,
1997).
Report of the National Commission on Restructuring
the Internal Revenue Service (July 24, 1997).
Recommendations of the National Commission on
Restructuring the Internal Revenue Service to Expand
Electronic Filing of Tax Returns (September 9,
1997).
Recommendations of the National Commission on
Restructuring the Internal Revenue Service on
Taxpayer Protections and Rights (September 26,
1997).
In addition, the Subcommittee on Oversight submitted
recommendations on October 20, 1997, to the Full
Committee relating to (1) electronic filing and (2)
taxpayer rights and protections. These Subcommittee
recommendations are the basis for the provisions in
Title II and Title
III
, respectively, of the Committee bill. Chairman
Archer had directed the Subcommittee on Oversight to
review these two areas of the Commission's report
and to make recommendations to the Full Committee.
II.
EXPLANATION OF THE
BILL
TITLE I. EXECUTIVE BRANCH GOVERNANCE
A. CREATION OF
IRS
OVERSIGHT BOARD (sec. 101 of the bill and sec. 7802
of the Code)
PRESENT LAW
Under present law, the administration and
enforcement of the internal revenue laws are
performed by or under the supervision of the
Secretary of the Treasury.3
Present law imposes standards of ethical conduct on
Federal employees in order to avoid conflicts of
interest. Criminal penalties are imposed on
violations of these standards. In some cases, less
strict standards apply to special government
employees than to regular, full-time Federal
government employees. In general, a special
government employee is an individual who is expected
to serve no more than 130 days during any 365-day
period.
In general, the ethical conduct rules (1) prohibit a
Federal employee from accepting compensation for
representing clients before the agency in which the
employee serves or against the United States;4
(2) prohibit a Federal employee from acting as agent
or attorney for anyone in a claim against the United
States;5
(3) impose post-employment restrictions on senior
employees in order to prohibit the unfair use of
prior Government employment;6
and (4) prohibit a Federal employee from
participating personally and substantially in
matters that affect his or her own financial
interest or that of persons with certain
relationships to the employee.7
In the case of a special government employee who
serves less than 60 days in the preceding 365 days,
the restrictions in (1) and (2) above only apply
with respect to matters in which the special
government employee personally and substantially
participated in his or her official capacity.
One of the post-employment restrictions prohibits
senior government employees from representing
parties other than the
United States
before their former department or agency for one
year after employment. This restriction does not
apply to special government employees who serve less
than 60 days in the final 1-year period of service.
Federal government employees compensated at certain
pay grades are subject to public financial
disclosure requirements. Special government
employees who serve less than 60 days in a year are
not subject to the public financial disclosure
requirements, but are subject to confidential
financial disclosure requirements.
REASONS FOR CHANGE
The Committee believes that a well-run
IRS
is critical to the operation of our tax system.
Public confidence in the
IRS
must be restored so that our system of voluntary
compliance will not be compromised. The Committee
believes that most Americans are willing to pay
their fair share of taxes, and that public faith in
the
IRS
is key to maintaining that willingness.
The National Commission on Restructuring the
IRS
(the "Restructuring Commission"), which
conducted a year-long study of the
IRS
, found that a number of factors contribute to
current
IRS
management problems, including the following. While
the Treasury is responsible for
IRS
oversight, it has generally provided little
consistent strategic oversight or guidance to the
IRS
. The Secretary and Deputy Secretary have many other
broad responsibilities, and generally leave the
IRS
largely independent. The average tenure of an
IRS
Commissioner is under 3 years, as is the average
tenure of senior Treasury officials responsible for
IRS
oversight. Many of the issues that need to be
addressed by the
IRS
will require expertise in various areas,
particularly management and technology.
The Restructuring Commission concluded that
"problems throughout the
IRS
cannot be solved without focus, consistency and
direction from the top. The current structure, which
includes Congress, the President, the Department of
the Treasury, and the
IRS
itself, does not allow the
IRS
to set and maintain consistent long-term strategy
and priorities, nor to develop and execute focused
plans for improvement. Additionally, the structure
does not ensure that the
IRS
budget, staffing and technology are targeted toward
achieving organizational success."
