Case Processing & Controls

Home Services FAQ Site Map Contact Us

Articles by Alvin Brown
Tax Preparation
Offer In Compromise
State Offers in Compromise
Levy
IRS Tax Liens
IRS Tax Liens - continued
IRS Tax Liens - continued 2
Levy - continued
Audit Techniques Guide
Congressional Contacts
Criminal Investigation
D.O.J Criminal Tax Manual
Tax Litigation
Penalty
Installment Agreements
Statute of Limitations
Frivolous Tax Argument
Interest Abatement
IRS Misconduct
IRS Abuses
Tax Fraud
Fraud Statutes
Bankruptcy
Tax Reform Legislation
Tax Shelters
Tax Court
Trust Fund Penalty
Legislation
Innocent Spouse Relief
Important Links

Offer In Compromise Forms
OIC Frequently Asked Questions
Overview
Offer Receipts
Processability
Appeals Manual
Investigation
Financial Analysis
Collateral Agreements
Return & Reject Processing
Acceptance Processing
Actions on Accepted Offers
Special Case Processing
Effective Tax Administration
Independent Admin. Review
OIC Received in Exam
Doubt as to Liability Offers
Effective Tax Admin. Offers
Combination Offers
Review, Closing & Reporting
Case Processing & Controls
Special Case Processing
Financial Analysis Handbook
OIC Cases - bankruptcy
OIC Cases - Miscellaneous
OIC Cases - abuse of discretion
OIC Cases - Economic Hardship
Technical Advice
RS Policy Statement P-5-100
OIC Payments Plans
OIC in Examination
Financial Analysis Handbook
Offer in Compromise Regulations
Legislative History
Contractual Terms
Necessary Expenses
IRS Criticized
7122 statute
Bulletin 2003-36
Final Regulations
T.D. 9086
T.D. 8829
Statute of Limitations
Levy Prohibited
Authority in OIC
Revenue Procedure 60-22
Revenue Procedure 57-16
Revenue Procedure 2003-71
Revenue Procedure 80-6
Revenue Ruling 72-436
OIC cases  6224(c)(2)
Enforceability on Children
Delegation of Authority
U.S. Attorney
Jurisdiction
Equitable Estopple
Acceptance p1
Acceptance p2
Breach of Agreement
Writing Required
Bankruptcy p1
Bankruptcy p2
Department of Justice
Oral Statements
Overpayment
Partnerships
Net Operating Loss
IR-2003-124
IR-2004-17
IR-2004-130
Claim for Refund
Penalties
Minor Child
Contract Law Principles
Tithing
Alternative Minimum Tax
Receiver
Summons
Release of Other Parties
Satisfaction & Accord
Tax Court
Attorney General
Interest
Fact Finding p1
Fact Finding p2
Fact Finding p3
Fact Finding p4
Fact Finding p5
Fact Finding p6
OIC Policy Statements
Abuse of Discretion Cases

 

 

 

Case Processing and Controls


Back Next

5.8.25  Case Processing and Controls

5.8.25.1  (01-01-2000)
Overview

  1. This section provides guidance for various processing issues and case controls.

5.8.25.2  (02-01-2004)
Payments Made with Form 656

  1. If a payment is received with Form 656, or any payment is made on the offer before the taxpayer's offer is accepted by the Service, these payments are treated as deposits and not collections of tax. The Record of OIC, Form 2515, is used to process these payments. Once the offer is determined to be processable, the deposit is attached to Form 2515 and, forwarded via overnight delivery to the Campus OIC Unit.
  2. If the taxpayer's offer is rejected or withdrawn and the taxpayer paid an amount with Form 656, the Service is required to refund the deposit when the offer is processed by the Campus. The taxpayer, however may authorize the application of the deposit amount to any outstanding liability. This is done using Form 3040, Authorization to Apply Offer in Compromise Deposit to Liability.
  3. Form 3040 is executed by the taxpayer after the offer case is completed if the taxpayer wants the deposit amount applied to any outstanding liability. The completed Form 3040 is forwarded to the Campus OIC Unit along with the OIC file upon closing/final processing of the case.

