| |
:: Passive Activity Loss ATG - Exhibit 1.1: IRC § 469 – CITATIONS Case Law and Rulings
Exhibit
1.1: IRC § 469 – CITATIONS Case
Law and Rulings
Activity
(Grouping) Rules – Reg. §
1.469-4
-
Gates,
T.C. Memo Summary Opinion
1998-181 à Rentals could not
be grouped with a business
under Reg. 1.469-4(b)(1). A
summary opinion cannot be
cited as precedent for any
other case (§ 7463(b)).
-
Glick,
96 F Supp2d 850 200-1à
Grouping rental real estate
with a management arm in
another entity was
permitted.
-
Gregg,
USTC AFTR 2d 2001-503
(Oregon) à No pro-ration for
short year; LLC member not a
limited partner; grouping of
similar businesses. Note:
not a precedent setting
case.
-
Kahle,
T.C. Memo 1997-90 à Taxpayer
could not group rental and
nonrental operations into a
single undertaking. Note:
issue was based on temporary
regulations, now expired.
-
Schumacher, T.C. Summary
Opinion 2003-96 A Schedule C
airplane leasing activity
was insubstantial under Reg.
1.469-4(d)(1)(A) in relation
to an S Corporation
business.
-
Vezey,
No. F96-0055-CV, 1988 U.S.
District Court of Alaska à
Rental could not be grouped
with a closely held C
Corporation.
-
PLR
199924012
-
TAM
200014010
-
FSA
199907011
Condo /
Hotel / Vacation Rentals – Reg.
§ 1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii)(A)&(B)
-
Barniskis, T.C. Memo
1999-256 à Jointly held
condo was passive activity;
losses nondeductible.
Excepted from rental
definition. Taxpayer failed
to show material
participation.
-
Chapin,
T.C. Memo 1996-56 à The
taxpayer failed requirement
for regular and continuous
participation to materially
participate in condo.
-
Madler,
T.C. Memo 1998-112 à No
material or active
participation in condo.
-
Mordkin,
T.C. Memo 1996-187 à Board
chairman did not materially
participate in hotel condo.
-
Pohoski,
T.C. Memo 1998-17 CA-9 à No
material participation in
one Hawaii condo, but
material participation in
another.
-
Rapp,
T.C. Memo 1999-249 à No
material participation in
condo for condo president.
-
Scheiner,
T.C. Memo 1996-554 à No
material participation in
hotel condo.
-
Serenbetz, T.C. Memo
1996-510 à No material
participation in condo.
-
Toups,
T.C. Memo 1993-359 à Cottage
rented on average less than
7 days; no material
participation.
Credits
-
Sidell,
T.C. Memo 1999-301 à
Self-rental rules apply to C
Corporations; cannot offset
rehabilitation credit.
-
Housing
Pioneers, Inc., à Did
not qualify as a low income
housing nonprofit
organization.
Equipment
Leases
-
Blewett
T.C. Summary 2001-174
Equipment leased to a C
Corporation was excepted
from the passive loss rules
as gross receipts were less
than 2 percent of basis or
Fair Market Value (FMV),
i.e. activity was incidental
to the business.
-
Frank,
T.C. Memo 1996-177 à Losses
from airplane lease were
passive and not deductible.
-
Goshorn,
T.C. Memo 1993-578 à Charter
boat – no material
participation.
-
Hairston,
T.C. Memo 2000-386 à Losses
from lease of construction
equipment to taxpayer’s
corporation were
nondeductible.
-
Kelly,
T.C. Memo 2000-32 à Airplane
leased to flight school was
a rental. Fact that it was
subleased hourly was not
relevant.
-
Kenville,
97-2 USTC ¶ 50,936 à
Airplane chartered in two
ways (a) charter activity #1
met exception to a rental as
extraordinary personal
services were provided; (b)
charter activity #2 did not
meet exception to a rental
for “ nonexclusive use
exception to a rental”.
-
Schetzer,
T.C. Memo 1999-252 à No
$25,000 offset for an auto
rental; definition of a
rental activity.
-
Vezey,
No. F96-0055-CV, 1988 U.S.
District Court of Alaska à
Rental could not be grouped
with a closely held C
Corporation.
-
Welch,
T.C. Memo 1998-310 à
Taxpayer leased his tools on
average for less than 30
days and provided
significant services. Thus,
standard was material
participation.