The Committee shares the concerns of the Commission,
and agrees that fundamental change in
IRS
management and oversight is essential. The Committee
believes that a new management structure that will
bring greater expertise in more areas, focus, and
continuity will help the
IRS
on the path toward becoming an efficient,
responsive, and respected agency that always acts
appropriately in carrying out its functions.
The Committee believes that private sector input is
a necessary part of any new management structure.
The Committee believes that the ethics rules
applicable to special government employees (without
regard to exceptions for length of service or pay
grade) should be applied to the private sector
members of the new
IRS
management. These rules will enhance the ability of
such members to demonstrate impartiality in the
performance of their duties, while not unduly
restricting the available pool of potential
candidates.
The Committee is aware that the taxpaying public may
never relish contacts with the agency responsible
for collecting taxes. Nevertheless, by establishing
a new management structure that will better enable
the
IRS
to develop and fulfill long-term goals, the
Committee believes that the
IRS
will be able to gain public support, and will make
contacts with the
IRS
as infrequent and as pleasant as possible. The
Committee is also aware that changes being made to
IRS
management structure are not the final step, and
that continued oversight of the
IRS
, by Congress as well as the Administration, is
necessary in order to ensure long-term progress.
EXPLANATION OF PROVISION
Duties, responsibilities, and powers of the
IRS
Oversight Board
The bill provides for the establishment within the
Treasury Department of the Internal Revenue Service
Oversight Board (referred to as the
"Board"). The general responsibilities of
the Board are to oversee the Internal Revenue
Service (the "
IRS
") in its administration, management, conduct,
direction, and supervision of the execution and
application of the internal revenue laws. The Board
has no responsibilities or authority with respect to
(1) the development and formulation of Federal tax
policy relating to existing or proposed internal
revenue laws, (2) law enforcement activities of the
IRS
, including compliance activities such as criminal
investigations, examinations, and collection
activities,8
and (3) specific procurement activities of the
IRS
(e.g., selecting vendors or awarding contracts). As
discussed more fully in Part B., below, the Board
also has the authority to recommend candidates for
IRS
Commissioner to the President, and to recommend
removal of the Commissioner. The members of the
Board do not have authority to receive confidential
taxpayer return information.9
The Board has the following specific
responsibilities: (1) to review and approve
strategic plans of the
IRS
, including the establishment of mission and
objectives and standards of performance) and annual
and long-range strategic plans; (2) to review the
operational functions of the
IRS
, including plans for modernization of the tax
system, out sourcing or managed competition, and
training and education; (3) to provide for the
review of the Commissioner's selection, evaluation
and compensation of senior managers; and (4) to
review and approve the Commissioner's plans for
major reorganization of the
IRS
. It is intended that major reorganizations subject
to the Board's review and approval are limited to
major changes in organizational structure, such as
the 1995
IRS
reorganization that combined 7 regions into 4 and 63
districts into 33. In addition, the Board will
review and approve the budget request of the
IRS
prepared by the Commissioner, submit such budget
request to the Secretary, and ensure that the budget
request supports the annual and long-range strategic
plans of the
IRS
. The Secretary is required to submit the budget
request approved by the Board to the President, who
is required to submit such request, without
revision, to the Congress together with the
President's annual budget request for the
IRS
. The bill does not affect the ability of the
President to include, in addition, his own budget
request relating to the
IRS
.
It is intended that the Board will reach a formal
decision on all matters subject to its review. With
respect to those matters over which the Board has
approval authority, the Board's decisions are
determinative. It is fully expected that, with
respect to those matters over which the Board has
approval authority (other than as relates to the
development of the budget), the Secretary will exert
his or her oversight responsibility over the
IRS
by working through and with the Board.10
The Board is required to report each year to the
President and the Congress regarding the conduct of
its responsibilities.
It is expected that the Treasury Department will no
longer utilize the
IRS
Management Board once the new Board created by the
bill is in place, as the functions of the
IRS
Management Board would be taken over by the new
Board.
Composition of the Board
The Board is composed of 11 members. Eight of the
members are so-called "private-life"
members who are not Federal officers or employees.
These private-life members will be appointed by the
President, with the advice and consent of the
Senate. The remaining members are (1) the Secretary
of the Treasury (or, if the Secretary so designates,
the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury), (2) a
representative from a union representing a
substantial number of
IRS
employees, who will be appointed by the President
with the advice and consent of the Senate, and11
(3) the Commissioner of the
IRS
.
