|
6337
Annotations: Representations- Levy
Redemption
of Properly: Representations
[72-2 USTC ¶9507]Kenneth E.
Fidler, Plaintiff v.
United States of America
, and Robert E. Liegel, Defendants
U.
S. District Court, No. Dist. N. Y., 72-CV-81,
4/20/72
[Code Sec. 6325]
Lien for taxes: Property subject to lien sold: Jurisdiction as
to U. S.: Taxpayer's redemption rights.--The Court dismissed
an action by the taxpayer with respect to his redemption rights
against the U. S. in property sold for taxes, but set a date for
trial on the issue against the holder of the certificate of sale.
The dismissal as to the
U. S.
was based on lack of jurisdiction or, alternatively, on failure to
state a claim on which relief could be granted.
Warren
W. Bader, Costello, Cooney & Fearon, 600
Monroe
Bldg.,
Syracuse
, N. Y., for plaintiff. James M. Sullivan, Jr., United States
Attorney,
Syracuse
, N. Y., J. Brian Ferrel, Department of Justice,
Washington
, D. C. 20530, for defendant
United States
. Robert G. Liegel, Failmezger & Liegel, 716 State Tower
Bldg., Syracuse, N. Y., for defendant Robert E. Liegel.
Memorandum-Decision
and Order
PORT,
District Judge:
This is
an action by the plaintiff taxpayer against the
United States
and the defendant Liegel, holder of a certificate of sale to
certain real property of the plaintiff sold to satisfy unpaid tax
liens against the plaintiff. The plaintiff questions neither the
underlying assessment, the tax liens, nor the regularity of the
sale. He claims that his right to redemption was interfered with
by reason of representations made to him by the defendants.
[Defendants'
Motions]
Both
defendants have moved pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction
and for failure to state a claim.
The
action against the
United States
must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative,
for failure to state a claim. See Falik v. United States
[65-1 USTC ¶9295], 343 F. 2d 38 (2d Cir. 1965) and Fidler v.
United States, Civil Number 72-CV-150, decided today.
Insofar
as the defendant Liegel is concerned, there are questions of fact
which should be disposed of on a trial. Accordingly, the case is
set down for a hearing at
Auburn
,
New York
, at 10:00 a. m. on
May 3, 1972
.
[Show
Cause Order]
Prior to
the institution of the above-captioned action, an order was
obtained by the plaintiff requiring the defendant to show cause
why the United States, its officers and agents should not be
stayed from conveying title to the real property covered by the
certificate of sale. The order to show cause contained a stay
which has been continued to date by consent of the parties. The
order to show cause was filed with the Clerk of the Court by the
plaintiff as a separate action and was accorded Civil Number
71-CV-591. In view of the disposition made in the above-captioned
action, the order to show cause has been mooted and should be
dismissed in order that the Clerk's docket may be cleared.
For the
reasons herein, it is
ORDERED,
that the stay heretofore granted in the show cause order in
71-CV-591 be and it hereby is vacated; and it is further
ORDERED,
that an action in this court entitled Kenneth E. Fidler,
Plaintiff v.
United States of America
, Robert E. Liegel, Defendants, 71-CV-591, be and the same
hereby is dismissed as moot; and it is further
ORDERED,
that the motion of the defendant
United States
to dismiss the complaint in 72-CV-81 be and the same hereby is
granted; and it is further
ORDERED,
that judgment be entered dismissing the above-entitled action
(72-CV-81) against the United States for lack of jurisdiction or,
in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief
can be granted; and it is further
ORDERED,
that the issues between the plaintiff and the defendant, Robert E.
Liegel, in the above-entitled action be and they hereby are set
down for trial at a session of this court to be held at the United
States Post Office & Courthouse,
Auburn
,
New York
, at 10:00 a. m. on
May 3, 1972
; and it is further
ORDERED,
that pending the disposition of this action, the defendant, Robert
E. Liegel be and he hereby is restrained from surrendering the
Certificate of Sale of Seized Property dated
August 23, 1971
relating to realty and improvements at West Lake Road,
Skaneateles, New York signed by Walter K. Benchley, and receiving
therefore a deed pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §6338.
|