-
TAM
9722007
-
TAM
9343010
-
TAM
199949036
Income
-
Carlstedt,
T.C. Memo 1997-331 à Income
determined to be non-passive
as Taxpayer materially
participated in business.
-
Cox,
T.C. Memo 1993-326 à In
community property State,
husband could take half
deduction for rent expense
from wife, and half was
reportable as rental income.
-
Edelberg,
T.C. Memo 1995-386 à Fees
from previously owned
medical billing company not
passive income.
-
Mayer,
T.C. Memo 1994-209 à Gain
from sale of securities
business was not passive.
-
Sandy
Lake Road LP, T.C. Memo
1997-295 à Rollback taxes
and attorney's fees related
to the determination of such
taxes are incurred "in
connection with" property
from which portfolio income
is derived, and are
therefore expenses allocable
to portfolio income.
-
Seits,
T.C. Memo 1994-522 à Sale of
coop apartment - not passive
income.
-
Schaefer,
105 TC No. 16 à Income from
a covenant not to compete is
not passive.
-
Shannon,
T.C. Memo 1993-554 à
Discharge of indebtedness
not passive income as debt
originated in farm where
taxpayer materially
participated.
-
Wiseman,
T.C. Memo 1995-203 à
Activity issue,
recharacterization
income-land non-passive.
-
PLR
200010004
-
PLR
199924020
-
FSA
200002015
-
FSA
1999-1202
Investment
Interest Expense
-
Malone,
T.C. Memo 1996-408 à
Interest on a loan to by C
Corporation stock was
investment interest expense.
Marinas &
Charter Boats
-
Dougherty, T.C. Memo
1994-597 à No material
participation in marina.
-
Goshorn,
T.C. Memo 1993-578 à Charter
boat – no material
participation.
-
Oberle,
T.C. Memo 1998-156 à No
material participation in a
charter boat activity.
-
Speer, T.C.
Memo 1996-323 à No material
participation in two S
Corporations.
Material
Participation Also see Condo
above.
-
Dougherty, T.C. Memo
1994-597 à No material
participation in marina.
-
Goshorn,
T.C. Memo 1993-578 à Charter
boat – no material
participation.
-
Gregg,
USTC AFTR 2d 2001-503
(Oregon) à No proration for
short year; LLC member not a
limited partner: grouping
similar businesses.
-
Hasan,
T.C. Memo 1997-439 à No
credible argument that
losses from a limited
partnership were anything
but passive.
-
Machado,
97-2 USTC ¶ 50,593 CA-9;
T.C. Memo 1995-526 à
Taxpayer did not materially
participate in horse racing
partnership.
-
Oberle,
T.C. Memo 1998-156 à No
material participation in a
charter boat activity.
-
Speer,
T.C. Memo 1996-323 à No
material participation in
two S Corporations.
Mini Storage
Units
-
Harris,
T.C. Memo 1998-332 à
Mini-storage units are
rentals; thus losses are
limited under IRC § 469.
Real Estate
Professional
-
Bailey
T.C. Memo 2001-296 Attorney
not a real estate
professional. Taxpayer did
not rise to 750 hour test.
-
DeGuzman
2001-2 USTC para 50,560, US
District Court, NJ Taxpayer
did not rise to 750 hour
test. Time must be in a
business or rental in which
you own an interest.
-
Fowler
TC Memo 2002-223 Heating and
air condition business owner
did not rise to 750 hour
test.
-
Galagar
T.C. Summary Opinion
2004-39: Taxpayer did not
meet the 750-hour test in
order to be a real estate
professional.
-
Jahina
T.C. Summary Opinion
2002 $150,000 Taxpayer
failed half personal
services test in order to be
a real estate professional.
-
Kosonen,
T.C. Memo 2000-107 à
Taxpayer did not file a
proper election to group his
rentals as a real estate
professional.
-
Mowafi,
T.C. Memo 2001-111 à The
taxpayer, a full-time
manager of research for a
large corporation, did not
meet either half-personal
services test or 750 hour
test.
-
Paleveda,
T.C. Memo 1997-416 à Relief
provisions for real estate
professionals cannot be
applied to years prior to
1994.
-
Pungot,
T.C. Memo 2000-60 à Taxpayer
was not a real estate
professional as he did not
own more than 5 percent of a
construction firm.
-
Shaw
TC Memo 2002-35, the
Government argued that
Taxpayer did not established
he was a real estate
professional. Documentation
provided not reasonable.
Rental v.