The private-life members of the Board are to be
appointed based on their expertise in the following
areas: management of large service organizations;
customer service; the Federal tax laws, including
administration and compliance; information
technology; organization development; and the needs
and concerns of taxpayers. In the aggregate, the
members of the Board should collectively bring to
bear expertise in all these enumerated areas.
The private-life members are considered special
government employees during the entire period of
their appointment. That is, they will be considered
to be performing services as a special government
employee on each day during their appointment, not
just on those days on which they actually perform
services. Thus, they will be subject to the ethical
conduct rules applicable to special government
employees who serve more than 60 days during any
365-day period. Thus, for example, private-life
Board members would not be able to represent clients
before the
IRS
on matters during their term as a Board member.
Private-life Board members would also be subject to
the 1-year post-employment restriction applicable to
senior-level employees. Finally, private-life
members would be subject to the public financial
disclosure rules generally applicable to special
government employees above certain pay grades.
Compensation of Board members
The private-life members of the Board will be
compensated at a rate of $30,000 per year, except
that the Chair will be compensated at a rate of
$50,000 a year. Other members of the Board will
receive no compensation for their services as Board
members. The members of the Board will be entitled
to travel expenses for purposes of attending
meetings of the Board.
Administrative matters
The 8 private-life Board members and the union
representative generally will be appointed for
5-year terms. The private-life members may serve no
more than two 5-year terms. Each 5-year term begins
upon appointment. Board member terms are staggered,
as a result of a special rule providing that some
private-life members first appointed to the Board
will serve initial terms of less than 5 years. The
members of the Board are to elect a chairperson from
among the private-life Board members for a 2-year
term. Any member of the Board can be removed at the
will of the President. In addition, the Secretary of
the Treasury (or, if so delegated, the Deputy
Secretary) and the
IRS
Commissioner are removed from the Board upon
termination of employment in such positions and the
representative of
IRS
employees is removed from the Board upon termination
of their employment, membership, or other
affiliation with the organization representing
IRS
employees.
The Board is required to meet at least once a month,
and can meet at such other times as the Board
determines appropriate.
A quorum of 6 members is required in order for the
Board to conduct business. Actions of the Board are
taken by a majority vote of those members present
and voting.
The Board will not have its own permanent staff, but
will have such staff as detailed by the Commissioner
at the request of the Chair of the Board. The Chair
can procure temporary and intermittent services
under section 3109(b) of title 5 of the U.S. Code.
Claims against Board members
The private-life members of the Board and the union
representative have no personal liability under
Federal law with respect to any claim arising out of
or resulting from an act or omission by such Board
member within the scope of service as a Board
member. The bill does not limit personal liability
for criminal acts or omissions, wilful or malicious
conduct, acts or omissions for private gain, or any
other act or omission outside the scope of service
of the Board member.
The bill does not affect any other immunities and
protections that may be available under applicable
law or any other right or remedy against the
United States
under applicable law, or limit or alter the
immunities that are available under applicable law
for Federal officers and employees.
EFFECTIVE DATE
The provision s of the bill relating to the Board
are effective on the date of enactment. The
President is directed to submit nominations for
Board members to the Senate within 6 months of the
date of enactment.
B. APPOINTMENT
AND
DUTIES OF
IRS
COMMISSIONER (secs. 102 and 103 of the bill and secs.
7803 and 7804 of the Code)
PRESENT LAW
Within the Department of the Treasury is a
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, who is appointed
by the President, with the advice and consent of the
Senate. The Commissioner has such duties and powers
as may be prescribed by the Secretary.12
The Secretary has delegated to the Commissioner the
administration and enforcement of the internal
revenue laws.13
The Commissioner generally does not have authority
with respect to policy matters.14
The Secretary is authorized to employ such persons
as the Secretary deems appropriate for the
administration and enforcement of the internal
revenue laws and to assign posts of duty.