5.8.25.3  (01-01-2000)
Statutory Period of Limitation

  1. The normal statutory period for collection purposes is ten years from the assessment of the tax liability.
  2. The Offer in Compromise, Form 656, provides that the taxpayer agrees to the waiver and suspension of the running of the statutory period of limitations on both assessment and collection of the liability sought to be compromised for the period the offer is pending, during the period any offered amount remains unpaid, during the time that any term or condition of the offer remains unsatisfied, and for one additional year thereafter.
    1. The waiver must be executed by the Service to acknowledge agreement to the suspension period.
    2. The Service does not sign the waiver of the statute of limitations until the taxpayer's offer is determined to be processable.
    3. When the offer is formally rejected by the Service, or withdrawn by the taxpayer, the statute of limitations begins to run again.

     

  3. Effective January 1, 2000, the waiver can no longer be used. The statute of limitations will be suspended (by statute) only during the period the offer in compromise is considered pending by the IRS.
  4. Waivers secured before January 1, 2000 will have no effect after December 31, 2002.
  5. The Offer in Compromise DOES NOT extend the statute for additional tax assessments or overpayments. Steps should be taken to protect the interest of the Government before the statutory period expires.
  6. IRC Section 6511(a) prescribes the period of limitation for a refund of tax. Offer to compromise are not considered for tax amounts that have already been paid.
  7. If the taxpayer submitted an offer to Appeals during a Due Process (CDP) proceeding, the statutory period of limitations is suspended by law until a final determination is reached. Final determination occurs after the Office of Appeals issues a determination, and an expiration of the taxpayer's right to judicial review, or after a final determination by the court. This suspension could exceed the pending period of the offer. Taxpayers who submit offers to Appeals during an Equivalent appeal proceeding are not entitled to a suspension of the statutory period, provided for in IRC Section 6320 or 6330 (CDP).

5.8.25.4  (01-01-2000)
Innocent Spouse Procedures

  1. In processing an offer with an "innocent spouse" issue, once an innocent spouse determination is made, the Master File joint assessment is transferred to a Non-Master File assessment established on the liable spouse. This can be done on the bottom portion of Form 3870, Request for Adjustment. The examiner must be specific on the exact amount of tax for each spouse. In such instances, all time is charged to indirect activity code 720.

5.8.25.5  (02-01-2004)
Examiner's Time

  1. Offer in Compromise cases are received in Technical Services Examination for control (by the Compliance Examination OIC Coordinator) and are then sent to the examination group.
  2. Time applied to investigating an OIC is charged (below the line) to activity code 720. If it is determined that a tax adjustment should be made, time spent examining books/records and preparing the report is charged directly to the case (return). Time spent preparing the rejection/withdrawal memorandum and taxpayer letters is charged to activity code 720.
  3. If all time was charged to indirect exam time activity code 720:
    1. Return not on AIMS and ordered under source code 45—Form 5344 is not submitted when the case is closed from the group; return is surveyed using disposal code 45.
    2. Return on AIMS—Close using Form 5344 and original source code.

     

5.8.25.6  (01-01-2000)
Return Controls

  1. For AIMS purposes, the statute is controlled under Claim status AA alpha code if he normal statute has expired.
  2. In some situations, the case file may not include the administrative file and tax return. A copy of the return should be secured from the taxpayer or internally.
  3. If the return is still reflected on AIMS when the offer in compromise was received, command codes ESTAB and AMSTUR should be used to order and establish he return. The originating source code is retained. ERCS controls must be reopened manually.
  4. If the return is not on AIMS when the offer in compromise is received, the return should be ordered using source code 45. The source code and status code are updated to 73 and 12, respectively, once it is determined that a tax adjustment should be made.
  5. Tax abatements for accepted OICs are completed using Form 3870. All other tax abatements (in arriving at correct tax) are completed on report Form 4549, Income Tax Examination Changes.

5.8.25.7  (02-01-2004)
Dual Notice Requirement

  1. Section 3201 of the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 requires that, wherever practicable, any notice relating to a joint return be sent separately to each individual filing the joint return.
  2. This requirement also applies to offers in compromise filed on joint liabilities. See IRM 4.10, Examination of Returns, for a description of applicable correspondence and notice procedures. In general, the dual notice requirement applies to letters issued as described within this chapter.

Home ] Services ] FAQ ] Site Map ] Contact Us ]

Presented by Alvin Brown and Associates, tax attorney, formerly with the Office of the Chief Counsel of the IRS. 
Call us for all IRS tax issues, problems and emergencies
Protect yourself from IRS intimidation, errors, and penalties.
www.irstaxattorney.com - ab@irstaxattorney.com - (888) 712-7690 - (703) 425-1400

Web Design & Web Development by Web Design Company Yotta Design, LLC