Business
-
Gates,
T.C. Memo Summary Opinion
1998-181 à Taxpayer argued
his rental business
constitutes a business in
which he materially
participates. A summary
opinion may not be treated
as precedent for any other
case.
-
Kenville,
97-2 USTC ¶ 50,936 à
Airplane chartered in two
ways (a) charter activity #1
met exception to a rental as
extraordinary personal
services were provided; (b)
charter activity #2 did not
meet exception to a rental
for “ non-exclusive use
exception to a rental”.
Self-Charged
Items
-
Hillman,
114 TC No. 6 19893-97 Feb.
29, 2000, David H. Hillman,
et ux. v. IRS; 87 AFTR2d
Par. 2001-803; No. 00-1915
(17 Apr 2001) à On appeal,
Government sustained. S
Corporation shareholder
cannot treat management fees
as a self-charged item, i.e.
passive income.
Self-Employment Tax
-
Norwood,
T.C. Memo 2000-84 à The fact
that the taxpayer’s interest
in a partnership was passive
did not exempt him from
self-employment tax, because
he was a general partner in
a partnership.
Self-Rented
Property
(Recharacterization of income
for property leased to a
business where the taxpayer
works)
-
Connor,
T.C. Memo 1999-185 à
Self-rented income not
passive, Reg. 1.469-2(f)(6)
applies to rentals to C
corporations.
-
Fransen,
98-2 USTC ¶ 50,776 à
Self-rental
recharacterization applies
to rentals to C
Corporations.
-
Krukowski, 114 TC No. 25
à Options to renew are not
pre-88 binding contracts;
self-rental
recharacterization applies
to rentals to C Corporations
beginning 5/11/92.
-
Kucera,
T.C. Memo Summary 2001-18 à
Post-88 lease is a new
contract. Taxpayer
materially participated.
Rentals should be grouped
with business.
-
Schwalback, 111 TC No. 9
à Self-rental
recharacterization applies
to C- Corporations.
-
Sidell,
T.C. Memo 1999-301 à
Self-rental rules apply to C
Corporations; cannot offset
rehabilitation credit.
Tax Equity
and Fiscal Responsibility Act
(TEFRA)
-
Estate
of Robert Quick, 110 TC
172 à Passive losses are an
affected item, governed by
the partnership TEFRA
statute.
Validity of
Section 469 Regulations
-
Adler,
U.S. Court of Federal Claims
93-720T; 32 FedCl 736
Validity of temporary
regulations.
-
Mordkin,
T.C. Memo 1996-187 à Court
upheld the validity of the
temporary regulations.
-
Schaefer,
105 TC No. 16 à Upheld
validity of Reg. §
1.469-2T(c)(7)(iv) of the
temporary regulations.
-
Schetzer,
T.C. Memo 1999-252 à no
$25,000 offset for an auto
rental; definition of a
rental activity.
-
Schwalback, 111 TC No. 9
à Court held that the plain
language of the regulation
clearly indicated that it
applied to entities in which
the taxpayer materially
participated.
-
Sidell,
T.C. Memo 1999-301 à Court
held that the self-rental
rule in Reg. § 1.469-2(f)(6)
is valid.
Miscellaneous PAL Items
-
Business v.
Portfolio Royalty Income -
PLR 9225027
-
Cancellation of Debt (COD)
Income from passive source
is passive - Revenue Ruling
92-92, 1992-45 I.R.B. 21
-
Distributions in excess of
Basis - Revenue Ruling 95-5,
1995-2 I.R.B. 5
-
Distributions in excess of
Basis - TAM 9501001
-
No
Carryback of PALs / Primary
Purpose of IRC § 469 -
Adler, 32 FedCl 736
-
Carryforward of PAL from C
Corporation to new S
Corporation - St. Charles
Investment Co., 110 TC
46
-
Personal
Services Corporation -
Char-Lil Corp, T.C. Memo
1998-457 Rental losses were
disallowed as corporation
was a personal service
corporation. Interest
income is not passive
income.
Legislative
History
-
Senate
Report 99-313, 1986-3 C.B.
(Vol. 3) 1 (passive activity
losses addressed in pages
718-746).
-
House
Report 99-841, 1986-3 C.B.
(Vol. 4) 1 (passive activity
losses on pages 137-150.
-
The CCH has
reported portions of the
Committee Reports on P.L.
99-514 (Tax Reform Act of
1986) at paragraph 21,960.20
(2002)
|
|