REASONS FOR CHANGE
The Committee believes that the duties and
responsibilities of the Commissioner are of such
significance that the Commissioner should continue
to be appointed by the President.15
However, the frequency with which the Commissioner
changes --the average tenure in office is under 3
years --is one of the factors contributing to lack
of
IRS
management continuity. The Committee believes (as
did the National Commission on Restructuring the
IRS
) that providing a statutory term for the
Commissioner to serve would help ensure greater
continuity of
IRS
management.
The Committee believes that it is appropriate to
preserve the present-law structure under which the
duties of the Commissioner are delegated by the
Secretary of the Treasury. Modifying this structure
may unnecessarily interfere with the operations of
the
IRS
and other agencies within the Treasury. In order to
enable the Congress to properly fulfill its
oversight responsibilities with respect to the
IRS
, the Committee believes that the Congress should be
notified of changes in the delegation of authority
to the Commissioner.
EXPLANATION OF PROVISION
As under present law, the Commissioner will be
appointed by the President, with the advice and
consent of the Senate, and can be removed at will by
the President. The Commissioner will be appointed to
a 5-year term, beginning with the date of
appointment. The Board has the power to recommend
candidates to the President for Commissioner. The
Board has the authority to recommend the removal of
the Commissioner. Although the President is not
required to nominate for Commissioner a candidate
recommended by the Board (or to remove a
Commissioner when the Board so recommends), it is
expected that the President will generally give
deference to the Board's expertise and familiarity
with the needs and functions of the
IRS
and will act in accordance with the Board's
recommendations.
The Commissioner has such duties and powers as
prescribed by the Secretary. Unless otherwise
specified by the Secretary, such duties and powers
include the power to administer, manage, conduct,
direct, and supervise the execution and application
of the internal revenue laws or related statutes and
tax conventions to which the United States is a
party and to recommend to the President a candidate
for Chief Counsel (and recommend the removal of the
Chief Counsel). It is intended that the listed
duties codify present delegations. However, if the
Secretary changes such orders, they may be subject
to the notice requirement of the bill, described
below.
If the Secretary determines not to delegate the
specified duties to the Commissioner, such
determination will not take effect until 30 days
after the Secretary notifies the House Committees on
Ways and Means, Government Reform and Oversight, and
Appropriations, the Senate Committees on Finance,
Government Operations, and Appropriations, and the
Joint Committee on Taxation.
This provision is not intended to alter the
Secretary's existing authority to delegate to
agencies other than the
IRS
the authority to administer and enforce certain
portions of the internal revenue laws. For example,
the Secretary currently has delegated to the Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms the authority to
administer and enforce the taxes under section 4181
and chapters 51, 52, and 53 of the Internal Revenue
Code (regarding excise and other taxes on alcohol,
tobacco, firearms, and destructive devices).
The Commissioner is to consult with the Board on all
matters within the Board's authority (other than the
recommendation of candidates for Commissioner and
the recommendation to remove the Commissioner). With
respect to those matters within the Board's approval
authority (other than with respect to the
development of the budget), it is fully expected
that the Secretary will exert his or her oversight
responsibility over the
IRS
by working through and with the Board.16
Unless otherwise specified by the Secretary, the
Commissioner is authorized to employ such persons as
the Commissioner deems proper for the administration
and enforcement of the internal revenue laws and
would be required to issue all necessary directions,
instructions, orders, and rules applicable to such
persons. Unless otherwise provided by the Secretary,
the Commissioner will determine and designate the
posts of duty.
The Commissioner is compensated as under present
law. EFFECTIVE DATE
The provision s of the bill relating to the
Commissioner generally are effective on the date of
enactment. The provision relating to the 5-year term
of office applies to the Commissioner in office on
the date of enactment. This 5-year term runs from
the date of appointment.
C. STRUCTURE
AND
FUNDING OF THE EMPLOYEE PLANS
AND
EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS ("EP/EO") DIVISION
(sec. 102 of the bill and sec. 7802(b) of the Code)
PRESENT LAW
Prior to 1974, no one specific office in the
IRS
had primary responsibility for employee plans and
tax-exempt organizations. As part of the reforms
contained in the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), Congress
statutorily created the Office of Employee Plans and
Exempt Organizations ("EP/EO") under the
direction of an Assistant Commissioner.17
EP/EO was created to oversee deferred compensation
plans governed by sections 401-414 of the Code and
organizations exempt from tax under Code section
501(a).
In general, EP/EO was established in response to
concern about the level of
IRS
resources devoted to oversight of employee plans and
exempt organizations. The legislative history of
Code section 7802(b) states that, with respect to
administration of laws relating to employee plans
and exempt organizations, "the natural tendency
is for the Service to emphasize those areas that
produce revenue rather than those areas primarily
concerned with maintaining the integrity and
carrying out the purposes of exemption
provisions."18
To provide funding for the new EP/EO office, ERISA
authorized the appropriation of an amount equal to
the sum of the section 4940 excise tax on investment
income of private foundations (assuming a rate of 2
percent) as would have been collected during the
second preceding year plus the greater of the same
amount or $30 million.19
However, amounts raised by the section 4940 excise
tax have never been dedicated to the administration
of EP/EO, but are transferred instead to general
revenues. Thus, the level of EP/EO funding, like
that of the rest of the
IRS
, is dependent on annual Congressional
appropriations to the Treasury Department.
REASONS FOR CHANGE
The Committee believes that it is important to
retain the Office of Employee Plans and Exempt
Organizations under the supervision and direction of
an Assistant Commissioner of the Internal Revenue.
Because of EP/EO's expertise in the area of
retirement benefits, the Committee believes that its
responsibilities should be expanded to include
nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. In
addition, the inclusion of an annual reporting
mechanism in the bill is designed to ensure that the
Commissioner is adequately informed regarding the
activities of EP/EO.
The funding formula for EP/EO set forth in section
7802(b)(2) would, if utilized, result in an unstable
level of funding that may bear little or no relation
to the amount of financial resources actually
required by the EP/EO division. In repealing the
funding mechanism, however, the Committee notes
that, given the magnitude of the sectors EP/EO is
charged with regulating, as well as the unique
nature of its mandate, an adequately funded EP/EO is
extremely important to the efficient and fair
administration of the Federal tax system.
Accordingly, financial resources for EP/EO should
not be constrained on the basis that EP/EO is a
"non-core"
IRS
function; rather, EP/EO, like all functions of the
IRS
, should be funded so as to promote the efficient
and fair administration of the Federal tax system.
EXPLANATION OF PROVISION
The bill retains the Office of Employee Plans and
Exempt Organizations under the supervision and
direction of an Assistant Commissioner of the
Internal Revenue. As under present law, EP/EO is
responsible for carrying out functions and duties
associated with organizations designed to be exempt
from tax under section 501(a) of the Code and with
respect to plans designed to be qualified under
section 401(a). In addition, however, EP/EO's
responsibilities are expanded to include
nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. The
bill also provides that the Assistant Commissioner
shall report annually to the Commissioner on EP/EO
operations.
In addition, the bill repeals the funding mechanism
for EP/EO set forth in section 7802(b). Thus, the
appropriate level of funding for EP/EO is,
consistent with current practice, subject to annual
Congressional appropriations, as are other functions
within the
IRS
.
EFFECTIVE DATE
The provision is effective on the date of enactment.
D. TAXPAYER ADVOCATE (sec. 102 of the bill and sec.
7803 of the Code)
PRESENT LAW
In 1996, the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2 ("TBOR
2")20
established the position of Taxpayer Advocate, which
replaced the position of Taxpayer Ombudsman, created
in 1979 by the
IRS
. Before the creation of the Taxpayer Advocate, the
Taxpayer Ombudsman was a career civil servant
selected by and serving at the pleasure of the
IRS
Commissioner. The Taxpayer Advocate is appointed by
and reports directly to the
IRS
Commissioner.
TBOR 2 also created the office of the Taxpayer
Advocate. The functions of the office are (1) to
assist taxpayers in resolving problems with the
IRS
, (2) to identify areas in which taxpayers have
problems in dealings with the
IRS
, (3) to propose changes (to the extent possible) in
the administrative practices of the
IRS
that will mitigate those problems, and (4) to
identify potential legislative changes that may
mitigate those problems.
The Taxpayer Advocate is required to submit two
annual reports to the tax-writing committees, one,
due by June 30, that describes the objectives of the
Taxpayer Advocate for the next fiscal year and
another, due by December 31, that describes the
activities of the Taxpayer Advocate for the previous
fiscal year. The December 31 report must identify
what the Taxpayer Advocate has done to improve
taxpayer services and
IRS
responsiveness, contain recommendations received
from individuals who have the authority to issue a
Taxpayer Assistance Order, describe in detail the
progress made in implementing those recommendations,
contain a summary of at least 20 of the most serious
problems encountered by taxpayers in dealing with
the
IRS
, include recommendations for such administrative
and legislative action as may be appropriate to
resolve such problems, describe the extent to which
regional problem resolution officers participate in
the selection and evaluation of local problem
resolution officers, and include other such
information as the Taxpayer Advocate may deem
advisable. The reports are submitted without review
by the Commissioner, the Secretary of the Treasury,
or any other officer or employee of the Department
of Treasury or the Office of Management and Budget.
REASONS FOR CHANGE
The Committee believes that the Taxpayer Advocate
serves an important role within the
IRS
in terms of preserving taxpayer rights and solving
problems that taxpayers encounter in their dealings
with the
IRS
. To that end, it is appropriate that the
IRS
Oversight Board have input in the selection of the
Taxpayer Advocate. In addition, the Committee
believes that the Taxpayer Advocate should have
experience appropriate to the position and that the
Taxpayer Advocate's objectivity would be best
preserved by limiting future employment with the
IRS
. The Committee also believes that the reporting
requirements of the Taxpayer Advocate should be
targeted not only towards solving problems with the
IRS
but also towards preventing problems before they
arise.
EXPLANATION OF PROVISION
The bill requires the Commissioner to obtain the
approval of the
IRS
Oversight Board on the selection of the Taxpayer
Advocate. A candidate for the Taxpayer Advocate must
have either substantial experience representing
taxpayers before the
IRS
or have substantial experience within the
IRS
. If the prospective Taxpayer Advocate was an
officer or an employee of the
IRS
before being appointed as the Taxpayer Advocate, the
individual is required to agree not to accept any
employment with the
IRS
for at least 5 years after ceasing to be the
Taxpayer Advocate.
The bill modifies the information to be included in
the December 31 report to the tax-writing
committees. The report no longer needs to include
information about the extent to which regional
problem resolution officers participate in the
selection and evaluation of local problem resolution
officers. The report identifies areas of the tax law
that impose significant compliance burdens on
taxpayers or the
IRS
, including specific recommendations for solving
these problems. The Taxpayer Advocate also is
required to work in conjunction with the National
Director of Appeals to identify the 10 most
litigated issues for each category of taxpayers, and
include the list of issues and recommendations for
mitigating such disputes in the report. Categories
of taxpayers include, for example, individuals,
self-employed individuals, small businesses, etc.
As under present law, the reports are submitted
directly to the tax-writing committees, without
review by the
IRS
Oversight Board, the Secretary of the Treasury, or
any other officer or employee of the Department of
the Treasury or the Office of Management and Budget.
In addition, the bill imposes new responsibilities
on the Taxpayer Advocate. The Taxpayer Advocate is
requested to monitor the coverage and geographical
allocation of problem resolution officers and
develop guidance that outlines criteria to be used
by
IRS
employees in referring taxpayer inquiries to problem
resolution officers. In connection with these
responsibilities, it is anticipated that the
Taxpayer Advocate will work with the
IRS
District Offices to ensure convenient taxpayer
access to the local problem resolution officer. For
example, the local telephone number for the problem
resolution officer in each district should be
published and available to taxpayers.
It is intended that the Taxpayer Advocate will work
with the Commissioner in developing career paths for
local problem resolution officers, so that
individuals can progress through the General
Schedule in the same manner as examination
employees, without having to leave the problem
resolution system. In that regard, it is
contemplated that the compensation levels of local
and regional problem resolution officers should be
the same as those of
IRS
personnel operating in other functional units. Under
the current system, local problem resolution
officers generally must return to an audit or
collection function to achieve promotion. This lack
of a career path within the problem resolution
system reduces the independence of the system. It is
contemplated that, to the extent feasible, regional
problem resolution officers should be selected from
the available pool of local problem resolution
officers.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This provision is effective on the date of
enactment, except that the post-employment
restrictions on the Taxpayer Advocate do not apply
to an individual holding that position on the date
of enactment.
E. PROHIBITION ON EXECUTIVE BRANCH INFLUENCE OVER
TAXPAYER AUDITS
(sec. 104 of the bill and new sec. 7217 of the Code)
PRESENT LAW
There is no explicit prohibition in the Code on
high-level Executive Branch influence over taxpayer
audits and collection activity.
The Internal Revenue Code prohibits disclosure of
tax returns and return information, except to the
extent specifically authorized by the Internal
Revenue Code (sec. 6103). Unauthorized disclosure is
a felony punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000
or imprisonment of not more than five years, or both
(sec. 7213). An action for civil damages also may be
brought for unauthorized disclosure (sec. 7431).
REASONS FOR CHANGE
The Committee believes that the perception that it
is possible that high-level Executive Branch
influence over taxpayer audits and collection
activity could occur has a negative influence on
taxpayers' views of the tax system. Accordingly, the
Committee believes that it is appropriate to
prohibit such influence.
EXPLANATION OF PROVISION
The bill makes it unlawful for a specified person to
request that any officer or employee of the
IRS
conduct or terminate an audit or otherwise
investigate or terminate the investigation of any
particular taxpayer with respect to the tax
liability of that taxpayer. The prohibition applies
to the President, the Vice President, and employees
of the executive offices of either the President or
Vice President, as well as any individual (except
the Attorney General) serving in a position
specified in section 5312 of Title 5 of the United
States Code (these are generally Cabinet-level
positions). The prohibition applies to both direct
requests and requests made through an intermediary.
Any request made in violation of this rule must be
reported by the
IRS
employee to whom the request was made to the Chief
Inspector of the
IRS
. The Chief Inspector has the authority to
investigate such violations and to refer any
violations to the Department of Justice for possible
prosecution, as appropriate. Anyone convicted of
violating this provision will be punished by
imprisonment of not more than 5 years or a fine not
exceeding $5,000 (or both).
Three exceptions to the general prohibition apply.
First, the prohibition does not apply to a request
made to a specified person by a taxpayer or a
taxpayer's representative that is forwarded by the
specified person to the
IRS
. This exception is intended to cover two types of
situations. The first situation is where a taxpayer
(or a taxpayer's representative) writes to a
specified person seeking assistance in resolving a
difficulty with the
IRS
. This exception permits the specified person who
receives such a request to forward it to the
IRS
for resolution without violating the general
prohibition. The second situation that this first
exception is intended to cover is an audit or
investigation by the
IRS
of a Presidential nominee. Under present law (sec.
6103(c)), nominees for Presidentially appointed
positions consent to disclosure of their tax returns
and return information so that background checks may
be conducted. Sometimes an audit or other
investigation is initiated as part of that
background check. The Committee anticipates that any
such audit or investigation that is part of such a
background check will be encompassed within this
first exception.
The second exception to the general prohibition
applies to requests for disclosure of returns or
return information under section 6103 if the request
is made in accordance with the requirements of
section 6103.
The third exception to the general prohibition
applies to requests made by the Secretary of the
Treasury as a consequence of the implementation of a
change in tax policy.
EFFECTIVE DATE
The provision applies to violations occurring after
the date of enactment.
F.
IRS
PERSONNEL FLEXIBILITIES (sec. 111 of the bill and
new secs. 9301-9304 of title 5, U.S.C.)
PRESENT LAW
The Internal Revenue Service, like almost all other
federal agencies, is subject to the personnel rules
and procedures set forth in title 5, United States
Code. As such, its employees generally are
classified under the General Schedule or the Senior
Executive Service.
REASONS FOR CHANGE
Under the existing personnel rules and procedures
set forth in title 5, hiring, evaluating, promoting,
and firing employees is subject to extensive
regulation. Given the role of the
IRS
in the federal government, its unique needs in terms
of skilled tax, technology, and service personnel,
and its present needs to motivate its managers and
employees to embrace continuous improvements and
cost savings while maintaining adequate levels of
service for taxpayers, the Committee finds that
certain flexibilities are appropriate and will
facilitate the efforts of the
IRS
to better manage its workforce.
|